Go Pro

Cars.com (CARS) Competitors

Cars.com logo
$10.07 +0.08 (+0.75%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$10.02 -0.05 (-0.50%)
As of 04:15 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CARS vs. ZD, WB, OPRA, WBTN, and ZI

Should you buy Cars.com stock or one of its competitors? Cars.com's main competitors and comparable companies include Ziff Davis (ZD), Weibo (WB), Opera (OPRA), WEBTOON Entertainment (WBTN), and ZoomInfo Technologies (ZI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "interactive media & services" industry.

How does Cars.com compare to Ziff Davis?

Cars.com (NYSE:CARS) and Ziff Davis (NASDAQ:ZD) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

89.2% of Cars.com shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Ziff Davis shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Cars.com shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Ziff Davis shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ziff Davis had 1 more articles in the media than Cars.com. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ziff Davis and 3 mentions for Cars.com. Ziff Davis' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Cars.com's score of 0.00 indicating that Ziff Davis is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cars.com
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ziff Davis
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ziff Davis has higher revenue and earnings than Cars.com. Ziff Davis is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cars.com, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cars.com$723.24M0.74$20.05M$0.5717.45
Ziff Davis$1.45B1.31$47.35M$17.673.13

Cars.com presently has a consensus target price of $14.83, suggesting a potential upside of 49.15%. Ziff Davis has a consensus target price of $59.75, suggesting a potential upside of 8.12%. Given Cars.com's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cars.com is more favorable than Ziff Davis.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cars.com
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Ziff Davis
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Ziff Davis has a net margin of 48.57% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 4.73%. Cars.com's return on equity of 18.82% beat Ziff Davis' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cars.com4.73% 18.82% 8.31%
Ziff Davis 48.57%10.73%5.54%

Summary

Ziff Davis beats Cars.com on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cars.com compare to Weibo?

Cars.com (NYSE:CARS) and Weibo (NASDAQ:WB) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Weibo has higher revenue and earnings than Cars.com. Weibo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cars.com, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cars.com$723.24M0.74$20.05M$0.5717.45
Weibo$1.76B0.88$449.02M$1.215.21

Cars.com currently has a consensus price target of $14.83, suggesting a potential upside of 49.15%. Weibo has a consensus price target of $8.80, suggesting a potential upside of 39.57%. Given Cars.com's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Cars.com is more favorable than Weibo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cars.com
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Weibo
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Weibo has a net margin of 17.78% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 4.73%. Cars.com's return on equity of 18.82% beat Weibo's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cars.com4.73% 18.82% 8.31%
Weibo 17.78%8.87%4.96%

In the previous week, Cars.com and Cars.com both had 3 articles in the media. Cars.com's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Weibo's score of -0.62 indicating that Cars.com is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cars.com
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Weibo
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

89.2% of Cars.com shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.8% of Weibo shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Cars.com shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.3% of Weibo shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weibo has a beta of 0.17, indicating that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cars.com beats Weibo on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cars.com compare to Opera?

Cars.com (NYSE:CARS) and Opera (NASDAQ:OPRA) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Opera has a net margin of 18.55% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 4.73%. Cars.com's return on equity of 18.82% beat Opera's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cars.com4.73% 18.82% 8.31%
Opera 18.55%9.14%8.03%

Opera has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cars.com. Opera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cars.com, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cars.com$723.24M0.74$20.05M$0.5717.45
Opera$614.83M2.56$108.28M$1.3912.74

89.2% of Cars.com shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Opera shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Cars.com shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 84.4% of Opera shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.64, suggesting that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Opera has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Cars.com currently has a consensus price target of $14.83, suggesting a potential upside of 49.15%. Opera has a consensus price target of $24.75, suggesting a potential upside of 39.71%. Given Cars.com's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cars.com is more favorable than Opera.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cars.com
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Opera
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

In the previous week, Opera had 1 more articles in the media than Cars.com. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Opera and 3 mentions for Cars.com. Opera's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Cars.com's score of 0.00 indicating that Opera is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cars.com
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Opera
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Opera beats Cars.com on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cars.com compare to WEBTOON Entertainment?

