3M (MMM) Competitors

Carlisle Companies has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3M has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

89.5% of Carlisle Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of 3M shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Carlisle Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of 3M shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Carlisle Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. 3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Carlisle Companies pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Carlisle Companies has raised its dividend for 48 consecutive years and 3M has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than Carlisle Companies. Carlisle Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3M, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Carlisle Companies currently has a consensus target price of $402.43, indicating a potential upside of 14.01%. 3M has a consensus target price of $177.21, indicating a potential upside of 5.21%. Given Carlisle Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Carlisle Companies is more favorable than 3M.

Carlisle Companies has a net margin of 14.21% compared to 3M's net margin of 11.90%. 3M's return on equity of 115.87% beat Carlisle Companies' return on equity.

In the previous week, Carlisle Companies had 6 more articles in the media than 3M. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Carlisle Companies and 8 mentions for 3M. Carlisle Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat 3M's score of 1.08 indicating that Carlisle Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than DuPont de Nemours. 3M is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DuPont de Nemours, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3M presently has a consensus target price of $177.21, suggesting a potential upside of 5.21%. DuPont de Nemours has a consensus target price of $166.60, suggesting a potential upside of 26.17%. Given DuPont de Nemours' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DuPont de Nemours is more favorable than 3M.

In the previous week, DuPont de Nemours had 3 more articles in the media than 3M. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for DuPont de Nemours and 8 mentions for 3M. DuPont de Nemours' average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat 3M's score of 1.08 indicating that DuPont de Nemours is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

3M has a net margin of 11.90% compared to DuPont de Nemours' net margin of 0.67%. 3M's return on equity of 115.87% beat DuPont de Nemours' return on equity.

65.3% of 3M shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.0% of DuPont de Nemours shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of 3M shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of DuPont de Nemours shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. DuPont de Nemours pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DuPont de Nemours pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. 3M has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. 3M is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

3M has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DuPont de Nemours has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Danaher had 21 more articles in the media than 3M. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Danaher and 8 mentions for 3M. Danaher's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat 3M's score of 1.08 indicating that Danaher is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Danaher has a net margin of 15.95% compared to 3M's net margin of 11.90%. 3M's return on equity of 115.87% beat Danaher's return on equity.

Danaher has higher revenue and earnings than 3M. 3M is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Danaher, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Danaher pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Danaher pays out 28.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. 3M has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Danaher has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

3M currently has a consensus price target of $177.21, suggesting a potential upside of 5.21%. Danaher has a consensus price target of $228.91, suggesting a potential upside of 10.34%. Given Danaher's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Danaher is more favorable than 3M.

3M has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Danaher has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

65.3% of 3M shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.1% of Danaher shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of 3M shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.8% of Danaher shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

65.3% of 3M shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Griffon shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of 3M shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of Griffon shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, 3M had 1 more articles in the media than Griffon. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for 3M and 7 mentions for Griffon. Griffon's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat 3M's score of 1.08 indicating that Griffon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

3M currently has a consensus target price of $177.21, indicating a potential upside of 5.21%. Griffon has a consensus target price of $122.50, indicating a potential upside of 23.03%. Given Griffon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Griffon is more favorable than 3M.

3M has a net margin of 11.90% compared to Griffon's net margin of 8.08%. Griffon's return on equity of 249.31% beat 3M's return on equity.

3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Griffon pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Griffon pays out 22.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. 3M has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Griffon has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than Griffon. Griffon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3M, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3M has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Griffon has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.