Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AA or HBM?

Alcoa has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alcoa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alcoa $12.83B 1.72 $1.16B $3.95 21.22 HudBay Minerals $2.21B 5.71 $568.50M $1.66 19.15

Is AA or HBM more profitable?

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 8.27%. Alcoa's return on equity of 12.57% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Alcoa 8.27% 12.57% 5.05% HudBay Minerals 27.75% 10.04% 5.36%

Does the media favor AA or HBM?

In the previous week, Alcoa had 2 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Alcoa and 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Alcoa's score of 0.80 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alcoa 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive HudBay Minerals 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ERO or HBM?

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ero Copper $785.80M 4.27 $263.72M $2.81 11.46 HudBay Minerals $2.21B 5.71 $568.50M $1.66 19.15

Is ERO or HBM more profitable?

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.75%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 29.86% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ero Copper 31.63% 29.86% 14.08% HudBay Minerals 27.75% 10.04% 5.36%

Does the media refer more to ERO or HBM?

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 3 mentions for Ero Copper. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.36 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ero Copper 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral HudBay Minerals 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer HBM or FCX?

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 17 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.89 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HudBay Minerals 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Freeport-McMoRan 17 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, HBM or HL?

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Hecla Mining. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hecla Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HudBay Minerals $2.21B 5.71 $568.50M $1.66 19.15 Hecla Mining $1.42B 8.38 $321.71M $0.41 43.38

Does the media favor HBM or HL?

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals and HudBay Minerals both had 5 articles in the media. Hecla Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.89 indicating that Hecla Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HudBay Minerals 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hecla Mining 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer HBM or KGC?

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 4 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Kinross Gold and 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Kinross Gold's score of 0.84 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HudBay Minerals 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kinross Gold 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

$31.78 +1.20 (+3.91%)

Closing price 06/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$31.70 -0.08 (-0.25%)

As of 08:01 AM Eastern

Compare

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, HL, and KGC

Should you buy HudBay Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares HudBay Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with HudBay Minerals include Alcoa (AA), Ero Copper (ERO), Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), Hecla Mining (HL), and Kinross Gold (KGC).

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Alcoa (NYSE:AA) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Alcoa had 2 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Alcoa and 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Alcoa's score of 0.80 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alcoa	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
HudBay Minerals	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alcoa pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Alcoa pays out 10.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 8.27%. Alcoa's return on equity of 12.57% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alcoa	8.27%	12.57%	5.05%
HudBay Minerals	27.75%	10.04%	5.36%

Alcoa presently has a consensus target price of $68.60, suggesting a potential downside of 18.18%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus target price of $27.33, suggesting a potential downside of 14.01%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Alcoa.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alcoa	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Alcoa has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Alcoa has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alcoa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alcoa	$12.83B	1.72	$1.16B	$3.95	21.22
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.71	$568.50M	$1.66	19.15

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Alcoa on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and earnings.

Ero Copper currently has a consensus target price of $31.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.17%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus target price of $27.33, indicating a potential downside of 14.01%. Given Ero Copper's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ero Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ero Copper	$785.80M	4.27	$263.72M	$2.81	11.46
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.71	$568.50M	$1.66	19.15

Ero Copper has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 3 mentions for Ero Copper. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.36 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
HudBay Minerals	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

71.3% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.75%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 29.86% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ero Copper	31.63%	29.86%	14.08%
HudBay Minerals	27.75%	10.04%	5.36%

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Ero Copper on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 17 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.89 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Freeport-McMoRan	17 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Freeport-McMoRan has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freeport-McMoRan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.71	$568.50M	$1.66	19.15
Freeport-McMoRan	$25.92B	3.97	$2.20B	$1.88	38.11

HudBay Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $27.33, indicating a potential downside of 14.01%. Freeport-McMoRan has a consensus price target of $66.04, indicating a potential downside of 7.81%. Given Freeport-McMoRan's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Freeport-McMoRan is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Freeport-McMoRan	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Freeport-McMoRan's net margin of 10.34%. HudBay Minerals' return on equity of 10.04% beat Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals	27.75%	10.04%	5.36%
Freeport-McMoRan	10.34%	9.88%	5.26%

HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Freeport-McMoRan pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. HudBay Minerals pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Freeport-McMoRan beats HudBay Minerals on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Hecla Mining?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

HudBay Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $27.33, suggesting a potential downside of 14.01%. Hecla Mining has a consensus price target of $22.25, suggesting a potential upside of 25.11%. Given Hecla Mining's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hecla Mining is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hecla Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals and HudBay Minerals both had 5 articles in the media. Hecla Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.89 indicating that Hecla Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hecla Mining	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hecla Mining pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. HudBay Minerals pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hecla Mining pays out 2.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.0% of Hecla Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Hecla Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Hecla Mining's net margin of 17.41%. Hecla Mining's return on equity of 16.89% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals	27.75%	10.04%	5.36%
Hecla Mining	17.41%	16.89%	12.44%

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hecla Mining has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Hecla Mining. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hecla Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.71	$568.50M	$1.66	19.15
Hecla Mining	$1.42B	8.38	$321.71M	$0.41	43.38

Summary

HudBay Minerals and Hecla Mining tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 35.99% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.75%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 32.47% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals	27.75%	10.04%	5.36%
Kinross Gold	35.99%	32.47%	22.37%

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

HudBay Minerals currently has a consensus target price of $27.33, suggesting a potential downside of 14.01%. Kinross Gold has a consensus target price of $38.81, suggesting a potential upside of 34.19%. Given Kinross Gold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.87

HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. HudBay Minerals pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinross Gold pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.71	$568.50M	$1.66	19.15
Kinross Gold	$7.05B	4.89	$2.39B	$2.36	12.26

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 4 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Kinross Gold and 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Kinross Gold's score of 0.84 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kinross Gold	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats HudBay Minerals on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get HudBay Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HBM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HBM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	HudBay Minerals	MINING Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$12.15B	$10.49B	$4.93B	$23.17B
Dividend Yield	0.05%	1.59%	4.95%	4.09%
P/E Ratio	19.15	16.59	23.71	31.31
Price / Sales	5.71	211.64	6,557.16	24.49
Price / Cash	18.85	124.84	27.35	24.80
Price / Book	3.90	4.91	9.66	4.74
Net Income	$568.50M	$319.20M	$156.62M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	19.59%	5.11%	1.53%	0.62%
1 Month Performance	39.32%	3.45%	2.22%	1.54%
1 Year Performance	239.22%	127.84%	72.98%	26.87%

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HBM HudBay Minerals	3.9515 of 5 stars	$31.79 +3.9%	$27.33 -14.0%	+247.2%	$12.15B	$2.21B	19.15	3,072
AA Alcoa	3.3291 of 5 stars	$77.99 +0.4%	$68.60 -12.0%	+215.6%	$20.49B	$12.83B	19.74	14,900	Analyst Downgrade
ERO Ero Copper	2.4677 of 5 stars	$31.41 +3.2%	$31.50 +0.3%	+121.9%	$3.17B	$785.80M	11.18	3,690
FCX Freeport-McMoRan	4.2492 of 5 stars	$67.04 +2.0%	$65.72 -2.0%	+78.4%	$94.46B	$25.92B	35.66	29,000	Positive News Analyst Forecast
HL Hecla Mining	3.4773 of 5 stars	$17.56 -1.2%	$22.25 +26.7%	+215.6%	$11.92B	$1.42B	42.82	1,865	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HBM) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, HL, and KGC

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Hecla Mining?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HBM vs. The Competition

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, HL, and KGC

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Does the media favor AA or HBM?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of AA or HBM?

Is AA or HBM a better dividend stock?

Is AA or HBM more profitable?

Do analysts recommend AA or HBM?

Which has more risk & volatility, AA or HBM?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AA or HBM?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Do analysts recommend ERO or HBM?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ERO or HBM?

Which has more volatility & risk, ERO or HBM?

Does the media refer more to ERO or HBM?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in ERO or HBM?

Is ERO or HBM more profitable?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Which has more volatility and risk, HBM or FCX?

Does the media prefer HBM or FCX?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HBM or FCX?

Do analysts recommend HBM or FCX?

Is HBM or FCX more profitable?

Is HBM or FCX a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HBM or FCX?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Hecla Mining?

Do analysts recommend HBM or HL?

Does the media favor HBM or HL?

Is HBM or HL a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HBM or HL?

Is HBM or HL more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, HBM or HL?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, HBM or HL?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

Is HBM or KGC more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of HBM or KGC?

Do analysts rate HBM or KGC?

Is HBM or KGC a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation & earnings, HBM or KGC?

Does the media prefer HBM or KGC?

Which has more volatility & risk, HBM or KGC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HBM vs. The Competition

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools