Cohen & Steers (CNS) Competitors

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 28.28% compared to Cohen & Steers' net margin of 27.47%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 27.60% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity.

Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Cohen & Steers presently has a consensus price target of $75.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.16%. T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $100.08, suggesting a potential downside of 5.59%. Given Cohen & Steers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. T. Rowe Price Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. T. Rowe Price Group pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Cohen & Steers pays out 88.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 55.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years and T. Rowe Price Group has increased its dividend for 39 consecutive years. T. Rowe Price Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, T. Rowe Price Group had 1 more articles in the media than Cohen & Steers. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for T. Rowe Price Group and 8 mentions for Cohen & Steers. T. Rowe Price Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.22 indicating that T. Rowe Price Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.4% of T. Rowe Price Group shares are held by institutional investors. 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of T. Rowe Price Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Victory Capital pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Victory Capital pays out 45.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers pays out 88.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Victory Capital has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Cohen & Steers has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Cohen & Steers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Victory Capital has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Victory Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. Victory Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

87.7% of Victory Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Victory Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers had 7 more articles in the media than Victory Capital. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Cohen & Steers and 1 mentions for Victory Capital. Victory Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.22 indicating that Victory Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cohen & Steers has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Victory Capital's net margin of 25.79%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 27.60% beat Victory Capital's return on equity.

Victory Capital currently has a consensus price target of $84.71, suggesting a potential downside of 1.77%. Cohen & Steers has a consensus price target of $75.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.16%. Given Cohen & Steers' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than Victory Capital.

Cohen & Steers currently has a consensus target price of $75.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.16%. Virtus Investment Partners has a consensus target price of $134.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.02%. Given Cohen & Steers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cohen & Steers is more favorable than Virtus Investment Partners.

Cohen & Steers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Virtus Investment Partners. Virtus Investment Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers had 8 more articles in the media than Virtus Investment Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Cohen & Steers and 0 mentions for Virtus Investment Partners. Cohen & Steers' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Virtus Investment Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Cohen & Steers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Cohen & Steers has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Virtus Investment Partners' net margin of 13.42%. Cohen & Steers' return on equity of 27.60% beat Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity.

Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Virtus Investment Partners pays an annual dividend of $9.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Cohen & Steers pays out 88.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Virtus Investment Partners pays out 56.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cohen & Steers has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Virtus Investment Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

51.5% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Artisan Partners Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. 45.4% of Cohen & Steers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.3% of Artisan Partners Asset Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers had 7 more articles in the media than Artisan Partners Asset Management. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Cohen & Steers and 1 mentions for Artisan Partners Asset Management. Artisan Partners Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Cohen & Steers' score of 0.22 indicating that Artisan Partners Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cohen & Steers pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Artisan Partners Asset Management pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Cohen & Steers pays out 88.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Artisan Partners Asset Management pays out 78.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cohen & Steers has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Artisan Partners Asset Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Artisan Partners Asset Management has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

Artisan Partners Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers. Artisan Partners Asset Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cohen & Steers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cohen & Steers has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Artisan Partners Asset Management's net margin of 23.49%. Artisan Partners Asset Management's return on equity of 72.99% beat Cohen & Steers' return on equity.

Cohen & Steers currently has a consensus price target of $75.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.16%. Artisan Partners Asset Management has a consensus price target of $39.75, indicating a potential upside of 12.16%. Given Artisan Partners Asset Management's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Artisan Partners Asset Management is more favorable than Cohen & Steers.