Go Pro

California Water Service Group (CWT) Competitors

California Water Service Group logo
$50.57 +0.07 (+0.14%)
As of 11:23 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CWT vs. CWCO, GWRS, MSEX, YORW, and AWK

Should you buy California Water Service Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares California Water Service Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with California Water Service Group include Consolidated Water (CWCO), Global Water Resources (GWRS), Middlesex Water (MSEX), York Water (YORW), and American Water Works (AWK). These companies are all part of the "util - water sply" industry.

How does California Water Service Group compare to Consolidated Water?

California Water Service Group (NYSE:CWT) and Consolidated Water (NASDAQ:CWCO) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

California Water Service Group pays an annual dividend of $1.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Consolidated Water pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. California Water Service Group pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Consolidated Water pays out 62.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. California Water Service Group has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years and Consolidated Water has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. California Water Service Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Consolidated Water has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

California Water Service Group currently has a consensus target price of $54.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.77%. Consolidated Water has a consensus target price of $40.00, suggesting a potential upside of 37.05%. Given Consolidated Water's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Consolidated Water is more favorable than California Water Service Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
California Water Service Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Consolidated Water
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

California Water Service Group has higher revenue and earnings than Consolidated Water. California Water Service Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Consolidated Water, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
California Water Service Group$1.00B3.03$128.21M$2.0025.29
Consolidated Water$132.07M3.54$18.34M$0.9032.43

82.8% of California Water Service Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.2% of Consolidated Water shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of California Water Service Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Consolidated Water shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, California Water Service Group had 12 more articles in the media than Consolidated Water. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for California Water Service Group and 3 mentions for Consolidated Water. California Water Service Group's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Consolidated Water's score of 0.47 indicating that California Water Service Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
California Water Service Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Consolidated Water
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Consolidated Water has a net margin of 13.50% compared to California Water Service Group's net margin of 11.77%. Consolidated Water's return on equity of 7.81% beat California Water Service Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
California Water Service Group11.77% 7.06% 2.13%
Consolidated Water 13.50%7.81%6.84%

Summary

California Water Service Group and Consolidated Water tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does California Water Service Group compare to Global Water Resources?

Global Water Resources (NASDAQ:GWRS) and California Water Service Group (NYSE:CWT) are both utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

California Water Service Group has a net margin of 11.77% compared to Global Water Resources' net margin of 3.53%. California Water Service Group's return on equity of 7.06% beat Global Water Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Water Resources3.53% 3.53% 0.63%
California Water Service Group 11.77%7.06%2.13%

Global Water Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. California Water Service Group pays an annual dividend of $1.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Global Water Resources pays out 428.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. California Water Service Group pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Water Resources has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and California Water Service Group has increased its dividend for 59 consecutive years.

Global Water Resources presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 109.09%. California Water Service Group has a consensus target price of $54.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.77%. Given Global Water Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Global Water Resources is more favorable than California Water Service Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Water Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
California Water Service Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

27.9% of Global Water Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of California Water Service Group shares are held by institutional investors. 53.7% of Global Water Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of California Water Service Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

California Water Service Group has higher revenue and earnings than Global Water Resources. California Water Service Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Water Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Water Resources$56.59M3.65$2.96M$0.07102.49
California Water Service Group$1.00B3.03$128.21M$2.0025.29

In the previous week, California Water Service Group had 12 more articles in the media than Global Water Resources. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for California Water Service Group and 3 mentions for Global Water Resources. Global Water Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat California Water Service Group's score of 0.89 indicating that Global Water Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Global Water Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
California Water Service Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

California Water Service Group beats Global Water Resources on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does California Water Service Group compare to Middlesex Water?

Middlesex Water (NASDAQ:MSEX) and California Water Service Group (NYSE:CWT) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, California Water Service Group had 10 more articles in the media than Middlesex Water. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for California Water Service Group and 5 mentions for Middlesex Water. California Water Service Group's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Middlesex Water's score of 0.88 indicating that California Water Service Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Middlesex Water
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
California Water Service Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

California Water Service Group has higher revenue and earnings than Middlesex Water. Middlesex Water is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than California Water Service Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Middlesex Water$194.69M5.49$42.82M$2.4023.94
California Water Service Group$1.00B3.03$128.21M$2.0025.29

Middlesex Water pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. California Water Service Group pays an annual dividend of $1.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Middlesex Water pays out 60.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. California Water Service Group pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Middlesex Water has raised its dividend for 52 consecutive years and California Water Service Group has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years. California Water Service Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Middlesex Water has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

79.5% of Middlesex Water shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of California Water Service Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Middlesex Water shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of California Water Service Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Middlesex Water has a net margin of 22.07% compared to California Water Service Group's net margin of 11.77%. Middlesex Water's return on equity of 9.08% beat California Water Service Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Middlesex Water22.07% 9.08% 3.25%
California Water Service Group 11.77%7.06%2.13%

Middlesex Water currently has a consensus price target of $61.67, indicating a potential upside of 7.35%. California Water Service Group has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.77%. Given California Water Service Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe California Water Service Group is more favorable than Middlesex Water.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Middlesex Water
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
California Water Service Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

California Water Service Group beats Middlesex Water on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does California Water Service Group compare to York Water?

California Water Service Group (NYSE:CWT) and York Water (NASDAQ:YORW) are both utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

California Water Service Group has higher revenue and earnings than York Water. York Water is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than California Water Service Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
California Water Service Group$1.00B3.03$128.21M$2.0025.29
York Water$79.11M6.33$20.06M$1.4721.02

California Water Service Group pays an annual dividend of $1.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. York Water pays an annual dividend of $0.91 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. California Water Service Group pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. York Water pays out 61.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. California Water Service Group has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years and York Water has raised its dividend for 27 consecutive years. York Water is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

York Water has a net margin of 26.84% compared to California Water Service Group's net margin of 11.77%. York Water's return on equity of 8.89% beat California Water Service Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
California Water Service Group11.77% 7.06% 2.13%
York Water 26.84%8.89%3.16%

California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, York Water has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

82.8% of California Water Service Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.9% of York Water shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of California Water Service Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of York Water shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, California Water Service Group had 13 more articles in the media than York Water. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for California Water Service Group and 2 mentions for York Water. California Water Service Group's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat York Water's score of 0.62 indicating that California Water Service Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
California Water Service Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
York Water
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

California Water Service Group currently has a consensus target price of $54.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.77%. Given California Water Service Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe California Water Service Group is more favorable than York Water.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
California Water Service Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
York Water
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

California Water Service Group beats York Water on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does California Water Service Group compare to American Water Works?

California Water Service Group (NYSE:CWT) and American Water Works (NYSE:AWK) are both utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, American Water Works had 19 more articles in the media than California Water Service Group. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for American Water Works and 15 mentions for California Water Service Group. California Water Service Group's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat American Water Works' score of 0.73 indicating that California Water Service Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
California Water Service Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
American Water Works
13 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
14 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

California Water Service Group pays an annual dividend of $1.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. American Water Works pays an annual dividend of $3.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. California Water Service Group pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. American Water Works pays out 62.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. California Water Service Group has increased its dividend for 59 consecutive years and American Water Works has increased its dividend for 18 consecutive years. California Water Service Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.8% of California Water Service Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of American Water Works shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of California Water Service Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of American Water Works shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

American Water Works has higher revenue and earnings than California Water Service Group. American Water Works is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than California Water Service Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
California Water Service Group$1.00B3.03$128.21M$2.0025.29
American Water Works$5.28B5.01$1.11B$5.7723.50

California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, American Water Works has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

American Water Works has a net margin of 21.35% compared to California Water Service Group's net margin of 11.77%. American Water Works' return on equity of 10.38% beat California Water Service Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
California Water Service Group11.77% 7.06% 2.13%
American Water Works 21.35%10.38%3.23%

California Water Service Group presently has a consensus target price of $54.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.77%. American Water Works has a consensus target price of $140.60, suggesting a potential upside of 3.67%. Given California Water Service Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe California Water Service Group is more favorable than American Water Works.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
California Water Service Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
American Water Works
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

Summary

American Water Works beats California Water Service Group on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get California Water Service Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CWT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CWT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CWT vs. The Competition

MetricCalifornia Water Service GroupUTIL IndustryUtilities SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.02B$8.04B$18.63B$23.60B
Dividend Yield2.59%2.78%4.00%4.19%
P/E Ratio25.2724.8019.8030.69
Price / Sales3.034.2322.10158.16
Price / Cash11.2113.0419.3031.18
Price / Book1.782.082.404.63
Net Income$128.21M$416.55M$786.22M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.30%-0.35%-0.93%0.09%
1 Month Performance3.72%0.90%-0.26%1.00%
1 Year Performance11.24%-3.09%21.16%17.26%

California Water Service Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CWT
California Water Service Group
3.5016 of 5 stars
$50.57
+0.1%
$54.50
+7.8%
+12.7%$3.02B$1.00B25.271,336
CWCO
Consolidated Water
3.9111 of 5 stars
$29.00
-0.6%
$40.00
+37.9%
+0.8%$466.73M$132.07M32.22200
GWRS
Global Water Resources
4.5023 of 5 stars
$7.03
-0.6%
$15.00
+113.4%
-25.2%$203.36M$55.76M100.4390
MSEX
Middlesex Water
2.5639 of 5 stars
$56.79
-1.1%
$60.67
+6.8%
+7.4%$1.07B$194.69M23.66350
YORW
York Water
1.848 of 5 stars
$31.26
-0.6%
N/A+0.7%$509.78M$77.49M21.27110

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CWT) was last updated on 7/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners