3M (MMM) Competitors

In the previous week, 3M had 1 more articles in the media than Carlisle Companies. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for 3M and 5 mentions for Carlisle Companies. 3M's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Carlisle Companies' score of 0.68 indicating that 3M is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Carlisle Companies presently has a consensus target price of $402.43, indicating a potential upside of 27.62%. 3M has a consensus target price of $179.36, indicating a potential upside of 7.10%. Given Carlisle Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Carlisle Companies is more favorable than 3M.

Carlisle Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. 3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Carlisle Companies pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Carlisle Companies has increased its dividend for 48 consecutive years and 3M has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than Carlisle Companies. Carlisle Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3M, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Carlisle Companies has a net margin of 14.21% compared to 3M's net margin of 11.90%. 3M's return on equity of 115.87% beat Carlisle Companies' return on equity.

Carlisle Companies has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3M has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

89.5% of Carlisle Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of 3M shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Carlisle Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of 3M shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

3M currently has a consensus price target of $179.36, indicating a potential upside of 7.10%. DuPont de Nemours has a consensus price target of $166.60, indicating a potential upside of 28.06%. Given DuPont de Nemours' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe DuPont de Nemours is more favorable than 3M.

3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. DuPont de Nemours pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DuPont de Nemours pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. 3M has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. 3M is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than DuPont de Nemours. 3M is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DuPont de Nemours, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3M has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DuPont de Nemours has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

3M has a net margin of 11.90% compared to DuPont de Nemours' net margin of 0.67%. 3M's return on equity of 115.87% beat DuPont de Nemours' return on equity.

65.3% of 3M shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.0% of DuPont de Nemours shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of 3M shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of DuPont de Nemours shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, DuPont de Nemours had 3 more articles in the media than 3M. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for DuPont de Nemours and 6 mentions for 3M. DuPont de Nemours' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat 3M's score of 1.07 indicating that DuPont de Nemours is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Danaher currently has a consensus price target of $230.23, indicating a potential upside of 2.93%. 3M has a consensus price target of $179.36, indicating a potential upside of 7.10%. Given 3M's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe 3M is more favorable than Danaher.

Danaher has a net margin of 15.95% compared to 3M's net margin of 11.90%. 3M's return on equity of 115.87% beat Danaher's return on equity.

Danaher has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3M has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Danaher had 6 more articles in the media than 3M. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Danaher and 6 mentions for 3M. 3M's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Danaher's score of 0.79 indicating that 3M is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Danaher pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. 3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Danaher pays out 28.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Danaher has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and 3M has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

79.1% of Danaher shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of 3M shares are held by institutional investors. 10.8% of Danaher shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of 3M shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Danaher has higher earnings, but lower revenue than 3M. 3M is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Danaher, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than Griffon. Griffon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3M, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Griffon currently has a consensus target price of $122.50, suggesting a potential upside of 27.00%. 3M has a consensus target price of $179.36, suggesting a potential upside of 7.10%. Given Griffon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Griffon is more favorable than 3M.

Griffon pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. 3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Griffon pays out 22.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3M pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Griffon has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and 3M has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

3M has a net margin of 11.90% compared to Griffon's net margin of 8.08%. Griffon's return on equity of 249.31% beat 3M's return on equity.

In the previous week, 3M had 2 more articles in the media than Griffon. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for 3M and 4 mentions for Griffon. 3M's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Griffon's score of 0.34 indicating that 3M is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Griffon has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3M has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

73.2% of Griffon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of 3M shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Griffon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of 3M shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.