Does the media refer more to ADM or BG?

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 3 more articles in the media than Bunge Global. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 2 mentions for Bunge Global. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Bunge Global's score of -0.33 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Archer Daniels Midland 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Bunge Global 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer ADM or CTVA?

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 3 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 2 mentions for Corteva. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.32 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Archer Daniels Midland 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Corteva 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor ADM or MCK?

In the previous week, McKesson had 17 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for McKesson and 5 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. McKesson's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.32 indicating that McKesson is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Archer Daniels Midland 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral McKesson 19 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ADM or MPC?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 9 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 5 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.32 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Archer Daniels Midland 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Marathon Petroleum 11 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) Competitors

$76.53 +0.13 (+0.17%)

Closing price 07/1/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$77.12 +0.60 (+0.78%)

As of 06:16 AM Eastern

Compare

ADM vs. AGRO, BG, CTVA, MCK, and MPC

Should you buy Archer Daniels Midland stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Archer Daniels Midland with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Archer Daniels Midland include Adecoagro (AGRO), Bunge Global (BG), Corteva (CTVA), McKesson (MCK), and Marathon Petroleum (MPC).

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Adecoagro?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Adecoagro (NYSE:AGRO) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Archer Daniels Midland has higher revenue and earnings than Adecoagro. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Adecoagro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland	$80.27B	0.46	$1.08B	$2.23	34.32
Adecoagro	$1.43B	0.95	-$8.35M	$0.02	475.45

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of Adecoagro shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Adecoagro shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Archer Daniels Midland currently has a consensus price target of $75.33, indicating a potential downside of 1.56%. Adecoagro has a consensus price target of $12.12, indicating a potential upside of 27.42%. Given Adecoagro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Adecoagro is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
Adecoagro	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 1.34% compared to Adecoagro's net margin of 0.95%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.37% beat Adecoagro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland	1.34%	7.37%	3.15%
Adecoagro	0.95%	-2.38%	-0.90%

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Adecoagro pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Adecoagro pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Archer Daniels Midland has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Adecoagro has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 5 more articles in the media than Adecoagro. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 0 mentions for Adecoagro. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Adecoagro's score of 0.00 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland	Neutral
Adecoagro	Neutral

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Adecoagro has a beta of -0.04, suggesting that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Archer Daniels Midland beats Adecoagro on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Bunge Global?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Bunge Global (NYSE:BG) are both large-cap agricultural products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Archer Daniels Midland has higher revenue and earnings than Bunge Global. Bunge Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer Daniels Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland	$80.27B	0.46	$1.08B	$2.23	34.32
Bunge Global	$70.33B	0.29	$816M	$4.29	24.45

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 3 more articles in the media than Bunge Global. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 2 mentions for Bunge Global. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Bunge Global's score of -0.33 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Bunge Global	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.2% of Bunge Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Bunge Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Bunge Global pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bunge Global pays out 67.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Bunge Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Archer Daniels Midland presently has a consensus target price of $75.33, suggesting a potential downside of 1.56%. Bunge Global has a consensus target price of $132.67, suggesting a potential upside of 26.46%. Given Bunge Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bunge Global is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
Bunge Global	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bunge Global has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 1.34% compared to Bunge Global's net margin of 0.85%. Bunge Global's return on equity of 8.60% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland	1.34%	7.37%	3.15%
Bunge Global	0.85%	8.60%	3.24%

Summary

Bunge Global beats Archer Daniels Midland on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Corteva?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Archer Daniels Midland presently has a consensus target price of $75.33, suggesting a potential downside of 1.56%. Corteva has a consensus target price of $88.81, suggesting a potential upside of 6.56%. Given Corteva's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Corteva is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
Corteva	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corteva has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Corteva shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Corteva shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Corteva has a net margin of 6.50% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 1.34%. Corteva's return on equity of 9.95% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland	1.34%	7.37%	3.15%
Corteva	6.50%	9.95%	5.91%

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 3 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 2 mentions for Corteva. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.32 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Corteva	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Corteva has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland	$80.27B	0.46	$1.08B	$2.23	34.32
Corteva	$17.40B	3.20	$1.09B	$1.70	49.03

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Corteva pays out 42.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Corteva has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Corteva beats Archer Daniels Midland on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to McKesson?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and McKesson (NYSE:MCK) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, McKesson had 17 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for McKesson and 5 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. McKesson's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.32 indicating that McKesson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
McKesson	19 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Archer Daniels Midland currently has a consensus target price of $75.33, indicating a potential downside of 1.56%. McKesson has a consensus target price of $960.53, indicating a potential upside of 24.91%. Given McKesson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe McKesson is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
McKesson	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

McKesson has higher revenue and earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. McKesson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer Daniels Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland	$80.27B	0.46	$1.08B	$2.23	34.32
McKesson	$403.43B	0.22	$4.76B	$38.47	19.99

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McKesson has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of McKesson shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of McKesson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. McKesson pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. McKesson pays out 8.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and McKesson has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 1.34% compared to McKesson's net margin of 1.18%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.37% beat McKesson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland	1.34%	7.37%	3.15%
McKesson	1.18%	-345.35%	5.85%

Summary

McKesson beats Archer Daniels Midland on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 1.34%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 16.22% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland	1.34%	7.37%	3.15%
Marathon Petroleum	3.36%	16.22%	4.60%

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marathon Petroleum pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Archer Daniels Midland presently has a consensus target price of $75.33, suggesting a potential downside of 1.56%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus target price of $272.63, suggesting a potential upside of 2.97%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 9 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 5 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.32 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Marathon Petroleum	11 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer Daniels Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland	$80.27B	0.46	$1.08B	$2.23	34.32
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.57	$4.05B	$15.32	17.28

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats Archer Daniels Midland on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Archer Daniels Midland News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ADM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ADM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Archer Daniels Midland	AGRI OPERATIONS Industry	Staples Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$36.82B	$3.34B	$16.36B	$23.43B
Dividend Yield	2.72%	2.87%	3.33%	4.08%
P/E Ratio	34.32	33.64	26.68	31.21
Price / Sales	0.46	3.23	47.34	21.42
Price / Cash	12.92	8.90	16.36	25.08
Price / Book	1.62	3.89	5.53	4.81
Net Income	$1.08B	-$7.36M	$680.96M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.05%	-1.80%	5.18%	1.43%
1 Month Performance	-7.09%	-7.24%	9.72%	2.47%
1 Year Performance	36.88%	-21.67%	-12.62%	20.45%

Archer Daniels Midland Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ADM Archer Daniels Midland	2.5007 of 5 stars	$76.53 +0.2%	$75.33 -1.6%	+40.8%	$36.82B	$80.27B	34.32	41,496
AGRO Adecoagro	3.439 of 5 stars	$9.29 +1.9%	$12.12 +30.5%	+3.1%	$1.30B	$1.43B	464.48	10,283	Gap Down
BG Bunge Global	4.4406 of 5 stars	$111.30 +2.1%	$132.67 +19.2%	+30.7%	$21.15B	$70.33B	25.94	34,000	Analyst Downgrade
CTVA Corteva	3.1479 of 5 stars	$81.51 +1.8%	$88.81 +9.0%	+11.1%	$53.57B	$17.40B	47.95	21,500
MCK McKesson	4.9698 of 5 stars	$764.77 -0.2%	$960.53 +25.6%	+5.9%	$89.75B	$403.43B	19.88	43,000	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ADM) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) Competitors

ADM vs. AGRO, BG, CTVA, MCK, and MPC

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Adecoagro?

Summary

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Bunge Global?

Summary

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Corteva?

Summary

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to McKesson?

Summary

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ADM vs. The Competition

Archer Daniels Midland Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) Competitors

ADM vs. AGRO, BG, CTVA, MCK, and MPC

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Adecoagro?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ADM or AGRO?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ADM or AGRO?

Do analysts prefer ADM or AGRO?

Is ADM or AGRO more profitable?

Is ADM or AGRO a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer ADM or AGRO?

Which has more risk and volatility, ADM or AGRO?

Summary

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Bunge Global?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ADM or BG?

Does the media refer more to ADM or BG?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ADM or BG?

Is ADM or BG a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend ADM or BG?

Which has more volatility and risk, ADM or BG?

Is ADM or BG more profitable?

Summary

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Corteva?

Do analysts rate ADM or CTVA?

Which has more risk & volatility, ADM or CTVA?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ADM or CTVA?

Is ADM or CTVA more profitable?

Does the media prefer ADM or CTVA?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ADM or CTVA?

Is ADM or CTVA a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to McKesson?

Does the media favor ADM or MCK?

Do analysts rate ADM or MCK?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ADM or MCK?

Which has more volatility and risk, ADM or MCK?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ADM or MCK?

Is ADM or MCK a better dividend stock?

Is ADM or MCK more profitable?

Summary

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Which has more volatility & risk, ADM or MPC?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ADM or MPC?

Is ADM or MPC more profitable?

Is ADM or MPC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer ADM or MPC?

Does the media favor ADM or MPC?

Which has better earnings & valuation, ADM or MPC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ADM vs. The Competition

Archer Daniels Midland Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools