Free Trial

Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) Competitors

Archer Daniels Midland logo
$79.06 -2.22 (-2.74%)
Closing price 06/11/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$78.98 -0.08 (-0.10%)
As of 04:05 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ADM vs. AGRO, BG, CTVA, MCK, and MPC

Should you buy Archer Daniels Midland stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Archer Daniels Midland with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Archer Daniels Midland include Adecoagro (AGRO), Bunge Global (BG), Corteva (CTVA), McKesson (MCK), and Marathon Petroleum (MPC).

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Adecoagro?

Adecoagro (NYSE:AGRO) and Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Adecoagro currently has a consensus target price of $11.53, suggesting a potential downside of 1.29%. Archer Daniels Midland has a consensus target price of $74.50, suggesting a potential downside of 5.76%. Given Adecoagro's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Adecoagro is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Adecoagro
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Archer Daniels Midland
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Adecoagro pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Adecoagro pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Adecoagro has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

45.3% of Adecoagro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by institutional investors. 6.7% of Adecoagro shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Archer Daniels Midland has higher revenue and earnings than Adecoagro. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Adecoagro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Adecoagro$1.43B1.17-$8.35M$0.02584.20
Archer Daniels Midland$80.27B0.47$1.08B$2.2335.45

Adecoagro has a beta of -0.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 9 more articles in the media than Adecoagro. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 1 mentions for Adecoagro. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Adecoagro's score of 0.50 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Adecoagro
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Archer Daniels Midland
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 1.34% compared to Adecoagro's net margin of 0.95%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.37% beat Adecoagro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Adecoagro0.95% -2.38% -0.90%
Archer Daniels Midland 1.34%7.37%3.15%

Summary

Archer Daniels Midland beats Adecoagro on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Bunge Global?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Bunge Global (NYSE:BG) are both large-cap agricultural products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bunge Global has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.2% of Bunge Global shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Bunge Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Bunge Global pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bunge Global pays out 67.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Archer Daniels Midland presently has a consensus target price of $74.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.76%. Bunge Global has a consensus target price of $132.67, indicating a potential upside of 5.79%. Given Bunge Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bunge Global is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
Bunge Global
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 6 more articles in the media than Bunge Global. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 4 mentions for Bunge Global. Bunge Global's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.90 indicating that Bunge Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Bunge Global
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Archer Daniels Midland has higher revenue and earnings than Bunge Global. Bunge Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer Daniels Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland$80.27B0.47$1.08B$2.2335.45
Bunge Global$70.33B0.35$816M$4.2929.23

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 1.34% compared to Bunge Global's net margin of 0.85%. Bunge Global's return on equity of 8.60% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland1.34% 7.37% 3.15%
Bunge Global 0.85%8.60%3.24%

Summary

Bunge Global beats Archer Daniels Midland on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Corteva?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Corteva has a net margin of 6.50% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 1.34%. Corteva's return on equity of 9.95% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland1.34% 7.37% 3.15%
Corteva 6.50%9.95%5.91%

Archer Daniels Midland currently has a consensus target price of $74.50, suggesting a potential downside of 5.76%. Corteva has a consensus target price of $88.81, suggesting a potential upside of 18.65%. Given Corteva's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Corteva is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
Corteva
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.61

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Corteva pays out 42.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Corteva has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Corteva shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Corteva shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corteva has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 2 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 8 mentions for Corteva. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Corteva's score of 0.52 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Corteva
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Corteva has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland$80.27B0.47$1.08B$2.2335.45
Corteva$17.40B2.88$1.09B$1.7044.03

Summary

Corteva beats Archer Daniels Midland on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to McKesson?

McKesson (NYSE:MCK) and Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

85.1% of McKesson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of McKesson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

McKesson has higher revenue and earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. McKesson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer Daniels Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McKesson$403.43B0.23$4.76B$38.4720.50
Archer Daniels Midland$80.27B0.47$1.08B$2.2335.45

In the previous week, McKesson had 23 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for McKesson and 10 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. McKesson's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.90 indicating that McKesson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
McKesson
25 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Archer Daniels Midland
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

McKesson pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. McKesson pays out 8.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. McKesson has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Archer Daniels Midland has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

McKesson has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

McKesson currently has a consensus target price of $960.53, suggesting a potential upside of 21.83%. Archer Daniels Midland has a consensus target price of $74.50, suggesting a potential downside of 5.76%. Given McKesson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe McKesson is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McKesson
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Archer Daniels Midland
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 1.34% compared to McKesson's net margin of 1.18%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.37% beat McKesson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McKesson1.18% -345.35% 5.85%
Archer Daniels Midland 1.34%7.37%3.15%

Summary

McKesson beats Archer Daniels Midland on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 1.34%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 16.22% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum3.36% 16.22% 4.60%
Archer Daniels Midland 1.34%7.37%3.15%

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer Daniels Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum$135.22B0.56$4.05B$15.3217.01
Archer Daniels Midland$80.27B0.47$1.08B$2.2335.45

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Marathon Petroleum currently has a consensus price target of $270.38, indicating a potential upside of 3.76%. Archer Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $74.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.76%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Archer Daniels Midland
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 24 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 10 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.90 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum
24 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Archer Daniels Midland
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats Archer Daniels Midland on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Archer Daniels Midland News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ADM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ADM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ADM vs. The Competition

MetricArcher Daniels MidlandAGRI OPERATIONS IndustryStaples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$39.17B$3.19B$16.23B$22.81B
Dividend Yield2.56%2.86%3.49%4.10%
P/E Ratio35.4538.3526.1531.00
Price / Sales0.473.5947.4921.39
Price / Cash13.758.7816.3323.95
Price / Book1.673.845.694.68
Net Income$1.08B-$7.12M$673.17M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.62%0.87%3.19%1.53%
1 Month Performance-2.13%-5.31%3.78%1.32%
1 Year Performance59.23%-21.55%-10.89%21.42%

Archer Daniels Midland Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ADM
Archer Daniels Midland
3.7807 of 5 stars
$79.06
-2.7%
$74.50
-5.8%
+62.4%$39.17B$80.27B35.4541,496
AGRO
Adecoagro
1.8493 of 5 stars
$12.12
-0.6%
$11.53
-4.8%
+26.7%$1.74B$1.43B606.0510,283
BG
Bunge Global
4.0815 of 5 stars
$129.52
-1.4%
$132.67
+2.4%
+66.3%$25.50B$70.33B30.1934,000
CTVA
Corteva
4.1095 of 5 stars
$77.49
-0.4%
$88.67
+14.4%
+3.9%$52.03B$17.40B45.5821,500
MCK
McKesson
4.8918 of 5 stars
$756.73
+2.3%
$968.87
+28.0%
+10.0%$88.89B$403.43B19.6743,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ADM) was last updated on 6/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners