Which has better valuation & earnings, HBM or AA?

Alcoa has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HudBay Minerals $2.21B 5.32 $568.50M $1.70 15.58 Alcoa $12.83B 0.99 $1.16B $4.86 9.93

Is HBM or AA more profitable?

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.48% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 9.48%. Alcoa's return on equity of 18.90% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets HudBay Minerals 27.48% 9.47% 5.44% Alcoa 9.48% 18.90% 7.71%

Does the media refer more to HBM or AA?

In the previous week, Alcoa had 9 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Alcoa and 12 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Alcoa's score of 0.60 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HudBay Minerals 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Alcoa 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 5 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ERO or HBM?

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ero Copper $1.04B 3.54 $263.72M $2.98 11.91 HudBay Minerals $2.21B 5.32 $568.50M $1.70 15.58

Does the media favor ERO or HBM?

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 9 mentions for Ero Copper. Ero Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.69 indicating that Ero Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ero Copper 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive HudBay Minerals 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor HBM or FCX?

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 27 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 12 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.69 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HudBay Minerals 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Freeport-McMoRan 22 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer KGC or HBM?

In the previous week, Kinross Gold and Kinross Gold both had 12 articles in the media. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.69 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kinross Gold 10 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive HudBay Minerals 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer HBM or SCCO?

In the previous week, Southern Copper had 11 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Southern Copper and 12 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.69 indicating that Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HudBay Minerals 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Southern Copper 16 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

$26.48 -0.17 (-0.63%)

Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$26.98 +0.50 (+1.90%)

As of 09/11/2026 07:42 PM Eastern

Compare

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, KGC, and SCCO

Should you buy HudBay Minerals stock or one of its competitors? HudBay Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Alcoa (AA), Ero Copper (ERO), Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), Kinross Gold (KGC), and Southern Copper (SCCO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Alcoa (NYSE:AA) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.48% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 9.48%. Alcoa's return on equity of 18.90% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals	27.48%	9.47%	5.44%
Alcoa	9.48%	18.90%	7.71%

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alcoa has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Alcoa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.32	$568.50M	$1.70	15.58
Alcoa	$12.83B	0.99	$1.16B	$4.86	9.93

In the previous week, Alcoa had 9 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Alcoa and 12 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Alcoa's score of 0.60 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Alcoa	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	5 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

HudBay Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.32%. Alcoa has a consensus price target of $61.09, suggesting a potential upside of 26.58%. Given Alcoa's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alcoa is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Alcoa	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Alcoa pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alcoa pays out 8.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alcoa has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

HudBay Minerals and Alcoa tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Ero Copper (NYSE:ERO) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Ero Copper has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ero Copper	$1.04B	3.54	$263.72M	$2.98	11.91
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.32	$568.50M	$1.70	15.58

Ero Copper presently has a consensus target price of $32.33, indicating a potential downside of 8.88%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus target price of $31.33, indicating a potential upside of 18.32%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ero Copper	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Ero Copper has a net margin of 29.79% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.48%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.32% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ero Copper	29.79%	30.32%	15.17%
HudBay Minerals	27.48%	9.47%	5.44%

In the previous week, HudBay Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for HudBay Minerals and 9 mentions for Ero Copper. Ero Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.69 indicating that Ero Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
HudBay Minerals	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

71.3% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats Ero Copper on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.8% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Freeport-McMoRan pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Freeport-McMoRan has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freeport-McMoRan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.32	$568.50M	$1.70	15.58
Freeport-McMoRan	$25.87B	3.95	$2.20B	$2.03	35.01

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.48% compared to Freeport-McMoRan's net margin of 11.39%. Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity of 10.63% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals	27.48%	9.47%	5.44%
Freeport-McMoRan	11.39%	10.63%	5.69%

HudBay Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $31.33, indicating a potential upside of 18.32%. Freeport-McMoRan has a consensus price target of $69.75, indicating a potential downside of 1.87%. Given HudBay Minerals' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Freeport-McMoRan.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Freeport-McMoRan	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

In the previous week, Freeport-McMoRan had 27 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Freeport-McMoRan and 12 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Freeport-McMoRan's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.69 indicating that Freeport-McMoRan is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Freeport-McMoRan	22 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Freeport-McMoRan beats HudBay Minerals on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Kinross Gold currently has a consensus price target of $38.43, suggesting a potential upside of 31.99%. HudBay Minerals has a consensus price target of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.32%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 37.52% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.48%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 34.00% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kinross Gold	37.52%	34.00%	23.84%
HudBay Minerals	27.48%	9.47%	5.44%

In the previous week, Kinross Gold and Kinross Gold both had 12 articles in the media. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.69 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kinross Gold	10 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
HudBay Minerals	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Kinross Gold pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold	$7.05B	4.89	$2.39B	$2.64	11.03
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.32	$568.50M	$1.70	15.58

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats HudBay Minerals on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Southern Copper?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and Southern Copper (NYSE:SCCO) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Southern Copper had 11 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Southern Copper and 12 mentions for HudBay Minerals. Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat HudBay Minerals' score of 0.69 indicating that Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Southern Copper	16 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.9% of Southern Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Southern Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

HudBay Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Southern Copper pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. HudBay Minerals pays out 1.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Southern Copper pays out 64.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Southern Copper has higher revenue and earnings than HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Southern Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals	$2.21B	5.32	$568.50M	$1.70	15.58
Southern Copper	$15.79B	10.21	$4.33B	$6.84	28.25

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Southern Copper has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

HudBay Minerals presently has a consensus target price of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.32%. Southern Copper has a consensus target price of $146.84, suggesting a potential downside of 24.00%. Given HudBay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe HudBay Minerals is more favorable than Southern Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Southern Copper	7 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.73

Southern Copper has a net margin of 35.87% compared to HudBay Minerals' net margin of 27.48%. Southern Copper's return on equity of 49.04% beat HudBay Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals	27.48%	9.47%	5.44%
Southern Copper	35.87%	49.04%	25.81%

Summary

Southern Copper beats HudBay Minerals on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get HudBay Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HBM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HBM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	HudBay Minerals	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$11.84B	$3.93B	$4.92B	$23.19B
Dividend Yield	0.11%	5.17%	4.68%	3.56%
P/E Ratio	15.58	26.26	26.16	28.69
Price / Sales	5.32	8,048.19	4,793.08	99.79
Price / Cash	16.42	29.51	26.92	33.82
Price / Book	3.25	12.33	10.24	4.74
Net Income	$568.50M	$127.55M	$158.16M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-3.53%	-1.38%	-1.40%	-1.99%
1 Month Performance	-4.95%	9.77%	7.12%	-2.68%
1 Year Performance	95.58%	47.25%	37.29%	10.45%

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HBM HudBay Minerals	4.9493 of 5 stars	$26.48 -0.6%	$31.33 +18.3%	+95.1%	$11.84B	$2.21B	15.58	3,072	News Coverage Ex-Dividend
AA Alcoa	4.542 of 5 stars	$48.36 +0.1%	$61.09 +26.3%	+49.6%	$12.76B	$12.83B	9.95	14,900
ERO Ero Copper	3.7909 of 5 stars	$35.76 +2.2%	$32.33 -9.6%	+109.7%	$3.73B	$785.80M	12.01	3,547	News Coverage
FCX Freeport-McMoRan	4.4594 of 5 stars	$71.54 +0.5%	$69.75 -2.5%	+55.0%	$102.78B	$25.92B	35.26	29,000	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
KGC Kinross Gold	4.8756 of 5 stars	$29.08 +0.5%	$38.43 +32.2%	+25.1%	$34.47B	$7.05B	11.02	6,800	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HBM) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, KGC, and SCCO

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Southern Copper?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HBM vs. The Competition

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

HudBay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

HBM vs. AA, ERO, FCX, KGC, and SCCO

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Alcoa?

Is HBM or AA more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in HBM or AA?

Which has better valuation & earnings, HBM or AA?

Does the media refer more to HBM or AA?

Do analysts prefer HBM or AA?

Is HBM or AA a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, HBM or AA?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Which has more volatility & risk, ERO or HBM?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ERO or HBM?

Do analysts recommend ERO or HBM?

Is ERO or HBM more profitable?

Does the media favor ERO or HBM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in ERO or HBM?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Freeport-McMoRan?

Which has more volatility & risk, HBM or FCX?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in HBM or FCX?

Is HBM or FCX a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, HBM or FCX?

Is HBM or FCX more profitable?

Do analysts rate HBM or FCX?

Does the media favor HBM or FCX?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Kinross Gold?

Do analysts prefer KGC or HBM?

Is KGC or HBM more profitable?

Does the media prefer KGC or HBM?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in KGC or HBM?

Is KGC or HBM a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, KGC or HBM?

Which has more risk and volatility, KGC or HBM?

Summary

How does HudBay Minerals compare to Southern Copper?

Does the media prefer HBM or SCCO?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of HBM or SCCO?

Is HBM or SCCO a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HBM or SCCO?

Which has more volatility & risk, HBM or SCCO?

Do analysts recommend HBM or SCCO?

Is HBM or SCCO more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HBM vs. The Competition

HudBay Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools