Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) Competitors

$23.73 -0.04 (-0.16%)

Closing price 05/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$23.70 -0.04 (-0.16%)

As of 04:51 AM Eastern

BXSL vs. ARCC, MFIC, GSBD, NCDL, and OBDC

Should you buy Blackstone Secured Lending Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Blackstone Secured Lending Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Blackstone Secured Lending Fund include Ares Capital (ARCC), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending (NCDL), and Blue Owl Capital (OBDC). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (NYSE:BXSL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund had 5 more articles in the media than Ares Capital. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and 15 mentions for Ares Capital. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Ares Capital's score of 0.71 indicating that Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	7 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 37.30% compared to Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's net margin of 31.63%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.73% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ares Capital	37.30%	9.85%	4.59%
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	31.63%	11.73%	5.12%

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays out 161.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. Ares Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital	$3.05B	4.42	$1.30B	$1.63	11.52
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	$1.42B	3.89	$563.46M	$1.91	12.43

Ares Capital currently has a consensus price target of $20.75, suggesting a potential upside of 10.49%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a consensus price target of $25.91, suggesting a potential upside of 9.16%. Given Ares Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ares Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

Summary

Ares Capital beats Blackstone Secured Lending Fund on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (NYSE:BXSL) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund had 8 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and 12 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.73 indicating that Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	7 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MidCap Financial Investment presently has a consensus price target of $11.54, suggesting a potential upside of 4.77%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a consensus price target of $25.91, suggesting a potential upside of 9.16%. Given Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays out 161.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a net margin of 31.63% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.73% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment	1.90%	10.86%	4.31%
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	31.63%	11.73%	5.12%

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment	$320.88M	2.83	$63.17M	$0.04	275.25
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	$1.42B	3.89	$563.46M	$1.91	12.43

Summary

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund beats MidCap Financial Investment on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (NYSE:BXSL) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund had 9 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and 11 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of -0.17 indicating that Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	7 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Goldman Sachs BDC	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund presently has a consensus target price of $25.91, suggesting a potential upside of 9.16%. Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus target price of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.32%. Given Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44
Goldman Sachs BDC	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.83

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays out 161.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of 21.32%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.73% beat Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	31.63%	11.73%	5.12%
Goldman Sachs BDC	21.32%	10.94%	4.66%

36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Goldman Sachs BDC. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goldman Sachs BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	$1.42B	3.89	$563.46M	$1.91	12.43
Goldman Sachs BDC	$365.57M	2.75	$119.27M	$0.65	13.75

Summary

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund beats Goldman Sachs BDC on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending?

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending (NYSE:NCDL) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (NYSE:BXSL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending currently has a consensus target price of $15.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.25%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a consensus target price of $25.91, suggesting a potential upside of 9.16%. Given Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending is more favorable than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's net margin of 29.56%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.73% beat Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending	29.56%	9.80%	4.18%
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	31.63%	11.73%	5.12%

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending. Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending	$207.86M	3.14	$65.61M	$1.20	11.02
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	$1.42B	3.89	$563.46M	$1.91	12.43

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays out 161.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund had 8 more articles in the media than Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and 12 mentions for Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's score of -0.07 indicating that Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	7 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund beats Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Blue Owl Capital?

Blue Owl Capital (NYSE:OBDC) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (NYSE:BXSL) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund had 2 more articles in the media than Blue Owl Capital. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and 18 mentions for Blue Owl Capital. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Blue Owl Capital's score of 0.03 indicating that Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Blue Owl Capital	4 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	7 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

42.8% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Blue Owl Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Blue Owl Capital pays out 211.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays out 161.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blue Owl Capital has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Blue Owl Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Blue Owl Capital currently has a consensus target price of $13.33, suggesting a potential upside of 19.25%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a consensus target price of $25.91, suggesting a potential upside of 9.16%. Given Blue Owl Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Capital is more favorable than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Blue Owl Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 20.21%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.73% beat Blue Owl Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Blue Owl Capital	20.21%	9.76%	4.27%
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	31.63%	11.73%	5.12%

Blue Owl Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Blue Owl Capital	$1.85B	3.00	$800.36M	$0.70	15.97
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	$1.42B	3.89	$563.46M	$1.91	12.43

Summary

Blue Owl Capital beats Blackstone Secured Lending Fund on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Blackstone Secured Lending Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BXSL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BXSL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	FIN Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$5.53B	$1.32B	$13.49B	$22.96B
Dividend Yield	12.96%	12.69%	5.81%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	12.43	10.73	23.13	28.29
Price / Sales	3.89	15.28	174.52	24.48
Price / Cash	6.40	7.37	20.50	25.11
Price / Book	0.91	0.83	2.14	4.73
Net Income	$563.46M	$118.06M	$1.11B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-2.67%	-4.34%	-1.14%	-1.11%
1 Month Performance	-1.73%	-2.61%	0.14%	1.36%
1 Year Performance	-23.88%	-19.39%	10.81%	24.41%

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	3.2165 of 5 stars	$23.73 -0.2%	$25.91 +9.2%	-23.8%	$5.53B	$1.42B	12.43	2,020	Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast
ARCC Ares Capital	3.7773 of 5 stars	$19.18 -0.4%	$20.75 +8.2%	-13.8%	$13.82B	$3.05B	11.77	2,550
MFIC MidCap Financial Investment	2.2856 of 5 stars	$12.12 +1.5%	$11.54 -4.8%	-13.8%	$1.10B	$320.88M	18.36	N/A
GSBD Goldman Sachs BDC	2.5595 of 5 stars	$10.06 -0.3%	$9.50 -5.5%	-20.8%	$1.14B	$365.57M	9.67	N/A	Earnings Report
NCDL Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending	4.4698 of 5 stars	$14.77 -0.4%	$15.50 +5.0%	-14.0%	$731.92M	$76.61M	11.27	N/A	Earnings Report

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:BXSL) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) Competitors

BXSL vs. ARCC, MFIC, GSBD, NCDL, and OBDC

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Ares Capital?

Summary

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Summary

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Summary

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending?

Summary

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Blue Owl Capital?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BXSL vs. The Competition

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) Competitors

BXSL vs. ARCC, MFIC, GSBD, NCDL, and OBDC

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Ares Capital?

Does the media favor ARCC or BXSL?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in ARCC or BXSL?

Is ARCC or BXSL more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, ARCC or BXSL?

Is ARCC or BXSL a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ARCC or BXSL?

Do analysts recommend ARCC or BXSL?

Summary

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Does the media refer more to MFIC or BXSL?

Do analysts recommend MFIC or BXSL?

Which has more risk & volatility, MFIC or BXSL?

Is MFIC or BXSL a better dividend stock?

Is MFIC or BXSL more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MFIC or BXSL?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MFIC or BXSL?

Summary

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Does the media prefer BXSL or GSBD?

Do analysts recommend BXSL or GSBD?

Which has more volatility & risk, BXSL or GSBD?

Is BXSL or GSBD a better dividend stock?

Is BXSL or GSBD more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of BXSL or GSBD?

Which has better earnings and valuation, BXSL or GSBD?

Summary

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending?

Do analysts rate NCDL or BXSL?

Is NCDL or BXSL more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, NCDL or BXSL?

Which has more risk & volatility, NCDL or BXSL?

Is NCDL or BXSL a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in NCDL or BXSL?

Does the media prefer NCDL or BXSL?

Summary

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Blue Owl Capital?

Does the media prefer OBDC or BXSL?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in OBDC or BXSL?

Which has more risk & volatility, OBDC or BXSL?

Is OBDC or BXSL a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate OBDC or BXSL?

Is OBDC or BXSL more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, OBDC or BXSL?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BXSL vs. The Competition

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools