Go Pro

TEN (XHLD) Competitors

TEN logo
$2.09 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.06 -0.03 (-1.67%)
As of 07/2/2026 07:57 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

XHLD vs. PSQH, TULP, WHLM, MGIH, and IPM

Should you buy TEN stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TEN with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TEN include PSQ (PSQH), Lendway (TULP), Wilhelmina International (WHLM), Millennium Group International (MGIH), and Intelligent Protection Management (IPM). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does TEN compare to PSQ?

TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) and PSQ (NYSE:PSQH) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

TEN has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PSQ has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

17.3% of PSQ shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of TEN shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.2% of PSQ shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PSQ has a net margin of -143.15% compared to TEN's net margin of -546.18%. PSQ's return on equity of -217.16% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TEN-546.18% -466.58% -168.38%
PSQ -143.15%-217.16%-53.86%

TEN has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PSQ. PSQ is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TEN$3.22M2.58-$19.51M-$4.18N/A
PSQ$23.33M0.88-$36.61M-$0.81N/A

PSQ has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 732.34%. Given PSQ's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PSQ is more favorable than TEN.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TEN
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
PSQ
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, PSQ had 1 more articles in the media than TEN. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for PSQ and 1 mentions for TEN. TEN's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PSQ'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TEN
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
PSQ
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

PSQ beats TEN on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to Lendway?

Lendway (NASDAQ:TULP) and TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) are both small-cap services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lendway
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
TEN
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Lendway has a net margin of -9.79% compared to TEN's net margin of -546.18%. Lendway's return on equity of -42.76% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lendway-9.79% -42.76% -4.77%
TEN -546.18%-466.58%-168.38%

6.6% of Lendway shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Lendway shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of TEN shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lendway has higher revenue and earnings than TEN. Lendway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lendway$5.15M3.47-$2.85M-$2.75N/A
TEN$3.22M2.58-$19.51M-$4.18N/A

Lendway has a beta of 2.6, meaning that its share price is 160% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TEN has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TEN had 1 more articles in the media than Lendway. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TEN and 0 mentions for Lendway. Lendway's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TEN'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lendway Neutral
TEN Neutral

Summary

Lendway beats TEN on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to Wilhelmina International?

TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) and Wilhelmina International (NASDAQ:WHLM) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TEN
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Wilhelmina International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, TEN had 1 more articles in the media than Wilhelmina International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TEN and 0 mentions for Wilhelmina International. TEN's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Wilhelmina International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TEN Neutral
Wilhelmina International Neutral

20.0% of Wilhelmina International shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of TEN shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 49.4% of Wilhelmina International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wilhelmina International has higher revenue and earnings than TEN. TEN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wilhelmina International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TEN$3.22M2.58-$19.51M-$4.18N/A
Wilhelmina International$17.09M0.19$430K$0.105.00

TEN has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Wilhelmina International has a net margin of 3.38% compared to TEN's net margin of -546.18%. Wilhelmina International's return on equity of 2.29% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TEN-546.18% -466.58% -168.38%
Wilhelmina International 3.38%2.29%1.40%

Summary

Wilhelmina International beats TEN on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to Millennium Group International?

TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) and Millennium Group International (NASDAQ:MGIH) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

TEN has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Millennium Group International has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

0.3% of Millennium Group International shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of TEN shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Millennium Group International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to TEN's net margin of -546.18%. Millennium Group International's return on equity of 0.00% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TEN-546.18% -466.58% -168.38%
Millennium Group International N/A N/A N/A

Millennium Group International has higher revenue and earnings than TEN.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TEN$3.22M2.58-$19.51M-$4.18N/A
Millennium Group International$25.33M0.65-$6.32MN/AN/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TEN
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Millennium Group International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, TEN had 1 more articles in the media than Millennium Group International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TEN and 0 mentions for Millennium Group International. TEN's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Millennium Group International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TEN Neutral
Millennium Group International Neutral

Summary

Millennium Group International beats TEN on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to Intelligent Protection Management?

TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) and Intelligent Protection Management (NASDAQ:IPM) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Intelligent Protection Management has a net margin of -14.01% compared to TEN's net margin of -546.18%. Intelligent Protection Management's return on equity of -18.44% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TEN-546.18% -466.58% -168.38%
Intelligent Protection Management -14.01%-18.44%-12.16%

In the previous week, TEN and TEN both had 1 articles in the media. TEN's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Intelligent Protection Management'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TEN
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Intelligent Protection Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

3.9% of Intelligent Protection Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of TEN shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.8% of Intelligent Protection Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TEN
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Intelligent Protection Management
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

TEN has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intelligent Protection Management has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Intelligent Protection Management has higher revenue and earnings than TEN. Intelligent Protection Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TEN$3.22M2.58-$19.51M-$4.18N/A
Intelligent Protection Management$24.45M0.64-$1.96M-$0.26N/A

Summary

Intelligent Protection Management beats TEN on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TEN News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for XHLD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding XHLD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

XHLD vs. The Competition

MetricTENServices – Misc. Business Services IndustryServices SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$8.29M$1.48B$24.85B$12.48B
Dividend YieldN/A42.19%5.29%6.52%
P/E Ratio-0.5022.4318.3624.70
Price / Sales2.583.6041.3899.42
Price / CashN/A31.65362.7757.09
Price / Book1.451.3113.446.46
Net Income-$19.51M-$2.66M-$12.63M$337.01M
7 Day Performance65.87%5.09%21.20%1.69%
1 Month Performance46.15%2.55%6.87%3.81%
1 Year PerformanceN/A10.06%-11.35%23.90%

TEN Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
XHLD
TEN
0.1572 of 5 stars
$2.09
flat
N/AN/A$8.29M$3.22MN/A37
PSQH
PSQ
1.4836 of 5 stars
$0.39
+1.7%
$3.50
+803.0%
-80.3%$18.89M$18.22MN/A45
TULP
Lendway
0.1704 of 5 stars
$3.68
-0.3%
N/AN/A$17.55M$5.15MN/A30
WHLM
Wilhelmina International
N/A$2.75
flat
N/AN/A$17.47M$17.09M22.8880
MGIH
Millennium Group International
0.3087 of 5 stars
$1.50
flat
N/A-8.7%$16.87M$25.33MN/A792

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:XHLD) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners