Go Pro

Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) Competitors

Archer Daniels Midland logo
$84.51 -0.10 (-0.12%)
Closing price 09/8/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$84.03 -0.49 (-0.58%)
As of 08:19 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ADM vs. AGRO, BG, CTVA, MCK, and MPC

Should you buy Archer Daniels Midland stock or one of its competitors? Archer Daniels Midland's main competitors and comparable companies include Adecoagro (AGRO), Bunge Global (BG), Corteva (CTVA), McKesson (MCK), and Marathon Petroleum (MPC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Adecoagro?

Adecoagro (NYSE:AGRO) and Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

Adecoagro has a net margin of 3.03% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 2.16%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 9.21% beat Adecoagro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Adecoagro3.03% -0.38% -0.14%
Archer Daniels Midland 2.16%9.21%3.95%

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 14 more articles in the media than Adecoagro. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 2 mentions for Adecoagro. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Adecoagro's score of 0.70 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Adecoagro
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Archer Daniels Midland
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Adecoagro presently has a consensus target price of $11.62, indicating a potential downside of 5.20%. Archer Daniels Midland has a consensus target price of $79.67, indicating a potential downside of 5.73%. Given Adecoagro's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Adecoagro is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Adecoagro
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
Archer Daniels Midland
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Adecoagro pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Adecoagro pays out 72.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Adecoagro has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Adecoagro has a beta of -0.01, meaning that its stock price is 101% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Archer Daniels Midland has higher revenue and earnings than Adecoagro. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Adecoagro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Adecoagro$1.43B1.22-$8.35M$0.3337.13
Archer Daniels Midland$82.10B0.50$1.08B$3.6523.15

45.3% of Adecoagro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Archer Daniels Midland beats Adecoagro on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Bunge Global?

Bunge Global (NYSE:BG) and Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Bunge Global's net margin of 1.10%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 9.21% beat Bunge Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bunge Global1.10% 9.15% 3.43%
Archer Daniels Midland 2.16%9.21%3.95%

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 7 more articles in the media than Bunge Global. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 9 mentions for Bunge Global. Bunge Global's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.90 indicating that Bunge Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bunge Global
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Archer Daniels Midland
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Archer Daniels Midland has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bunge Global. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bunge Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bunge Global$91.82B0.26$816M$5.1524.05
Archer Daniels Midland$82.10B0.50$1.08B$3.6523.15

Bunge Global pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Bunge Global pays out 55.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Bunge Global presently has a consensus price target of $132.67, suggesting a potential upside of 7.13%. Archer Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $79.67, suggesting a potential downside of 5.73%. Given Bunge Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Bunge Global is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bunge Global
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Archer Daniels Midland
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Bunge Global has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

86.2% of Bunge Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Bunge Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Bunge Global beats Archer Daniels Midland on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Corteva?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corteva has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Corteva has a net margin of 5.66% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 2.16%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland2.16% 9.21% 3.95%
Corteva 5.66%10.18%6.00%

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 6 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 10 mentions for Corteva. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.90 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Corteva
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corteva pays out 47.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Corteva has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Archer Daniels Midland presently has a consensus price target of $79.67, indicating a potential downside of 5.73%. Corteva has a consensus price target of $91.50, indicating a potential upside of 6.46%. Given Corteva's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Corteva is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Corteva
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.61

Corteva has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland$82.10B0.50$1.08B$3.6523.15
Corteva$17.40B3.30$1.09B$1.5156.92

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Corteva shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Corteva shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Corteva beats Archer Daniels Midland on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to McKesson?

McKesson (NYSE:MCK) and Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

McKesson has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

McKesson has higher revenue and earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McKesson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McKesson$403.43B0.26$4.76B$37.3723.75
Archer Daniels Midland$82.10B0.50$1.08B$3.6523.15

McKesson pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. McKesson pays out 10.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. McKesson has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, McKesson had 13 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for McKesson and 16 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. McKesson's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.90 indicating that McKesson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
McKesson
24 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Archer Daniels Midland
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 2.16% compared to McKesson's net margin of 1.12%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 9.21% beat McKesson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McKesson1.12% -253.21% 5.90%
Archer Daniels Midland 2.16%9.21%3.95%

85.1% of McKesson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of McKesson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

McKesson presently has a consensus price target of $973.44, indicating a potential upside of 9.66%. Archer Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $79.67, indicating a potential downside of 5.73%. Given McKesson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe McKesson is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McKesson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Archer Daniels Midland
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Summary

McKesson beats Archer Daniels Midland on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer Daniels Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland$82.10B0.50$1.08B$3.6523.15
Marathon Petroleum$153.58B0.76$4.05B$29.0913.71

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 6 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 16 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 0.90 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Marathon Petroleum
14 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Archer Daniels Midland presently has a consensus target price of $79.67, indicating a potential downside of 5.73%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus target price of $330.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.11%. Given Archer Daniels Midland's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Archer Daniels Midland is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Marathon Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.48% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 2.16%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland2.16% 9.21% 3.95%
Marathon Petroleum 5.48%31.96%8.88%

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats Archer Daniels Midland on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Archer Daniels Midland News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ADM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ADM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ADM vs. The Competition

MetricArcher Daniels MidlandFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$40.78B$5.63B$15.79B$23.62B
Dividend Yield2.46%3.14%3.22%3.73%
P/E Ratio23.1511.8113.3729.07
Price / Sales0.5082.96262,948.48107.22
Price / Cash14.31112.2457.2233.53
Price / Book1.793.704.774.79
Net Income$1.08B$765.39M$835.37M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.09%-0.76%-0.70%-0.02%
1 Month Performance10.42%0.84%-0.74%-1.40%
1 Year Performance35.97%39.97%11.69%12.56%

Archer Daniels Midland Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ADM
Archer Daniels Midland
3.4218 of 5 stars
$84.51
-0.1%
$79.67
-5.7%
+35.8%$40.78B$82.10B23.1541,496
AGRO
Adecoagro
1.9492 of 5 stars
$11.59
-1.6%
$11.62
+0.2%
+52.7%$1.68B$1.43B35.1210,283
BG
Bunge Global
4.1393 of 5 stars
$120.12
-2.2%
$132.67
+10.4%
+46.9%$23.60B$70.33B23.3234,000
CTVA
Corteva
3.7694 of 5 stars
$88.71
-1.4%
$91.50
+3.1%
+17.9%$60.03B$17.40B58.7521,500
MCK
McKesson
4.7745 of 5 stars
$921.70
-0.3%
$973.44
+5.6%
+27.4%$107.82B$403.43B24.6643,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ADM) was last updated on 9/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners