3M (MMM) Competitors

65.3% of 3M shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of Carlisle Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of 3M shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Carlisle Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Carlisle Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carlisle Companies pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. 3M has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Carlisle Companies has raised its dividend for 48 consecutive years.

3M has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carlisle Companies has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Carlisle Companies has a net margin of 14.21% compared to 3M's net margin of 11.90%. 3M's return on equity of 115.87% beat Carlisle Companies' return on equity.

In the previous week, 3M had 4 more articles in the media than Carlisle Companies. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for 3M and 6 mentions for Carlisle Companies. 3M's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Carlisle Companies' score of -0.04 indicating that 3M is being referred to more favorably in the media.

3M currently has a consensus target price of $181.71, suggesting a potential upside of 10.74%. Carlisle Companies has a consensus target price of $394.50, suggesting a potential upside of 21.10%. Given Carlisle Companies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Carlisle Companies is more favorable than 3M.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than Carlisle Companies. Carlisle Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3M, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3M has a net margin of 11.90% compared to DuPont de Nemours' net margin of 0.67%. 3M's return on equity of 115.87% beat DuPont de Nemours' return on equity.

65.3% of 3M shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.0% of DuPont de Nemours shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of 3M shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of DuPont de Nemours shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

3M presently has a consensus price target of $181.71, suggesting a potential upside of 10.74%. DuPont de Nemours has a consensus price target of $163.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.93%. Given DuPont de Nemours' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe DuPont de Nemours is more favorable than 3M.

3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. DuPont de Nemours pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DuPont de Nemours pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. 3M has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. 3M is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, DuPont de Nemours had 4 more articles in the media than 3M. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for DuPont de Nemours and 10 mentions for 3M. 3M's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat DuPont de Nemours' score of 0.09 indicating that 3M is being referred to more favorably in the media.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than DuPont de Nemours. 3M is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DuPont de Nemours, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3M has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DuPont de Nemours has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Danaher had 69 more articles in the media than 3M. MarketBeat recorded 79 mentions for Danaher and 10 mentions for 3M. Danaher's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat 3M's score of 0.35 indicating that Danaher is being referred to more favorably in the media.

79.1% of Danaher shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of 3M shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.8% of Danaher shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of 3M shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Danaher pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. 3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Danaher pays out 28.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Danaher has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and 3M has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Danaher has a net margin of 15.95% compared to 3M's net margin of 11.90%. 3M's return on equity of 115.87% beat Danaher's return on equity.

Danaher has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3M has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Danaher currently has a consensus price target of $235.41, suggesting a potential upside of 4.79%. 3M has a consensus price target of $181.71, suggesting a potential upside of 10.74%. Given 3M's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe 3M is more favorable than Danaher.

Danaher has higher revenue and earnings than 3M. 3M is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Danaher, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, 3M had 8 more articles in the media than Griffon. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for 3M and 2 mentions for Griffon. 3M's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Griffon's score of 0.17 indicating that 3M is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Griffon presently has a consensus target price of $122.50, suggesting a potential upside of 33.20%. 3M has a consensus target price of $181.71, suggesting a potential upside of 10.74%. Given Griffon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Griffon is more favorable than 3M.

Griffon pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. 3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Griffon pays out 22.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Griffon has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and 3M has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than Griffon. Griffon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3M, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3M has a net margin of 11.90% compared to Griffon's net margin of 8.08%. Griffon's return on equity of 249.31% beat 3M's return on equity.

Griffon has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3M has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

73.2% of Griffon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of 3M shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Griffon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of 3M shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.