Do analysts recommend NEOV or GWH?

ESS Tech has a consensus price target of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 143.01%. Given ESS Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ESS Tech is more favorable than NeoVolta. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NeoVolta 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 ESS Tech 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, NEOV or GWH?

NeoVolta has higher revenue and earnings than ESS Tech. NeoVolta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESS Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NeoVolta $18.07M 4.21 -$5.03M -$0.33 N/A ESS Tech $1.58M 15.31 -$63.44M -$3.37 N/A

Is NEOV or GWH more profitable?

NeoVolta has a net margin of -63.35% compared to ESS Tech's net margin of -1,045.28%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -141.89% beat ESS Tech's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets NeoVolta -63.35% -141.89% -89.61% ESS Tech -1,045.28% -1,251.69% -139.79%

Which has higher valuation and earnings, STEM or GWH?

Stem has higher revenue and earnings than ESS Tech. Stem is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESS Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Stem $156.27M 0.42 $137.76M -$8.70 N/A ESS Tech $1.58M 15.31 -$63.44M -$3.37 N/A

Is STEM or GWH more profitable?

Stem has a net margin of 94.16% compared to ESS Tech's net margin of -1,045.28%. Stem's return on equity of 0.00% beat ESS Tech's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Stem 94.16% N/A -21.16% ESS Tech -1,045.28% -1,251.69% -139.79%

Does the media refer more to STEM or GWH?

In the previous week, Stem had 5 more articles in the media than ESS Tech. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Stem and 2 mentions for ESS Tech. ESS Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Stem's score of 0.39 indicating that ESS Tech is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Stem 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral ESS Tech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ELBM or GWH?

In the previous week, Electra Battery Materials had 1 more articles in the media than ESS Tech. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Electra Battery Materials and 2 mentions for ESS Tech. ESS Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Electra Battery Materials' score of 0.87 indicating that ESS Tech is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Electra Battery Materials 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ESS Tech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend GWH or CBAT?

ESS Tech currently has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 143.01%. Given ESS Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe ESS Tech is more favorable than China BAK Battery. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ESS Tech 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 China BAK Battery 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is GWH or CBAT more profitable?

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to ESS Tech's net margin of -1,045.28%. China BAK Battery's return on equity of -15.32% beat ESS Tech's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ESS Tech -1,045.28% -1,251.69% -139.79% China BAK Battery -7.43% -15.32% -4.23%

Does the media refer more to GWH or CBAT?

In the previous week, ESS Tech and ESS Tech both had 2 articles in the media. ESS Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.63 indicating that ESS Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ESS Tech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive China BAK Battery 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend GWH or ZEO?

ESS Tech currently has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 143.01%. Given ESS Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe ESS Tech is more favorable than Zeo Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ESS Tech 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Zeo Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GWH or ZEO?

Zeo Energy has higher revenue and earnings than ESS Tech. Zeo Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESS Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ESS Tech $1.58M 15.31 -$63.44M -$3.37 N/A Zeo Energy $69.35M 0.65 -$14.01M -$0.37 N/A

Is GWH or ZEO more profitable?

Zeo Energy has a net margin of -15.13% compared to ESS Tech's net margin of -1,045.28%. Zeo Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat ESS Tech's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ESS Tech -1,045.28% -1,251.69% -139.79% Zeo Energy -15.13% N/A -20.46%

ESS Tech (GWH) Competitors

$0.82 -0.05 (-5.77%)

Closing price 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$0.82 -0.01 (-0.73%)

As of 08:00 PM Eastern

Compare

GWH vs. NEOV, STEM, ELBM, CBAT, and ZEO

Should you buy ESS Tech stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares ESS Tech with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with ESS Tech include NeoVolta (NEOV), Stem (STEM), Electra Battery Materials (ELBM), China BAK Battery (CBAT), and Zeo Energy (ZEO). These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment" industry.

How does ESS Tech compare to NeoVolta?

NeoVolta (NASDAQ:NEOV) and ESS Tech (NYSE:GWH) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

NeoVolta has higher revenue and earnings than ESS Tech. NeoVolta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESS Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NeoVolta	$18.07M	4.21	-$5.03M	-$0.33	N/A
ESS Tech	$1.58M	15.31	-$63.44M	-$3.37	N/A

ESS Tech has a consensus price target of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 143.01%. Given ESS Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ESS Tech is more favorable than NeoVolta.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NeoVolta	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
ESS Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

NeoVolta has a net margin of -63.35% compared to ESS Tech's net margin of -1,045.28%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -141.89% beat ESS Tech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NeoVolta	-63.35%	-141.89%	-89.61%
ESS Tech	-1,045.28%	-1,251.69%	-139.79%

5.1% of NeoVolta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.8% of ESS Tech shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of NeoVolta shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of ESS Tech shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NeoVolta has a beta of -0.92, indicating that its share price is 192% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ESS Tech has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ESS Tech had 1 more articles in the media than NeoVolta. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for ESS Tech and 1 mentions for NeoVolta. NeoVolta's average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat ESS Tech's score of 1.44 indicating that NeoVolta is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NeoVolta	Very Positive
ESS Tech	Positive

Summary

NeoVolta and ESS Tech tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ESS Tech compare to Stem?

