Federal Signal (FSS) Competitors

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.56% compared to ITT's net margin of 10.80%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.18% beat ITT's return on equity.

In the previous week, ITT had 9 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for ITT and 15 mentions for Federal Signal. Federal Signal's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat ITT's score of 0.70 indicating that Federal Signal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

ITT presently has a consensus target price of $234.75, suggesting a potential upside of 23.01%. Federal Signal has a consensus target price of $139.25, suggesting a potential upside of 24.35%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than ITT.

ITT has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Signal. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ITT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ITT pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. ITT pays out 27.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ITT has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Federal Signal has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. ITT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

91.6% of ITT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of ITT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ITT has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Signal has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Enpro currently has a consensus target price of $358.33, suggesting a potential upside of 20.86%. Federal Signal has a consensus target price of $139.25, suggesting a potential upside of 24.35%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Enpro.

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Enpro's net margin of 3.70%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.18% beat Enpro's return on equity.

Enpro pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Enpro pays out 63.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enpro has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Federal Signal is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Federal Signal had 5 more articles in the media than Enpro. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Federal Signal and 10 mentions for Enpro. Enpro's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Federal Signal's score of 0.73 indicating that Enpro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Federal Signal has higher revenue and earnings than Enpro. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enpro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.3% of Enpro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Enpro shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enpro has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Signal has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 15 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 15 mentions for Federal Signal. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Federal Signal's score of 0.73 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 11.56%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 27.97% beat Federal Signal's return on equity.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Signal. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Federal Signal presently has a consensus price target of $139.25, suggesting a potential upside of 24.35%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus price target of $1,027.38, suggesting a potential upside of 7.94%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

92.9% of Terex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Terex shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Terex pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Terex pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Terex has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Federal Signal has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Terex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Terex currently has a consensus price target of $79.45, suggesting a potential upside of 23.44%. Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $139.25, suggesting a potential upside of 24.35%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Terex.

Terex has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Signal has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Federal Signal had 4 more articles in the media than Terex. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Federal Signal and 11 mentions for Terex. Terex's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Federal Signal's score of 0.73 indicating that Terex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Federal Signal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Terex. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Terex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Terex's net margin of 1.87%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.18% beat Terex's return on equity.