Which has preferable earnings & valuation, NTR or CTVA?

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Corteva. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Nutrien $28.21B 1.14 $2.27B $4.94 13.60 Corteva $17.81B 2.86 $1.09B $1.51 50.55

Is NTR or CTVA more profitable?

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.44% compared to Corteva's net margin of 5.66%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat Nutrien's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Nutrien 8.44% 8.88% 4.27% Corteva 5.66% 10.18% 6.00%

Does the media favor NTR or CTVA?

In the previous week, Nutrien had 16 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Nutrien and 6 mentions for Corteva. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Nutrien's score of 0.46 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Nutrien 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Corteva 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is CF or CTVA more profitable?

CF Industries has a net margin of 27.12% compared to Corteva's net margin of 5.66%. CF Industries' return on equity of 24.41% beat Corteva's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CF Industries 27.12% 24.41% 13.74% Corteva 5.66% 10.18% 6.00%

Does the media prefer CF or CTVA?

In the previous week, CF Industries had 13 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for CF Industries and 6 mentions for Corteva. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat CF Industries' score of 0.49 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment CF Industries 9 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Corteva 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MOS or CTVA?

Corteva has higher revenue and earnings than Mosaic. Mosaic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Mosaic $12.05B 0.61 $540.70M -$2.02 N/A Corteva $17.81B 2.86 $1.09B $1.51 50.55

Is MOS or CTVA more profitable?

Corteva has a net margin of 5.66% compared to Mosaic's net margin of -5.21%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat Mosaic's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Mosaic -5.21% 3.77% 1.87% Corteva 5.66% 10.18% 6.00%

Does the media prefer MOS or CTVA?

In the previous week, Mosaic had 2 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Mosaic and 6 mentions for Corteva. Mosaic's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Corteva's score of 0.72 indicating that Mosaic is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mosaic 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Corteva 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ICL or CTVA?

Corteva has higher revenue and earnings than ICL Group. ICL Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ICL Group $7.15B 0.96 $226M $0.24 22.27 Corteva $17.81B 2.86 $1.09B $1.51 50.55

Is ICL or CTVA more profitable?

Corteva has a net margin of 5.66% compared to ICL Group's net margin of 3.95%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat ICL Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ICL Group 3.95% 8.40% 4.19% Corteva 5.66% 10.18% 6.00%

Does the media favor ICL or CTVA?

In the previous week, ICL Group had 4 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for ICL Group and 6 mentions for Corteva. ICL Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Corteva's score of 0.72 indicating that ICL Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ICL Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Corteva 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings & valuation, SMG or CTVA?

Corteva has higher revenue and earnings than Scotts Miracle-Gro. Corteva is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Scotts Miracle-Gro $3.41B 1.06 $145.20M $1.15 53.98 Corteva $17.81B 2.86 $1.09B $1.51 50.55

Does the media favor SMG or CTVA?

In the previous week, Scotts Miracle-Gro had 4 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro and 6 mentions for Corteva. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's score of 0.56 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Scotts Miracle-Gro 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Corteva 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Corteva (CTVA) Competitors

$76.34 -0.13 (-0.17%)

Closing price 08/11/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$76.50 +0.16 (+0.21%)

As of 05:55 AM Eastern

Compare

CTVA vs. NTR, CF, MOS, ICL, and SMG

Should you buy Corteva stock or one of its competitors? Corteva's main competitors and comparable companies include Nutrien (NTR), CF Industries (CF), Mosaic (MOS), ICL Group (ICL), and Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "fertilizers & agricultural chemicals" industry.

How does Corteva compare to Nutrien?

Nutrien (NYSE:NTR) and Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability and valuation.

Nutrien pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Nutrien pays out 44.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corteva pays out 47.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nutrien has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Corteva has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Nutrien is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Nutrien currently has a consensus price target of $81.58, indicating a potential upside of 21.43%. Corteva has a consensus price target of $91.70, indicating a potential upside of 20.13%. Given Nutrien's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Nutrien is more favorable than Corteva.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nutrien	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
Corteva	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

Nutrien has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corteva has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than Corteva. Nutrien is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nutrien	$28.21B	1.14	$2.27B	$4.94	13.60
Corteva	$17.81B	2.86	$1.09B	$1.51	50.55

Nutrien has a net margin of 8.44% compared to Corteva's net margin of 5.66%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat Nutrien's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nutrien	8.44%	8.88%	4.27%
Corteva	5.66%	10.18%	6.00%

In the previous week, Nutrien had 16 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Nutrien and 6 mentions for Corteva. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Nutrien's score of 0.46 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Nutrien	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Corteva	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

63.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Corteva shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Corteva shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nutrien beats Corteva on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corteva compare to CF Industries?

CF Industries (NYSE:CF) and Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and profitability.

CF Industries currently has a consensus price target of $116.56, indicating a potential downside of 1.03%. Corteva has a consensus price target of $91.70, indicating a potential upside of 20.13%. Given Corteva's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Corteva is more favorable than CF Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CF Industries	3 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.30
Corteva	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

CF Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Corteva. CF Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CF Industries	$7.08B	2.52	$1.46B	$13.49	8.73
Corteva	$17.81B	2.86	$1.09B	$1.51	50.55

93.1% of CF Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Corteva shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of CF Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Corteva shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CF Industries pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. CF Industries pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corteva pays out 47.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CF Industries has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Corteva has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. CF Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CF Industries has a net margin of 27.12% compared to Corteva's net margin of 5.66%. CF Industries' return on equity of 24.41% beat Corteva's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CF Industries	27.12%	24.41%	13.74%
Corteva	5.66%	10.18%	6.00%

In the previous week, CF Industries had 13 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for CF Industries and 6 mentions for Corteva. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat CF Industries' score of 0.49 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CF Industries	9 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Corteva	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

CF Industries has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corteva has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CF Industries beats Corteva on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corteva compare to Mosaic?

Mosaic (NYSE:MOS) and Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Mosaic pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Mosaic pays out -43.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corteva pays out 47.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mosaic has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Corteva has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Mosaic is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Corteva has higher revenue and earnings than Mosaic. Mosaic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mosaic	$12.05B	0.61	$540.70M	-$2.02	N/A
Corteva	$17.81B	2.86	$1.09B	$1.51	50.55

Mosaic presently has a consensus price target of $27.17, suggesting a potential upside of 17.59%. Corteva has a consensus price target of $91.70, suggesting a potential upside of 20.13%. Given Corteva's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Corteva is more favorable than Mosaic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mosaic	2 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Corteva	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

77.5% of Mosaic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Corteva shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Mosaic shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Corteva shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mosaic has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corteva has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mosaic had 2 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Mosaic and 6 mentions for Corteva. Mosaic's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Corteva's score of 0.72 indicating that Mosaic is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mosaic	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Corteva	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Corteva has a net margin of 5.66% compared to Mosaic's net margin of -5.21%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat Mosaic's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mosaic	-5.21%	3.77%	1.87%
Corteva	5.66%	10.18%	6.00%

Summary

Corteva beats Mosaic on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corteva compare to ICL Group?

ICL Group (NYSE:ICL) and Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Corteva has a net margin of 5.66% compared to ICL Group's net margin of 3.95%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat ICL Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ICL Group	3.95%	8.40%	4.19%
Corteva	5.66%	10.18%	6.00%

ICL Group presently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.25%. Corteva has a consensus target price of $91.70, indicating a potential upside of 20.13%. Given Corteva's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Corteva is more favorable than ICL Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ICL Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Corteva	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

Corteva has higher revenue and earnings than ICL Group. ICL Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corteva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ICL Group	$7.15B	0.96	$226M	$0.24	22.27
Corteva	$17.81B	2.86	$1.09B	$1.51	50.55

ICL Group pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. ICL Group pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corteva pays out 47.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Corteva has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

13.4% of ICL Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Corteva shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Corteva shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ICL Group has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corteva has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ICL Group had 4 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for ICL Group and 6 mentions for Corteva. ICL Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Corteva's score of 0.72 indicating that ICL Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ICL Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Corteva	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Corteva beats ICL Group on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corteva compare to Scotts Miracle-Gro?

Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) and Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

74.1% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Corteva shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.4% of Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Corteva shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Scotts Miracle-Gro had 4 more articles in the media than Corteva. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Scotts Miracle-Gro and 6 mentions for Corteva. Corteva's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's score of 0.56 indicating that Corteva is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Scotts Miracle-Gro	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Corteva	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Scotts Miracle-Gro pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Scotts Miracle-Gro pays out 229.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Corteva pays out 47.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corteva has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Corteva has a net margin of 5.66% compared to Scotts Miracle-Gro's net margin of 2.19%. Corteva's return on equity of 10.18% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Scotts Miracle-Gro	2.19%	-81.90%	8.97%
Corteva	5.66%	10.18%	6.00%

Corteva has higher revenue and earnings than Scotts Miracle-Gro. Corteva is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scotts Miracle-Gro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Scotts Miracle-Gro	$3.41B	1.06	$145.20M	$1.15	53.98
Corteva	$17.81B	2.86	$1.09B	$1.51	50.55

Scotts Miracle-Gro presently has a consensus target price of $75.40, indicating a potential upside of 21.46%. Corteva has a consensus target price of $91.70, indicating a potential upside of 20.13%. Given Scotts Miracle-Gro's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Scotts Miracle-Gro is more favorable than Corteva.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Scotts Miracle-Gro	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
Corteva	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corteva has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Corteva beats Scotts Miracle-Gro on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Corteva News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CTVA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CTVA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Corteva	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$51.02B	$11.42B	$4.92B	$24.25B
Dividend Yield	0.94%	2.86%	4.71%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	50.55	20.87	21.48	30.36
Price / Sales	2.86	52.51	5,219.13	68.52
Price / Cash	14.85	15.51	27.12	33.15
Price / Book	2.01	3.90	8.88	6.54
Net Income	$1.09B	$223.51M	$154.60M	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	-3.15%	1.13%	3.58%	0.35%
1 Month Performance	-11.06%	3.44%	5.96%	2.41%
1 Year Performance	7.48%	21.70%	43.80%	18.19%

Corteva Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CTVA Corteva	4.1233 of 5 stars	$76.34 -0.2%	$91.70 +20.1%	+5.3%	$51.02B	$17.81B	50.55	21,500
NTR Nutrien	4.9336 of 5 stars	$65.89 -4.6%	$81.84 +24.2%	+19.3%	$33.04B	$26.89B	13.42	25,100	Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast
CF CF Industries	3.1256 of 5 stars	$118.16 -5.6%	$116.69 -1.2%	+42.5%	$19.23B	$7.08B	10.62	2,900	Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
MOS Mosaic	4.4562 of 5 stars	$21.83 -1.3%	$27.11 +24.2%	-28.9%	$7.02B	$12.05B	167.97	13,249	Positive News
ICL ICL Group	2.6647 of 5 stars	$5.09 +0.5%	$6.00 +18.0%	-11.3%	$6.53B	$7.15B	25.43	13,007	Positive News Earnings Report Dividend Announcement

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CTVA) was last updated on 8/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Corteva (CTVA) Competitors