Stem (NYSE:STEM) and ESS Tech (NYSE:GWH) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

61.6% of Stem shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.8% of ESS Tech shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of Stem shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of ESS Tech shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Stem has higher revenue and earnings than ESS Tech. Stem is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESS Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Stem	$156.27M	0.42	$137.76M	-$8.70	N/A
ESS Tech	$1.58M	15.31	-$63.44M	-$3.37	N/A

Stem has a net margin of 94.16% compared to ESS Tech's net margin of -1,045.28%. Stem's return on equity of 0.00% beat ESS Tech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Stem	94.16%	N/A	-21.16%
ESS Tech	-1,045.28%	-1,251.69%	-139.79%

Stem has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ESS Tech has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Stem had 5 more articles in the media than ESS Tech. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Stem and 2 mentions for ESS Tech. ESS Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Stem's score of 0.39 indicating that ESS Tech is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Stem	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
ESS Tech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Stem currently has a consensus target price of $12.38, suggesting a potential upside of 69.06%. ESS Tech has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 143.01%. Given ESS Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ESS Tech is more favorable than Stem.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Stem	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.60
ESS Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Stem beats ESS Tech on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ESS Tech compare to Electra Battery Materials?

Electra Battery Materials (NASDAQ:ELBM) and ESS Tech (NYSE:GWH) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

ESS Tech has higher revenue and earnings than Electra Battery Materials. Electra Battery Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESS Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Electra Battery Materials	N/A	N/A	-$95.52M	-$1.16	N/A
ESS Tech	$1.58M	15.31	-$63.44M	-$3.37	N/A

Electra Battery Materials has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ESS Tech's net margin of -1,045.28%. Electra Battery Materials' return on equity of 4.90% beat ESS Tech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Electra Battery Materials	N/A	4.90%	1.67%
ESS Tech	-1,045.28%	-1,251.69%	-139.79%

32.9% of Electra Battery Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.8% of ESS Tech shares are held by institutional investors. 22.7% of Electra Battery Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of ESS Tech shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Electra Battery Materials presently has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 235.23%. ESS Tech has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 143.01%. Given Electra Battery Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Electra Battery Materials is more favorable than ESS Tech.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Electra Battery Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
ESS Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Electra Battery Materials had 1 more articles in the media than ESS Tech. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Electra Battery Materials and 2 mentions for ESS Tech. ESS Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Electra Battery Materials' score of 0.87 indicating that ESS Tech is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Electra Battery Materials	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ESS Tech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Electra Battery Materials has a beta of 2.52, meaning that its stock price is 152% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ESS Tech has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Electra Battery Materials beats ESS Tech on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ESS Tech compare to China BAK Battery?

ESS Tech (NYSE:GWH) and China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, ESS Tech and ESS Tech both had 2 articles in the media. ESS Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.63 indicating that ESS Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ESS Tech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
China BAK Battery	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ESS Tech currently has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 143.01%. Given ESS Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe ESS Tech is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ESS Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
China BAK Battery	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

China BAK Battery has higher revenue and earnings than ESS Tech. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESS Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ESS Tech	$1.58M	15.31	-$63.44M	-$3.37	N/A
China BAK Battery	$195.19M	0.32	-$9.38M	-$0.18	N/A

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to ESS Tech's net margin of -1,045.28%. China BAK Battery's return on equity of -15.32% beat ESS Tech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ESS Tech	-1,045.28%	-1,251.69%	-139.79%
China BAK Battery	-7.43%	-15.32%	-4.23%

ESS Tech has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

46.8% of ESS Tech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of ESS Tech shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ESS Tech beats China BAK Battery on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ESS Tech compare to Zeo Energy?

ESS Tech (NYSE:GWH) and Zeo Energy (NASDAQ:ZEO) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ESS Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Zeo Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Zeo Energy has a net margin of -15.13% compared to ESS Tech's net margin of -1,045.28%. Zeo Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat ESS Tech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ESS Tech	-1,045.28%	-1,251.69%	-139.79%
Zeo Energy	-15.13%	N/A	-20.46%

46.8% of ESS Tech shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of ESS Tech shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 56.2% of Zeo Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Zeo Energy has higher revenue and earnings than ESS Tech. Zeo Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESS Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ESS Tech	$1.58M	15.31	-$63.44M	-$3.37	N/A
Zeo Energy	$69.35M	0.65	-$14.01M	-$0.37	N/A

ESS Tech has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zeo Energy has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ESS Tech and ESS Tech both had 2 articles in the media. Zeo Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat ESS Tech's score of 1.44 indicating that Zeo Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
ESS Tech	Positive
Zeo Energy	Positive

Summary

Zeo Energy beats ESS Tech on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ESS Tech News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GWH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GWH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	ESS Tech	ELEC PRODS Industry	Computer Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$24.19M	$14.60B	$38.47B	$23.27B
Dividend Yield	N/A	0.98%	3.16%	4.10%
P/E Ratio	-0.24	35.59	80.71	31.30
Price / Sales	15.31	361.19	633.71	12.66
Price / Cash	N/A	63.45	47.91	23.95
Price / Book	2.11	7.09	9.63	4.69
Net Income	-$63.44M	$402.10M	$1.07B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-9.26%	5.80%	0.59%	2.08%
1 Month Performance	5.51%	9.83%	5.38%	1.84%
1 Year Performance	-26.52%	66.54%	157.41%	22.17%

ESS Tech Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GWH ESS Tech	3.8522 of 5 stars	$0.82 -5.8%	$2.00 +143.0%	-27.9%	$25.67M	$1.58M	N/A	270	Positive News
NEOV NeoVolta	1.6347 of 5 stars	$1.97 +0.5%	N/A	-37.2%	$84.14M	$18.07M	N/A	5
STEM Stem	3.0942 of 5 stars	$7.84 +1.8%	$12.38 +57.8%	-37.5%	$68.97M	$156.27M	N/A	660
ELBM Electra Battery Materials	3.1021 of 5 stars	$0.62 -3.5%	$2.00 +221.5%	-40.7%	$65.51M	N/A	N/A	37
CBAT China BAK Battery	1.3538 of 5 stars	$0.73 +1.8%	N/A	-34.2%	$63.83M	$195.19M	N/A	1,739	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:GWH) was last updated on 6/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

ESS Tech (GWH) Competitors