Target Hospitality (TH) Competitors

Park Hotels & Resorts (NYSE:PK) and Target Hospitality (NASDAQ:TH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, community ranking, profitability, risk and dividends.

Which has more risk & volatility, PK or TH?

Park Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Target Hospitality has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the media prefer PK or TH?

In the previous week, Park Hotels & Resorts had 1 more articles in the media than Target Hospitality. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Park Hotels & Resorts and 3 mentions for Target Hospitality. Target Hospitality's average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat Park Hotels & Resorts' score of 1.54 indicating that Target Hospitality is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Park Hotels & Resorts	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Target Hospitality	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Does the MarketBeat Community prefer PK or TH?

Park Hotels & Resorts received 279 more outperform votes than Target Hospitality when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 53.04% of users gave Park Hotels & Resorts an outperform vote while only 48.65% of users gave Target Hospitality an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Park Hotels & Resorts	Outperform Votes 297 53.04%	Underperform Votes 263 46.96%
Target Hospitality	Outperform Votes 18 48.65%	Underperform Votes 19 51.35%

Do institutionals & insiders believe in PK or TH?

92.7% of Park Hotels & Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.4% of Target Hospitality shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Park Hotels & Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 68.0% of Target Hospitality shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Do analysts prefer PK or TH?

Park Hotels & Resorts currently has a consensus target price of $12.75, suggesting a potential upside of 20.00%. Target Hospitality has a consensus target price of $11.25, suggesting a potential upside of 60.94%. Given Target Hospitality's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Target Hospitality is more favorable than Park Hotels & Resorts.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Park Hotels & Resorts	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.10
Target Hospitality	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Is PK or TH more profitable?

Target Hospitality has a net margin of 20.84% compared to Park Hotels & Resorts' net margin of 8.16%. Target Hospitality's return on equity of 22.80% beat Park Hotels & Resorts' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Park Hotels & Resorts	8.16%	5.63%	2.27%
Target Hospitality	20.84%	22.80%	12.82%

Which has better valuation and earnings, PK or TH?

Target Hospitality has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Park Hotels & Resorts. Target Hospitality is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Park Hotels & Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Park Hotels & Resorts	$2.59B	0.82	$97M	$0.59	18.01
Target Hospitality	$349.50M	1.99	$173.70M	$0.43	16.26

Summary

Target Hospitality beats Park Hotels & Resorts on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.