Which has stronger valuation and earnings, AA or HBM?

Alcoa has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alcoa $12.83B 0.86 $1.16B $4.86 8.64 HudBay Minerals $2.21B 5.42 $568.50M $1.70 15.86

Is AA or HBM more profitable?

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.48% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 9.48%. Alcoa's return on equity of 18.90% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Alcoa 9.48% 18.90% 7.71% HudBay Minerals 27.48% 9.47% 5.44%

Does the media favor AA or HBM?

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 7 more articles in the media than Alcoa. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 3 mentions for Alcoa. Alcoa's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.37 indicating that Alcoa is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alcoa 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive HudBay Minerals 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, HBM or ERO?

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HudBay Minerals $2.21B 5.42 $568.50M $1.70 15.86 Ero Copper $785.80M 4.95 $263.72M $2.98 12.51

Does the media favor HBM or ERO?

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 7 mentions for Ero Copper. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.24 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HudBay Minerals 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ero Copper 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to FCX or HBM?

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 7 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 10 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.37 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Freeport-McMoRan 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive HudBay Minerals 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to KGC or HBM?

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 12 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Kinross Gold and 10 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Kinross Gold's score of -0.08 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kinross Gold 2 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 9 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral HudBay Minerals 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer HBM or SCCO?

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals and HudBay Minerals both had 10 articles in the media. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Southern Copper's score of 0.35 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HudBay Minerals 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Southern Copper 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

$27.20 +1.03 (+3.92%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, KGC, and SCCO

Should you buy HudBay Minerals stock or one of its competitors? HudBay Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Alcoa (AA), Ero Copper (ERO), Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), Kinross Gold (KGC), and Southern Copper (SCCO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Alcoa (NYSE:AA) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Alcoa has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Alcoa has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alcoa	$12.83B	0.86	$1.16B	$4.86	8.64
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.42	$568.50M	$1.70	15.86

Alcoa pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Alcoa pays out 8.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 7 more articles in the media than Alcoa. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 3 mentions for Alcoa. Alcoa's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.37 indicating that Alcoa is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alcoa	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
HudBay Minerals	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Alcoa presently has a consensus price target of $61.42, indicating a potential upside of 46.32%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus price target of $31.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.22%. Given Alcoa's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Alcoa is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alcoa	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.46
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.48% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 9.48%. Alcoa's return on equity of 18.90% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alcoa	9.48%	18.90%	7.71%
HudBay Minerals	27.48%	9.47%	5.44%

Summary

Alcoa and HudBay Minerals tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 7 mentions for Ero Copper. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.24 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ero Copper	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.3% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

HudBay Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $31.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.22%. Ero Copper has a consensus price target of $32.33, indicating a potential downside of 13.27%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Ero Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Ero Copper has a net margin of 29.79% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.48%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.32% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals	27.48%	9.47%	5.44%
Ero Copper	29.79%	30.32%	15.17%

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.42	$568.50M	$1.70	15.86
Ero Copper	$785.80M	4.95	$263.72M	$2.98	12.51

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Ero Copper on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.48% compared to Freeport-McMoRan's net margin of 11.39%. Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity of 10.63% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Freeport-McMoRan	11.39%	10.63%	5.69%
HudBay Minerals	27.48%	9.47%	5.44%

Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Freeport-McMoRan pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

80.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 7 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 10 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.37 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Freeport-McMoRan	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
HudBay Minerals	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Freeport-McMoRan has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freeport-McMoRan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Freeport-McMoRan	$25.92B	3.98	$2.20B	$2.03	35.36
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.42	$568.50M	$1.70	15.86

Freeport-McMoRan presently has a consensus target price of $72.87, suggesting a potential upside of 1.51%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus target price of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 16.22%. Given HudBay Minerals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Freeport-McMoRan.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Freeport-McMoRan	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Summary

Freeport-McMoRan beats HudBay Minerals on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Kinross Gold pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold	$7.05B	4.04	$2.39B	$2.64	9.10
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.42	$568.50M	$1.70	15.86

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 12 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Kinross Gold and 10 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Kinross Gold's score of -0.08 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kinross Gold	2 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	9 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
HudBay Minerals	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 37.52% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.48%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 34.00% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kinross Gold	37.52%	34.00%	23.84%
HudBay Minerals	27.48%	9.47%	5.44%

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus target price of $37.70, indicating a potential upside of 56.85%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus target price of $31.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.22%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Summary

Kinross Gold beats HudBay Minerals on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Southern Copper?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Southern Copper (NYSE:SCCO) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.9% of Southern Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Southern Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

HudBay Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $31.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.22%. Southern Copper has a consensus price target of $146.84, indicating a potential downside of 27.99%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Southern Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Southern Copper	7 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.73

Southern Copper has a net margin of 35.87% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.48%. Southern Copper's return on equity of 49.04% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals	27.48%	9.47%	5.44%
Southern Copper	35.87%	49.04%	25.81%

Southern Copper has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Southern Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.42	$568.50M	$1.70	15.86
Southern Copper	$13.42B	12.68	$4.33B	$6.84	29.81

HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Southern Copper pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Southern Copper pays out 64.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals and HudBay Minerals both had 10 articles in the media. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Southern Copper's score of 0.35 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Southern Copper	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Southern Copper has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Southern Copper beats HudBay Minerals on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get HudBay Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HBM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HBM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	HudBay Minerals	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$12.09B	$3.74B	$4.70B	$22.72B
Dividend Yield	0.11%	5.24%	4.75%	3.74%
P/E Ratio	16.01	25.00	25.10	27.75
Price / Sales	5.47	27,852.69	16,596.32	20.15
Price / Cash	16.44	27.14	24.99	39.56
Price / Book	3.34	12.28	10.20	4.64
Net Income	$568.50M	$127.43M	$158.44M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	2.18%	-3.18%	-2.72%	-1.06%
1 Month Performance	-0.29%	-4.70%	-4.51%	-5.02%
1 Year Performance	76.09%	20.83%	17.89%	5.78%

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HBM HudBay Minerals	4.8406 of 5 stars	$27.22 +4.0%	$31.33 +15.1%	+70.3%	$12.09B	$2.21B	16.01	3,072
AA Alcoa	4.6449 of 5 stars	$42.81 +0.3%	$61.42 +43.5%	+24.2%	$11.30B	$12.83B	8.81	14,900
ERO Ero Copper	3.7322 of 5 stars	$37.52 +1.1%	$32.33 -13.8%	+72.2%	$3.91B	$785.80M	12.59	3,547	News Coverage Gap Up
FCX Freeport-McMoRan	4.3739 of 5 stars	$71.93 -0.2%	$70.29 -2.3%	+77.2%	$103.24B	$25.92B	35.41	29,000	Analyst Forecast
KGC Kinross Gold	4.5368 of 5 stars	$24.91 +2.0%	$37.70 +51.3%	-5.6%	$29.51B	$8.47B	9.44	6,800	Analyst Revision

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HBM) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, KGC, and SCCO

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Southern Copper?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HBM vs. The Competition

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, KGC, and SCCO

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Which has more risk and volatility, AA or HBM?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, AA or HBM?

Is AA or HBM a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AA or HBM?

Does the media favor AA or HBM?

Do analysts prefer AA or HBM?

Is AA or HBM more profitable?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Does the media favor HBM or ERO?

Which has more risk and volatility, HBM or ERO?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in HBM or ERO?

Do analysts rate HBM or ERO?

Is HBM or ERO more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, HBM or ERO?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Is FCX or HBM more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, FCX or HBM?

Is FCX or HBM a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in FCX or HBM?

Does the media refer more to FCX or HBM?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FCX or HBM?

Do analysts prefer FCX or HBM?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

Which has more risk & volatility, KGC or HBM?

Is KGC or HBM a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, KGC or HBM?

Does the media refer more to KGC or HBM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in KGC or HBM?

Is KGC or HBM more profitable?

Do analysts recommend KGC or HBM?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Southern Copper?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HBM or SCCO?

Do analysts prefer HBM or SCCO?

Is HBM or SCCO more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HBM or SCCO?

Is HBM or SCCO a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer HBM or SCCO?

Which has more volatility & risk, HBM or SCCO?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HBM vs. The Competition

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools