Free Trial
Your $100 Credit Expires Tomorrow! Get MarketBeat All Access
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Don't Miss Out
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Neuronetics (STIM) Competitors

Neuronetics logo
$1.20 +0.01 (+0.84%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.22 +0.02 (+1.83%)
As of 05/22/2026 07:57 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

STIM vs. CV, TLSI, SI, SGHT, and CARL

Should you buy Neuronetics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Neuronetics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Neuronetics include CapsoVision (CV), TriSalus Life Sciences (TLSI), Shoulder Innovations (SI), Sight Sciences (SGHT), and Carlsmed (CARL). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does Neuronetics compare to CapsoVision?

Neuronetics (NASDAQ:STIM) and CapsoVision (NASDAQ:CV) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, Neuronetics had 2 more articles in the media than CapsoVision. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Neuronetics and 1 mentions for CapsoVision. Neuronetics' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat CapsoVision's score of 0.00 indicating that Neuronetics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Neuronetics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CapsoVision
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Neuronetics presently has a consensus target price of $3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 150.00%. CapsoVision has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 28.01%. Given Neuronetics' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Neuronetics is more favorable than CapsoVision.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neuronetics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
CapsoVision
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Neuronetics has a net margin of -24.48% compared to CapsoVision's net margin of -198.87%. CapsoVision's return on equity of 0.00% beat Neuronetics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neuronetics-24.48% -139.83% -27.13%
CapsoVision -198.87%N/A -136.03%

CapsoVision has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neuronetics. CapsoVision is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neuronetics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neuronetics$149.16M0.56-$39M-$0.54N/A
CapsoVision$13.55M24.48-$25.32M-$2.34N/A

53.6% of Neuronetics shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of Neuronetics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of CapsoVision shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Neuronetics beats CapsoVision on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neuronetics compare to TriSalus Life Sciences?

Neuronetics (NASDAQ:STIM) and TriSalus Life Sciences (NASDAQ:TLSI) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, TriSalus Life Sciences had 10 more articles in the media than Neuronetics. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for TriSalus Life Sciences and 3 mentions for Neuronetics. Neuronetics' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat TriSalus Life Sciences' score of 0.57 indicating that Neuronetics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Neuronetics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TriSalus Life Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Neuronetics has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TriSalus Life Sciences has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

53.6% of Neuronetics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of TriSalus Life Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of Neuronetics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of TriSalus Life Sciences shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Neuronetics has a net margin of -24.48% compared to TriSalus Life Sciences' net margin of -60.85%. TriSalus Life Sciences' return on equity of 0.00% beat Neuronetics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neuronetics-24.48% -139.83% -27.13%
TriSalus Life Sciences -60.85%N/A -69.91%

Neuronetics has higher revenue and earnings than TriSalus Life Sciences. TriSalus Life Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neuronetics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neuronetics$149.16M0.56-$39M-$0.54N/A
TriSalus Life Sciences$45.15M4.43-$39.23M-$1.41N/A

Neuronetics presently has a consensus price target of $3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 150.00%. TriSalus Life Sciences has a consensus price target of $7.50, suggesting a potential upside of 130.06%. Given Neuronetics' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Neuronetics is more favorable than TriSalus Life Sciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neuronetics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
TriSalus Life Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Summary

Neuronetics beats TriSalus Life Sciences on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neuronetics compare to Shoulder Innovations?

Neuronetics (NASDAQ:STIM) and Shoulder Innovations (NYSE:SI) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Neuronetics had 2 more articles in the media than Shoulder Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Neuronetics and 1 mentions for Shoulder Innovations. Neuronetics' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Shoulder Innovations' score of 0.62 indicating that Neuronetics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Neuronetics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Shoulder Innovations
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

53.6% of Neuronetics shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of Neuronetics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.0% of Shoulder Innovations shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Neuronetics has a net margin of -24.48% compared to Shoulder Innovations' net margin of -81.78%. Shoulder Innovations' return on equity of -35.11% beat Neuronetics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neuronetics-24.48% -139.83% -27.13%
Shoulder Innovations -81.78%-35.11%-20.58%

Neuronetics currently has a consensus target price of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 150.00%. Shoulder Innovations has a consensus target price of $21.00, indicating a potential upside of 43.13%. Given Neuronetics' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Neuronetics is more favorable than Shoulder Innovations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neuronetics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Shoulder Innovations
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Neuronetics has higher revenue and earnings than Shoulder Innovations. Neuronetics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shoulder Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neuronetics$149.16M0.56-$39M-$0.54N/A
Shoulder Innovations$47.32M6.43-$40.36M-$166.96N/A

Summary

Neuronetics beats Shoulder Innovations on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neuronetics compare to Sight Sciences?

Neuronetics (NASDAQ:STIM) and Sight Sciences (NASDAQ:SGHT) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Neuronetics had 3 more articles in the media than Sight Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Neuronetics and 0 mentions for Sight Sciences. Neuronetics' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Sight Sciences' score of 0.00 indicating that Neuronetics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Neuronetics Positive
Sight Sciences Neutral

Sight Sciences has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neuronetics. Sight Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neuronetics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neuronetics$149.16M0.56-$39M-$0.54N/A
Sight Sciences$77.36M3.54-$38.43M-$0.71N/A

Neuronetics has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sight Sciences has a beta of 2.38, meaning that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the broader market.

53.6% of Neuronetics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.5% of Sight Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.4% of Neuronetics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.9% of Sight Sciences shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Neuronetics has a net margin of -24.48% compared to Sight Sciences' net margin of -46.83%. Sight Sciences' return on equity of -52.34% beat Neuronetics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neuronetics-24.48% -139.83% -27.13%
Sight Sciences -46.83%-52.34%-28.49%

Neuronetics currently has a consensus target price of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 150.00%. Sight Sciences has a consensus target price of $8.31, indicating a potential upside of 65.26%. Given Neuronetics' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Neuronetics is more favorable than Sight Sciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neuronetics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Sight Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Summary

Sight Sciences beats Neuronetics on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neuronetics compare to Carlsmed?

Carlsmed (NASDAQ:CARL) and Neuronetics (NASDAQ:STIM) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Carlsmed has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Neuronetics. Carlsmed is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neuronetics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carlsmed$50.51M6.52-$29.63M-$2.51N/A
Neuronetics$149.16M0.56-$39M-$0.54N/A

Neuronetics has a net margin of -24.48% compared to Carlsmed's net margin of -57.76%. Carlsmed's return on equity of -60.74% beat Neuronetics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carlsmed-57.76% -60.74% -29.84%
Neuronetics -24.48%-139.83%-27.13%

Carlsmed currently has a consensus target price of $19.33, suggesting a potential upside of 59.65%. Neuronetics has a consensus target price of $3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 150.00%. Given Neuronetics' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neuronetics is more favorable than Carlsmed.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carlsmed
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Neuronetics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Neuronetics had 3 more articles in the media than Carlsmed. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Neuronetics and 0 mentions for Carlsmed. Neuronetics' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Carlsmed's score of 0.00 indicating that Neuronetics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Carlsmed Neutral
Neuronetics Positive

53.6% of Neuronetics shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.4% of Neuronetics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Neuronetics beats Carlsmed on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Neuronetics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for STIM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding STIM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

STIM vs. The Competition

MetricNeuroneticsMED INSTRUMENTS IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$83.51M$7.04B$6.43B$12.33B
Dividend YieldN/A1.68%2.76%5.28%
P/E RatioN/A48.4421.0625.67
Price / Sales0.5674.06553.4382.70
Price / CashN/A24.9143.6856.73
Price / Book4.806.5310.367.14
Net Income-$39M$158.81M$3.56B$335.80M
7 Day Performance-6.25%4.60%5.12%3.02%
1 Month Performance-28.57%0.74%3.54%2.48%
1 Year Performance-69.92%3.17%34.14%35.08%

Neuronetics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
STIM
Neuronetics
3.5782 of 5 stars
$1.20
+0.8%
$3.00
+150.0%
-69.9%$83.51M$149.16MN/A180
CV
CapsoVision
1.1505 of 5 stars
$7.24
-0.4%
$8.50
+17.4%
N/A$360.91M$13.55MN/A90
TLSI
TriSalus Life Sciences
3.5342 of 5 stars
$4.63
+2.0%
$7.00
+51.2%
-41.4%$285.09M$45.15MN/A106
SI
Shoulder Innovations
4.2339 of 5 stars
$13.24
+0.2%
$21.00
+58.6%
N/A$273.33M$47.32MN/A61
SGHT
Sight Sciences
3.6698 of 5 stars
$4.95
-6.8%
$8.31
+67.9%
+57.2%$268.51M$77.36MN/A210

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:STIM) was last updated on 5/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners