Go Pro

Vine Hill Capital Investment (VCIC) Competitors

Vine Hill Capital Investment logo
$11.00 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/13/2026

VCIC vs. PSEC, OCSL, VRTS, GSBD, and RHLD

Should you buy Vine Hill Capital Investment stock or one of its competitors? Vine Hill Capital Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include Prospect Capital (PSEC), Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL), Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS), Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), and Resolute Holdings Management (RHLD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Vine Hill Capital Investment compare to Prospect Capital?

Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC) and Vine Hill Capital Investment (NASDAQ:VCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

Prospect Capital presently has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential downside of 13.04%. Given Prospect Capital's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Prospect Capital is more favorable than Vine Hill Capital Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Prospect Capital
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Vine Hill Capital Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

9.1% of Prospect Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Prospect Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Prospect Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Vine Hill Capital Investment. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Prospect Capital and 0 mentions for Vine Hill Capital Investment. Prospect Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.91 beat Vine Hill Capital Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Prospect Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Prospect Capital Very Positive
Vine Hill Capital Investment Neutral

Prospect Capital has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vine Hill Capital Investment has a beta of 0.09, meaning that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

Vine Hill Capital Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Prospect Capital. Prospect Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vine Hill Capital Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Prospect Capital$7.61M151.38-$469.92M-$0.37N/A
Vine Hill Capital InvestmentN/AN/A$5.54M$0.1861.11

Vine Hill Capital Investment has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Prospect Capital's net margin of -10.42%. Prospect Capital's return on equity of 12.03% beat Vine Hill Capital Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Prospect Capital-10.42% 12.03% 5.43%
Vine Hill Capital Investment N/A -100.73%2.40%

Summary

Prospect Capital beats Vine Hill Capital Investment on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vine Hill Capital Investment compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Vine Hill Capital Investment (NASDAQ:VCIC) and Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Vine Hill Capital Investment. Oaktree Specialty Lending is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vine Hill Capital Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vine Hill Capital InvestmentN/AN/A$5.54M$0.1861.11
Oaktree Specialty Lending$316.80M3.61$33.92M$0.4827.04

Vine Hill Capital Investment has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $11.83, indicating a potential downside of 8.83%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than Vine Hill Capital Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vine Hill Capital Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Oaktree Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 5 more articles in the media than Vine Hill Capital Investment. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 0 mentions for Vine Hill Capital Investment. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Vine Hill Capital Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vine Hill Capital Investment Neutral
Oaktree Specialty Lending Neutral

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 14.45% compared to Vine Hill Capital Investment's net margin of 0.00%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 9.70% beat Vine Hill Capital Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vine Hill Capital InvestmentN/A -100.73% 2.40%
Oaktree Specialty Lending 14.45%9.70%4.64%

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Oaktree Specialty Lending beats Vine Hill Capital Investment on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vine Hill Capital Investment compare to Virtus Investment Partners?

Vine Hill Capital Investment (NASDAQ:VCIC) and Virtus Investment Partners (NASDAQ:VRTS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Virtus Investment Partners has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Vine Hill Capital Investment's net margin of 0.00%. Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity of 21.56% beat Vine Hill Capital Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vine Hill Capital InvestmentN/A -100.73% 2.40%
Virtus Investment Partners 13.42%21.56%5.27%

Virtus Investment Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Vine Hill Capital Investment. Virtus Investment Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vine Hill Capital Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vine Hill Capital InvestmentN/AN/A$5.54M$0.1861.11
Virtus Investment Partners$819.58M1.37$121.75M$17.559.63

80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Vine Hill Capital Investment has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Virtus Investment Partners has a consensus target price of $145.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.90%. Given Virtus Investment Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Virtus Investment Partners is more favorable than Vine Hill Capital Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vine Hill Capital Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Virtus Investment Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

In the previous week, Virtus Investment Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Vine Hill Capital Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Virtus Investment Partners and 0 mentions for Vine Hill Capital Investment. Virtus Investment Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Vine Hill Capital Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Virtus Investment Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vine Hill Capital Investment Neutral
Virtus Investment Partners Positive

Summary

Virtus Investment Partners beats Vine Hill Capital Investment on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vine Hill Capital Investment compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and Vine Hill Capital Investment (NASDAQ:VCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 3 more articles in the media than Vine Hill Capital Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 0 mentions for Vine Hill Capital Investment. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Vine Hill Capital Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Goldman Sachs BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC Neutral
Vine Hill Capital Investment Neutral

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Vine Hill Capital Investment. Goldman Sachs BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vine Hill Capital Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M3.03$119.27M$0.5218.95
Vine Hill Capital InvestmentN/AN/A$5.54M$0.1861.11

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to Vine Hill Capital Investment's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat Vine Hill Capital Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC17.19% 11.04% 4.62%
Vine Hill Capital Investment N/A -100.73%2.40%

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vine Hill Capital Investment has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus price target of $8.75, suggesting a potential downside of 11.21%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than Vine Hill Capital Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.57
Vine Hill Capital Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats Vine Hill Capital Investment on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vine Hill Capital Investment compare to Resolute Holdings Management?

Vine Hill Capital Investment (NASDAQ:VCIC) and Resolute Holdings Management (NYSE:RHLD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vine Hill Capital Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Resolute Holdings Management
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Vine Hill Capital Investment has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resolute Holdings Management has a beta of -1.3, indicating that its stock price is 230% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Resolute Holdings Management had 1 more articles in the media than Vine Hill Capital Investment. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Resolute Holdings Management and 0 mentions for Vine Hill Capital Investment. Vine Hill Capital Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Resolute Holdings Management'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vine Hill Capital Investment Neutral
Resolute Holdings Management Neutral

Resolute Holdings Management has a net margin of 4.21% compared to Vine Hill Capital Investment's net margin of 0.00%. Resolute Holdings Management's return on equity of 3.55% beat Vine Hill Capital Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vine Hill Capital InvestmentN/A -100.73% 2.40%
Resolute Holdings Management 4.21%3.55%1.71%

Vine Hill Capital Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resolute Holdings Management. Resolute Holdings Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vine Hill Capital Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vine Hill Capital InvestmentN/AN/A$5.54M$0.1861.11
Resolute Holdings Management$462.05M2.27-$5.92M$5.4324.65

Summary

Resolute Holdings Management beats Vine Hill Capital Investment on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Vine Hill Capital Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VCIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VCIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

VCIC vs. The Competition

MetricVine Hill Capital InvestmentCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$322.66M$5.70B$14.11B$13.10B
Dividend YieldN/A7.38%5.87%10.45%
P/E Ratio61.1138.1329.3425.28
Price / SalesN/A1,232.90513.8291.94
Price / Cash58.2648.3337.4950.90
Price / Book-44.003.693.716.24
Net Income$5.54M$417.15M$1.31B$347.60M
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.56%0.73%1.06%
1 Month PerformanceN/A0.71%1.52%0.81%
1 Year Performance4.86%7.69%12.46%20.90%

Vine Hill Capital Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
VCIC
Vine Hill Capital Investment
N/A$11.00
flat
N/AN/A$322.66MN/A61.11N/A
PSEC
Prospect Capital
1.6833 of 5 stars
$2.33
+5.4%
$2.00
-14.2%
-19.3%$1.17B$719.44MN/A2,019
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
2.1563 of 5 stars
$12.96
+1.9%
$11.83
-8.7%
-4.6%$1.14B$316.80M27.00N/A
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
3.4483 of 5 stars
$165.16
+1.0%
$145.50
-11.9%
-14.9%$1.10B$819.58M9.77770
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
2.1022 of 5 stars
$9.77
+7.4%
$8.50
-13.0%
-12.4%$1.10B$365.57M15.02N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:VCIC) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners