Do analysts prefer IZEA or XHLD?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Izea Worldwide 2 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 TEN 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, IZEA or XHLD?

Izea Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than TEN. Izea Worldwide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Izea Worldwide $31.24M 1.23 $40K -$0.14 N/A TEN $3.10M 3.35 -$19.51M -$1.74 N/A

Is IZEA or XHLD more profitable?

Izea Worldwide has a net margin of -9.36% compared to TEN's net margin of -666.35%. Izea Worldwide's return on equity of -5.10% beat TEN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Izea Worldwide -9.36% -5.10% -4.41% TEN -666.35% -505.28% -226.25%

Does the media favor IZEA or XHLD?

In the previous week, TEN had 3 more articles in the media than Izea Worldwide. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TEN and 3 mentions for Izea Worldwide. Izea Worldwide's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat TEN's score of 0.15 indicating that Izea Worldwide is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Izea Worldwide 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TEN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate GRSD or XHLD?

Gambling.com Group currently has a consensus price target of $6.43, suggesting a potential upside of 622.23%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than TEN. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gambling.com Group 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.56 TEN 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is GRSD or XHLD more profitable?

Gambling.com Group has a net margin of -22.36% compared to TEN's net margin of -666.35%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 13.87% beat TEN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Gambling.com Group -22.36% 13.87% 5.33% TEN -666.35% -505.28% -226.25%

Does the media favor GRSD or XHLD?

In the previous week, TEN had 4 more articles in the media than Gambling.com Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TEN and 2 mentions for Gambling.com Group. Gambling.com Group's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat TEN's score of 0.15 indicating that Gambling.com Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gambling.com Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TEN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate XHLD or MF?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score TEN 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 U-BX Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, XHLD or MF?

TEN has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U-BX Technology. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TEN $3.10M 3.35 -$19.51M -$1.74 N/A U-BX Technology $14.86M 4.29 -$33.11M N/A N/A

Is XHLD or MF more profitable?

U-BX Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to TEN's net margin of -666.35%. U-BX Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat TEN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TEN -666.35% -505.28% -226.25% U-BX Technology N/A N/A N/A

Does the media favor XHLD or MF?

In the previous week, U-BX Technology had 2 more articles in the media than TEN. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for U-BX Technology and 6 mentions for TEN. TEN's average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat U-BX Technology's score of 0.09 indicating that TEN is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TEN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral U-BX Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate XHLD or EDHL?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score TEN 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Everbright Digital 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, XHLD or EDHL?

Everbright Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TEN. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TEN $3.10M 3.35 -$19.51M -$1.74 N/A Everbright Digital $1.86M 20.48 -$2.25M N/A N/A

Is XHLD or EDHL more profitable?

Everbright Digital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to TEN's net margin of -666.35%. Everbright Digital's return on equity of 0.00% beat TEN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TEN -666.35% -505.28% -226.25% Everbright Digital N/A N/A N/A

Does the media prefer XHLD or EDHL?

In the previous week, TEN had 1 more articles in the media than Everbright Digital. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TEN and 5 mentions for Everbright Digital. Everbright Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat TEN's score of 0.15 indicating that Everbright Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TEN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Everbright Digital 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer XHLD or GAME?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score TEN 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 GameSquare 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, XHLD or GAME?

TEN has higher earnings, but lower revenue than GameSquare. TEN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GameSquare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TEN $3.10M 3.35 -$19.51M -$1.74 N/A GameSquare $45M 0.69 -$40.10M -$4.96 N/A

Is XHLD or GAME more profitable?

GameSquare has a net margin of -96.06% compared to TEN's net margin of -666.35%. GameSquare's return on equity of 7.97% beat TEN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TEN -666.35% -505.28% -226.25% GameSquare -96.06% 7.97% 3.14%

Does the media prefer XHLD or GAME?

In the previous week, TEN had 3 more articles in the media than GameSquare. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TEN and 3 mentions for GameSquare. GameSquare's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat TEN's score of 0.15 indicating that GameSquare is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TEN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral GameSquare 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

TEN (XHLD) Competitors

$0.86 +0.00 (+0.22%)

Closing price 11/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$0.85 -0.01 (-1.27%)

As of 11/11/2026 07:43 PM Eastern

Compare

XHLD vs. IZEA, GRSD, MF, EDHL, and GAME

Should you buy TEN stock or one of its competitors? TEN's main competitors and comparable companies include Izea Worldwide (IZEA), Gambling.com Group (GRSD), U-BX Technology (MF), Everbright Digital (EDHL), and GameSquare (GAME). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "advertising" industry.

How does TEN compare to Izea Worldwide?

Izea Worldwide (NASDAQ:IZEA) and TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Izea Worldwide	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
TEN	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Izea Worldwide has a net margin of -9.36% compared to TEN's net margin of -666.35%. Izea Worldwide's return on equity of -5.10% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Izea Worldwide	-9.36%	-5.10%	-4.41%
TEN	-666.35%	-505.28%	-226.25%

15.6% of Izea Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.3% of Izea Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of TEN shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Izea Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than TEN. Izea Worldwide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Izea Worldwide	$31.24M	1.23	$40K	-$0.14	N/A
TEN	$3.10M	3.35	-$19.51M	-$1.74	N/A

Izea Worldwide has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TEN has a beta of 6.11, suggesting that its stock price is 511% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TEN had 3 more articles in the media than Izea Worldwide. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TEN and 3 mentions for Izea Worldwide. Izea Worldwide's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat TEN's score of 0.15 indicating that Izea Worldwide is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Izea Worldwide	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TEN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Izea Worldwide beats TEN on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to Gambling.com Group?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GRSD) and TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

TEN has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group. Gambling.com Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group	$165.45M	0.19	-$32.93M	-$1.04	N/A
TEN	$3.10M	3.35	-$19.51M	-$1.74	N/A

Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TEN has a beta of 6.11, suggesting that its stock price is 511% more volatile than the broader market.

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of TEN shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, TEN had 4 more articles in the media than Gambling.com Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TEN and 2 mentions for Gambling.com Group. Gambling.com Group's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat TEN's score of 0.15 indicating that Gambling.com Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TEN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Gambling.com Group currently has a consensus price target of $6.43, suggesting a potential upside of 622.23%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than TEN.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gambling.com Group	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56
TEN	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Gambling.com Group has a net margin of -22.36% compared to TEN's net margin of -666.35%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 13.87% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group	-22.36%	13.87%	5.33%
TEN	-666.35%	-505.28%	-226.25%

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats TEN on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to U-BX Technology?

TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) and U-BX Technology (NASDAQ:MF) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

U-BX Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to TEN's net margin of -666.35%. U-BX Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TEN	-666.35%	-505.28%	-226.25%
U-BX Technology	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TEN	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
U-BX Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, U-BX Technology had 2 more articles in the media than TEN. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for U-BX Technology and 6 mentions for TEN. TEN's average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat U-BX Technology's score of 0.09 indicating that TEN is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TEN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
U-BX Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TEN has a beta of 6.11, meaning that its stock price is 511% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, U-BX Technology has a beta of -4.66, meaning that its stock price is 566% less volatile than the broader market.

TEN has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U-BX Technology.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TEN	$3.10M	3.35	-$19.51M	-$1.74	N/A
U-BX Technology	$14.86M	4.29	-$33.11M	N/A	N/A

Summary

U-BX Technology beats TEN on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to Everbright Digital?

TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) and Everbright Digital (NASDAQ:EDHL) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, TEN had 1 more articles in the media than Everbright Digital. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TEN and 5 mentions for Everbright Digital. Everbright Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat TEN's score of 0.15 indicating that Everbright Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TEN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Everbright Digital	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TEN has a beta of 6.11, meaning that its share price is 511% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everbright Digital has a beta of -0.33, meaning that its share price is 133% less volatile than the broader market.

Everbright Digital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to TEN's net margin of -666.35%. Everbright Digital's return on equity of 0.00% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TEN	-666.35%	-505.28%	-226.25%
Everbright Digital	N/A	N/A	N/A

Everbright Digital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TEN.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TEN	$3.10M	3.35	-$19.51M	-$1.74	N/A
Everbright Digital	$1.86M	20.48	-$2.25M	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TEN	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Everbright Digital	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Everbright Digital beats TEN on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to GameSquare?

TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) and GameSquare (NASDAQ:GAME) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

GameSquare has a net margin of -96.06% compared to TEN's net margin of -666.35%. GameSquare's return on equity of 7.97% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TEN	-666.35%	-505.28%	-226.25%
GameSquare	-96.06%	7.97%	3.14%

TEN has higher earnings, but lower revenue than GameSquare. TEN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GameSquare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TEN	$3.10M	3.35	-$19.51M	-$1.74	N/A
GameSquare	$45M	0.69	-$40.10M	-$4.96	N/A

64.3% of GameSquare shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of TEN shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of GameSquare shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, TEN had 3 more articles in the media than GameSquare. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TEN and 3 mentions for GameSquare. GameSquare's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat TEN's score of 0.15 indicating that GameSquare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TEN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
GameSquare	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TEN	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
GameSquare	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

TEN has a beta of 6.11, suggesting that its stock price is 511% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GameSquare has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

GameSquare beats TEN on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TEN News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding XHLD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

XHLD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	TEN	Media Industry	Communication Services Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$10.35M	$3.16B	$30.26B	$12.02B
Dividend Yield	N/A	6.02%	4.52%	4.45%
P/E Ratio	N/A	25.32	23.58	29.19
Price / Sales	3.35	2.22	2.74	5.83
Price / Cash	N/A	11.05	14.98	22.50
Price / Book	3.31	1.83	3.70	3.80
Net Income	-$19.51M	$34.73M	$1.11B	$390.04M
7 Day Performance	71.91%	1.03%	1.32%	3.40%
1 Month Performance	95.88%	-1.47%	-0.04%	-5.35%
1 Year Performance	N/A	-3.21%	-5.79%	-5.92%

TEN Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
XHLD TEN	0.3059 of 5 stars	$0.86 +0.2%	N/A	N/A	$10.35M	$3.10M	N/A	25	Earnings Report Gap Up
IZEA Izea Worldwide	1.0606 of 5 stars	$2.31 +2.7%	N/A	-57.9%	$40.15M	$31.24M	N/A	75	Positive News Gap Up
GRSD Gambling.com Group	4.2333 of 5 stars	$1.09 -0.9%	$6.43 +489.5%	-87.0%	$38.28M	$165.45M	N/A	230
MF U-BX Technology	0.3772 of 5 stars	$10.10 +21.0%	N/A	-69.8%	$36.76M	$14.86M	N/A	40	Analyst Upgrade Short Interest Increase Gap Up
EDHL Everbright Digital	0.7529 of 5 stars	$5.92 flat	N/A	-62.7%	$35.25M	$1.86M	N/A	6	Short Interest Decrease

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:XHLD) was last updated on 11/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TEN (XHLD) Competitors