Workhorse Group Competitors

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Workhorse Group (NASDAQ:WKHS) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

41.4% of Tesla shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of Workhorse Group shares are held by institutional investors. 23.0% of Tesla shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Workhorse Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Tesla and Workhorse Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Tesla and Workhorse Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Workhorse Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tesla. Tesla is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workhorse Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Tesla has a beta of 2.18, suggesting that its share price is 118% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.8, suggesting that its share price is 180% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Tesla and Workhorse Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Tesla presently has a consensus target price of $324.9241, indicating a potential downside of 47.71%. Workhorse Group has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.40%. Given Workhorse Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Workhorse Group is more favorable than Tesla.

Summary

Tesla beats Workhorse Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM) and Workhorse Group (NASDAQ:WKHS) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Toyota Motor and Workhorse Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.40%. Given Workhorse Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Workhorse Group is more favorable than Toyota Motor.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.1% of Toyota Motor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of Workhorse Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Workhorse Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Toyota Motor and Workhorse Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Toyota Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Workhorse Group. Workhorse Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Toyota Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Toyota Motor and Workhorse Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.8, suggesting that its stock price is 180% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Workhorse Group (NASDAQ:WKHS) and General Motors (NYSE:GM) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Workhorse Group and General Motors' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

General Motors has higher revenue and earnings than Workhorse Group. Workhorse Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than General Motors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Workhorse Group and General Motors, as reported by MarketBeat.

Workhorse Group currently has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.40%. General Motors has a consensus price target of $55.3889, indicating a potential upside of 6.87%. Given Workhorse Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Workhorse Group is more favorable than General Motors.

Profitability

This table compares Workhorse Group and General Motors' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

21.4% of Workhorse Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.7% of General Motors shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Workhorse Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of General Motors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.8, suggesting that its share price is 180% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, General Motors has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

General Motors beats Workhorse Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

NIO (NYSE:NIO) and Workhorse Group (NASDAQ:WKHS) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

21.4% of Workhorse Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of NIO shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Workhorse Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares NIO and Workhorse Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Workhorse Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NIO. Workhorse Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NIO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for NIO and Workhorse Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

NIO currently has a consensus target price of $50.6375, indicating a potential upside of 28.91%. Workhorse Group has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.40%. Given Workhorse Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Workhorse Group is more favorable than NIO.

Profitability

This table compares NIO and Workhorse Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

NIO has a beta of 2.81, meaning that its share price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.8, meaning that its share price is 180% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Workhorse Group beats NIO on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Honda Motor (NYSE:HMC) and Workhorse Group (NASDAQ:WKHS) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.4% of Honda Motor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of Workhorse Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Workhorse Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Honda Motor and Workhorse Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Honda Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Workhorse Group. Workhorse Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Honda Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Honda Motor and Workhorse Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Workhorse Group has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.40%. Given Workhorse Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Workhorse Group is more favorable than Honda Motor.

Profitability

This table compares Honda Motor and Workhorse Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Honda Motor has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.8, meaning that its stock price is 180% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Honda Motor beats Workhorse Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ford Motor (NYSE:F) and Workhorse Group (NASDAQ:WKHS) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

48.8% of Ford Motor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of Workhorse Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Ford Motor shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Workhorse Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ford Motor and Workhorse Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ford Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Workhorse Group. Workhorse Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ford Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Ford Motor and Workhorse Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Ford Motor presently has a consensus target price of $9.9643, indicating a potential downside of 16.48%. Workhorse Group has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.40%. Given Workhorse Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Workhorse Group is more favorable than Ford Motor.

Profitability

This table compares Ford Motor and Workhorse Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.8, meaning that its stock price is 180% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Ford Motor beats Workhorse Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.