Archer-Daniels-Midland Competitors

Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE:ADM) and The Estée Lauder Companies (NYSE:EL) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.9% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.0% of The Estée Lauder Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of The Estée Lauder Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Archer-Daniels-Midland and The Estée Lauder Companies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Archer-Daniels-Midland presently has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.33%. The Estée Lauder Companies has a consensus price target of $285.9524, indicating a potential downside of 8.43%. Given Archer-Daniels-Midland's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Archer-Daniels-Midland is more favorable than The Estée Lauder Companies.

Dividends

Archer-Daniels-Midland pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. The Estée Lauder Companies pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Archer-Daniels-Midland pays out 45.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Estée Lauder Companies pays out 51.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer-Daniels-Midland has increased its dividend for 47 consecutive years and The Estée Lauder Companies has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Archer-Daniels-Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and The Estée Lauder Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Archer-Daniels-Midland has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Estée Lauder Companies has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and The Estée Lauder Companies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Archer-Daniels-Midland has higher revenue and earnings than The Estée Lauder Companies. Archer-Daniels-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Estée Lauder Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

The Estée Lauder Companies beats Archer-Daniels-Midland on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Diageo (NYSE:DEO) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.9% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Diageo shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Archer-Daniels-Midland and Diageo, as reported by MarketBeat.

Archer-Daniels-Midland presently has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.33%. Diageo has a consensus price target of $143.50, indicating a potential downside of 19.82%. Given Archer-Daniels-Midland's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Archer-Daniels-Midland is more favorable than Diageo.

Dividends

Archer-Daniels-Midland pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Diageo pays an annual dividend of $3.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Archer-Daniels-Midland pays out 45.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diageo pays out 55.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer-Daniels-Midland has increased its dividend for 47 consecutive years. Archer-Daniels-Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and Diageo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Archer-Daniels-Midland has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diageo has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and Diageo's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Diageo has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Archer-Daniels-Midland. Archer-Daniels-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diageo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Archer-Daniels-Midland beats Diageo on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Altria Group (NYSE:MO) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.9% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.2% of Altria Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Altria Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Archer-Daniels-Midland and Altria Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Archer-Daniels-Midland presently has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.33%. Altria Group has a consensus price target of $49.90, indicating a potential downside of 4.61%. Given Altria Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Altria Group is more favorable than Archer-Daniels-Midland.

Dividends

Archer-Daniels-Midland pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Altria Group pays an annual dividend of $3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Archer-Daniels-Midland pays out 45.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Altria Group pays out 81.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Archer-Daniels-Midland has increased its dividend for 47 consecutive years and Altria Group has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and Altria Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Archer-Daniels-Midland has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Altria Group has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and Altria Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Archer-Daniels-Midland has higher revenue and earnings than Altria Group. Altria Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer-Daniels-Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE:ADM) and British American Tobacco (NYSE:BTI) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.9% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of British American Tobacco shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Archer-Daniels-Midland and British American Tobacco, as reported by MarketBeat.

Archer-Daniels-Midland presently has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.33%. Given Archer-Daniels-Midland's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Archer-Daniels-Midland is more favorable than British American Tobacco.

Dividends

Archer-Daniels-Midland pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. British American Tobacco pays an annual dividend of $2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Archer-Daniels-Midland pays out 45.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. British American Tobacco pays out 71.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer-Daniels-Midland has increased its dividend for 47 consecutive years and British American Tobacco has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and British American Tobacco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Archer-Daniels-Midland has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, British American Tobacco has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and British American Tobacco's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

British American Tobacco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Archer-Daniels-Midland. British American Tobacco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer-Daniels-Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Archer-Daniels-Midland beats British American Tobacco on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Mondelez International (NASDAQ:MDLZ) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Archer-Daniels-Midland has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mondelez International has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and Mondelez International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Archer-Daniels-Midland and Mondelez International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Archer-Daniels-Midland presently has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.33%. Mondelez International has a consensus price target of $64.2308, indicating a potential upside of 9.29%. Given Mondelez International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mondelez International is more favorable than Archer-Daniels-Midland.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.9% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.1% of Mondelez International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Mondelez International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Archer-Daniels-Midland pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Mondelez International pays an annual dividend of $1.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Archer-Daniels-Midland pays out 45.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 51.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer-Daniels-Midland has increased its dividend for 47 consecutive years and Mondelez International has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Archer-Daniels-Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and Mondelez International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Mondelez International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Archer-Daniels-Midland. Archer-Daniels-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mondelez International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Mondelez International beats Archer-Daniels-Midland on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE:CL) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Archer-Daniels-Midland has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and Colgate-Palmolive's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Archer-Daniels-Midland and Colgate-Palmolive, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Archer-Daniels-Midland currently has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.33%. Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $82.1667, indicating a potential upside of 1.82%. Given Colgate-Palmolive's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Colgate-Palmolive is more favorable than Archer-Daniels-Midland.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.9% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Archer-Daniels-Midland pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Colgate-Palmolive pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Archer-Daniels-Midland pays out 45.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 62.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer-Daniels-Midland has raised its dividend for 47 consecutive years and Colgate-Palmolive has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years. Archer-Daniels-Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Archer-Daniels-Midland and Colgate-Palmolive's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Colgate-Palmolive has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Archer-Daniels-Midland. Archer-Daniels-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colgate-Palmolive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Archer-Daniels-Midland beats Colgate-Palmolive on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.