TXNM Energy (TXNM) Competitors

Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp has a net margin of 24.25% compared to TXNM Energy's net margin of 6.96%. Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp's return on equity of 16.38% beat TXNM Energy's return on equity.

Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TXNM Energy has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp has higher revenue and earnings than TXNM Energy. Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TXNM Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. TXNM Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp pays out 26.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TXNM Energy pays out 121.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp presently has a consensus price target of $183.00, indicating a potential upside of 3,136.07%. TXNM Energy has a consensus price target of $61.25, indicating a potential upside of 2.98%. Given Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp is more favorable than TXNM Energy.

In the previous week, TXNM Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for TXNM Energy and 0 mentions for Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp. Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat TXNM Energy's score of 0.66 indicating that Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

10.6% of Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of TXNM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Companhia de saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo - Sabesp shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of TXNM Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Evergy has higher revenue and earnings than TXNM Energy. Evergy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TXNM Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

TXNM Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Evergy pays an annual dividend of $2.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. TXNM Energy pays out 121.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Evergy pays out 73.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Evergy has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Evergy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, TXNM Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Evergy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for TXNM Energy and 2 mentions for Evergy. Evergy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat TXNM Energy's score of 0.66 indicating that Evergy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

TXNM Energy has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Evergy has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Evergy has a net margin of 14.63% compared to TXNM Energy's net margin of 6.96%. Evergy's return on equity of 9.09% beat TXNM Energy's return on equity.

91.7% of TXNM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of Evergy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of TXNM Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Evergy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TXNM Energy presently has a consensus price target of $61.25, indicating a potential upside of 2.98%. Evergy has a consensus price target of $89.60, indicating a potential upside of 6.74%. Given Evergy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Evergy is more favorable than TXNM Energy.

Alliant Energy has higher revenue and earnings than TXNM Energy. Alliant Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TXNM Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Alliant Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. TXNM Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Alliant Energy pays out 67.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TXNM Energy pays out 121.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Alliant Energy has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Alliant Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alliant Energy presently has a consensus price target of $76.60, indicating a potential upside of 3.58%. TXNM Energy has a consensus price target of $61.25, indicating a potential upside of 2.98%. Given Alliant Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Alliant Energy is more favorable than TXNM Energy.

Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TXNM Energy has a beta of 0.16, indicating that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

Alliant Energy has a net margin of 18.58% compared to TXNM Energy's net margin of 6.96%. Alliant Energy's return on equity of 11.37% beat TXNM Energy's return on equity.

79.9% of Alliant Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of TXNM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alliant Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of TXNM Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Alliant Energy had 5 more articles in the media than TXNM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Alliant Energy and 4 mentions for TXNM Energy. TXNM Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Alliant Energy's score of 0.21 indicating that TXNM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Western Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TXNM Energy has a beta of 0.16, indicating that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

Western Midstream Partners currently has a consensus target price of $43.25, indicating a potential downside of 6.48%. TXNM Energy has a consensus target price of $61.25, indicating a potential upside of 2.98%. Given TXNM Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TXNM Energy is more favorable than Western Midstream Partners.

84.8% of Western Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of TXNM Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Western Midstream Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of TXNM Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Western Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. TXNM Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Western Midstream Partners pays out 121.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TXNM Energy pays out 121.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Western Midstream Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Western Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, TXNM Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Western Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for TXNM Energy and 2 mentions for Western Midstream Partners. Western Midstream Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat TXNM Energy's score of 0.66 indicating that Western Midstream Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Western Midstream Partners has higher revenue and earnings than TXNM Energy. Western Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TXNM Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Western Midstream Partners has a net margin of 29.98% compared to TXNM Energy's net margin of 6.96%. Western Midstream Partners' return on equity of 33.89% beat TXNM Energy's return on equity.