Trupanion (TRUP) Competitors

Lemonade has a beta of 1.87, suggesting that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trupanion has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Lemonade currently has a consensus price target of $64.50, indicating a potential upside of 30.48%. Trupanion has a consensus price target of $39.20, indicating a potential upside of 57.49%. Given Trupanion's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trupanion is more favorable than Lemonade.

Trupanion has higher revenue and earnings than Lemonade. Lemonade is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trupanion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

80.3% of Lemonade shares are held by institutional investors. 12.2% of Lemonade shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Trupanion shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lemonade had 12 more articles in the media than Trupanion. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Lemonade and 6 mentions for Trupanion. Trupanion's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Lemonade's score of 0.44 indicating that Trupanion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Trupanion has a net margin of 1.53% compared to Lemonade's net margin of -14.19%. Trupanion's return on equity of 5.96% beat Lemonade's return on equity.

90.3% of Palomar shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Trupanion shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Palomar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Palomar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trupanion. Palomar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trupanion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Palomar had 8 more articles in the media than Trupanion. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Palomar and 6 mentions for Trupanion. Trupanion's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Palomar's score of 0.55 indicating that Trupanion is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Palomar has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Trupanion presently has a consensus price target of $39.20, indicating a potential upside of 57.49%. Palomar has a consensus price target of $162.75, indicating a potential upside of 21.76%. Given Trupanion's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trupanion is more favorable than Palomar.

Palomar has a net margin of 18.61% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 1.53%. Palomar's return on equity of 23.28% beat Trupanion's return on equity.

In the previous week, Assured Guaranty had 1 more articles in the media than Trupanion. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Assured Guaranty and 6 mentions for Trupanion. Assured Guaranty's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Trupanion's score of 0.93 indicating that Assured Guaranty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Assured Guaranty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trupanion. Assured Guaranty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trupanion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trupanion has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 37.34% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 1.53%. Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 7.11% beat Trupanion's return on equity.

Assured Guaranty presently has a consensus target price of $90.33, indicating a potential upside of 23.78%. Trupanion has a consensus target price of $39.20, indicating a potential upside of 57.49%. Given Trupanion's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trupanion is more favorable than Assured Guaranty.

92.2% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Trupanion shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Slide Insurance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trupanion. Slide Insurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trupanion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Slide Insurance had 9 more articles in the media than Trupanion. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Slide Insurance and 6 mentions for Trupanion. Trupanion's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Slide Insurance's score of 0.75 indicating that Trupanion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Slide Insurance has a beta of 0.07, suggesting that its stock price is 93% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trupanion has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Slide Insurance currently has a consensus target price of $25.40, indicating a potential upside of 2.25%. Trupanion has a consensus target price of $39.20, indicating a potential upside of 57.49%. Given Trupanion's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trupanion is more favorable than Slide Insurance.

Slide Insurance has a net margin of 40.02% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 1.53%. Slide Insurance's return on equity of 50.69% beat Trupanion's return on equity.