Free Trial

The Korea Fund (KF) Competitors

The Korea Fund logo
$68.90 +0.08 (+0.11%)
Closing price 10/5/2026 03:56 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$68.90 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10/5/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

KF vs. GSBD, OCSL, FSCO, ASA, and TYG

Should you buy The Korea Fund stock or one of its competitors? The Korea Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL), FS Credit Opportunities (FSCO), ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does The Korea Fund compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and The Korea Fund (NYSE:KF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to The Korea Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat The Korea Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC17.19% 11.04% 4.62%
The Korea Fund N/A N/A N/A

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than The Korea Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.79$119.27M$0.5217.43
The Korea Fund$244.36M1.17N/AN/AN/A

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Korea Fund has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC presently has a consensus price target of $8.75, suggesting a potential downside of 3.47%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than The Korea Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
3 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
The Korea Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 4 more articles in the media than The Korea Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 0 mentions for The Korea Fund. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat The Korea Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Goldman Sachs BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC Positive
The Korea Fund Neutral

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.1%. The Korea Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.0% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.5% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats The Korea Fund on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Korea Fund compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

The Korea Fund (NYSE:KF) and Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

The Korea Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

The Korea Fund has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

70.0% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.5% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 14.45% compared to The Korea Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 9.70% beat The Korea Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Korea FundN/A N/A N/A
Oaktree Specialty Lending 14.45%9.70%4.64%

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than The Korea Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Korea Fund$244.36M1.17N/AN/AN/A
Oaktree Specialty Lending$316.80M3.29$33.92M$0.4824.65

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus target price of $11.83, suggesting a potential upside of 0.03%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than The Korea Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Korea Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Oaktree Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 3 more articles in the media than The Korea Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 0 mentions for The Korea Fund. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.09 beat The Korea Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Korea Fund Neutral
Oaktree Specialty Lending Neutral

Summary

Oaktree Specialty Lending beats The Korea Fund on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Korea Fund compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

The Korea Fund (NYSE:KF) and FS Credit Opportunities (NYSE:FSCO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, The Korea Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FS Credit Opportunities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Korea Fund Neutral
FS Credit Opportunities Neutral

The Korea Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. FS Credit Opportunities pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.6%.

70.0% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.4% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.5% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Korea Fund$244.36M1.17N/AN/AN/A
FS Credit Opportunities$137.77M7.45N/AN/AN/A

The Korea Fund has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FS Credit Opportunities has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Korea FundN/A N/A N/A
FS Credit Opportunities N/A N/A N/A

Summary

The Korea Fund beats FS Credit Opportunities on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Korea Fund compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) and The Korea Fund (NYSE:KF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
The Korea Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASA Gold and Precious MetalsN/A N/A N/A
The Korea Fund N/A N/A N/A

70.0% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 59.5% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASA Gold and Precious MetalsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
The Korea Fund$244.36M1.17N/AN/AN/A

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Korea Fund has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ASA Gold and Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat The Korea Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that ASA Gold and Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ASA Gold and Precious Metals Positive
The Korea Fund Neutral

ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. The Korea Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%.

Summary

The Korea Fund beats ASA Gold and Precious Metals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Korea Fund compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

The Korea Fund (NYSE:KF) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

The Korea Fund has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

70.0% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.5% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Korea FundN/A N/A N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure N/A N/A N/A

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Korea Fund$244.36M1.17N/AN/AN/A
Tortoise Energy InfrastructureN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure had 2 more articles in the media than The Korea Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and 0 mentions for The Korea Fund. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat The Korea Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Korea Fund Neutral
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Positive

The Korea Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%.

Summary

The Korea Fund beats Tortoise Energy Infrastructure on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get The Korea Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KF vs. The Competition

MetricThe Korea FundCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$286.17M$5.13B$13.34B$22.78B
Dividend Yield0.66%7.56%6.03%3.72%
P/E RatioN/A29.4824.4327.90
Price / Sales1.171,188.74497.0420.36
Price / CashN/A47.6729.4619.11
Price / BookN/A3.492.714.70
Net IncomeN/A$415.67M$1.31B$1.07B
7 Day Performance3.01%-0.26%-0.28%0.47%
1 Month Performance2.71%-2.78%-3.21%-5.36%
1 Year Performance113.76%10.84%11.16%5.39%

The Korea Fund Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KF
The Korea Fund
N/A$68.90
+0.1%
N/A+114.3%$286.17M$244.36MN/AN/A
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
2.0583 of 5 stars
$9.49
+0.3%
$8.75
-7.7%
-9.8%$1.06B$71.05M18.248
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
1.4285 of 5 stars
$12.10
+0.8%
$11.83
-2.2%
-8.6%$1.06B$53.53M25.21N/A
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities
N/A$5.17
+2.5%
N/A-27.2%$1.04B$137.77MN/AN/A
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
2.4758 of 5 stars
$55.74
+2.1%
N/A+23.7%$1.03BN/AN/A1,100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:KF) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners