Cohen & Steers (CNS) Competitors

T. Rowe Price Group pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 55.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers pays out 82.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. T. Rowe Price Group has increased its dividend for 39 consecutive years and Cohen & Steers has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. T. Rowe Price Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

73.4% of T. Rowe Price Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of T. Rowe Price Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 29.26% compared to Cohen & Steers' net margin of 28.82%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 28.03% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity.

T. Rowe Price Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. T. Rowe Price Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

T. Rowe Price Group currently has a consensus target price of $105.08, indicating a potential downside of 5.97%. Cohen & Steers has a consensus target price of $76.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.43%. Given T. Rowe Price Group's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe T. Rowe Price Group is more favorable than Cohen & Steers.

In the previous week, T. Rowe Price Group had 16 more articles in the media than Cohen & Steers. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for T. Rowe Price Group and 16 mentions for Cohen & Steers. T. Rowe Price Group's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.54 indicating that T. Rowe Price Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cohen & Steers presently has a consensus target price of $76.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.43%. Victory Capital has a consensus target price of $90.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.12%. Given Cohen & Steers' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than Victory Capital.

Cohen & Steers has a net margin of 28.82% compared to Victory Capital's net margin of 25.79%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 28.03% beat Victory Capital's return on equity.

Victory Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. Victory Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Victory Capital pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Cohen & Steers pays out 82.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Victory Capital pays out 45.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Victory Capital has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Cohen & Steers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers had 13 more articles in the media than Victory Capital. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Cohen & Steers and 3 mentions for Victory Capital. Victory Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.54 indicating that Victory Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victory Capital has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of Victory Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Victory Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cohen & Steers has a net margin of 28.82% compared to Virtus Investment Partners' net margin of 13.42%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 28.03% beat Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity.

Virtus Investment Partners pays an annual dividend of $9.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Virtus Investment Partners pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers pays out 82.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cohen & Steers has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Virtus Investment Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cohen & Steers has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Virtus Investment Partners. Virtus Investment Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers had 10 more articles in the media than Virtus Investment Partners. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Cohen & Steers and 6 mentions for Virtus Investment Partners. Cohen & Steers' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Virtus Investment Partners' score of 0.44 indicating that Cohen & Steers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Virtus Investment Partners currently has a consensus price target of $145.50, suggesting a potential downside of 9.00%. Cohen & Steers has a consensus price target of $76.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.43%. Given Cohen & Steers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than Virtus Investment Partners.

80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Artisan Partners Asset Management had 9 more articles in the media than Cohen & Steers. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Artisan Partners Asset Management and 16 mentions for Cohen & Steers. Artisan Partners Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.54 indicating that Artisan Partners Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Artisan Partners Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.3% of Artisan Partners Asset Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cohen & Steers presently has a consensus target price of $76.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.43%. Artisan Partners Asset Management has a consensus target price of $38.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.28%. Given Artisan Partners Asset Management's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Artisan Partners Asset Management is more favorable than Cohen & Steers.

Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Artisan Partners Asset Management has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

Cohen & Steers has a net margin of 28.82% compared to Artisan Partners Asset Management's net margin of 24.08%. Artisan Partners Asset Management's return on equity of 73.11% beat Cohen & Steers' return on equity.

Artisan Partners Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. Artisan Partners Asset Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Artisan Partners Asset Management pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Cohen & Steers pays out 82.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Artisan Partners Asset Management pays out 74.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Artisan Partners Asset Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.