Federal Signal (FSS) Competitors

Federal Signal has higher revenue and earnings than Enpro. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enpro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Enpro had 2 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Enpro and 2 mentions for Federal Signal. Enpro's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Federal Signal's score of 0.50 indicating that Enpro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Enpro shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Enpro shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Enpro pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enpro pays out 63.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Enpro has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Federal Signal is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Signal presently has a consensus price target of $139.25, indicating a potential upside of 28.77%. Enpro has a consensus price target of $315.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.93%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Enpro.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enpro has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Enpro's net margin of 3.70%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.18% beat Enpro's return on equity.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Signal. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 11.56%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 27.97% beat Federal Signal's return on equity.

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Signal presently has a consensus target price of $139.25, suggesting a potential upside of 28.77%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus target price of $1,020.80, suggesting a potential upside of 20.41%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 15 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 2 mentions for Federal Signal. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Federal Signal's score of 0.50 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Signal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Terex. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Terex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.9% of Terex shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Terex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Terex pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Terex pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Terex has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Terex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Terex's net margin of 1.87%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.18% beat Terex's return on equity.

Federal Signal currently has a consensus price target of $139.25, suggesting a potential upside of 28.77%. Terex has a consensus price target of $75.30, suggesting a potential upside of 28.86%. Given Terex's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Terex is more favorable than Federal Signal.

In the previous week, Terex had 2 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Terex and 2 mentions for Federal Signal. Federal Signal's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Terex's score of 0.43 indicating that Federal Signal is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Terex has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Wabtec has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Signal has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Wabtec had 4 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Wabtec and 2 mentions for Federal Signal. Wabtec's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Federal Signal's score of 0.50 indicating that Wabtec is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Wabtec's net margin of 10.52%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.18% beat Wabtec's return on equity.

Wabtec has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Signal. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wabtec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Wabtec pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Wabtec pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Wabtec has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Federal Signal has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Federal Signal is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Wabtec presently has a consensus target price of $289.82, indicating a potential upside of 10.98%. Federal Signal has a consensus target price of $139.25, indicating a potential upside of 28.77%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Wabtec.

91.7% of Wabtec shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Federal Signal shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Wabtec shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.