NASDAQ:WHLM

Wilhelmina International Competitors

$5.06
+0.36 (+7.66 %)
(As of 05/7/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$4.70
$5.32
50-Day Range
$4.70
$10.80
52-Week Range
$2.32
$14.21
Volume110,575 shs
Average Volume641,237 shs
Market Capitalization$26.09 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.17

Competitors

Wilhelmina International (NASDAQ:WHLM) Vs. GIB, BAH, G, EXPO, FCN, and AMEH

Should you be buying WHLM stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "management consulting services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Wilhelmina International, including CGI (GIB), Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), Genpact (G), Exponent (EXPO), FTI Consulting (FCN), and Apollo Medical (AMEH).

CGI (NYSE:GIB) and Wilhelmina International (NASDAQ:WHLM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

51.3% of CGI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.7% of Wilhelmina International shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of CGI shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 65.8% of Wilhelmina International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

CGI has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.17, suggesting that its share price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares CGI and Wilhelmina International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CGI9.20%18.58%8.79%
Wilhelmina International-19.22%-28.69%-16.34%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for CGI and Wilhelmina International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CGI041002.71
Wilhelmina International0000N/A

CGI presently has a consensus price target of $114.8889, indicating a potential upside of 26.18%. Given CGI's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe CGI is more favorable than Wilhelmina International.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares CGI and Wilhelmina International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CGI$9.04 billion2.56$831.69 million$3.6325.08
Wilhelmina International$75.50 million0.35$-4,790,000.00N/AN/A

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Wilhelmina International.

Summary

CGI beats Wilhelmina International on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) and Wilhelmina International (NASDAQ:WHLM) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Booz Allen Hamilton and Wilhelmina International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Booz Allen Hamilton6.62%54.01%10.09%
Wilhelmina International-19.22%-28.69%-16.34%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.9% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.7% of Wilhelmina International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 65.8% of Wilhelmina International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Booz Allen Hamilton and Wilhelmina International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Booz Allen Hamilton$7.46 billion1.55$482.60 million$3.1826.45
Wilhelmina International$75.50 million0.35$-4,790,000.00N/AN/A

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Wilhelmina International.

Risk & Volatility

Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.17, suggesting that its share price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Booz Allen Hamilton and Wilhelmina International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Booz Allen Hamilton04602.60
Wilhelmina International0000N/A

Booz Allen Hamilton presently has a consensus price target of $85.2857, indicating a potential upside of 1.40%. Given Booz Allen Hamilton's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Booz Allen Hamilton is more favorable than Wilhelmina International.

Summary

Booz Allen Hamilton beats Wilhelmina International on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wilhelmina International (NASDAQ:WHLM) and Genpact (NYSE:G) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Wilhelmina International and Genpact's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wilhelmina International-19.22%-28.69%-16.34%
Genpact8.53%21.81%7.90%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

4.7% of Wilhelmina International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.5% of Genpact shares are held by institutional investors. 65.8% of Wilhelmina International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Genpact shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Wilhelmina International and Genpact's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wilhelmina International$75.50 million0.35$-4,790,000.00N/AN/A
Genpact$3.52 billion2.51$304.88 million$1.5630.21

Genpact has higher revenue and earnings than Wilhelmina International.

Risk and Volatility

Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.17, meaning that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Genpact has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Wilhelmina International and Genpact, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wilhelmina International0000N/A
Genpact02402.67

Genpact has a consensus price target of $45.6667, indicating a potential downside of 3.10%. Given Genpact's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Genpact is more favorable than Wilhelmina International.

Summary

Genpact beats Wilhelmina International on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wilhelmina International (NASDAQ:WHLM) and Exponent (NASDAQ:EXPO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.17, meaning that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Exponent has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Wilhelmina International and Exponent's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wilhelmina International-19.22%-28.69%-16.34%
Exponent19.63%23.66%15.24%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Wilhelmina International and Exponent's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wilhelmina International$75.50 million0.35$-4,790,000.00N/AN/A
Exponent$417.20 million12.00$82.46 million$1.5362.80

Exponent has higher revenue and earnings than Wilhelmina International.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

4.7% of Wilhelmina International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Exponent shares are held by institutional investors. 65.8% of Wilhelmina International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Exponent shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Wilhelmina International and Exponent, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wilhelmina International0000N/A
Exponent01102.50

Exponent has a consensus target price of $94.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.16%. Given Exponent's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Exponent is more favorable than Wilhelmina International.

Summary

Exponent beats Wilhelmina International on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and Wilhelmina International (NASDAQ:WHLM) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

97.3% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.7% of Wilhelmina International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 65.8% of Wilhelmina International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for FTI Consulting and Wilhelmina International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FTI Consulting00103.00
Wilhelmina International0000N/A

FTI Consulting presently has a consensus target price of $170.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.23%. Given FTI Consulting's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than Wilhelmina International.

Risk & Volatility

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.17, meaning that its share price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares FTI Consulting and Wilhelmina International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FTI Consulting7.56%13.27%7.18%
Wilhelmina International-19.22%-28.69%-16.34%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FTI Consulting and Wilhelmina International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTI Consulting$2.35 billion2.09$216.73 million$5.8024.79
Wilhelmina International$75.50 million0.35$-4,790,000.00N/AN/A

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Wilhelmina International.

Summary

FTI Consulting beats Wilhelmina International on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wilhelmina International (NASDAQ:WHLM) and Apollo Medical (NASDAQ:AMEH) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Wilhelmina International and Apollo Medical, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wilhelmina International0000N/A
Apollo Medical0000N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Wilhelmina International and Apollo Medical's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wilhelmina International$75.50 million0.35$-4,790,000.00N/AN/A
Apollo Medical$560.62 million3.28$14.12 million$0.4377.81

Apollo Medical has higher revenue and earnings than Wilhelmina International.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

4.7% of Wilhelmina International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Apollo Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. 65.8% of Wilhelmina International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Apollo Medical shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Wilhelmina International and Apollo Medical's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wilhelmina International-19.22%-28.69%-16.34%
Apollo Medical5.01%16.69%4.46%

Risk and Volatility

Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.17, indicating that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Apollo Medical has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Apollo Medical beats Wilhelmina International on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.


Wilhelmina International Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
CGI logo
GIB
CGI
1.9$91.05+0.9%$23.11 billion$9.04 billion29.09News Coverage
Booz Allen Hamilton logo
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton
2.1$84.11+0.1%$11.58 billion$7.46 billion22.92
Genpact logo
G
Genpact
1.8$47.13+0.1%$8.82 billion$3.52 billion29.27Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Announcement
Exponent logo
EXPO
Exponent
1.6$96.08+1.2%$5.01 billion$417.20 million64.05Analyst Upgrade
FTI Consulting logo
FCN
FTI Consulting
1.6$143.79+0.5%$4.92 billion$2.35 billion29.53Analyst Report
Apollo Medical logo
AMEH
Apollo Medical
0.8$33.46+3.7%$1.84 billion$560.62 million35.98Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
ICF International logo
ICFI
ICF International
2.1$93.02+0.1%$1.75 billion$1.48 billion28.89Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Huron Consulting Group logo
HURN
Huron Consulting Group
1.7$56.66+0.6%$1.28 billion$965.47 million-283.29Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
The RMR Group logo
RMR
The RMR Group
1.6$40.18+0.6%$1.26 billion$589.51 million22.83News Coverage
The Hackett Group logo
HCKT
The Hackett Group
2.2$16.79+2.6%$507.66 million$282.47 million83.95Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
Atlas Technical Consultants logo
ATCX
Atlas Technical Consultants
0.9$11.73+2.6%$413.83 millionN/A-12.89
BlackRock Capital Investment logo
BKCC
BlackRock Capital Investment
1.0$3.98+3.8%$295.13 million$78.12 million-2.38Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
Information Services Group logo
III
Information Services Group
1.3$4.88+1.6%$236.20 million$265.76 million81.35Upcoming Earnings
Avalon GloboCare logo
AVCO
Avalon GloboCare
0.8$0.92+0.0%$78.06 million$1.55 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
ATIF
ATIF
0.5$0.95+3.2%$44.66 million$690,000.000.00News Coverage
Gap Down
Lightbridge logo
LTBR
Lightbridge
0.6$4.69+1.3%$30.84 millionN/A-1.70Upcoming Earnings
HUSN
Hudson Capital
0.2$2.76+5.4%$17.68 million$1.37 million0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 5/9/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.