Sprinklr (CXM) Competitors

$4.92 +0.03 (+0.51%)

As of 10:07 AM Eastern

CXM vs. PSN, DUOL, GLBE, DOCS, and KC

Should you buy Sprinklr stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sprinklr with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sprinklr include Parsons (PSN), Duolingo (DUOL), Global-e Online (GLBE), Doximity (DOCS), and Kingsoft Cloud (KC). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Sprinklr compare to Parsons?

Sprinklr (NYSE:CXM) and Parsons (NYSE:PSN) are both business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Parsons had 11 more articles in the media than Sprinklr. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Parsons and 4 mentions for Sprinklr. Parsons' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Sprinklr's score of 0.69 indicating that Parsons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sprinklr	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Parsons	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Parsons has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Parsons has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 2.67%. Parsons' return on equity of 11.52% beat Sprinklr's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sprinklr	2.67%	7.86%	4.05%
Parsons	3.62%	11.52%	5.36%

Parsons has higher revenue and earnings than Sprinklr. Parsons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprinklr, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sprinklr	$857.20M	1.43	$22.91M	$0.09	54.61
Parsons	$6.36B	0.86	$241.14M	$2.09	24.44

40.2% of Sprinklr shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.0% of Parsons shares are held by institutional investors. 25.2% of Sprinklr shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Parsons shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sprinklr presently has a consensus target price of $8.28, suggesting a potential upside of 68.49%. Parsons has a consensus target price of $78.17, suggesting a potential upside of 53.00%. Given Sprinklr's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Sprinklr is more favorable than Parsons.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sprinklr	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.89
Parsons	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Summary

Parsons beats Sprinklr on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sprinklr compare to Duolingo?

Sprinklr (NYSE:CXM) and Duolingo (NASDAQ:DUOL) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

40.2% of Sprinklr shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Duolingo shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.2% of Sprinklr shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of Duolingo shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Duolingo has higher revenue and earnings than Sprinklr. Duolingo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprinklr, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sprinklr	$857.20M	1.43	$22.91M	$0.09	54.61
Duolingo	$1.04B	4.89	$414.07M	$8.69	12.44

Sprinklr currently has a consensus price target of $8.28, suggesting a potential upside of 68.49%. Duolingo has a consensus price target of $195.94, suggesting a potential upside of 81.30%. Given Duolingo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Duolingo is more favorable than Sprinklr.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sprinklr	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.89
Duolingo	2 Sell rating(s)	17 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.05

Duolingo has a net margin of 38.44% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 2.67%. Duolingo's return on equity of 14.07% beat Sprinklr's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sprinklr	2.67%	7.86%	4.05%
Duolingo	38.44%	14.07%	9.45%

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Duolingo has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Duolingo had 5 more articles in the media than Sprinklr. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Duolingo and 4 mentions for Sprinklr. Duolingo's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Sprinklr's score of 0.69 indicating that Duolingo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sprinklr	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Duolingo	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Duolingo beats Sprinklr on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sprinklr compare to Global-e Online?

Sprinklr (NYSE:CXM) and Global-e Online (NASDAQ:GLBE) are both computer software companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Global-e Online had 25 more articles in the media than Sprinklr. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Global-e Online and 4 mentions for Sprinklr. Global-e Online's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Sprinklr's score of 0.69 indicating that Global-e Online is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sprinklr	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Global-e Online	11 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global-e Online has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Global-e Online has higher revenue and earnings than Sprinklr. Sprinklr is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global-e Online, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sprinklr	$857.20M	1.43	$22.91M	$0.09	54.61
Global-e Online	$962.20M	4.89	$68.27M	$0.37	74.96

40.2% of Sprinklr shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of Global-e Online shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.2% of Sprinklr shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Global-e Online shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global-e Online has a net margin of 7.10% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 2.67%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 7.86% beat Global-e Online's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sprinklr	2.67%	7.86%	4.05%
Global-e Online	7.10%	7.46%	5.31%

Sprinklr presently has a consensus price target of $8.28, suggesting a potential upside of 68.49%. Global-e Online has a consensus price target of $45.29, suggesting a potential upside of 63.27%. Given Sprinklr's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Sprinklr is more favorable than Global-e Online.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sprinklr	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.89
Global-e Online	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

Summary

Global-e Online beats Sprinklr on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sprinklr compare to Doximity?

Sprinklr (NYSE:CXM) and Doximity (NYSE:DOCS) are both computer software companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Doximity had 27 more articles in the media than Sprinklr. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Doximity and 4 mentions for Sprinklr. Sprinklr's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Doximity's score of 0.53 indicating that Sprinklr is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sprinklr	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Doximity	8 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

40.2% of Sprinklr shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of Doximity shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.2% of Sprinklr shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.3% of Doximity shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Doximity has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Doximity has a net margin of 37.54% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 2.67%. Doximity's return on equity of 23.84% beat Sprinklr's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sprinklr	2.67%	7.86%	4.05%
Doximity	37.54%	23.84%	20.42%

Sprinklr presently has a consensus price target of $8.28, suggesting a potential upside of 68.49%. Doximity has a consensus price target of $32.38, suggesting a potential upside of 83.03%. Given Doximity's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Doximity is more favorable than Sprinklr.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sprinklr	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.89
Doximity	0 Sell rating(s)	13 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.52

Doximity has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sprinklr. Doximity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprinklr, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sprinklr	$857.20M	1.43	$22.91M	$0.09	54.61
Doximity	$570.40M	5.73	$223.18M	$1.20	14.74

Summary

Doximity beats Sprinklr on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sprinklr compare to Kingsoft Cloud?

Sprinklr (NYSE:CXM) and Kingsoft Cloud (NASDAQ:KC) are both computer software companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

Sprinklr currently has a consensus price target of $8.28, indicating a potential upside of 68.49%. Kingsoft Cloud has a consensus price target of $18.53, indicating a potential upside of 14.21%. Given Sprinklr's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Sprinklr is more favorable than Kingsoft Cloud.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sprinklr	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.89
Kingsoft Cloud	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Sprinklr has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kingsoft Cloud. Kingsoft Cloud is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprinklr, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sprinklr	$857.20M	1.43	$22.91M	$0.09	54.61
Kingsoft Cloud	$1.37B	3.59	-$133.88M	-$0.49	N/A

In the previous week, Sprinklr had 2 more articles in the media than Kingsoft Cloud. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Sprinklr and 2 mentions for Kingsoft Cloud. Kingsoft Cloud's average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Sprinklr's score of 0.69 indicating that Kingsoft Cloud is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sprinklr	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kingsoft Cloud	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Sprinklr has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kingsoft Cloud has a beta of 2.04, indicating that its share price is 104% more volatile than the broader market.

40.2% of Sprinklr shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Kingsoft Cloud shares are held by institutional investors. 25.2% of Sprinklr shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Kingsoft Cloud shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sprinklr has a net margin of 2.67% compared to Kingsoft Cloud's net margin of -9.74%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 7.86% beat Kingsoft Cloud's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sprinklr	2.67%	7.86%	4.05%
Kingsoft Cloud	-9.74%	-13.06%	-3.89%

Summary

Sprinklr beats Kingsoft Cloud on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sprinklr News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CXM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CXM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Sprinklr	Technology Services Industry	Business Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.22B	$3.87B	$6.31B	$22.94B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.14%	3.12%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	54.39	54.58	31.40	28.34
Price / Sales	1.43	54.56	434.19	24.51
Price / Cash	19.95	40.33	23.44	25.11
Price / Book	2.07	5.45	6.68	4.74
Net Income	$22.91M	$31.15M	$199.93M	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	-9.57%	-0.12%	-0.86%	-0.92%
1 Month Performance	-7.96%	1.94%	0.98%	1.53%
1 Year Performance	-41.83%	32.37%	35.33%	24.53%

Sprinklr Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CXM Sprinklr	4.1441 of 5 stars	$4.92 +0.5%	$8.28 +68.5%	-42.3%	$1.22B	$857.20M	54.39	3,258
PSN Parsons	4.9582 of 5 stars	$48.72 -0.9%	$78.17 +60.4%	-22.8%	$5.26B	$6.36B	23.31	21,000	Insider Trade
DUOL Duolingo	4.7025 of 5 stars	$105.15 -2.6%	$195.94 +86.3%	-80.2%	$5.07B	$1.10B	12.10	600
GLBE Global-e Online	4.7411 of 5 stars	$29.91 +0.4%	$46.77 +56.4%	-35.0%	$5.06B	$962.20M	80.84	1,219	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Gap Down High Trading Volume
DOCS Doximity	3.1807 of 5 stars	$26.31 +1.3%	$40.58 +54.3%	N/A	$4.80B	$570.40M	21.92	890	Trending News Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CXM) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Sprinklr (CXM) Competitors