Go Pro

Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) Competitors

Archer Daniels Midland logo
$84.38 +3.09 (+3.80%)
As of 03:58 PM Eastern

ADM vs. AGRO, BG, CTVA, MCK, and MPC

Should you buy Archer Daniels Midland stock or one of its competitors? Archer Daniels Midland's main competitors and comparable companies include Adecoagro (AGRO), Bunge Global (BG), Corteva (CTVA), McKesson (MCK), and Marathon Petroleum (MPC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Adecoagro?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Adecoagro (NYSE:AGRO) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

Archer Daniels Midland presently has a consensus target price of $79.67, suggesting a potential downside of 5.59%. Adecoagro has a consensus target price of $11.62, suggesting a potential downside of 3.03%. Given Adecoagro's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Adecoagro is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Adecoagro
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 15 more articles in the media than Adecoagro. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 4 mentions for Adecoagro. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Adecoagro's score of 0.82 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland
16 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Adecoagro
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Adecoagro pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Adecoagro pays out 72.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Adecoagro has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Adecoagro has a beta of -0.02, meaning that its share price is 102% less volatile than the broader market.

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of Adecoagro shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Archer Daniels Midland has higher revenue and earnings than Adecoagro. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Adecoagro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland$80.27B0.51$1.08B$3.6523.12
Adecoagro$1.43B1.20-$8.35M$0.3336.30

Adecoagro has a net margin of 3.03% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 2.16%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 9.21% beat Adecoagro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland2.16% 9.21% 3.95%
Adecoagro 3.03%-0.38%-0.14%

Summary

Archer Daniels Midland beats Adecoagro on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Bunge Global?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Bunge Global (NYSE:BG) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Bunge Global pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bunge Global pays out 55.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer Daniels Midland has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bunge Global has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Bunge Global's net margin of 1.10%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 9.21% beat Bunge Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland2.16% 9.21% 3.95%
Bunge Global 1.10%9.15%3.43%

Archer Daniels Midland has higher revenue and earnings than Bunge Global. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bunge Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland$80.27B0.51$1.08B$3.6523.12
Bunge Global$70.33B0.33$816M$5.1523.51

Archer Daniels Midland currently has a consensus price target of $79.67, indicating a potential downside of 5.59%. Bunge Global has a consensus price target of $132.67, indicating a potential upside of 9.59%. Given Bunge Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bunge Global is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Bunge Global
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

In the previous week, Archer Daniels Midland had 15 more articles in the media than Bunge Global. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland and 4 mentions for Bunge Global. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Bunge Global's score of 0.76 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland
16 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Bunge Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.2% of Bunge Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Bunge Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Archer Daniels Midland beats Bunge Global on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Corteva?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Archer Daniels Midland currently has a consensus target price of $79.67, indicating a potential downside of 5.59%. Corteva has a consensus target price of $91.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.56%. Given Corteva's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Corteva is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Corteva
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.61

In the previous week, Corteva had 14 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Corteva and 19 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 1.22 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland
16 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Corteva
30 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corteva has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Corteva has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland$80.27B0.51$1.08B$3.6523.12
Corteva$17.40B3.36$1.09B$1.5157.95

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corteva pays out 47.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Corteva has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Corteva has a net margin of 5.66% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 2.16%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland2.16% 9.21% 3.95%
Corteva 5.66%10.18%6.00%

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Corteva shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Corteva shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Corteva beats Archer Daniels Midland on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to McKesson?

Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) and McKesson (NYSE:MCK) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, McKesson had 34 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for McKesson and 19 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. Archer Daniels Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat McKesson's score of 1.11 indicating that Archer Daniels Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Archer Daniels Midland
16 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
McKesson
49 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McKesson has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. McKesson pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. McKesson pays out 8.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archer Daniels Midland has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and McKesson has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

McKesson has higher revenue and earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Archer Daniels Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McKesson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Archer Daniels Midland$80.27B0.51$1.08B$3.6523.12
McKesson$403.43B0.26$4.76B$37.3724.30

78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of McKesson shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of McKesson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Archer Daniels Midland has a net margin of 2.16% compared to McKesson's net margin of 1.12%. Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity of 9.21% beat McKesson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Archer Daniels Midland2.16% 9.21% 3.95%
McKesson 1.12%-253.21%5.90%

Archer Daniels Midland currently has a consensus target price of $79.67, indicating a potential downside of 5.59%. McKesson has a consensus target price of $973.44, indicating a potential upside of 7.21%. Given McKesson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe McKesson is more favorable than Archer Daniels Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Archer Daniels Midland
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
McKesson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Summary

McKesson beats Archer Daniels Midland on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Archer Daniels Midland compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Archer Daniels Midland shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 37 more articles in the media than Archer Daniels Midland. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 19 mentions for Archer Daniels Midland. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Archer Daniels Midland's score of 1.22 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum
43 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Archer Daniels Midland
16 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Archer Daniels Midland. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archer Daniels Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum$135.22B0.82$4.05B$29.0913.13
Archer Daniels Midland$80.27B0.51$1.08B$3.6523.12

Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus target price of $315.06, indicating a potential downside of 17.54%. Archer Daniels Midland has a consensus target price of $79.67, indicating a potential downside of 5.59%. Given Archer Daniels Midland's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Archer Daniels Midland is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Archer Daniels Midland
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Archer Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Archer Daniels Midland pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer Daniels Midland pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Archer Daniels Midland has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Archer Daniels Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.48% compared to Archer Daniels Midland's net margin of 2.16%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat Archer Daniels Midland's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum5.48% 31.96% 8.88%
Archer Daniels Midland 2.16%9.21%3.95%

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats Archer Daniels Midland on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Archer Daniels Midland News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ADM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ADM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ADM vs. The Competition

MetricArcher Daniels MidlandFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$39.18B$5.70B$15.86B$24.03B
Dividend Yield2.56%3.10%3.20%3.73%
P/E Ratio23.1212.0313.5629.40
Price / Sales0.5183.59262,949.3320.19
Price / Cash13.75112.2557.3332.44
Price / Book1.723.424.457.55
Net Income$1.08B$767.07M$836.00M$1.07B
7 Day Performance6.68%-0.39%-1.04%-1.95%
1 Month Performance6.45%1.35%0.37%0.58%
1 Year Performance34.74%41.26%12.47%11.90%

Archer Daniels Midland Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ADM
Archer Daniels Midland
3.4588 of 5 stars
$84.38
+3.8%
$79.67
-5.6%
+29.9%$39.18B$80.27B23.1241,496
AGRO
Adecoagro
1.9688 of 5 stars
$10.70
-3.5%
$11.62
+8.6%
+34.8%$1.58B$1.43B32.4210,283
BG
Bunge Global
3.7699 of 5 stars
$111.47
-1.6%
$132.67
+19.0%
+38.4%$21.76B$70.33B21.6434,000
CTVA
Corteva
3.663 of 5 stars
$82.27
-0.7%
$91.50
+11.2%
+14.2%$55.30B$17.40B54.4821,500
MCK
McKesson
4.6672 of 5 stars
$890.20
-0.7%
$973.44
+9.4%
+29.0%$104.54B$403.43B23.8243,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ADM) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners