Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) Competitors

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 28.69% compared to Franklin Resources' net margin of 8.72%. Franklin Resources' return on equity of 11.55% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

In the previous week, Franklin Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Blue Owl Technology Finance. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Franklin Resources and 6 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance. Franklin Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of -0.05 indicating that Franklin Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Franklin Resources currently has a consensus target price of $35.89, suggesting a potential upside of 12.22%. Blue Owl Technology Finance has a consensus target price of $13.60, suggesting a potential upside of 45.53%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than Franklin Resources.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Franklin Resources. Blue Owl Technology Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franklin Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blue Owl Technology Finance has a beta of -0.58, indicating that its share price is 158% less volatile than the broader market.

47.6% of Franklin Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.4% of Franklin Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Franklin Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.0%. Franklin Resources pays out 89.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 175.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Franklin Resources has increased its dividend for 45 consecutive years.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a beta of -0.58, indicating that its share price is 158% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carlyle Group has a beta of 1.88, indicating that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

55.9% of Carlyle Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.4% of Carlyle Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.0%. Carlyle Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 175.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Carlyle Group pays out 145.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Carlyle Group has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 28.69% compared to Carlyle Group's net margin of 10.08%. Carlyle Group's return on equity of 22.52% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

In the previous week, Carlyle Group had 5 more articles in the media than Blue Owl Technology Finance. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Carlyle Group and 6 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance. Carlyle Group's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of -0.05 indicating that Carlyle Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Blue Owl Technology Finance presently has a consensus price target of $13.60, suggesting a potential upside of 45.53%. Carlyle Group has a consensus price target of $56.60, suggesting a potential upside of 47.32%. Given Carlyle Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Carlyle Group is more favorable than Blue Owl Technology Finance.

Carlyle Group has higher revenue and earnings than Blue Owl Technology Finance. Blue Owl Technology Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

35.9% of Blue Owl Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 25.7% of Blue Owl Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Blue Owl Capital presently has a consensus price target of $13.56, suggesting a potential upside of 42.82%. Blue Owl Technology Finance has a consensus price target of $13.60, suggesting a potential upside of 45.53%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than Blue Owl Capital.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Blue Owl Capital. Blue Owl Technology Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Blue Owl Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.0%. Blue Owl Capital pays out 766.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 175.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blue Owl Capital has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Blue Owl Technology Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 28.69% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 2.71%. Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 23.14% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

In the previous week, Blue Owl Capital had 9 more articles in the media than Blue Owl Technology Finance. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Blue Owl Capital and 6 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance. Blue Owl Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of -0.05 indicating that Blue Owl Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blue Owl Technology Finance has a beta of -0.58, meaning that its share price is 158% less volatile than the broader market.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Blue Owl Technology Finance. Blue Owl Technology Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.0%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 175.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 30.91% compared to Blue Owl Technology Finance's net margin of 28.69%. Ares Capital's return on equity of 9.80% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

Blue Owl Technology Finance presently has a consensus target price of $13.60, suggesting a potential upside of 45.53%. Ares Capital has a consensus target price of $20.39, suggesting a potential upside of 9.85%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than Ares Capital.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 2 more articles in the media than Blue Owl Technology Finance. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Ares Capital and 6 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of -0.05 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a beta of -0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 158% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.