CMS Energy Competitors

CMS Energy (NYSE:CMS) and Dominion Energy (NYSE:D) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

CMS Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Dominion Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. CMS Energy pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dominion Energy pays out 59.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CMS Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Dominion Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Dominion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.2% of CMS Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of Dominion Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of CMS Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Dominion Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CMS Energy and Dominion Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Dominion Energy has higher revenue and earnings than CMS Energy. Dominion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CMS Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for CMS Energy and Dominion Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

CMS Energy presently has a consensus target price of $65.35, indicating a potential upside of 19.75%. Dominion Energy has a consensus target price of $82.5714, indicating a potential upside of 16.02%. Given CMS Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CMS Energy is more favorable than Dominion Energy.

Volatility and Risk

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.11, indicating that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dominion Energy has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares CMS Energy and Dominion Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Dominion Energy beats CMS Energy on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

CMS Energy (NYSE:CMS) and Sempra Energy (NYSE:SRE) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares CMS Energy and Sempra Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for CMS Energy and Sempra Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

CMS Energy currently has a consensus target price of $65.35, indicating a potential upside of 19.75%. Sempra Energy has a consensus target price of $143.2308, indicating a potential upside of 16.86%. Given CMS Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe CMS Energy is more favorable than Sempra Energy.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

90.2% of CMS Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Sempra Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of CMS Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sempra Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CMS Energy and Sempra Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sempra Energy has higher revenue and earnings than CMS Energy. Sempra Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CMS Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.11, indicating that its share price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sempra Energy has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

CMS Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Sempra Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. CMS Energy pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sempra Energy pays out 61.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CMS Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Sempra Energy has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Sempra Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Sempra Energy beats CMS Energy on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

CMS Energy (NYSE:CMS) and Public Service Enterprise Group (NYSE:PEG) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

CMS Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Public Service Enterprise Group pays an annual dividend of $1.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. CMS Energy pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Public Service Enterprise Group pays out 59.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CMS Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Public Service Enterprise Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Public Service Enterprise Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.11, indicating that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Public Service Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for CMS Energy and Public Service Enterprise Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

CMS Energy currently has a consensus price target of $65.35, indicating a potential upside of 19.75%. Public Service Enterprise Group has a consensus price target of $63.9167, indicating a potential upside of 14.04%. Given CMS Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CMS Energy is more favorable than Public Service Enterprise Group.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.2% of CMS Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.6% of Public Service Enterprise Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of CMS Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Public Service Enterprise Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares CMS Energy and Public Service Enterprise Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CMS Energy and Public Service Enterprise Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Public Service Enterprise Group has higher revenue and earnings than CMS Energy. Public Service Enterprise Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CMS Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Public Service Enterprise Group beats CMS Energy on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

WEC Energy Group (NYSE:WEC) and CMS Energy (NYSE:CMS) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares WEC Energy Group and CMS Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

WEC Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than CMS Energy. CMS Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WEC Energy Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.1% of WEC Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.2% of CMS Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of WEC Energy Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of CMS Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

WEC Energy Group has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMS Energy has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

WEC Energy Group pays an annual dividend of $2.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. CMS Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. WEC Energy Group pays out 75.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CMS Energy pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WEC Energy Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CMS Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for WEC Energy Group and CMS Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

WEC Energy Group presently has a consensus price target of $94.20, suggesting a potential upside of 14.98%. CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $65.35, suggesting a potential upside of 19.75%. Given CMS Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CMS Energy is more favorable than WEC Energy Group.

Profitability

This table compares WEC Energy Group and CMS Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

WEC Energy Group beats CMS Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

DTE Energy (NYSE:DTE) and CMS Energy (NYSE:CMS) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

73.6% of DTE Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.2% of CMS Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of DTE Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of CMS Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares DTE Energy and CMS Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares DTE Energy and CMS Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

DTE Energy has higher revenue and earnings than CMS Energy. DTE Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CMS Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for DTE Energy and CMS Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

DTE Energy presently has a consensus price target of $131.3571, suggesting a potential upside of 6.02%. CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $65.35, suggesting a potential upside of 19.75%. Given CMS Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CMS Energy is more favorable than DTE Energy.

Volatility and Risk

DTE Energy has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMS Energy has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

DTE Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. CMS Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. DTE Energy pays out 68.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMS Energy pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. DTE Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CMS Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. DTE Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

DTE Energy beats CMS Energy on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

CMS Energy (NYSE:CMS) and Consolidated Edison (NYSE:ED) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Profitability

This table compares CMS Energy and Consolidated Edison's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

90.2% of CMS Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.4% of Consolidated Edison shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of CMS Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Consolidated Edison shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

CMS Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Consolidated Edison pays an annual dividend of $3.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. CMS Energy pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Consolidated Edison pays out 70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CMS Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Consolidated Edison has increased its dividend for 47 consecutive years. Consolidated Edison is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for CMS Energy and Consolidated Edison, as provided by MarketBeat.

CMS Energy currently has a consensus target price of $65.35, indicating a potential upside of 19.75%. Consolidated Edison has a consensus target price of $76.2692, indicating a potential upside of 14.43%. Given CMS Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CMS Energy is more favorable than Consolidated Edison.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CMS Energy and Consolidated Edison's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Consolidated Edison has higher revenue and earnings than CMS Energy. Consolidated Edison is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CMS Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

CMS Energy beats Consolidated Edison on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.