Free Trial

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

HudBay Minerals logo
$27.76 +0.64 (+2.34%)
Closing price 05/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$27.73 -0.03 (-0.09%)
As of 04:03 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HBM vs. CENX, AA, ERO, FCX, and HL

Should you buy HudBay Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares HudBay Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with HudBay Minerals include Century Aluminum (CENX), Alcoa (AA), Ero Copper (ERO), Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), and Hecla Mining (HL).

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Century Aluminum?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Century Aluminum (NASDAQ:CENX) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 13.75%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 13.59% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals27.75% 10.04% 5.36%
Century Aluminum 13.75%13.59%5.42%

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Century Aluminum has a beta of 1.91, meaning that its share price is 91% more volatile than the broader market.

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Century Aluminum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Century Aluminum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

HudBay Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Century Aluminum. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Century Aluminum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals$2.21B4.99$568.50M$1.6616.72
Century Aluminum$2.53B2.52$41.80M$3.3519.21

HudBay Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.32%. Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $80.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.34%. Given Century Aluminum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Century Aluminum is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HudBay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Century Aluminum
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Century Aluminum had 13 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Century Aluminum and 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Century Aluminum's score of 0.81 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Century Aluminum
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Century Aluminum beats HudBay Minerals on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Alcoa (NYSE:AA) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Alcoa has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alcoa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alcoa$12.83B1.41$1.16B$3.9517.32
HudBay Minerals$2.21B4.99$568.50M$1.6616.72

In the previous week, Alcoa had 13 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Alcoa and 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Alcoa's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.88 indicating that Alcoa is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Alcoa
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
HudBay Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alcoa currently has a consensus price target of $64.27, indicating a potential downside of 6.06%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.32%. Given Alcoa's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Alcoa is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alcoa
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
HudBay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

Alcoa pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Alcoa pays out 10.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Alcoa has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 8.27%. Alcoa's return on equity of 12.57% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alcoa8.27% 12.57% 5.05%
HudBay Minerals 27.75%10.04%5.36%

Summary

Alcoa beats HudBay Minerals on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero Copper$785.80M4.12$263.72M$2.8111.04
HudBay Minerals$2.21B4.99$568.50M$1.6616.72

In the previous week, Ero Copper and Ero Copper both had 5 articles in the media. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Ero Copper's score of -0.05 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
HudBay Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ero Copper has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Ero Copper currently has a consensus price target of $31.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.53%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.32%. Given Ero Copper's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53
HudBay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

71.3% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.63% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.75%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 29.86% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ero Copper31.63% 29.86% 14.08%
HudBay Minerals 27.75%10.04%5.36%

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Ero Copper on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Freeport-McMoRan presently has a consensus price target of $65.14, suggesting a potential downside of 2.92%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus price target of $26.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.32%. Given Freeport-McMoRan's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Freeport-McMoRan is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freeport-McMoRan
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
HudBay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 39 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 44 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.88 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freeport-McMoRan
22 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
HudBay Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Freeport-McMoRan pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Freeport-McMoRan has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freeport-McMoRan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freeport-McMoRan$25.92B3.72$2.20B$1.8835.69
HudBay Minerals$2.21B4.99$568.50M$1.6616.72

Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Freeport-McMoRan's net margin of 10.34%. HudBay Minerals' return on equity of 10.04% beat Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freeport-McMoRan10.34% 9.88% 5.26%
HudBay Minerals 27.75%10.04%5.36%

80.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Freeport-McMoRan beats HudBay Minerals on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Hecla Mining?

Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

63.0% of Hecla Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Hecla Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.75% compared to Hecla Mining's net margin of 17.41%. Hecla Mining's return on equity of 16.89% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hecla Mining17.41% 16.89% 12.44%
HudBay Minerals 27.75%10.04%5.36%

In the previous week, Hecla Mining had 14 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Hecla Mining and 5 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Hecla Mining's score of 0.53 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hecla Mining
6 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
HudBay Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Hecla Mining. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hecla Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hecla Mining$1.42B9.91$321.71M$0.4151.31
HudBay Minerals$2.21B4.99$568.50M$1.6616.72

Hecla Mining pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hecla Mining pays out 2.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hecla Mining has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Hecla Mining currently has a consensus price target of $22.25, suggesting a potential upside of 5.77%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus price target of $26.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.32%. Given Hecla Mining's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hecla Mining is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hecla Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
HudBay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Hecla Mining on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get HudBay Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HBM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HBM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HBM vs. The Competition

MetricHudBay MineralsMINING IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$10.77B$10.51B$5.01B$22.96B
Dividend Yield0.05%1.58%4.97%4.07%
P/E Ratio16.7217.1823.7728.29
Price / Sales4.99197.187,414.3624.51
Price / Cash16.71128.8027.6525.11
Price / Book2.765.097.084.73
Net Income$568.50M$315.03M$159.16M$1.07B
7 Day Performance16.07%2.37%2.64%-1.11%
1 Month Performance9.92%8.86%3.24%1.36%
1 Year Performance226.53%152.41%87.70%24.41%

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HBM
HudBay Minerals
4.3189 of 5 stars
$27.76
+2.3%
$26.00
-6.3%
+220.1%$10.77B$2.21B16.723,072
CENX
Century Aluminum
4.4951 of 5 stars
$60.18
+2.2%
$80.00
+32.9%
+274.5%$5.83B$2.53B17.962,906
AA
Alcoa
2.9846 of 5 stars
$65.29
+3.3%
$64.27
-1.6%
+138.8%$16.67B$12.83B16.5314,900
ERO
Ero Copper
2.8742 of 5 stars
$28.97
+1.7%
$31.50
+8.7%
+131.5%$2.97B$923.93M10.313,690
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan
4.4201 of 5 stars
$64.38
+4.4%
$65.14
+1.2%
+70.0%$88.60B$25.92B34.2429,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:HBM) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners