Go Pro

TEN (XHLD) Competitors

TEN logo
$2.09 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.06 -0.03 (-1.67%)
As of 07/2/2026 07:57 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

XHLD vs. PSQH, TULP, WHLM, MGIH, and IPM

Should you buy TEN stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TEN with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TEN include PSQ (PSQH), Lendway (TULP), Wilhelmina International (WHLM), Millennium Group International (MGIH), and Intelligent Protection Management (IPM). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does TEN compare to PSQ?

PSQ (NYSE:PSQH) and TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and earnings.

TEN has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PSQ. PSQ is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PSQ$23.33M0.88-$36.61M-$0.81N/A
TEN$3.22M2.58-$19.51M-$4.18N/A

In the previous week, PSQ had 1 more articles in the media than TEN. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for PSQ and 1 mentions for TEN. PSQ's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TEN'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PSQ
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
TEN
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

PSQ presently has a consensus target price of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 732.34%. Given PSQ's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PSQ is more favorable than TEN.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PSQ
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
TEN
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

PSQ has a net margin of -143.15% compared to TEN's net margin of -546.18%. PSQ's return on equity of -217.16% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PSQ-143.15% -217.16% -53.86%
TEN -546.18%-466.58%-168.38%

PSQ has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TEN has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

17.3% of PSQ shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.2% of PSQ shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of TEN shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PSQ beats TEN on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to Lendway?

Lendway (NASDAQ:TULP) and TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) are both small-cap services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Lendway has a net margin of -9.79% compared to TEN's net margin of -546.18%. Lendway's return on equity of -42.76% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lendway-9.79% -42.76% -4.77%
TEN -546.18%-466.58%-168.38%

Lendway has a beta of 2.6, indicating that its share price is 160% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TEN has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

6.6% of Lendway shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Lendway shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of TEN shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lendway has higher revenue and earnings than TEN. Lendway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lendway$5.15M3.47-$2.85M-$2.75N/A
TEN$3.22M2.58-$19.51M-$4.18N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lendway
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
TEN
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, TEN had 1 more articles in the media than Lendway. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TEN and 0 mentions for Lendway. Lendway's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TEN'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lendway Neutral
TEN Neutral

Summary

Lendway beats TEN on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to Wilhelmina International?

Wilhelmina International (NASDAQ:WHLM) and TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Wilhelmina International has higher revenue and earnings than TEN. TEN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wilhelmina International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wilhelmina International$17.09M0.19$430K$0.105.00
TEN$3.22M2.58-$19.51M-$4.18N/A

In the previous week, TEN had 1 more articles in the media than Wilhelmina International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TEN and 0 mentions for Wilhelmina International. Wilhelmina International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TEN'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wilhelmina International Neutral
TEN Neutral

Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TEN has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

20.0% of Wilhelmina International shares are held by institutional investors. 49.4% of Wilhelmina International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of TEN shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wilhelmina International has a net margin of 3.38% compared to TEN's net margin of -546.18%. Wilhelmina International's return on equity of 2.29% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wilhelmina International3.38% 2.29% 1.40%
TEN -546.18%-466.58%-168.38%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wilhelmina International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
TEN
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Wilhelmina International beats TEN on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to Millennium Group International?

Millennium Group International (NASDAQ:MGIH) and TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Millennium Group International has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TEN has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Millennium Group International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
TEN
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Millennium Group International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to TEN's net margin of -546.18%. Millennium Group International's return on equity of 0.00% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Millennium Group InternationalN/A N/A N/A
TEN -546.18%-466.58%-168.38%

0.3% of Millennium Group International shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of TEN shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Millennium Group International has higher revenue and earnings than TEN.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Millennium Group International$25.33M0.65-$6.32MN/AN/A
TEN$3.22M2.58-$19.51M-$4.18N/A

In the previous week, TEN had 1 more articles in the media than Millennium Group International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TEN and 0 mentions for Millennium Group International. Millennium Group International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TEN'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Millennium Group International Neutral
TEN Neutral

Summary

Millennium Group International beats TEN on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TEN compare to Intelligent Protection Management?

Intelligent Protection Management (NASDAQ:IPM) and TEN (NASDAQ:XHLD) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and media sentiment.

Intelligent Protection Management has a net margin of -14.01% compared to TEN's net margin of -546.18%. Intelligent Protection Management's return on equity of -18.44% beat TEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intelligent Protection Management-14.01% -18.44% -12.16%
TEN -546.18%-466.58%-168.38%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intelligent Protection Management
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
TEN
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Intelligent Protection Management has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TEN has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Intelligent Protection Management and Intelligent Protection Management both had 1 articles in the media. Intelligent Protection Management's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TEN'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Intelligent Protection Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
TEN
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

3.9% of Intelligent Protection Management shares are held by institutional investors. 20.8% of Intelligent Protection Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of TEN shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Intelligent Protection Management has higher revenue and earnings than TEN. Intelligent Protection Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intelligent Protection Management$24.45M0.64-$1.96M-$0.26N/A
TEN$3.22M2.58-$19.51M-$4.18N/A

Summary

Intelligent Protection Management beats TEN on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TEN News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for XHLD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding XHLD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

XHLD vs. The Competition

MetricTENServices – Misc. Business Services IndustryServices SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$8.29M$1.48B$24.85B$12.48B
Dividend YieldN/A42.19%5.29%6.52%
P/E Ratio-0.5022.4318.3624.70
Price / Sales2.583.6041.3899.42
Price / CashN/A31.65362.7757.09
Price / Book1.451.3113.446.46
Net Income-$19.51M-$2.66M-$12.63M$337.01M
7 Day Performance65.87%5.09%21.20%1.69%
1 Month Performance46.15%2.55%6.87%3.81%
1 Year PerformanceN/A10.06%-11.35%23.90%

TEN Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
XHLD
TEN
0.1572 of 5 stars
$2.09
flat
N/AN/A$8.29M$3.22MN/A37
PSQH
PSQ
1.4831 of 5 stars
$0.39
+1.7%
$3.50
+803.0%
-80.3%$18.89M$18.22MN/A45
TULP
Lendway
0.1704 of 5 stars
$3.68
-0.3%
N/AN/A$17.55M$5.15MN/A30
WHLM
Wilhelmina International
N/A$2.75
flat
N/AN/A$17.47M$17.09M22.8880
MGIH
Millennium Group International
0.3087 of 5 stars
$1.50
flat
N/A-8.7%$16.87M$25.33MN/A792

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:XHLD) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners