Does the media refer more to OTF or CSW?

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance and Blue Owl Technology Finance both had 5 articles in the media. CSW Industrials' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.31 indicating that CSW Industrials is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Blue Owl Technology Finance 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral CSW Industrials 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to NIQ or OTF?

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 2 more articles in the media than NIQ Global Intelligence. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 3 mentions for NIQ Global Intelligence. NIQ Global Intelligence's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.31 indicating that NIQ Global Intelligence is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NIQ Global Intelligence 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Blue Owl Technology Finance 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer FSCO or OTF?

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a consensus price target of $13.40, suggesting a potential upside of 19.27%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than FS Credit Opportunities. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FS Credit Opportunities 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Blue Owl Technology Finance 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FSCO or OTF?

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than FS Credit Opportunities. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FS Credit Opportunities $163.59M 5.83 N/A N/A N/A Blue Owl Technology Finance $1.15B 4.54 $720.37M $0.90 12.48

Does the media prefer FSCO or OTF?

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 4 more articles in the media than FS Credit Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 1 mentions for FS Credit Opportunities. FS Credit Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.31 indicating that FS Credit Opportunities is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FS Credit Opportunities 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Blue Owl Technology Finance 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate OXLC or OTF?

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a consensus target price of $13.40, indicating a potential upside of 19.27%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than Oxford Lane Capital. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Oxford Lane Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Blue Owl Technology Finance 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Does the media refer more to OXLC or OTF?

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 4 more articles in the media than Oxford Lane Capital. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 1 mentions for Oxford Lane Capital. Oxford Lane Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.31 indicating that Oxford Lane Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Oxford Lane Capital 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Blue Owl Technology Finance 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) Competitors

$11.24 -0.26 (-2.22%)

As of 12:20 PM Eastern

Compare

OTF vs. CSW, NIQ, FSCO, OXLC, and PFLT

Should you buy Blue Owl Technology Finance stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Blue Owl Technology Finance with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Blue Owl Technology Finance include CSW Industrials (CSW), NIQ Global Intelligence (NIQ), FS Credit Opportunities (FSCO), Oxford Lane Capital (OXLC), and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to CSW Industrials?

Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) and CSW Industrials (NYSE:CSW) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than CSW Industrials. Blue Owl Technology Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CSW Industrials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Blue Owl Technology Finance	$1.15B	4.54	$720.37M	$0.90	12.48
CSW Industrials	$1.08B	4.02	$112.04M	$6.68	39.90

Blue Owl Technology Finance presently has a consensus target price of $13.40, suggesting a potential upside of 19.27%. CSW Industrials has a consensus target price of $328.57, suggesting a potential upside of 23.28%. Given CSW Industrials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CSW Industrials is more favorable than Blue Owl Technology Finance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Blue Owl Technology Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
CSW Industrials	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.5%. CSW Industrials pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CSW Industrials pays out 18.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CSW Industrials has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to CSW Industrials' net margin of 10.35%. CSW Industrials' return on equity of 15.91% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Blue Owl Technology Finance	32.78%	7.43%	4.20%
CSW Industrials	10.35%	15.91%	9.05%

82.8% of CSW Industrials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of CSW Industrials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance and Blue Owl Technology Finance both had 5 articles in the media. CSW Industrials' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.31 indicating that CSW Industrials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Blue Owl Technology Finance	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
CSW Industrials	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

CSW Industrials beats Blue Owl Technology Finance on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to NIQ Global Intelligence?

NIQ Global Intelligence (NYSE:NIQ) and Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to NIQ Global Intelligence's net margin of -7.78%. NIQ Global Intelligence's return on equity of 10.30% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NIQ Global Intelligence	-7.78%	10.30%	1.52%
Blue Owl Technology Finance	32.78%	7.43%	4.20%

NIQ Global Intelligence currently has a consensus price target of $17.58, suggesting a potential upside of 113.57%. Blue Owl Technology Finance has a consensus price target of $13.40, suggesting a potential upside of 19.27%. Given NIQ Global Intelligence's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NIQ Global Intelligence is more favorable than Blue Owl Technology Finance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NIQ Global Intelligence	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
Blue Owl Technology Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 2 more articles in the media than NIQ Global Intelligence. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 3 mentions for NIQ Global Intelligence. NIQ Global Intelligence's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.31 indicating that NIQ Global Intelligence is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NIQ Global Intelligence	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Blue Owl Technology Finance	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Blue Owl Technology Finance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NIQ Global Intelligence. NIQ Global Intelligence is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Technology Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NIQ Global Intelligence	$4.20B	0.58	-$353.30M	-$1.26	N/A
Blue Owl Technology Finance	$1.15B	4.54	$720.37M	$0.90	12.48

Summary

Blue Owl Technology Finance beats NIQ Global Intelligence on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

FS Credit Opportunities (NYSE:FSCO) and Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to FS Credit Opportunities' net margin of 0.00%. Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity of 7.43% beat FS Credit Opportunities' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FS Credit Opportunities	N/A	N/A	N/A
Blue Owl Technology Finance	32.78%	7.43%	4.20%

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 4 more articles in the media than FS Credit Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 1 mentions for FS Credit Opportunities. FS Credit Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.31 indicating that FS Credit Opportunities is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FS Credit Opportunities	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Blue Owl Technology Finance	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than FS Credit Opportunities.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FS Credit Opportunities	$163.59M	5.83	N/A	N/A	N/A
Blue Owl Technology Finance	$1.15B	4.54	$720.37M	$0.90	12.48

36.4% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a consensus price target of $13.40, suggesting a potential upside of 19.27%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than FS Credit Opportunities.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FS Credit Opportunities	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Blue Owl Technology Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

FS Credit Opportunities pays an annual dividend of $0.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.8%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.5%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Blue Owl Technology Finance beats FS Credit Opportunities on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

Oxford Lane Capital (NASDAQ:OXLC) and Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Lane Capital. Oxford Lane Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Technology Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Lane Capital	-$580.18M	-1.51	$585.52M	$6.46	1.50
Blue Owl Technology Finance	$1.15B	4.54	$720.37M	$0.90	12.48

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 4 more articles in the media than Oxford Lane Capital. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 1 mentions for Oxford Lane Capital. Oxford Lane Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.31 indicating that Oxford Lane Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Oxford Lane Capital	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Blue Owl Technology Finance	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to Oxford Lane Capital's net margin of 0.00%. Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity of 7.43% beat Oxford Lane Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oxford Lane Capital	N/A	N/A	N/A
Blue Owl Technology Finance	32.78%	7.43%	4.20%

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a consensus target price of $13.40, indicating a potential upside of 19.27%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than Oxford Lane Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oxford Lane Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Blue Owl Technology Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

6.7% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Oxford Lane Capital pays an annual dividend of $4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 45.0%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.5%. Oxford Lane Capital pays out 67.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oxford Lane Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Blue Owl Technology Finance beats Oxford Lane Capital on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

Blue Owl Technology Finance presently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential upside of 19.27%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 21.06%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Blue Owl Technology Finance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Blue Owl Technology Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Blue Owl Technology Finance. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 5 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance. Blue Owl Technology Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of -0.02 indicating that Blue Owl Technology Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Blue Owl Technology Finance	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 23.08%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 9.95% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Blue Owl Technology Finance	32.78%	7.43%	4.20%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	23.08%	9.95%	3.87%

Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.5%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.2%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 198.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Blue Owl Technology Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Blue Owl Technology Finance	$1.15B	4.54	$720.37M	$0.90	12.48
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$261.43M	3.07	$66.36M	$0.62	13.06

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Blue Owl Technology Finance on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Blue Owl Technology Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OTF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

OTF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Blue Owl Technology Finance	Asset Management Industry	Financial Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$5.19B	$2.42B	$5.72B	$23.16B
Dividend Yield	12.84%	6.02%	5.28%	4.08%
P/E Ratio	12.47	25.89	16.36	30.45
Price / Sales	4.54	2,096.70	1,339.61	81.39
Price / Cash	10.49	60.15	89.85	24.44
Price / Book	0.65	1.37	6.49	4.65
Net Income	$720.37M	$264.62M	$1.14B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.68%	-0.87%	-0.61%	-1.27%
1 Month Performance	-3.34%	0.32%	1.08%	-0.37%
1 Year Performance	N/A	10.76%	19.13%	23.51%

Blue Owl Technology Finance Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
OTF Blue Owl Technology Finance	4.8542 of 5 stars	$11.24 -2.2%	$13.40 +19.3%	N/A	$5.19B	$1.15B	12.47	N/A
CSW CSW Industrials	4.0762 of 5 stars	$276.84 -2.6%	$328.57 +18.7%	-11.2%	$4.52B	$1.08B	41.44	2,600
NIQ NIQ Global Intelligence	4.4789 of 5 stars	$8.40 +0.7%	$17.58 +109.3%	-34.3%	$2.48B	$4.20B	N/A	38,760	Short Interest Increase
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities	N/A	$5.04 -0.7%	N/A	-30.7%	$998.72M	$163.59M	N/A	N/A	Short Interest Increase
OXLC Oxford Lane Capital	2.1308 of 5 stars	$9.98 +0.3%	N/A	-55.5%	$904.56M	-$580.18M	1.54	601	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:OTF) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) Competitors

OTF vs. CSW, NIQ, FSCO, OXLC, and PFLT

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to CSW Industrials?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to NIQ Global Intelligence?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OTF vs. The Competition

Blue Owl Technology Finance Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) Competitors

OTF vs. CSW, NIQ, FSCO, OXLC, and PFLT

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to CSW Industrials?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, OTF or CSW?

Do analysts rate OTF or CSW?

Is OTF or CSW a better dividend stock?

Is OTF or CSW more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in OTF or CSW?

Does the media refer more to OTF or CSW?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to NIQ Global Intelligence?

Is NIQ or OTF more profitable?

Do analysts rate NIQ or OTF?

Does the media refer more to NIQ or OTF?

Which has better valuation and earnings, NIQ or OTF?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

Is FSCO or OTF more profitable?

Does the media prefer FSCO or OTF?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FSCO or OTF?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FSCO or OTF?

Do analysts prefer FSCO or OTF?

Is FSCO or OTF a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, OXLC or OTF?

Does the media refer more to OXLC or OTF?

Is OXLC or OTF more profitable?

Do analysts rate OXLC or OTF?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in OXLC or OTF?

Is OXLC or OTF a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Do analysts rate OTF or PFLT?

Does the media prefer OTF or PFLT?

Is OTF or PFLT more profitable?

Is OTF or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation & earnings, OTF or PFLT?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in OTF or PFLT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OTF vs. The Competition

Blue Owl Technology Finance Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools