3M (MMM) Competitors

3M presently has a consensus price target of $171.17, indicating a potential upside of 16.63%. Carlisle Companies has a consensus price target of $405.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.12%. Given 3M's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3M is more favorable than Carlisle Companies.

Carlisle Companies has a net margin of 14.57% compared to 3M's net margin of 11.14%. 3M's return on equity of 104.75% beat Carlisle Companies' return on equity.

3M has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Carlisle Companies has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

65.3% of 3M shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of Carlisle Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of 3M shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Carlisle Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than Carlisle Companies. Carlisle Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3M, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Carlisle Companies had 8 more articles in the media than 3M. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Carlisle Companies and 3 mentions for 3M. 3M's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Carlisle Companies' score of 1.11 indicating that 3M is being referred to more favorably in the media.

3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Carlisle Companies pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. 3M pays out 60.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carlisle Companies pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. 3M has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Carlisle Companies has raised its dividend for 48 consecutive years.

Danaher has a net margin of 14.89% compared to 3M's net margin of 11.14%. 3M's return on equity of 104.75% beat Danaher's return on equity.

3M presently has a consensus price target of $171.17, indicating a potential upside of 16.63%. Danaher has a consensus price target of $240.70, indicating a potential upside of 37.66%. Given Danaher's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Danaher is more favorable than 3M.

3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Danaher pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. 3M pays out 60.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Danaher pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. 3M has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Danaher has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Danaher has lower revenue, but higher earnings than 3M. 3M is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Danaher, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Danaher had 31 more articles in the media than 3M. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Danaher and 3 mentions for 3M. 3M's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Danaher's score of 1.00 indicating that 3M is being referred to more favorably in the media.

3M has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Danaher has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

65.3% of 3M shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.1% of Danaher shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of 3M shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.8% of Danaher shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

3M has a net margin of 11.14% compared to Griffon's net margin of 1.76%. Griffon's return on equity of 228.83% beat 3M's return on equity.

Griffon presently has a consensus price target of $107.67, indicating a potential upside of 16.17%. 3M has a consensus price target of $171.17, indicating a potential upside of 16.63%. Given 3M's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3M is more favorable than Griffon.

Griffon pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. 3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Griffon pays out 95.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. 3M pays out 60.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Griffon has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and 3M has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. 3M is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than Griffon. 3M is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Griffon had 6 more articles in the media than 3M. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Griffon and 3 mentions for 3M. 3M's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Griffon's score of 0.73 indicating that 3M is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Griffon has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, 3M has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

73.2% of Griffon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of 3M shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.2% of Griffon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of 3M shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

91.6% of ITT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of 3M shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of ITT shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of 3M shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ITT has a net margin of 12.39% compared to 3M's net margin of 11.14%. 3M's return on equity of 104.75% beat ITT's return on equity.

3M has higher revenue and earnings than ITT. 3M is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ITT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ITT presently has a consensus price target of $225.55, indicating a potential upside of 3.84%. 3M has a consensus price target of $171.17, indicating a potential upside of 16.63%. Given 3M's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3M is more favorable than ITT.

ITT has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, 3M has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, ITT had 23 more articles in the media than 3M. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for ITT and 3 mentions for 3M. 3M's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat ITT's score of 0.94 indicating that 3M is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

ITT pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. 3M pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. ITT pays out 25.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3M pays out 60.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ITT has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and 3M has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.