Go Pro

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

HudBay Minerals logo
$22.74 -0.02 (-0.07%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$22.75 +0.01 (+0.05%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:36 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, KGC, and MT

Should you buy HudBay Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares HudBay Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with HudBay Minerals include Alcoa (AA), Ero Copper (ERO), Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), Kinross Gold (KGC), and ArcelorMittal (MT).

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Alcoa (NYSE:AA) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Alcoa has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals$2.21B4.57$568.50M$1.7013.37
Alcoa$12.83B0.93$1.16B$4.869.32

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Alcoa. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 19 mentions for Alcoa. Alcoa's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.95 indicating that Alcoa is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alcoa
13 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Alcoa pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alcoa pays out 8.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

HudBay Minerals currently has a consensus target price of $31.33, indicating a potential upside of 37.82%. Alcoa has a consensus target price of $61.09, indicating a potential upside of 34.84%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Alcoa.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HudBay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Alcoa
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.48% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 9.48%. Alcoa's return on equity of 18.90% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals27.48% 9.47% 5.44%
Alcoa 9.48%18.90%7.71%

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alcoa has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Alcoa on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals$2.21B4.57$568.50M$1.7013.37
Ero Copper$785.80M3.57$263.72M$2.819.56

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

HudBay Minerals presently has a consensus target price of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 37.82%. Ero Copper has a consensus target price of $32.33, suggesting a potential upside of 20.31%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HudBay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.48%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 27.33% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals27.48% 9.47% 5.44%
Ero Copper 31.63%27.33%13.47%

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.3% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 15 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 5 mentions for Ero Copper. Ero Copper's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.95 indicating that Ero Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ero Copper
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Ero Copper on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

80.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.48% compared to Freeport-McMoRan's net margin of 11.39%. Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity of 10.63% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freeport-McMoRan11.39% 10.63% 5.69%
HudBay Minerals 27.48%9.47%5.44%

Freeport-McMoRan has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freeport-McMoRan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freeport-McMoRan$25.92B3.47$2.20B$2.0330.80
HudBay Minerals$2.21B4.57$568.50M$1.7013.37

Freeport-McMoRan presently has a consensus target price of $70.27, suggesting a potential upside of 12.38%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus target price of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 37.82%. Given HudBay Minerals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Freeport-McMoRan.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freeport-McMoRan
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
HudBay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 19 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 20 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.95 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freeport-McMoRan
29 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
HudBay Minerals
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Freeport-McMoRan pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Freeport-McMoRan beats HudBay Minerals on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 14 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Kinross Gold and 20 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Kinross Gold's score of 0.90 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Kinross Gold
14 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals$2.21B4.57$568.50M$1.7013.37
Kinross Gold$7.05B3.88$2.39B$2.648.74

HudBay Minerals presently has a consensus target price of $31.33, indicating a potential upside of 37.82%. Kinross Gold has a consensus target price of $37.31, indicating a potential upside of 61.67%. Given Kinross Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HudBay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Kinross Gold
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.79

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 37.52% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.48%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 34.00% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals27.48% 9.47% 5.44%
Kinross Gold 37.52%34.00%23.84%

HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinross Gold pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats HudBay Minerals on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to ArcelorMittal?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and ArcelorMittal (NYSE:MT) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than ArcelorMittal. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 17 mentions for ArcelorMittal. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat ArcelorMittal's score of 0.42 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ArcelorMittal
7 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

HudBay Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 37.82%. ArcelorMittal has a consensus price target of $72.40, suggesting a potential upside of 3.30%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than ArcelorMittal.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HudBay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
ArcelorMittal
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

ArcelorMittal has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ArcelorMittal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals$2.21B4.57$568.50M$1.7013.37
ArcelorMittal$61.35B0.89$3.15B$2.3629.70

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of ArcelorMittal shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ArcelorMittal shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. ArcelorMittal pays an annual dividend of $0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ArcelorMittal pays out 21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ArcelorMittal has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.48% compared to ArcelorMittal's net margin of 2.88%. HudBay Minerals' return on equity of 9.47% beat ArcelorMittal's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals27.48% 9.47% 5.44%
ArcelorMittal 2.88%4.20%2.42%

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats ArcelorMittal on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get HudBay Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HBM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HBM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HBM vs. The Competition

MetricHudBay MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$10.10B$3.51B$4.60B$23.69B
Dividend Yield0.13%5.29%4.76%4.22%
P/E Ratio13.3721.2820.1130.98
Price / Sales4.577,980.094,739.8519.22
Price / Cash14.0226.2724.3518.73
Price / Book2.799.668.194.76
Net Income$568.50M$122.62M$155.10M$1.07B
7 Day Performance1.68%-0.77%-0.58%0.35%
1 Month Performance0.72%-4.16%-3.10%-0.55%
1 Year Performance150.94%47.28%37.88%19.21%

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HBM
HudBay Minerals
4.9776 of 5 stars
$22.74
-0.1%
$31.33
+37.8%
+150.9%$10.10B$2.21B13.373,072
AA
Alcoa
4.9034 of 5 stars
$45.42
+1.0%
$61.09
+34.5%
+59.5%$11.98B$12.83B9.3414,900
ERO
Ero Copper
4.7496 of 5 stars
$26.78
-1.0%
$32.33
+20.7%
+100.1%$2.79B$923.93M9.523,547
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan
4.8815 of 5 stars
$62.60
-1.3%
$70.27
+12.2%
+56.2%$89.92B$25.87B30.8129,000
KGC
Kinross Gold
4.9653 of 5 stars
$23.01
-2.6%
$37.31
+62.2%
+42.5%$27.28B$7.05B8.716,800

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:HBM) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners