Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) Competitors

Archer Daniels Midland has higher revenue and earnings than Bunge Global. Bunge Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer Daniels Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Bunge Global pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bunge Global pays out 55.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Bunge Global's net margin of 1.10%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 9.21% beat Bunge Global's return on equity.

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.2% of Bunge Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Bunge Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bunge Global has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Archer Daniels Midland presently has a consensus price target of $79.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.37%. Bunge Global has a consensus price target of $132.67, indicating a potential upside of 19.18%. Given Bunge Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bunge Global is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 11 more articles in the media than Bunge Global. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 6 mentions for Bunge Global. Bunge Global's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 1.10 indicating that Bunge Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Corteva has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Corteva pays out 47.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Corteva has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Corteva has a net margin of 5.66% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 2.16%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

Corteva presently has a consensus target price of $91.70, indicating a potential upside of 21.98%. Archer Daniels Midland has a consensus target price of $79.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.37%. Given Corteva's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Corteva is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Corteva has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Archer Daniels Midland. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 11 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 6 mentions for Corteva. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Corteva's score of 0.72 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

81.5% of Corteva shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Corteva shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, McKesson had 35 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 52 mentions for McKesson and 17 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat McKesson's score of 0.87 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media.

McKesson has higher revenue and earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McKesson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of McKesson shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of McKesson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Archer Daniels Midland currently has a consensus price target of $79.67, suggesting a potential upside of 0.37%. McKesson has a consensus price target of $977.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.50%. Given McKesson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe McKesson is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McKesson has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 2.16% compared to McKesson's net margin of 1.12%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 9.21% beat McKesson's return on equity.

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. McKesson pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. McKesson pays out 10.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer Daniels Midland has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and McKesson has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 4 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 17 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.88 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Archer Daniels Midland currently has a consensus price target of $79.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.37%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $312.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.09%. Given Archer Daniels Midland's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Archer Daniels Midland is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.48% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 2.16%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer Daniels Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.