Free Trial
→ ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow! (From Weiss Ratings) (Ad)tc pixel Free BXSL Stock Alerts

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) Competitors

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund logo
$23.40 -0.35 (-1.47%)
As of 12:10 PM Eastern
Compare

BXSL vs. ARCC, MFIC, GSBD, NCDL, and OBDC

Should you buy Blackstone Secured Lending Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Blackstone Secured Lending Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Blackstone Secured Lending Fund include Ares Capital (ARCC), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending (NCDL), and Blue Owl Capital (OBDC). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (NYSE:BXSL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays out 161.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. Ares Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital$3.05B4.38$1.30B$1.6311.42
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund$1.42B3.84$563.46M$1.9112.25

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 12 more articles in the media than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Ares Capital and 2 mentions for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Ares Capital's score of 0.65 indicating that Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ares Capital has a net margin of 37.30% compared to Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's net margin of 31.63%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.73% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ares Capital37.30% 9.85% 4.59%
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund 31.63%11.73%5.12%

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ares Capital currently has a consensus price target of $20.75, suggesting a potential upside of 11.44%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a consensus price target of $25.13, suggesting a potential upside of 7.37%. Given Ares Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Summary

Ares Capital beats Blackstone Secured Lending Fund on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (NYSE:BXSL) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.8%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays out 161.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund had 1 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and 1 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's score of 0.88 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment Very Positive
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund Positive

MidCap Financial Investment currently has a consensus price target of $11.54, suggesting a potential upside of 9.45%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a consensus price target of $25.13, suggesting a potential upside of 7.37%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment$22.82M38.05$63.17M$0.04263.50
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund$1.42B3.84$563.46M$1.9112.25

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a net margin of 31.63% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.73% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment1.90% 10.86% 4.31%
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund 31.63%11.73%5.12%

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund beats MidCap Financial Investment on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (NYSE:BXSL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of 21.32%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.73% beat Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC21.32% 10.94% 4.66%
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund 31.63%11.73%5.12%

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Goldman Sachs BDC. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goldman Sachs BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.75$119.27M$0.6513.75
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund$1.42B3.84$563.46M$1.9112.25

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays out 161.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Goldman Sachs BDC presently has a consensus target price of $9.17, indicating a potential upside of 2.54%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a consensus target price of $25.13, indicating a potential upside of 7.37%. Given Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC and Goldman Sachs BDC both had 2 articles in the media. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.00 indicating that Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund beats Goldman Sachs BDC on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending?

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending (NYSE:NCDL) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (NYSE:BXSL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending presently has a consensus price target of $15.35, indicating a potential upside of 20.02%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a consensus price target of $25.13, indicating a potential upside of 7.37%. Given Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending is more favorable than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending had 2 more articles in the media than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending and 2 mentions for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's score of 0.20 indicating that Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending. Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending$207.86M3.04$65.61M$1.2010.66
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund$1.42B3.84$563.46M$1.9112.25

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays out 161.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's net margin of 29.56%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.73% beat Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending29.56% 9.80% 4.18%
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund 31.63%11.73%5.12%

Summary

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund beats Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blackstone Secured Lending Fund compare to Blue Owl Capital?

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (NYSE:BXSL) and Blue Owl Capital (NYSE:OBDC) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Blue Owl Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays out 161.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blue Owl Capital pays out 211.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blue Owl Capital has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Blue Owl Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a net margin of 31.63% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 20.21%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.73% beat Blue Owl Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund31.63% 11.73% 5.12%
Blue Owl Capital 20.21%9.76%4.27%

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund currently has a consensus target price of $25.13, indicating a potential upside of 7.37%. Blue Owl Capital has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.05%. Given Blue Owl Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Capital is more favorable than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Blue Owl Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

In the previous week, Blue Owl Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Blue Owl Capital and 2 mentions for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. Blue Owl Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's score of 0.88 indicating that Blue Owl Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Blue Owl Capital
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.8% of Blue Owl Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blue Owl Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Blue Owl Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund$1.42B3.84$563.46M$1.9112.25
Blue Owl Capital$1.85B2.93$800.36M$0.7015.60

Summary

Blue Owl Capital beats Blackstone Secured Lending Fund on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Blackstone Secured Lending Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BXSL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BXSL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BXSL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricBlackstone Secured Lending FundFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$5.44B$1.29B$13.39B$23.13B
Dividend Yield12.89%12.97%5.78%4.09%
P/E Ratio12.2510.9019.7531.16
Price / Sales3.8416.92140.4414.72
Price / Cash6.437.1719.9324.78
Price / Book0.870.772.174.68
Net Income$563.46M$121.13M$1.13B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.04%-1.08%-0.49%-0.38%
1 Month Performance-6.28%-8.00%-0.25%0.52%
1 Year Performance-26.00%-21.35%11.41%25.86%

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
3.435 of 5 stars		$23.40
-1.5%		$25.13
+7.4%		-24.9%$5.44B$1.42B12.252,020
ARCC
Ares Capital
3.9371 of 5 stars		$18.59
flat		$20.75
+11.6%		-13.7%$13.35B$3.05B11.402,550
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
3.1561 of 5 stars		$10.60
flat		$11.54
+8.8%		-15.9%$873.15M$320.88M265.07N/A
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
2.7733 of 5 stars		$8.86
-0.1%		$9.17
+3.5%		-18.8%$997.36M$365.57M13.62N/A
NCDL
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending
4.5055 of 5 stars		$12.89
+0.1%		$15.35
+19.1%		-16.9%$636.10M$207.86M10.74N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:BXSL) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The 1934 playbook
In 1934, a legal government maneuver transferred billions in wealth overnight. Most Americans never saw it com...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
$30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!)
In the next 3 minutes… James Altucher – legendary investor and venture capitalist… And someone who’s kno...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
June 12: $100 Turns Into $100,000?
The SpaceX IPO is scheduled for June 12, and former tech executive Jeff Brown - who identified Bitcoin, Tesla,...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX just filed. The clock is ticking.
Reuters reports Elon Musk filed secretly. Barron's says it's being finalized behind closed doors. CNBC just re...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX will mint billionaires. You won't be one of them.
By the time a company goes public, 95% of profits have already been made. Insiders bought SpaceX at $20 billio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel