Cboe Global Markets Competitors

Cboe Global Markets (NYSE:CBOE) and Public Storage (NYSE:PSA) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Cboe Global Markets and Public Storage's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Cboe Global Markets pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Public Storage pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Cboe Global Markets pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Public Storage pays out 74.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Public Storage has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Public Storage is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Cboe Global Markets and Public Storage, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Cboe Global Markets currently has a consensus target price of $111.75, suggesting a potential downside of 1.68%. Public Storage has a consensus target price of $243.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 11.25%. Given Cboe Global Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cboe Global Markets is more favorable than Public Storage.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cboe Global Markets and Public Storage's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Public Storage has higher revenue and earnings than Cboe Global Markets. Cboe Global Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Public Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.3% of Cboe Global Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Public Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Cboe Global Markets shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.8% of Public Storage shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Public Storage has a beta of 0.07, meaning that its share price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Public Storage beats Cboe Global Markets on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lloyds Banking Group (NYSE:LYG) and Cboe Global Markets (NYSE:CBOE) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Lloyds Banking Group and Cboe Global Markets' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Lloyds Banking Group pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Cboe Global Markets pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Lloyds Banking Group pays out 5.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cboe Global Markets pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Lloyds Banking Group and Cboe Global Markets, as reported by MarketBeat.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $111.75, suggesting a potential downside of 1.68%. Given Cboe Global Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cboe Global Markets is more favorable than Lloyds Banking Group.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lloyds Banking Group and Cboe Global Markets' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lloyds Banking Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cboe Global Markets. Lloyds Banking Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cboe Global Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.3% of Lloyds Banking Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.3% of Cboe Global Markets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Lloyds Banking Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Cboe Global Markets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Lloyds Banking Group has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Cboe Global Markets beats Lloyds Banking Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Bank of New York Mellon (NYSE:BK) and Cboe Global Markets (NYSE:CBOE) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares The Bank of New York Mellon and Cboe Global Markets' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

The Bank of New York Mellon pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Cboe Global Markets pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. The Bank of New York Mellon pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cboe Global Markets pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Bank of New York Mellon has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. The Bank of New York Mellon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for The Bank of New York Mellon and Cboe Global Markets, as reported by MarketBeat.

The Bank of New York Mellon presently has a consensus price target of $49.80, suggesting a potential downside of 3.66%. Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $111.75, suggesting a potential downside of 1.68%. Given Cboe Global Markets' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cboe Global Markets is more favorable than The Bank of New York Mellon.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The Bank of New York Mellon and Cboe Global Markets' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Bank of New York Mellon has higher revenue and earnings than Cboe Global Markets. The Bank of New York Mellon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cboe Global Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.3% of The Bank of New York Mellon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.3% of Cboe Global Markets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of The Bank of New York Mellon shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Cboe Global Markets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

The Bank of New York Mellon has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Bank of New York Mellon beats Cboe Global Markets on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Banco Bradesco (NYSE:BBD) and Cboe Global Markets (NYSE:CBOE) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Banco Bradesco and Cboe Global Markets, as reported by MarketBeat.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $111.75, suggesting a potential downside of 1.68%. Given Cboe Global Markets' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cboe Global Markets is more favorable than Banco Bradesco.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

2.1% of Banco Bradesco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.3% of Cboe Global Markets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Cboe Global Markets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Banco Bradesco and Cboe Global Markets' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Banco Bradesco has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Banco Bradesco pays an annual dividend of $0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Cboe Global Markets pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Banco Bradesco pays out 4.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cboe Global Markets pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Banco Bradesco and Cboe Global Markets' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Banco Bradesco has higher revenue and earnings than Cboe Global Markets. Banco Bradesco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cboe Global Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Cboe Global Markets beats Banco Bradesco on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cboe Global Markets (NYSE:CBOE) and Barclays (NYSE:BCS) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Cboe Global Markets and Barclays, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Cboe Global Markets presently has a consensus price target of $111.75, suggesting a potential downside of 1.68%. Given Cboe Global Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cboe Global Markets is more favorable than Barclays.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.3% of Cboe Global Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of Barclays shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Cboe Global Markets shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Barclays shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Cboe Global Markets and Barclays' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Barclays has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Cboe Global Markets pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Barclays pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Cboe Global Markets pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Barclays pays out 4.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cboe Global Markets and Barclays' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Barclays has higher revenue and earnings than Cboe Global Markets. Barclays is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cboe Global Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Cboe Global Markets beats Barclays on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cboe Global Markets (NYSE:CBOE) and American International Group (NYSE:AIG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Cboe Global Markets and American International Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Cboe Global Markets presently has a consensus price target of $111.75, suggesting a potential downside of 1.68%. American International Group has a consensus price target of $46.4167, suggesting a potential downside of 8.72%. Given Cboe Global Markets' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cboe Global Markets is more favorable than American International Group.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.3% of Cboe Global Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.0% of American International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Cboe Global Markets shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of American International Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Cboe Global Markets and American International Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, American International Group has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Cboe Global Markets pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. American International Group pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Cboe Global Markets pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. American International Group pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. American International Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. American International Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cboe Global Markets and American International Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

American International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cboe Global Markets. American International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cboe Global Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Cboe Global Markets beats American International Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.