Cardinal Health (CAH) Competitors

In the previous week, Merit Medical Systems had 3 more articles in the media than Cardinal Health. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Merit Medical Systems and 3 mentions for Cardinal Health. Cardinal Health's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Merit Medical Systems' score of 0.94 indicating that Cardinal Health is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Merit Medical Systems currently has a consensus price target of $92.80, suggesting a potential upside of 53.36%. Cardinal Health has a consensus price target of $241.80, suggesting a potential upside of 22.80%. Given Merit Medical Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Merit Medical Systems is more favorable than Cardinal Health.

Merit Medical Systems has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Health has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Cardinal Health has higher revenue and earnings than Merit Medical Systems. Merit Medical Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

99.7% of Merit Medical Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of Cardinal Health shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Merit Medical Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cardinal Health shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Merit Medical Systems has a net margin of 9.03% compared to Cardinal Health's net margin of 0.62%. Merit Medical Systems' return on equity of 13.54% beat Cardinal Health's return on equity.

Cardinal Health has a net margin of 0.62% compared to AMN Healthcare Services' net margin of -0.95%. AMN Healthcare Services' return on equity of 18.01% beat Cardinal Health's return on equity.

Cardinal Health currently has a consensus price target of $241.80, suggesting a potential upside of 22.80%. AMN Healthcare Services has a consensus price target of $25.29, suggesting a potential downside of 13.67%. Given Cardinal Health's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cardinal Health is more favorable than AMN Healthcare Services.

Cardinal Health has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AMN Healthcare Services has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, AMN Healthcare Services had 11 more articles in the media than Cardinal Health. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for AMN Healthcare Services and 3 mentions for Cardinal Health. Cardinal Health's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat AMN Healthcare Services' score of 0.17 indicating that Cardinal Health is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cardinal Health pays an annual dividend of $2.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. AMN Healthcare Services pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Cardinal Health pays out 31.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AMN Healthcare Services pays out -137.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cardinal Health has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years. AMN Healthcare Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

87.2% of Cardinal Health shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of AMN Healthcare Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cardinal Health shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of AMN Healthcare Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cardinal Health has higher revenue and earnings than AMN Healthcare Services. AMN Healthcare Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cencora has a net margin of 0.78% compared to Cardinal Health's net margin of 0.62%. Cencora's return on equity of 135.20% beat Cardinal Health's return on equity.

In the previous week, Cencora had 8 more articles in the media than Cardinal Health. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Cencora and 3 mentions for Cardinal Health. Cardinal Health's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Cencora's score of 0.52 indicating that Cardinal Health is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cencora pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Cardinal Health pays an annual dividend of $2.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Cencora pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cardinal Health pays out 31.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cencora has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Cardinal Health has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years. Cardinal Health is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cencora presently has a consensus target price of $380.25, indicating a potential upside of 44.18%. Cardinal Health has a consensus target price of $241.80, indicating a potential upside of 22.80%. Given Cencora's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cencora is more favorable than Cardinal Health.

Cencora has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Health has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

97.5% of Cencora shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of Cardinal Health shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Cencora shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cardinal Health shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cardinal Health has higher revenue and earnings than Cencora. Cencora is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cardinal Health currently has a consensus target price of $241.80, suggesting a potential upside of 22.80%. Elevance Health has a consensus target price of $407.05, suggesting a potential upside of 3.23%. Given Cardinal Health's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cardinal Health is more favorable than Elevance Health.

Cardinal Health pays an annual dividend of $2.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Elevance Health pays an annual dividend of $6.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Cardinal Health pays out 31.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Elevance Health pays out 29.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cardinal Health has raised its dividend for 29 consecutive years and Elevance Health has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Elevance Health is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

87.2% of Cardinal Health shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Elevance Health shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cardinal Health shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Elevance Health shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Elevance Health has a net margin of 2.62% compared to Cardinal Health's net margin of 0.62%. Elevance Health's return on equity of 15.58% beat Cardinal Health's return on equity.

In the previous week, Elevance Health had 13 more articles in the media than Cardinal Health. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Elevance Health and 3 mentions for Cardinal Health. Elevance Health's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Cardinal Health's score of 1.00 indicating that Elevance Health is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Elevance Health has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cardinal Health. Elevance Health is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cardinal Health has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Elevance Health has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.