WEBTOON Entertainment (NASDAQ:WBTN) and Cars.com (NYSE:CARS) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

89.2% of Cars.com shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of WEBTOON Entertainment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Cars.com shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cars.com has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WEBTOON Entertainment. WEBTOON Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cars.com, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WEBTOON Entertainment$1.38B1.03-$345.93M-$2.63N/A
Cars.com$723.24M0.74$20.05M$0.5717.45

WEBTOON Entertainment presently has a consensus target price of $10.88, indicating a potential upside of 4.07%. Cars.com has a consensus target price of $14.83, indicating a potential upside of 49.15%. Given Cars.com's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cars.com is more favorable than WEBTOON Entertainment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WEBTOON Entertainment
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Cars.com
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Cars.com has a net margin of 4.73% compared to WEBTOON Entertainment's net margin of -25.09%. Cars.com's return on equity of 18.82% beat WEBTOON Entertainment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WEBTOON Entertainment-25.09% 2.10% 1.60%
Cars.com 4.73%18.82%8.31%

WEBTOON Entertainment has a beta of 2.57, suggesting that its stock price is 157% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cars.com has a beta of 1.64, suggesting that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cars.com had 3 more articles in the media than WEBTOON Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cars.com and 0 mentions for WEBTOON Entertainment. WEBTOON Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Cars.com's score of 0.00 indicating that WEBTOON Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
WEBTOON Entertainment Positive
Cars.com Neutral

Summary

Cars.com beats WEBTOON Entertainment on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cars.com compare to ZoomInfo Technologies?

ZoomInfo Technologies (NASDAQ:ZI) and Cars.com (NYSE:CARS) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

ZoomInfo Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $5.19, suggesting a potential upside of 34.74%. Cars.com has a consensus target price of $14.83, suggesting a potential upside of 49.15%. Given Cars.com's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cars.com is more favorable than ZoomInfo Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ZoomInfo Technologies
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Cars.com
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

In the previous week, ZoomInfo Technologies and ZoomInfo Technologies both had 3 articles in the media. ZoomInfo Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Cars.com's score of 0.00 indicating that ZoomInfo Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ZoomInfo Technologies
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Cars.com
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Cars.com has a net margin of 4.73% compared to ZoomInfo Technologies' net margin of 0.74%. Cars.com's return on equity of 18.82% beat ZoomInfo Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ZoomInfo Technologies0.74% 12.05% 3.46%
Cars.com 4.73%18.82%8.31%

ZoomInfo Technologies has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cars.com has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

95.5% of ZoomInfo Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Cars.com shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.0% of ZoomInfo Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Cars.com shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ZoomInfo Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Cars.com. Cars.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZoomInfo Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ZoomInfo Technologies$1.21B1.09$107.30M$0.1232.08
Cars.com$723.24M0.74$20.05M$0.5717.45

Summary

Cars.com beats ZoomInfo Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cars.com News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CARS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CARS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CARS vs. The Competition

MetricCars.comInteractive Media & Services IndustryCommunication Services SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$539.32M$97.56B$33.89B$22.72B
Dividend YieldN/A4.11%5.53%3.74%
P/E Ratio17.6826.9422.6227.75
Price / Sales0.75106.0866.7120.15
Price / Cash3.4617.1020.2539.56
Price / Book1.2826.9912.194.64
Net Income$20.05M$3.55B$1.12B$1.08B
7 Day Performance-7.36%-0.31%-1.63%-1.06%
1 Month Performance-16.10%-4.35%-3.79%-5.02%
1 Year Performance-17.04%-18.41%-9.26%5.78%

Cars.com Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CARS
Cars.com
3.1371 of 5 stars
$10.08
+0.8%
$14.83
+47.2%
-18.8%$539.32M$723.24M17.681,700
ZD
Ziff Davis
2.8557 of 5 stars
$58.20
+1.3%
$59.75
+2.7%
+40.2%$2.00B$1.45B3.293,900
WB
Weibo
4.4774 of 5 stars
$6.69
-0.7%
$8.80
+31.5%
-49.4%$1.64B$1.76B5.535,651
OPRA
Opera
4.3708 of 5 stars
$17.94
-1.0%
$24.75
+38.0%
-10.4%$1.60B$614.83M12.91605
WBTN
WEBTOON Entertainment
1.6773 of 5 stars
$11.20
+0.8%
$10.88
-2.9%
-39.2%$1.52B$1.38BN/A1,800

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CARS) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners