Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) Competitors

$11.14 -0.02 (-0.18%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$11.16 +0.02 (+0.22%)

As of 07:58 PM Eastern

OTF vs. CSW, NIQ, FSCO, OXLC, and PFLT

Should you buy Blue Owl Technology Finance stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Blue Owl Technology Finance with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Blue Owl Technology Finance include CSW Industrials (CSW), NIQ Global Intelligence (NIQ), FS Credit Opportunities (FSCO), Oxford Lane Capital (OXLC), and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to CSW Industrials?

CSW Industrials (NYSE:CSW) and Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to CSW Industrials' net margin of 12.64%. CSW Industrials' return on equity of 14.55% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CSW Industrials	12.64%	14.55%	9.48%
Blue Owl Technology Finance	32.78%	7.43%	4.20%

82.8% of CSW Industrials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of CSW Industrials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CSW Industrials presently has a consensus target price of $328.43, indicating a potential upside of 28.26%. Blue Owl Technology Finance has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.67%. Given CSW Industrials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CSW Industrials is more favorable than Blue Owl Technology Finance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CSW Industrials	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56
Blue Owl Technology Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

CSW Industrials pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. CSW Industrials pays out 15.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CSW Industrials has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than CSW Industrials. Blue Owl Technology Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CSW Industrials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CSW Industrials	$878.30M	4.80	$136.65M	$7.54	33.96
Blue Owl Technology Finance	$1.15B	4.50	$720.37M	$0.90	12.38

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 10 more articles in the media than CSW Industrials. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 9 mentions for CSW Industrials. CSW Industrials' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.56 indicating that CSW Industrials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CSW Industrials	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Blue Owl Technology Finance	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

CSW Industrials beats Blue Owl Technology Finance on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to NIQ Global Intelligence?

Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) and NIQ Global Intelligence (NYSE:NIQ) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, NIQ Global Intelligence had 2 more articles in the media than Blue Owl Technology Finance. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for NIQ Global Intelligence and 19 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance. Blue Owl Technology Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat NIQ Global Intelligence's score of 0.55 indicating that Blue Owl Technology Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Blue Owl Technology Finance	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
NIQ Global Intelligence	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Blue Owl Technology Finance presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.67%. NIQ Global Intelligence has a consensus price target of $18.58, suggesting a potential upside of 125.75%. Given NIQ Global Intelligence's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NIQ Global Intelligence is more favorable than Blue Owl Technology Finance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Blue Owl Technology Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
NIQ Global Intelligence	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NIQ Global Intelligence. NIQ Global Intelligence is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Technology Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Blue Owl Technology Finance	$1.15B	4.50	$720.37M	$0.90	12.38
NIQ Global Intelligence	$4.20B	0.58	-$353.30M	-$1.26	N/A

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to NIQ Global Intelligence's net margin of -7.78%. NIQ Global Intelligence's return on equity of 10.84% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Blue Owl Technology Finance	32.78%	7.43%	4.20%
NIQ Global Intelligence	-7.78%	10.84%	1.51%

Summary

Blue Owl Technology Finance beats NIQ Global Intelligence on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) and FS Credit Opportunities (NYSE:FSCO) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 17 more articles in the media than FS Credit Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 2 mentions for FS Credit Opportunities. FS Credit Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.56 indicating that FS Credit Opportunities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Blue Owl Technology Finance	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
FS Credit Opportunities	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to FS Credit Opportunities' net margin of 0.00%. Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity of 7.43% beat FS Credit Opportunities' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Blue Owl Technology Finance	32.78%	7.43%	4.20%
FS Credit Opportunities	N/A	N/A	N/A

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than FS Credit Opportunities.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Blue Owl Technology Finance	$1.15B	4.50	$720.37M	$0.90	12.38
FS Credit Opportunities	$163.59M	6.15	N/A	N/A	N/A

Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. FS Credit Opportunities pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.4%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Blue Owl Technology Finance currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.67%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than FS Credit Opportunities.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Blue Owl Technology Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
FS Credit Opportunities	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

36.4% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Blue Owl Technology Finance beats FS Credit Opportunities on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) and Oxford Lane Capital (NASDAQ:OXLC) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. Oxford Lane Capital pays an annual dividend of $5.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 50.7%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

6.7% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 16 more articles in the media than Oxford Lane Capital. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 3 mentions for Oxford Lane Capital. Oxford Lane Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.56 indicating that Oxford Lane Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Blue Owl Technology Finance	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Oxford Lane Capital	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Lane Capital.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Blue Owl Technology Finance	$1.15B	4.50	$720.37M	$0.90	12.38
Oxford Lane Capital	$10.10M	89.49	N/A	N/A	N/A

