Cohen & Steers (CNS) Competitors

Cohen & Steers has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Cathay General Bancorp's net margin of 23.79%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 27.60% beat Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers had 6 more articles in the media than Cathay General Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Cohen & Steers and 2 mentions for Cathay General Bancorp. Cathay General Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.05 indicating that Cathay General Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cathay General Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. Cathay General Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

75.0% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cathay General Bancorp presently has a consensus target price of $51.75, indicating a potential downside of 8.70%. Cohen & Steers has a consensus target price of $72.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.59%. Given Cohen & Steers' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than Cathay General Bancorp.

Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Cathay General Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Cathay General Bancorp pays out 31.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers pays out 88.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cohen & Steers has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Cohen & Steers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, T. Rowe Price Group had 5 more articles in the media than Cohen & Steers. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for T. Rowe Price Group and 8 mentions for Cohen & Steers. T. Rowe Price Group's average media sentiment score of 1.69 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.05 indicating that T. Rowe Price Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 28.28% compared to Cohen & Steers' net margin of 27.47%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 27.60% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity.

T. Rowe Price Group presently has a consensus target price of $99.54, indicating a potential downside of 3.15%. Cohen & Steers has a consensus target price of $72.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.59%. Given Cohen & Steers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. T. Rowe Price Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

73.4% of T. Rowe Price Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of T. Rowe Price Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

T. Rowe Price Group pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 55.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers pays out 88.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. T. Rowe Price Group has raised its dividend for 39 consecutive years and Cohen & Steers has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. T. Rowe Price Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Victory Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. Victory Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Victory Capital has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Victory Capital presently has a consensus target price of $84.71, suggesting a potential downside of 0.31%. Cohen & Steers has a consensus target price of $72.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.59%. Given Cohen & Steers' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than Victory Capital.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers had 5 more articles in the media than Victory Capital. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Cohen & Steers and 3 mentions for Victory Capital. Victory Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.05 indicating that Victory Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

87.7% of Victory Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Victory Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cohen & Steers has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Victory Capital's net margin of 25.79%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 27.60% beat Victory Capital's return on equity.

Victory Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Victory Capital pays out 44.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers pays out 88.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Victory Capital has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Cohen & Steers has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Cohen & Steers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers had 8 more articles in the media than Virtus Investment Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Cohen & Steers and 0 mentions for Virtus Investment Partners. Cohen & Steers' average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Virtus Investment Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Cohen & Steers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Cohen & Steers presently has a consensus price target of $72.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.59%. Virtus Investment Partners has a consensus price target of $134.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.99%. Given Cohen & Steers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than Virtus Investment Partners.

Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Virtus Investment Partners pays an annual dividend of $9.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Cohen & Steers pays out 88.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Virtus Investment Partners pays out 56.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Virtus Investment Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cohen & Steers has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Virtus Investment Partners' net margin of 13.42%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 27.60% beat Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity.

Cohen & Steers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Virtus Investment Partners. Virtus Investment Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.