Go Pro

Federal Signal (FSS) Competitors

Federal Signal logo
$119.72 +0.44 (+0.37%)
As of 01:15 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FSS vs. ITT, NPO, PH, TEX, and WTS

Should you buy Federal Signal stock or one of its competitors? Federal Signal's main competitors and comparable companies include ITT (ITT), Enpro (NPO), Parker-Hannifin (PH), Terex (TEX), and Watts Water Technologies (WTS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Federal Signal compare to ITT?

Federal Signal (NYSE:FSS) and ITT (NYSE:ITT) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.66% compared to ITT's net margin of 8.90%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.36% beat ITT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Federal Signal11.66% 21.36% 13.07%
ITT 8.90%15.90%7.74%

In the previous week, ITT had 10 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for ITT and 2 mentions for Federal Signal. Federal Signal's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat ITT's score of 1.48 indicating that Federal Signal is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Federal Signal
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
ITT
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ITT has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

ITT has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Signal. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ITT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Federal Signal$2.18B3.34$246.60M$4.6425.70
ITT$3.94B4.61$488M$5.1039.83

Federal Signal presently has a consensus price target of $140.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.81%. ITT has a consensus price target of $244.82, suggesting a potential upside of 20.53%. Given ITT's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ITT is more favorable than Federal Signal.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Federal Signal
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
ITT
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of ITT shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of ITT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. ITT pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Federal Signal pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ITT pays out 30.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and ITT has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. ITT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

ITT beats Federal Signal on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Federal Signal compare to Enpro?

Enpro (NYSE:NPO) and Federal Signal (NYSE:FSS) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Enpro had 5 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Enpro and 2 mentions for Federal Signal. Federal Signal's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Enpro's score of 1.13 indicating that Federal Signal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Enpro
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Federal Signal
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Enpro pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Enpro pays out 62.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federal Signal pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enpro has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Federal Signal has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Federal Signal is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

98.3% of Enpro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Enpro shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enpro has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Signal has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Federal Signal has higher revenue and earnings than Enpro. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enpro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enpro$1.14B5.58$40.50M$2.05147.02
Federal Signal$2.18B3.34$246.60M$4.6425.70

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.66% compared to Enpro's net margin of 3.60%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.36% beat Enpro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enpro3.60% 11.83% 7.10%
Federal Signal 11.66%21.36%13.07%

Enpro currently has a consensus target price of $358.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.89%. Federal Signal has a consensus target price of $140.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.81%. Given Enpro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Enpro is more favorable than Federal Signal.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enpro
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Federal Signal
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Summary

Federal Signal beats Enpro on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Federal Signal compare to Parker-Hannifin?

Federal Signal (NYSE:FSS) and Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 11.66%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.48% beat Federal Signal's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Federal Signal11.66% 21.36% 13.07%
Parker-Hannifin 16.97%28.48%13.49%

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Federal Signal pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Federal Signal has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Signal presently has a consensus target price of $140.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.81%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus target price of $1,114.55, suggesting a potential upside of 16.11%. Given Federal Signal's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Federal Signal
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Parker-Hannifin
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 13 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 2 mentions for Federal Signal. Federal Signal's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Parker-Hannifin's score of 1.44 indicating that Federal Signal is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Federal Signal
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Parker-Hannifin
14 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Signal. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Federal Signal$2.18B3.34$246.60M$4.6425.70
Parker-Hannifin$21.50B5.63$3.65B$28.4933.69

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Federal Signal on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Federal Signal compare to Terex?

Federal Signal (NYSE:FSS) and Terex (NYSE:TEX) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.9% of Terex shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Terex shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Signal presently has a consensus target price of $140.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.81%. Terex has a consensus target price of $78.91, indicating a potential upside of 24.38%. Given Terex's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Terex is more favorable than Federal Signal.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Federal Signal
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Terex
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Terex pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Federal Signal pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Terex pays out 34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Federal Signal has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Terex has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Terex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.66% compared to Terex's net margin of 2.23%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.36% beat Terex's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Federal Signal11.66% 21.36% 13.07%
Terex 2.23%12.24%5.16%

In the previous week, Federal Signal and Federal Signal both had 2 articles in the media. Federal Signal's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Terex's score of 1.48 indicating that Federal Signal is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Federal Signal
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Terex
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Terex has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Federal Signal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Terex. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Terex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Federal Signal$2.18B3.34$246.60M$4.6425.70
Terex$5.42B1.34$221M$1.9632.37

Summary

Federal Signal beats Terex on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Federal Signal compare to Watts Water Technologies?

Watts Water Technologies (NYSE:WTS) and Federal Signal (NYSE:FSS) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Signal has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Watts Water Technologies had 11 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Watts Water Technologies and 2 mentions for Federal Signal. Federal Signal's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Watts Water Technologies' score of 0.85 indicating that Federal Signal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Watts Water Technologies
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Federal Signal
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 14.34% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 11.66%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.36% beat Watts Water Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Watts Water Technologies14.34% 19.16% 13.78%
Federal Signal 11.66%21.36%13.07%

Watts Water Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $367.70, suggesting a potential upside of 1.35%. Federal Signal has a consensus target price of $140.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.81%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Watts Water Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Watts Water Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Federal Signal
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

95.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Watts Water Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Watts Water Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Watts Water Technologies pays out 22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federal Signal pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Watts Water Technologies has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Watts Water Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Watts Water Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Signal. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watts Water Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Watts Water Technologies$2.44B4.97$340.80M$11.4531.69
Federal Signal$2.18B3.34$246.60M$4.6425.70

Summary

Watts Water Technologies beats Federal Signal on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Federal Signal News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FSS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FSS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FSS vs. The Competition

MetricFederal SignalMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$7.29B$11.46B$10.47B$23.52B
Dividend Yield0.50%2.23%97.15%3.73%
P/E Ratio25.7320.7925.8829.17
Price / Sales3.3464.64389.4921.45
Price / Cash21.2923.3924.2019.95
Price / Book5.254.395.014.82
Net Income$246.60M$365.71M$611.74M$1.07B
7 Day Performance4.98%1.59%1.07%1.04%
1 Month Performance-6.95%-0.38%-2.01%-1.15%
1 Year Performance-4.43%11.00%9.59%12.65%

Federal Signal Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FSS
Federal Signal
3.8053 of 5 stars
$119.72
+0.4%
$140.50
+17.4%
-4.7%$7.31B$2.18B25.805,800
ITT
ITT
4.8289 of 5 stars
$200.33
-1.3%
$241.08
+20.3%
+19.2%$18.15B$3.94B39.2811,600
NPO
Enpro
3.932 of 5 stars
$295.70
-1.1%
$358.33
+21.2%
+35.1%$6.33B$1.14B144.244,000
PH
Parker-Hannifin
4.8454 of 5 stars
$979.89
-1.5%
$1,100.00
+12.3%
+26.9%$125.42B$21.50B34.3959,850
TEX
Terex
4.9306 of 5 stars
$63.57
-0.3%
$78.91
+24.1%
+19.6%$7.28B$5.42B32.4310,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FSS) was last updated on 9/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners