Go Pro
→ Buy this stock tomorrow (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free OTF Stock Alerts

Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) Competitors

Blue Owl Technology Finance logo
$9.99 -0.11 (-1.04%)
As of 11:30 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

OTF vs. CSW, NIQ, FSCO, OXLC, and PFLT

Should you buy Blue Owl Technology Finance stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Blue Owl Technology Finance with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Blue Owl Technology Finance include CSW Industrials (CSW), NIQ Global Intelligence (NIQ), FS Credit Opportunities (FSCO), Oxford Lane Capital (OXLC), and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to CSW Industrials?

Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) and CSW Industrials (NYSE:CSW) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Blue Owl Technology Finance currently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential upside of 34.07%. CSW Industrials has a consensus price target of $330.43, indicating a potential upside of 18.74%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than CSW Industrials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blue Owl Technology Finance
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
CSW Industrials
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

82.8% of CSW Industrials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of CSW Industrials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CSW Industrials had 1 more articles in the media than Blue Owl Technology Finance. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for CSW Industrials and 8 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance. CSW Industrials' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.29 indicating that CSW Industrials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Blue Owl Technology Finance
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CSW Industrials
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to CSW Industrials' net margin of 10.35%. CSW Industrials' return on equity of 15.91% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Owl Technology Finance32.78% 7.43% 4.20%
CSW Industrials 10.35%15.91%9.05%

Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. CSW Industrials pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CSW Industrials pays out 18.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CSW Industrials has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than CSW Industrials. Blue Owl Technology Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CSW Industrials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Owl Technology Finance$1.15B4.04$720.37M$0.9011.11
CSW Industrials$1.08B4.19$112.04M$6.6841.66

Summary

CSW Industrials beats Blue Owl Technology Finance on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to NIQ Global Intelligence?

Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) and NIQ Global Intelligence (NYSE:NIQ) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 5 more articles in the media than NIQ Global Intelligence. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 3 mentions for NIQ Global Intelligence. NIQ Global Intelligence's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.29 indicating that NIQ Global Intelligence is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Blue Owl Technology Finance
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
NIQ Global Intelligence
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Blue Owl Technology Finance presently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential upside of 34.07%. NIQ Global Intelligence has a consensus price target of $17.58, indicating a potential upside of 62.45%. Given NIQ Global Intelligence's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NIQ Global Intelligence is more favorable than Blue Owl Technology Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blue Owl Technology Finance
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
NIQ Global Intelligence
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to NIQ Global Intelligence's net margin of -7.78%. NIQ Global Intelligence's return on equity of 10.30% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Owl Technology Finance32.78% 7.43% 4.20%
NIQ Global Intelligence -7.78%10.30%1.52%

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NIQ Global Intelligence. NIQ Global Intelligence is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Technology Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Owl Technology Finance$1.15B4.04$720.37M$0.9011.11
NIQ Global Intelligence$4.20B0.76-$353.30M-$1.26N/A

Summary

Blue Owl Technology Finance beats NIQ Global Intelligence on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

FS Credit Opportunities (NYSE:FSCO) and Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential upside of 34.07%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than FS Credit Opportunities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FS Credit Opportunities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Blue Owl Technology Finance
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to FS Credit Opportunities' net margin of 0.00%. Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity of 7.43% beat FS Credit Opportunities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FS Credit OpportunitiesN/A N/A N/A
Blue Owl Technology Finance 32.78%7.43%4.20%

36.4% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FS Credit Opportunities pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.5%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than FS Credit Opportunities.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FS Credit Opportunities$163.59M6.08N/AN/AN/A
Blue Owl Technology Finance$1.15B4.04$720.37M$0.9011.11

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 7 more articles in the media than FS Credit Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 1 mentions for FS Credit Opportunities. FS Credit Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 1.91 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.29 indicating that FS Credit Opportunities is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FS Credit Opportunities
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Blue Owl Technology Finance
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Blue Owl Technology Finance beats FS Credit Opportunities on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) and Oxford Lane Capital (NASDAQ:OXLC) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Lane Capital. Oxford Lane Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Technology Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Owl Technology Finance$1.15B4.04$720.37M$0.9011.11
Oxford Lane Capital-$580.18M-1.38$585.52M$6.461.36

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 8 more articles in the media than Oxford Lane Capital. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 0 mentions for Oxford Lane Capital. Blue Owl Technology Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Oxford Lane Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Blue Owl Technology Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Owl Technology Finance Neutral
Oxford Lane Capital Neutral

6.7% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. Oxford Lane Capital pays an annual dividend of $4.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 46.5%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oxford Lane Capital pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oxford Lane Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Blue Owl Technology Finance currently has a consensus target price of $13.40, indicating a potential upside of 34.07%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than Oxford Lane Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blue Owl Technology Finance
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Oxford Lane Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to Oxford Lane Capital's net margin of 0.00%. Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity of 7.43% beat Oxford Lane Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Owl Technology Finance32.78% 7.43% 4.20%
Oxford Lane Capital N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Blue Owl Technology Finance beats Oxford Lane Capital on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) and Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 23.08%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 9.95% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital23.08% 9.95% 3.87%
Blue Owl Technology Finance 32.78%7.43%4.20%

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Blue Owl Technology Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.64$66.36M$0.6211.20
Blue Owl Technology Finance$1.15B4.04$720.37M$0.9011.11

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 6 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 2 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.29 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Blue Owl Technology Finance
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus target price of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 41.11%. Blue Owl Technology Finance has a consensus target price of $13.40, suggesting a potential upside of 34.07%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Blue Owl Technology Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Blue Owl Technology Finance
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.8%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 154.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Blue Owl Technology Finance on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Blue Owl Technology Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OTF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OTF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OTF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricBlue Owl Technology FinanceAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.63B$2.43B$6.12B$23.31B
Dividend Yield13.86%6.01%5.23%4.16%
P/E Ratio11.1263.1130.0830.73
Price / Sales4.041,878.771,201.6120.27
Price / Cash9.7260.5088.7418.80
Price / Book0.581.316.664.74
Net Income$720.37M$265.96M$1.13B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.67%-0.42%5.21%-0.24%
1 Month Performance-6.19%-0.40%5.27%0.71%
1 Year PerformanceN/A7.00%14.55%16.46%

Blue Owl Technology Finance Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OTF
Blue Owl Technology Finance
4.8501 of 5 stars		$10.00
-1.0%		$13.40
+34.1%		N/A$4.63B$1.15B11.12N/A
CSW
CSW Industrials
3.5809 of 5 stars		$279.11
-7.2%		$330.43
+18.4%		-3.0%$4.55B$1.08B41.782,700
NIQ
NIQ Global Intelligence
4.6791 of 5 stars		$10.96
-1.7%		$17.58
+60.4%		-14.9%$3.23B$4.20BN/A38,760
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities
N/A$4.91
+1.6%		N/A-31.8%$992.13M$163.59MN/AN/A
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital
1.4391 of 5 stars		$8.77
-2.6%		N/A-55.8%$794.89M-$580.18M1.36601

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:OTF) was last updated on 7/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
NVIDIA offered $40B. The answer was no.
Apple, NVIDIA, Google, Amazon, and Samsung all pay one company billions in royalties every year. NVIDIA tried ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
SMX: From Under-the-Radar to Must-Watch!
SMX (Security Matters) PLC is building Digital Material Passport technology that embeds molecular-level marker...
Smallcaps Daily | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s $250 Bill – See Immediately
Former Goldman Sachs VP Dr. David Eifrig is warning that July 28 could trigger the biggest wealth reset in mod...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
The 1934 playbook
In 1934, a legal government maneuver transferred billions in wealth overnight. Most Americans never saw it com...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
My next big call (under $1)
17,556% on KDA. Here's what I'm buying now. It's a coin under $1.00 that most investors have never heard of...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
This same-day trade is getting a lot of attention
Zero-days-to-expiration trades happen every single day - and most traders either ignore them or use them wrong...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The chipmaker 148 times smaller than NVIDIA supplying Musk
According to Yahoo Finance, Elon Musk's latest project could 'upend another industry just as he did with cars ...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel