S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
Log in
NYSE:DAR

Darling Ingredients Competitors

$67.93
+1.77 (+2.68 %)
(As of 03/4/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$66.35
Now: $67.93
$70.25
50-Day Range
$60.69
MA: $66.54
$71.80
52-Week Range
$10.25
Now: $67.93
$72.85
Volume2.54 million shs
Average Volume1.46 million shs
Market Capitalization$11.02 billion
P/E Ratio23.03
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.33

Competitors

Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) Vs. KMB, KDP, STZ.B, ABEV, STZ, and SYY

Should you be buying DAR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer staples" are considered alternatives and competitors to Darling Ingredients, including Kimberly-Clark (KMB), Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP), Constellation Brands (STZ.B), Ambev (ABEV), Constellation Brands (STZ), and Sysco (SYY).

Kimberly-Clark (NYSE:KMB) and Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Kimberly-Clark and Darling Ingredients, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kimberly-Clark17402.25
Darling Ingredients021002.83

Kimberly-Clark currently has a consensus price target of $150.2727, suggesting a potential upside of 16.78%. Darling Ingredients has a consensus price target of $64.6364, suggesting a potential downside of 4.85%. Given Kimberly-Clark's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kimberly-Clark is more favorable than Darling Ingredients.

Profitability

This table compares Kimberly-Clark and Darling Ingredients' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kimberly-Clark12.49%812.50%16.74%
Darling Ingredients14.50%15.13%7.62%

Volatility & Risk

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darling Ingredients has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

71.9% of Kimberly-Clark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Darling Ingredients shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Kimberly-Clark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Darling Ingredients shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Kimberly-Clark and Darling Ingredients' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimberly-Clark$18.45 billion2.36$2.16 billion$6.8918.68
Darling Ingredients$3.36 billion3.28$312.60 million$1.3450.69

Kimberly-Clark has higher revenue and earnings than Darling Ingredients. Kimberly-Clark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darling Ingredients, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Darling Ingredients beats Kimberly-Clark on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Keurig Dr Pepper (NASDAQ:KDP) and Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

37.9% of Keurig Dr Pepper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Darling Ingredients shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Keurig Dr Pepper shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Darling Ingredients shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Keurig Dr Pepper and Darling Ingredients' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Keurig Dr Pepper11.40%8.33%3.90%
Darling Ingredients14.50%15.13%7.62%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Keurig Dr Pepper and Darling Ingredients, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Keurig Dr Pepper03802.73
Darling Ingredients021002.83

Keurig Dr Pepper currently has a consensus price target of $34.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.10%. Darling Ingredients has a consensus price target of $64.6364, indicating a potential downside of 4.85%. Given Keurig Dr Pepper's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more favorable than Darling Ingredients.

Risk and Volatility

Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darling Ingredients has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Keurig Dr Pepper and Darling Ingredients' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keurig Dr Pepper$11.12 billion3.91$1.25 billion$1.2225.31
Darling Ingredients$3.36 billion3.28$312.60 million$1.3450.69

Keurig Dr Pepper has higher revenue and earnings than Darling Ingredients. Keurig Dr Pepper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darling Ingredients, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Darling Ingredients beats Keurig Dr Pepper on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ.B) and Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Constellation Brands and Darling Ingredients, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Constellation Brands0000N/A
Darling Ingredients021002.83

Darling Ingredients has a consensus price target of $64.6364, suggesting a potential downside of 4.85%. Given Darling Ingredients' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Darling Ingredients is more favorable than Constellation Brands.

Volatility and Risk

Constellation Brands has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darling Ingredients has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Constellation Brands and Darling Ingredients' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Constellation Brands21.63%16.09%7.41%
Darling Ingredients14.50%15.13%7.62%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Darling Ingredients shares are owned by institutional investors. 96.8% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Darling Ingredients shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Constellation Brands and Darling Ingredients' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Constellation Brands$9.11 billion4.68$-11,800,000.00N/AN/A
Darling Ingredients$3.36 billion3.28$312.60 million$1.3450.69

Darling Ingredients has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Constellation Brands.

Summary

Darling Ingredients beats Constellation Brands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) and Ambev (NYSE:ABEV) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Darling Ingredients and Ambev's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Darling Ingredients$3.36 billion3.28$312.60 million$1.3450.69
Ambev$12.78 billion3.27$2.99 billion$0.1914.00

Ambev has higher revenue and earnings than Darling Ingredients. Ambev is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darling Ingredients, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Darling Ingredients has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ambev has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.7% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Ambev shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Darling Ingredients and Ambev's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Darling Ingredients14.50%15.13%7.62%
Ambev16.33%13.86%8.66%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Darling Ingredients and Ambev, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Darling Ingredients021002.83
Ambev21302.17

Darling Ingredients presently has a consensus price target of $64.6364, suggesting a potential downside of 4.85%. Given Darling Ingredients' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Darling Ingredients is more favorable than Ambev.

Summary

Darling Ingredients beats Ambev on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ) and Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Constellation Brands and Darling Ingredients, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Constellation Brands091112.62
Darling Ingredients021002.83

Constellation Brands currently has a consensus price target of $227.5238, indicating a potential upside of 7.75%. Darling Ingredients has a consensus price target of $64.6364, indicating a potential downside of 4.85%. Given Constellation Brands' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Constellation Brands is more favorable than Darling Ingredients.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

71.9% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Darling Ingredients shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Darling Ingredients shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Constellation Brands and Darling Ingredients' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Constellation Brands21.63%16.09%7.41%
Darling Ingredients14.50%15.13%7.62%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Constellation Brands and Darling Ingredients' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Constellation Brands$9.11 billion4.49$-11,800,000.00$9.1223.15
Darling Ingredients$3.36 billion3.28$312.60 million$1.3450.69

Darling Ingredients has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Constellation Brands. Constellation Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darling Ingredients, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Constellation Brands has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darling Ingredients has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Constellation Brands beats Darling Ingredients on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sysco (NYSE:SYY) and Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.0% of Sysco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Sysco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sysco and Darling Ingredients' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sysco$52.89 billion0.77$215.48 million$2.0139.51
Darling Ingredients$3.36 billion3.28$312.60 million$1.3450.69

Darling Ingredients has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sysco. Sysco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darling Ingredients, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Sysco and Darling Ingredients, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sysco05602.55
Darling Ingredients021002.83

Sysco currently has a consensus target price of $77.6250, suggesting a potential downside of 2.26%. Darling Ingredients has a consensus target price of $64.6364, suggesting a potential downside of 4.85%. Given Sysco's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Sysco is more favorable than Darling Ingredients.

Profitability

This table compares Sysco and Darling Ingredients' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sysco-0.04%39.64%3.26%
Darling Ingredients14.50%15.13%7.62%

Volatility and Risk

Sysco has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darling Ingredients has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Darling Ingredients beats Sysco on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Darling Ingredients Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Kimberly-Clark logo
KMB
Kimberly-Clark
2.5$128.68+0.5%$43.54 billion$18.45 billion18.70
Keurig Dr Pepper logo
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
1.8$30.88+0.8%$43.46 billion$11.12 billion33.57Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
STZ.B
Constellation Brands
1.1$220.17+0.0%$42.67 billion$9.11 billion21.44
Ambev logo
ABEV
Ambev
1.6$2.66+4.1%$41.83 billion$12.78 billion22.17Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Constellation Brands logo
STZ
Constellation Brands
2.1$211.15+2.3%$40.94 billion$9.11 billion20.56Increase in Short Interest
Sysco logo
SYY
Sysco
2.0$79.42+2.6%$40.54 billion$52.89 billion-1,134.41
Chewy logo
CHWY
Chewy
1.4$87.65+4.5%$36.17 billion$4.85 billion-203.83
General Mills logo
GIS
General Mills
2.1$55.29+0.7%$33.81 billion$17.63 billion14.18Unusual Options Activity
Corteva logo
CTVA
Corteva
1.9$43.85+3.4%$32.63 billion$13.85 billion53.48
International Flavors & Fragrances logo
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances
2.3$130.89+0.6%$32.56 billion$5.14 billion39.19Decrease in Short Interest
Archer-Daniels-Midland logo
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland
2.3$55.49+2.9%$30.99 billion$64.66 billion19.61Increase in Short Interest
The Hershey logo
HSY
The Hershey
1.8$146.09+1.2%$30.26 billion$7.99 billion25.63Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
Tyson Foods logo
TSN
Tyson Foods
2.1$72.19+3.1%$26.35 billion$43.19 billion12.32
Fomento Económico Mexicano logo
FMX
Fomento Económico Mexicano
1.6$72.17+3.6%$25.82 billion$26.33 billion72.90
Hormel Foods logo
HRL
Hormel Foods
2.0$46.96+0.1%$25.35 billion$9.61 billion28.12Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
Coca-Cola European Partners logo
CCEP
Coca-Cola European Partners
1.4$50.74+0.8%$24.58 billion$13.46 billion17.93Increase in Short Interest
The Clorox logo
CLX
The Clorox
2.3$178.17+1.0%$22.41 billion$6.72 billion19.84
McCormick & Company, Incorporated logo
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
1.7$82.90+0.3%$22.13 billion$5.35 billion29.29
Kellogg logo
K
Kellogg
2.0$57.70+0.6%$19.85 billion$13.58 billion16.68Unusual Options Activity
Church & Dwight logo
CHD
Church & Dwight
2.3$77.92+0.7%$19.10 billion$4.36 billion25.14
Conagra Brands logo
CAG
Conagra Brands
2.1$34.67+0.3%$16.94 billion$11.05 billion15.27
Campbell Soup logo
CPB
Campbell Soup
1.9$45.80+0.0%$13.87 billion$8.69 billion7.87Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Announcement
The J. M. Smucker logo
SJM
The J. M. Smucker
2.1$116.22+1.9%$12.74 billion$7.80 billion15.05Unusual Options Activity
The Boston Beer logo
SAM
The Boston Beer
1.5$1,030.81+0.8%$12.64 billion$1.25 billion73.63
Lamb Weston logo
LW
Lamb Weston
1.9$82.76+0.4%$12.11 billion$3.79 billion40.97
NTCO
Natura &Co
0.1$16.56+0.9%$11.39 billion$3.66 billion184.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Aramark logo
ARMK
Aramark
1.4$40.63+0.0%$10.32 billion$12.83 billion-22.20
Newell Brands logo
NWL
Newell Brands
1.4$23.96+1.7%$10.17 billion$9.71 billion-92.15Decrease in Short Interest
Molson Coors Beverage logo
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
1.3$45.39+1.0%$9.84 billion$13.01 billion16.87Increase in Short Interest
Coca-Cola FEMSA logo
KOF
Coca-Cola FEMSA
1.8$45.43+2.3%$9.54 billion$10.11 billion21.95Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
Beyond Meat logo
BYND
Beyond Meat
1.1$136.42+2.3%$8.59 billion$297.90 million-303.16Analyst Upgrade
The New York Times logo
NYT
The New York Times
1.8$50.46+3.3%$8.44 billion$1.81 billion53.12
Albertsons Companies logo
ACI
Albertsons Companies
2.1$17.93+1.2%$8.35 billion$62.46 billion0.00Analyst Downgrade
US Foods logo
USFD
US Foods
1.5$37.37+2.7%$8.26 billion$25.94 billion-59.32
Service Co. International logo
SCI
Service Co. International
1.9$46.19+1.8%$7.83 billion$3.23 billion18.11
Post logo
POST
Post
1.5$100.88+2.2%$6.49 billion$5.70 billion-3,361.55Insider Selling
Freshpet logo
FRPT
Freshpet
1.7$140.07+5.2%$6.04 billion$245.86 million1,273.48Analyst Report
Coty logo
COTY
Coty
1.3$7.82+4.2%$6.00 billion$4.72 billion-6.74Increase in Short Interest
Ingredion logo
INGR
Ingredion
2.1$89.11+1.7%$5.98 billion$6.21 billion17.61
Pilgrim's Pride logo
PPC
Pilgrim's Pride
1.7$23.75+0.9%$5.78 billion$11.41 billion31.25Analyst Upgrade
Helen of Troy logo
HELE
Helen of Troy
1.5$220.52+1.2%$5.38 billion$1.71 billion24.48Analyst Downgrade
Ollie's Bargain Outlet logo
OLLI
Ollie's Bargain Outlet
1.2$82.16+4.3%$5.37 billion$1.41 billion23.75News Coverage
Lancaster Colony logo
LANC
Lancaster Colony
2.0$175.24+0.6%$4.83 billion$1.33 billion36.21
Flowers Foods logo
FLO
Flowers Foods
1.3$22.40+0.9%$4.74 billion$4.12 billion48.70
National Beverage logo
FIZZ
National Beverage
1.3$48.88+1.0%$4.56 billion$1.00 billion14.21Decrease in Short Interest
51job logo
JOBS
51job
1.7$65.67+2.0%$4.43 billion$574.57 million30.98
WD-40 logo
WDFC
WD-40
1.6$311.95+0.4%$4.27 billion$423.35 million70.90
Nomad Foods logo
NOMD
Nomad Foods
1.8$24.70+2.3%$4.25 billion$2.60 billion20.58
The Hain Celestial Group logo
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group
1.5$41.94+0.1%$4.19 billion$2.05 billion161.31
Leslie's logo
LESL
Leslie's
1.7$20.93+6.4%$3.91 billion$1.11 billion49.83
This page was last updated on 3/5/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.