CenterPoint Energy (CNP) Competitors

In the previous week, CenterPoint Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Alliant Energy. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for CenterPoint Energy and 10 mentions for Alliant Energy. Alliant Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat CenterPoint Energy's score of 1.32 indicating that Alliant Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

91.8% of CenterPoint Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Alliant Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of CenterPoint Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Alliant Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CenterPoint Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Alliant Energy. Alliant Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CenterPoint Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Alliant Energy has a net margin of 18.58% compared to CenterPoint Energy's net margin of 11.38%. Alliant Energy's return on equity of 11.37% beat CenterPoint Energy's return on equity.

CenterPoint Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Alliant Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. CenterPoint Energy pays out 56.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliant Energy pays out 67.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CenterPoint Energy has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Alliant Energy has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Alliant Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CenterPoint Energy has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

CenterPoint Energy presently has a consensus target price of $45.31, suggesting a potential upside of 5.32%. Alliant Energy has a consensus target price of $77.36, suggesting a potential upside of 4.60%. Given CenterPoint Energy's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CenterPoint Energy is more favorable than Alliant Energy.

In the previous week, CenterPoint Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Ameren. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for CenterPoint Energy and 16 mentions for Ameren. CenterPoint Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Ameren's score of 1.14 indicating that CenterPoint Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ameren has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CenterPoint Energy. Ameren is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CenterPoint Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ameren has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CenterPoint Energy has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Ameren pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. CenterPoint Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Ameren pays out 54.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CenterPoint Energy pays out 56.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ameren has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and CenterPoint Energy has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Ameren is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

79.1% of Ameren shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of CenterPoint Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Ameren shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CenterPoint Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ameren presently has a consensus target price of $120.67, suggesting a potential upside of 9.23%. CenterPoint Energy has a consensus target price of $45.31, suggesting a potential upside of 5.32%. Given Ameren's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ameren is more favorable than CenterPoint Energy.

Ameren has a net margin of 17.17% compared to CenterPoint Energy's net margin of 11.38%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.94% beat CenterPoint Energy's return on equity.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CenterPoint Energy has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

CMS Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CenterPoint Energy. CMS Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CenterPoint Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CMS Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. CenterPoint Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. CMS Energy pays out 63.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CenterPoint Energy pays out 56.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CMS Energy has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and CenterPoint Energy has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

93.6% of CMS Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of CenterPoint Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of CMS Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CenterPoint Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CenterPoint Energy had 3 more articles in the media than CMS Energy. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for CenterPoint Energy and 15 mentions for CMS Energy. CenterPoint Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat CMS Energy's score of 1.28 indicating that CenterPoint Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

CMS Energy presently has a consensus price target of $81.33, indicating a potential upside of 11.60%. CenterPoint Energy has a consensus price target of $45.31, indicating a potential upside of 5.32%. Given CMS Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe CMS Energy is more favorable than CenterPoint Energy.

CMS Energy has a net margin of 12.55% compared to CenterPoint Energy's net margin of 11.38%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 12.17% beat CenterPoint Energy's return on equity.

CenterPoint Energy presently has a consensus price target of $45.31, suggesting a potential upside of 5.32%. DTE Energy has a consensus price target of $158.69, suggesting a potential upside of 8.76%. Given DTE Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe DTE Energy is more favorable than CenterPoint Energy.

In the previous week, DTE Energy had 2 more articles in the media than CenterPoint Energy. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for DTE Energy and 18 mentions for CenterPoint Energy. CenterPoint Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat DTE Energy's score of 0.74 indicating that CenterPoint Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

CenterPoint Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. DTE Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. CenterPoint Energy pays out 56.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DTE Energy pays out 76.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CenterPoint Energy has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and DTE Energy has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. DTE Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CenterPoint Energy has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DTE Energy has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

91.8% of CenterPoint Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.1% of DTE Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of CenterPoint Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of DTE Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

DTE Energy has higher revenue and earnings than CenterPoint Energy. DTE Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CenterPoint Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CenterPoint Energy has a net margin of 11.38% compared to DTE Energy's net margin of 7.65%. DTE Energy's return on equity of 12.37% beat CenterPoint Energy's return on equity.