Blue Owl Technology Finance presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.67%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than Oxford Lane Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Blue Owl Technology Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Oxford Lane Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to Oxford Lane Capital's net margin of 0.00%. Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity of 7.43% beat Oxford Lane Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Blue Owl Technology Finance	32.78%	7.43%	4.20%
Oxford Lane Capital	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Blue Owl Technology Finance beats Oxford Lane Capital on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) and Blue Owl Technology Finance (NYSE:OTF) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 198.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blue Owl Technology Finance pays out 155.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blue Owl Technology Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Blue Owl Technology Finance has a net margin of 32.78% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 23.08%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 9.95% beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	23.08%	9.95%	3.87%
Blue Owl Technology Finance	32.78%	7.43%	4.20%

Blue Owl Technology Finance has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Blue Owl Technology Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$261.43M	3.22	$66.36M	$0.62	13.67
Blue Owl Technology Finance	$1.15B	4.50	$720.37M	$0.90	12.38

In the previous week, Blue Owl Technology Finance had 13 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Blue Owl Technology Finance and 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Blue Owl Technology Finance's score of 0.56 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Blue Owl Technology Finance	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.01%. Blue Owl Technology Finance has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.67%. Given Blue Owl Technology Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Technology Finance is more favorable than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Blue Owl Technology Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Summary

Blue Owl Technology Finance beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Blue Owl Technology Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OTF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

OTF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Blue Owl Technology Finance	Asset Management Industry	Financial Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$5.16B	$2.33B	$5.73B	$23.01B
Dividend Yield	12.55%	5.95%	5.24%	4.09%
P/E Ratio	12.38	25.14	15.94	29.73
Price / Sales	4.50	2,063.04	997.89	23.94
Price / Cash	10.74	60.17	91.01	25.34
Price / Book	0.68	1.35	6.57	4.60
Net Income	$720.37M	$265.53M	$1.15B	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	1.78%	-0.86%	-0.24%	-2.26%
1 Month Performance	-9.11%	1.81%	1.55%	0.00%
1 Year Performance	N/A	12.51%	20.98%	22.53%

Blue Owl Technology Finance Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
OTF Blue Owl Technology Finance	4.6635 of 5 stars	$11.14 -0.2%	$14.00 +25.7%	N/A	$5.16B	$1.15B	12.38	N/A	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Insider Trade
CSW CSW Industrials	4.8305 of 5 stars	$256.06 -3.4%	$328.43 +28.3%	-21.3%	$4.22B	$878.30M	33.96	2,600
NIQ NIQ Global Intelligence	4.2658 of 5 stars	$8.23 +0.4%	$18.58 +125.7%	-36.2%	$2.43B	$4.20B	N/A	38,760	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities	N/A	$5.08 -1.3%	N/A	-27.0%	$1.01B	$163.59M	N/A	N/A	Short Interest Increase
OXLC Oxford Lane Capital	2.6378 of 5 stars	$9.97 -3.4%	N/A	-58.1%	$903.65M	$10.10M	1.38	601	Upcoming Earnings Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:OTF) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) Competitors

OTF vs. CSW, NIQ, FSCO, OXLC, and PFLT

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to CSW Industrials?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to NIQ Global Intelligence?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OTF vs. The Competition

Blue Owl Technology Finance Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) Competitors

OTF vs. CSW, NIQ, FSCO, OXLC, and PFLT

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to CSW Industrials?

Is CSW or OTF more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CSW or OTF?

Do analysts prefer CSW or OTF?

Is CSW or OTF a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CSW or OTF?

Does the media prefer CSW or OTF?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to NIQ Global Intelligence?

Does the media refer more to OTF or NIQ?

Do analysts rate OTF or NIQ?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, OTF or NIQ?

Is OTF or NIQ more profitable?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

Does the media prefer OTF or FSCO?

Is OTF or FSCO more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, OTF or FSCO?

Is OTF or FSCO a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend OTF or FSCO?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in OTF or FSCO?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

Is OTF or OXLC a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of OTF or OXLC?

Does the media prefer OTF or OXLC?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, OTF or OXLC?

Do analysts rate OTF or OXLC?

Is OTF or OXLC more profitable?

Summary

How does Blue Owl Technology Finance compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Is PFLT or OTF a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PFLT or OTF?

Is PFLT or OTF more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, PFLT or OTF?

Does the media prefer PFLT or OTF?

Do analysts prefer PFLT or OTF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OTF vs. The Competition

Blue Owl Technology Finance Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools