Alcoa Competitors

Alcoa (NYSE:AA) and Ball (NYSE:BLL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Alcoa and Ball's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Alcoa has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ball has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Alcoa and Ball, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Alcoa currently has a consensus price target of $32.7778, indicating a potential downside of 19.43%. Ball has a consensus price target of $99.9333, indicating a potential upside of 12.75%. Given Ball's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ball is more favorable than Alcoa.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.1% of Ball shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Ball shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Alcoa and Ball's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ball has higher revenue and earnings than Alcoa. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ball, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ball beats Alcoa on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Alcoa (NYSE:AA) and Zebra Technologies (NASDAQ:ZBRA) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Alcoa and Zebra Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Alcoa has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Alcoa and Zebra Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Alcoa currently has a consensus price target of $32.7778, indicating a potential downside of 19.43%. Zebra Technologies has a consensus price target of $412.50, indicating a potential downside of 14.42%. Given Zebra Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Zebra Technologies is more favorable than Alcoa.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

86.4% of Zebra Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Zebra Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Alcoa and Zebra Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Zebra Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alcoa. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zebra Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Zebra Technologies beats Alcoa on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Alcoa (NYSE:AA) and W.W. Grainger (NYSE:GWW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Alcoa and W.W. Grainger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Alcoa has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Alcoa and W.W. Grainger, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Alcoa currently has a consensus price target of $32.7778, indicating a potential downside of 19.43%. W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $421.1538, indicating a potential downside of 9.83%. Given W.W. Grainger's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe W.W. Grainger is more favorable than Alcoa.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

70.6% of W.W. Grainger shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.0% of W.W. Grainger shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Alcoa and W.W. Grainger's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

W.W. Grainger has higher revenue and earnings than Alcoa. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than W.W. Grainger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

W.W. Grainger beats Alcoa on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Alcoa (NYSE:AA) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Alcoa and Dover's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Alcoa has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Alcoa and Dover, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Alcoa currently has a consensus price target of $32.7778, indicating a potential downside of 19.43%. Dover has a consensus price target of $151.90, indicating a potential upside of 1.04%. Given Dover's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Dover is more favorable than Alcoa.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.7% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Dover shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Alcoa and Dover's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Dover has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alcoa. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Dover beats Alcoa on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Alcoa (NYSE:AA) and Xylem (NYSE:XYL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Alcoa and Xylem's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Alcoa has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xylem has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Alcoa and Xylem, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Alcoa currently has a consensus price target of $32.7778, indicating a potential downside of 19.43%. Xylem has a consensus price target of $93.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.88%. Given Alcoa's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Alcoa is more favorable than Xylem.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

84.9% of Xylem shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Xylem shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Alcoa and Xylem's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Xylem has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alcoa. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Xylem beats Alcoa on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Alcoa (NYSE:AA) and Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Alcoa and Ingersoll Rand's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ingersoll Rand has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alcoa. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Alcoa and Ingersoll Rand, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Alcoa currently has a consensus price target of $32.7778, indicating a potential downside of 19.43%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $52.3636, indicating a potential upside of 7.39%. Given Ingersoll Rand's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than Alcoa.

Volatility & Risk

Alcoa has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Alcoa and Ingersoll Rand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Ingersoll Rand beats Alcoa on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.