Kenon (KEN) Competitors

Kenon has a net margin of 7.98% compared to Talen Energy's net margin of -0.63%. Talen Energy's return on equity of 41.58% beat Kenon's return on equity.

In the previous week, Talen Energy and Talen Energy both had 3 articles in the media. Talen Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Kenon's score of 0.71 indicating that Talen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Kenon has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Talen Energy. Talen Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kenon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Talen Energy currently has a consensus price target of $448.58, suggesting a potential upside of 22.99%. Given Talen Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Talen Energy is more favorable than Kenon.

Talen Energy has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kenon has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

0.4% of Talen Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Kenon shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Talen Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Kenon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Korea Electric Power has a net margin of 8.80% compared to Kenon's net margin of 7.98%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 18.76% beat Kenon's return on equity.

In the previous week, Korea Electric Power had 1 more articles in the media than Kenon. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Korea Electric Power and 3 mentions for Kenon. Korea Electric Power's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Kenon's score of 0.71 indicating that Korea Electric Power is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Korea Electric Power has higher revenue and earnings than Kenon. Korea Electric Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kenon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kenon has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Korea Electric Power pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Kenon pays an annual dividend of $3.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Korea Electric Power pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kenon pays out 500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kenon has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Kenon is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

13.4% of Kenon shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Korea Electric Power shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Kenon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kenon has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DT Midstream has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Kenon pays an annual dividend of $3.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. DT Midstream pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Kenon pays out 500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DT Midstream pays out 77.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kenon has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and DT Midstream has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

DT Midstream has a consensus target price of $154.46, indicating a potential upside of 8.54%. Given DT Midstream's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe DT Midstream is more favorable than Kenon.

DT Midstream has higher revenue and earnings than Kenon. DT Midstream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kenon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

DT Midstream has a net margin of 36.28% compared to Kenon's net margin of 7.98%. DT Midstream's return on equity of 9.53% beat Kenon's return on equity.

In the previous week, DT Midstream had 10 more articles in the media than Kenon. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for DT Midstream and 3 mentions for Kenon. DT Midstream's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Kenon's score of 0.71 indicating that DT Midstream is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

13.4% of Kenon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of DT Midstream shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Kenon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of DT Midstream shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

38.9% of Enlight Renewable Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Kenon shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Kenon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Enlight Renewable Energy has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kenon has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Enlight Renewable Energy currently has a consensus price target of $63.17, indicating a potential downside of 30.57%. Given Enlight Renewable Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Enlight Renewable Energy is more favorable than Kenon.

Enlight Renewable Energy has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Kenon's net margin of 7.98%. Kenon's return on equity of 3.47% beat Enlight Renewable Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Enlight Renewable Energy had 11 more articles in the media than Kenon. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Enlight Renewable Energy and 3 mentions for Kenon. Kenon's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Enlight Renewable Energy's score of 0.34 indicating that Kenon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enlight Renewable Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kenon. Kenon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enlight Renewable Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.