CIG vs. CMS, EIX, NI, KEP, EBR, EVRG, LNT, PNW, ELPC, and OGE
Should you be buying Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS include CMS Energy (CMS), Edison International (EIX), NiSource (NI), Korea Electric Power (KEP), Centrais El�tricas Brasileiras (EBR), Evergy (EVRG), Alliant Energy (LNT), Pinnacle West Capital (PNW), Companhia Paranaense de Energia - Copel (ELPC), and OGE Energy (OGE). These companies are all part of the "util - elec pwr" industry.
Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS vs. Its Competitors
CMS Energy (NYSE:CMS) and Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS (NYSE:CIG) are both utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk and earnings.
In the previous week, CMS Energy had 17 more articles in the media than Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for CMS Energy and 1 mentions for Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS. CMS Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS's score of -0.13 indicating that CMS Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.
CMS Energy has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS has a net margin of 17.46% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 13.10%. Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS's return on equity of 15.91% beat CMS Energy's return on equity.
CMS Energy currently has a consensus target price of $77.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.32%. Given CMS Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe CMS Energy is more favorable than Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS.
93.6% of CMS Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of CMS Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CMS Energy. Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CMS Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
CMS Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. CMS Energy pays out 64.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS pays out 28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CMS Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
Summary
CMS Energy beats Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CIG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CIG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Comp En De Mn Cemig ADS Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NYSE:CIG) was last updated on 7/5/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff