Werner Enterprises (WERN) Competitors

Werner Enterprises has a net margin of -1.42% compared to Heartland Express' net margin of -2.98%. Werner Enterprises' return on equity of 1.18% beat Heartland Express' return on equity.

In the previous week, Heartland Express had 4 more articles in the media than Werner Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Heartland Express and 4 mentions for Werner Enterprises. Werner Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Heartland Express' score of 0.59 indicating that Werner Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

53.5% of Heartland Express shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of Werner Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.6% of Heartland Express shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Werner Enterprises shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Heartland Express pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Werner Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Heartland Express pays out -28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Werner Enterprises pays out -73.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Werner Enterprises has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Werner Enterprises is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Werner Enterprises has higher revenue and earnings than Heartland Express. Werner Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heartland Express, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Heartland Express currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.35%. Werner Enterprises has a consensus price target of $41.54, suggesting a potential upside of 11.42%. Given Werner Enterprises' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Werner Enterprises is more favorable than Heartland Express.

Heartland Express has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Werner Enterprises has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Hub Group has higher revenue and earnings than Werner Enterprises. Werner Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hub Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

89.3% of Werner Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.8% of Hub Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Werner Enterprises shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Hub Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hub Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Werner Enterprises' net margin of -1.42%. Werner Enterprises' return on equity of 1.18% beat Hub Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, Hub Group had 4 more articles in the media than Werner Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Hub Group and 4 mentions for Werner Enterprises. Werner Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Hub Group's score of 1.02 indicating that Werner Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Werner Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Hub Group pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Werner Enterprises pays out -73.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hub Group pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Werner Enterprises has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Werner Enterprises is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Werner Enterprises has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hub Group has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Werner Enterprises currently has a consensus price target of $41.54, indicating a potential upside of 11.42%. Hub Group has a consensus price target of $43.31, indicating a potential upside of 20.17%. Given Hub Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hub Group is more favorable than Werner Enterprises.

89.3% of Werner Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of J.B. Hunt Transport Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Werner Enterprises shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of J.B. Hunt Transport Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Werner Enterprises presently has a consensus target price of $41.54, indicating a potential upside of 11.42%. J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a consensus target price of $286.30, indicating a potential upside of 5.86%. Given Werner Enterprises' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Werner Enterprises is more favorable than J.B. Hunt Transport Services.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Werner Enterprises' net margin of -1.42%. J.B. Hunt Transport Services' return on equity of 18.75% beat Werner Enterprises' return on equity.

In the previous week, J.B. Hunt Transport Services had 3 more articles in the media than Werner Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for J.B. Hunt Transport Services and 4 mentions for Werner Enterprises. J.B. Hunt Transport Services' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Werner Enterprises' score of 1.14 indicating that J.B. Hunt Transport Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Werner Enterprises has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, J.B. Hunt Transport Services has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Werner Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. J.B. Hunt Transport Services pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Werner Enterprises pays out -73.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. J.B. Hunt Transport Services pays out 25.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Werner Enterprises has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and J.B. Hunt Transport Services has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Werner Enterprises is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services has higher revenue and earnings than Werner Enterprises. Werner Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J.B. Hunt Transport Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Landstar System currently has a consensus price target of $196.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.44%. Werner Enterprises has a consensus price target of $41.54, indicating a potential upside of 11.42%. Given Landstar System's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Landstar System is more favorable than Werner Enterprises.

Landstar System has higher revenue and earnings than Werner Enterprises. Werner Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landstar System, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.0% of Landstar System shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of Werner Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Landstar System shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Werner Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Landstar System pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Werner Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Landstar System pays out 45.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Werner Enterprises pays out -73.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Landstar System has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Werner Enterprises has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Werner Enterprises is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Landstar System has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Werner Enterprises' net margin of -1.42%. Landstar System's return on equity of 20.84% beat Werner Enterprises' return on equity.

In the previous week, Landstar System and Landstar System both had 4 articles in the media. Landstar System's average media sentiment score of 1.74 beat Werner Enterprises' score of 1.14 indicating that Landstar System is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Werner Enterprises has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.