Free Trial
→ The end may be near for these iconic stocks (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free DHF Stock Alerts

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (DHF) Competitors

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund logo
$2.22 -0.01 (-0.22%)
Closing price 10/6/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.22 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10/6/2026 07:55 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

DHF vs. SLRC, GAIN, VINP, EVAC, and NCDL

Should you buy BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund stock or one of its competitors? BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include SLR Investment (SLRC), Gladstone Investment (GAIN), Vinci Compass Investments (VINP), EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II (EVAC), and Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending (NCDL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund compare to SLR Investment?

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (NYSE:DHF) and SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

36.2% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of SLR Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.6% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SLR Investment has a net margin of 35.20% compared to BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's net margin of 0.00%. SLR Investment's return on equity of 7.96% beat BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies FundN/A N/A N/A
SLR Investment 35.20%7.96%3.09%

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.8%. SLR Investment pays out 91.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

SLR Investment has a consensus price target of $14.10, indicating a potential upside of 23.36%. Given SLR Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
SLR Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

SLR Investment has higher revenue and earnings than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund$12.84M12.60N/AN/AN/A
SLR Investment$85.42M7.30$92.54M$1.358.47

In the previous week, SLR Investment had 2 more articles in the media than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for SLR Investment and 1 mentions for BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund. BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.92 beat SLR Investment's score of 0.10 indicating that BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
SLR Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SLR Investment has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SLR Investment beats BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund compare to Gladstone Investment?

Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) and BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (NYSE:DHF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Gladstone Investment pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 5.90% beat BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gladstone Investment158.95% 5.90% 2.88%
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund N/A N/A N/A

11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.2% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gladstone Investment has higher revenue and earnings than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Investment$99.08M6.19$184.75M$4.183.68
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund$12.84M12.60N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Gladstone Investment had 3 more articles in the media than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gladstone Investment and 1 mentions for BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund. BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.92 beat Gladstone Investment's score of 0.30 indicating that BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Gladstone Investment currently has a consensus target price of $16.75, indicating a potential upside of 8.77%. Given Gladstone Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Gladstone Investment is more favorable than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gladstone Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gladstone Investment beats BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund compare to Vinci Compass Investments?

Vinci Compass Investments (NASDAQ:VINP) and BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (NYSE:DHF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Vinci Compass Investments had 3 more articles in the media than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Vinci Compass Investments and 1 mentions for BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund. BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.92 beat Vinci Compass Investments' score of -0.07 indicating that BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Vinci Compass Investments
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Vinci Compass Investments has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

34.1% of Vinci Compass Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.2% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 49.3% of Vinci Compass Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Vinci Compass Investments has higher revenue and earnings than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vinci Compass Investments$175.01M4.02$38.97M$0.7015.36
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund$12.84M12.60N/AN/AN/A

Vinci Compass Investments has a net margin of 23.77% compared to BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Vinci Compass Investments' return on equity of 12.65% beat BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vinci Compass Investments23.77% 12.65% 6.67%
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund N/A N/A N/A

Vinci Compass Investments presently has a consensus price target of $13.50, suggesting a potential upside of 25.58%. Given Vinci Compass Investments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Vinci Compass Investments is more favorable than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vinci Compass Investments
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Vinci Compass Investments pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Vinci Compass Investments pays out 97.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Vinci Compass Investments beats BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund compare to EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II?

EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II (NYSE:EVAC) and BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (NYSE:DHF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II has a beta of 0.03, suggesting that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's return on equity of 0.00% beat EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. IIN/A -102.93% 3.57%
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund N/A N/A N/A

EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. IIN/AN/A$8.92M$0.1473.68
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund$12.84M12.60N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund had 1 more articles in the media than EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund and 0 mentions for EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II. BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.92 beat EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II's score of 0.00 indicating that BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II Neutral
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund Very Positive

36.2% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 16.6% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund beats EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund compare to Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending?

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (NYSE:DHF) and Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending (NYSE:NCDL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending had 3 more articles in the media than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending and 1 mentions for BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund. BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.92 beat Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's score of -0.14 indicating that BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending has a consensus target price of $13.63, suggesting a potential upside of 24.94%. Given Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending is more favorable than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending has higher revenue and earnings than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund$12.84M12.60N/AN/AN/A
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending$207.86M2.59$65.61M$0.9511.48

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending pays out 151.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

36.2% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 16.6% of BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending has a net margin of 24.44% compared to BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's return on equity of 9.60% beat BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies FundN/A N/A N/A
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending 24.44%9.60%4.10%

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending beats BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DHF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DHF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DHF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricBNY Mellon High Yield Strategies FundCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$161.84M$5.16B$13.42B$22.91B
Dividend Yield9.46%7.57%6.04%3.72%
P/E RatioN/A30.4724.8328.11
Price / Sales12.601,194.33487.5314.98
Price / CashN/A47.6943.9836.95
Price / BookN/A3.492.714.72
Net IncomeN/A$415.67M$1.31B$1.07B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.15%0.02%1.31%
1 Month Performance-5.92%-2.69%-3.14%-4.97%
1 Year Performance-13.93%11.28%10.67%6.66%

BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DHF
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
N/A$2.23
-0.2%		N/A-13.8%$161.84M$12.84MN/AN/A
SLRC
SLR Investment
4.5279 of 5 stars		$11.71
+0.6%		$14.10
+20.4%		-23.0%$635.02M$218.54M8.67N/A
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
4.3197 of 5 stars		$15.83
+0.8%		$16.75
+5.8%		+11.2%$625.60M$99.08M3.7970
VINP
Vinci Compass Investments
4.409 of 5 stars		$9.32
+0.3%		$13.50
+44.8%		+0.3%$607.77M$175.01M13.31594
EVAC
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II
N/A$10.32
0.0%		N/AN/A$603.18MN/A73.687

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:DHF) was last updated on 10/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel