Which has better valuation & earnings, AA or HBM?

Alcoa has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alcoa $12.83B 1.00 $1.16B $3.95 12.33 HudBay Minerals $2.21B 4.20 $568.50M $1.66 12.60

Is AA or HBM more profitable?

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 8.27%. Alcoa's return on equity of 12.57% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Alcoa 8.27% 12.57% 5.05% HudBay Minerals 27.75% 10.04% 5.36%

Does the media favor AA or HBM?

In the previous week, Alcoa had 18 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Alcoa and 16 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Alcoa's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.29 indicating that Alcoa is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alcoa 10 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral HudBay Minerals 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ERO or HBM?

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ero Copper $785.80M 3.28 $263.72M $2.81 8.79 HudBay Minerals $2.21B 4.20 $568.50M $1.66 12.60

Is ERO or HBM more profitable?

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.75%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 27.33% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ero Copper 31.63% 27.33% 13.47% HudBay Minerals 27.75% 10.04% 5.36%

Does the media prefer ERO or HBM?

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 9 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 7 mentions for Ero Copper. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.12 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ero Copper 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral HudBay Minerals 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor FCX or HBM?

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 26 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 16 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.29 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Freeport-McMoRan 24 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive HudBay Minerals 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, HBM or HL?

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Hecla Mining. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hecla Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HudBay Minerals $2.21B 4.20 $568.50M $1.66 12.60 Hecla Mining $1.42B 7.20 $321.71M $0.41 37.28

Does the media prefer HBM or HL?

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 10 more articles in the media than Hecla Mining. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 6 mentions for Hecla Mining. Hecla Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.29 indicating that Hecla Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HudBay Minerals 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hecla Mining 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer KGC or HBM?

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 8 more articles in the media than Kinross Gold. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 8 mentions for Kinross Gold. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.29 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kinross Gold 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive HudBay Minerals 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

$20.92 -0.72 (-3.34%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$20.77 -0.15 (-0.71%)

As of 07:56 PM Eastern

Compare

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, HL, and KGC

Should you buy HudBay Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares HudBay Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with HudBay Minerals include Alcoa (AA), Ero Copper (ERO), Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), Hecla Mining (HL), and Kinross Gold (KGC).

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Alcoa (NYSE:AA) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Alcoa has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alcoa pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Alcoa pays out 10.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 8.27%. Alcoa's return on equity of 12.57% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alcoa	8.27%	12.57%	5.05%
HudBay Minerals	27.75%	10.04%	5.36%

Alcoa has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alcoa	$12.83B	1.00	$1.16B	$3.95	12.33
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	4.20	$568.50M	$1.66	12.60

Alcoa presently has a consensus target price of $64.91, indicating a potential upside of 33.31%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus target price of $30.67, indicating a potential upside of 46.61%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Alcoa.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alcoa	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

In the previous week, Alcoa had 18 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Alcoa and 16 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Alcoa's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.29 indicating that Alcoa is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alcoa	10 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
HudBay Minerals	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Alcoa on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Ero Copper presently has a consensus target price of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 27.50%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus target price of $30.67, suggesting a potential upside of 46.61%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ero Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

Ero Copper has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.75%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 27.33% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ero Copper	31.63%	27.33%	13.47%
HudBay Minerals	27.75%	10.04%	5.36%

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ero Copper	$785.80M	3.28	$263.72M	$2.81	8.79
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	4.20	$568.50M	$1.66	12.60

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 9 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 7 mentions for Ero Copper. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.12 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
HudBay Minerals	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

71.3% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Ero Copper on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 26 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 16 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.29 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Freeport-McMoRan	24 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
HudBay Minerals	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Freeport-McMoRan pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Freeport-McMoRan currently has a consensus price target of $68.63, suggesting a potential upside of 14.42%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus price target of $30.67, suggesting a potential upside of 46.61%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Freeport-McMoRan.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Freeport-McMoRan	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

80.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Freeport-McMoRan's net margin of 10.34%. HudBay Minerals' return on equity of 10.04% beat Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Freeport-McMoRan	10.34%	9.88%	5.26%
HudBay Minerals	27.75%	10.04%	5.36%

Freeport-McMoRan has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freeport-McMoRan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Freeport-McMoRan	$25.92B	3.33	$2.20B	$1.88	31.91
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	4.20	$568.50M	$1.66	12.60

Summary

Freeport-McMoRan beats HudBay Minerals on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Hecla Mining?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hecla Mining has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.0% of Hecla Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Hecla Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

HudBay Minerals currently has a consensus target price of $30.67, suggesting a potential upside of 46.61%. Hecla Mining has a consensus target price of $24.79, suggesting a potential upside of 62.21%. Given Hecla Mining's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hecla Mining is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Hecla Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Hecla Mining's net margin of 17.41%. Hecla Mining's return on equity of 16.89% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals	27.75%	10.04%	5.36%
Hecla Mining	17.41%	16.89%	12.44%

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Hecla Mining. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hecla Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	4.20	$568.50M	$1.66	12.60
Hecla Mining	$1.42B	7.20	$321.71M	$0.41	37.28

HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Hecla Mining pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hecla Mining pays out 2.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. HudBay Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 10 more articles in the media than Hecla Mining. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 6 mentions for Hecla Mining. Hecla Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.29 indicating that Hecla Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hecla Mining	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Hecla Mining on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 35.99% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.75%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 32.47% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kinross Gold	35.99%	32.47%	22.37%
HudBay Minerals	27.75%	10.04%	5.36%

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 8 more articles in the media than Kinross Gold. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 8 mentions for Kinross Gold. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.29 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kinross Gold	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
HudBay Minerals	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Kinross Gold pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold	$7.96B	3.50	$2.39B	$2.36	9.95
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	4.20	$568.50M	$1.66	12.60

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $37.81, suggesting a potential upside of 61.08%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus price target of $30.67, suggesting a potential upside of 46.61%. Given Kinross Gold's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats HudBay Minerals on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get HudBay Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HBM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HBM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	HudBay Minerals	MINING Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$9.61B	$8.70B	$4.58B	$23.46B
Dividend Yield	0.13%	1.94%	5.03%	4.02%
P/E Ratio	12.60	13.62	20.85	31.06
Price / Sales	4.20	149.29	5,824.19	19.75
Price / Cash	13.33	37.08	24.17	18.64
Price / Book	2.57	3.64	8.68	4.77
Net Income	$568.50M	$312.64M	$157.11M	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	-10.46%	-5.67%	-2.62%	-0.56%
1 Month Performance	-24.74%	-11.84%	-4.45%	-0.11%
1 Year Performance	99.78%	52.36%	37.38%	16.64%

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HBM HudBay Minerals	4.9894 of 5 stars	$20.92 -3.3%	$30.67 +46.6%	+106.7%	$9.61B	$2.21B	12.60	3,072	Analyst Downgrade
AA Alcoa	4.8369 of 5 stars	$49.90 +2.5%	$67.82 +35.9%	+56.5%	$12.85B	$12.83B	12.63	14,900	Upcoming Earnings
ERO Ero Copper	4.6089 of 5 stars	$26.40 +0.7%	$31.50 +19.3%	+69.7%	$2.73B	$785.80M	10.65	3,547	Analyst Downgrade
FCX Freeport-McMoRan	4.8561 of 5 stars	$61.01 +0.1%	$68.36 +12.0%	+32.5%	$87.65B	$25.92B	32.45	29,000	Positive News
HL Hecla Mining	3.042 of 5 stars	$16.44 +0.7%	$24.79 +50.8%	+150.0%	$10.95B	$1.42B	40.10	1,865	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HBM) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, HL, and KGC

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Hecla Mining?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HBM vs. The Competition

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, HL, and KGC

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Which has more risk and volatility, AA or HBM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AA or HBM?

Is AA or HBM a better dividend stock?

Is AA or HBM more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, AA or HBM?

Do analysts prefer AA or HBM?

Does the media favor AA or HBM?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Do analysts recommend ERO or HBM?

Which has more volatility & risk, ERO or HBM?

Is ERO or HBM more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ERO or HBM?

Does the media prefer ERO or HBM?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ERO or HBM?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Which has more risk & volatility, FCX or HBM?

Does the media favor FCX or HBM?

Is FCX or HBM a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend FCX or HBM?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FCX or HBM?

Is FCX or HBM more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FCX or HBM?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Hecla Mining?

Which has more volatility and risk, HBM or HL?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HBM or HL?

Do analysts rate HBM or HL?

Is HBM or HL more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, HBM or HL?

Is HBM or HL a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer HBM or HL?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

Is KGC or HBM more profitable?

Does the media prefer KGC or HBM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in KGC or HBM?

Is KGC or HBM a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, KGC or HBM?

Do analysts rate KGC or HBM?

Which has more risk & volatility, KGC or HBM?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HBM vs. The Competition

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools