Cohen & Steers (CNS) Competitors

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 29.26% compared to Cohen & Steers' net margin of 28.82%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 27.41% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity.

T. Rowe Price Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. T. Rowe Price Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, T. Rowe Price Group and T. Rowe Price Group both had 10 articles in the media. T. Rowe Price Group's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.47 indicating that T. Rowe Price Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

T. Rowe Price Group currently has a consensus price target of $105.92, suggesting a potential upside of 0.11%. Cohen & Steers has a consensus price target of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.43%. Given Cohen & Steers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 52.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers pays out 82.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. T. Rowe Price Group has raised its dividend for 39 consecutive years and Cohen & Steers has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. T. Rowe Price Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

73.4% of T. Rowe Price Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of T. Rowe Price Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Victory Capital pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Victory Capital pays out 36.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers pays out 82.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Victory Capital has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Cohen & Steers has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Cohen & Steers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Victory Capital currently has a consensus target price of $113.33, suggesting a potential downside of 0.78%. Cohen & Steers has a consensus target price of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.43%. Given Cohen & Steers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than Victory Capital.

Victory Capital has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

87.7% of Victory Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.5% of Victory Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers had 9 more articles in the media than Victory Capital. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Cohen & Steers and 1 mentions for Victory Capital. Victory Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.47 indicating that Victory Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Victory Capital has a net margin of 29.57% compared to Cohen & Steers' net margin of 28.82%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 27.41% beat Victory Capital's return on equity.

Victory Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. Victory Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers had 7 more articles in the media than Virtus Investment Partners. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Cohen & Steers and 3 mentions for Virtus Investment Partners. Virtus Investment Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.47 indicating that Virtus Investment Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cohen & Steers currently has a consensus target price of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.43%. Virtus Investment Partners has a consensus target price of $143.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.27%. Given Cohen & Steers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than Virtus Investment Partners.

Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Virtus Investment Partners pays an annual dividend of $9.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Cohen & Steers pays out 82.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Virtus Investment Partners pays out 55.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Virtus Investment Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cohen & Steers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Virtus Investment Partners. Virtus Investment Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cohen & Steers has a net margin of 28.82% compared to Virtus Investment Partners' net margin of 13.42%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 27.41% beat Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity.

Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ameris Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Ameris Bancorp pays out 14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers pays out 82.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cohen & Steers has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Cohen & Steers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers had 7 more articles in the media than Ameris Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Cohen & Steers and 3 mentions for Ameris Bancorp. Cohen & Steers' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Ameris Bancorp's score of 0.00 indicating that Cohen & Steers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

91.6% of Ameris Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ameris Bancorp shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ameris Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. Ameris Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ameris Bancorp currently has a consensus price target of $91.67, indicating a potential upside of 13.15%. Cohen & Steers has a consensus price target of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.43%. Given Cohen & Steers' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than Ameris Bancorp.

Cohen & Steers has a net margin of 28.82% compared to Ameris Bancorp's net margin of 21.98%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 27.41% beat Ameris Bancorp's return on equity.

Ameris Bancorp has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.