Wilhelmina International (WHLM) Competitors

Bridger Aerospace Group (NASDAQ:BAER) and Wilhelmina International (NASDAQ:WHLM) are both small-cap aerospace companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, community ranking, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Does the MarketBeat Community favor BAER or WHLM?

Wilhelmina International received 227 more outperform votes than Bridger Aerospace Group when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 100.00% of users gave Bridger Aerospace Group an outperform vote while only 82.98% of users gave Wilhelmina International an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Bridger Aerospace Group	Outperform Votes 7 100.00%	Underperform Votes No Votes
Wilhelmina International	Outperform Votes 234 82.98%	Underperform Votes 48 17.02%

Is BAER or WHLM more profitable?

Wilhelmina International has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Bridger Aerospace Group's net margin of -40.25%. Wilhelmina International's return on equity of 2.29% beat Bridger Aerospace Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bridger Aerospace Group	-40.25%	N/A	-12.15%
Wilhelmina International	3.38%	2.29%	1.40%

Which has more risk and volatility, BAER or WHLM?

Bridger Aerospace Group has a beta of 0.03, suggesting that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Do analysts rate BAER or WHLM?

Bridger Aerospace Group presently has a consensus target price of $5.25, indicating a potential upside of 277.70%. Given Bridger Aerospace Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bridger Aerospace Group is more favorable than Wilhelmina International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bridger Aerospace Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Wilhelmina International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Does the media favor BAER or WHLM?

In the previous week, Bridger Aerospace Group and Bridger Aerospace Group both had 1 articles in the media. Bridger Aerospace Group's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Wilhelmina International's score of 0.00 indicating that Bridger Aerospace Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bridger Aerospace Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Wilhelmina International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BAER or WHLM?

48.9% of Bridger Aerospace Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.0% of Wilhelmina International shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.5% of Bridger Aerospace Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 49.4% of Wilhelmina International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Which has better earnings and valuation, BAER or WHLM?

Wilhelmina International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bridger Aerospace Group. Bridger Aerospace Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wilhelmina International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bridger Aerospace Group	$108.75M	0.70	-$77.36M	-$0.79	-1.76
Wilhelmina International	$17.09M	1.33	$430K	$0.13	26.92

Summary

Wilhelmina International beats Bridger Aerospace Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.