Go Pro
→ Trump’s New Currency Reset (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free PFLT Stock Alerts

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) Competitors

$7.40 -0.12 (-1.60%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern
Compare

PFLT vs. ARCC, CSWC, MFIC, NMFC, and OCSL

Should you buy PennantPark Floating Rate Capital stock or one of its competitors? PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's main competitors and comparable companies include Ares Capital (ARCC), Capital Southwest (CSWC), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), and Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 154.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 7 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Ares Capital and 9 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of -0.01 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital
11 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Ares Capital presently has a consensus price target of $20.40, indicating a potential upside of 2.10%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 32.43%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital$3.05B4.70$1.30B$1.3514.80
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.81$66.36M$0.6211.94

Ares Capital has a net margin of 30.91% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 23.08%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 9.95% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ares Capital30.91% 9.80% 4.50%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 23.08%9.95%3.87%

Summary

Ares Capital beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Capital Southwest?

Capital Southwest (NASDAQ:CSWC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 46.68% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 23.08%. Capital Southwest's return on equity of 13.88% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Southwest46.68% 13.88% 6.45%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 23.08%9.95%3.87%

Capital Southwest presently has a consensus target price of $23.60, suggesting a potential downside of 6.13%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 32.43%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Capital Southwest.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital Southwest
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Capital Southwest had 5 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Capital Southwest and 9 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Capital Southwest's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of -0.01 indicating that Capital Southwest is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capital Southwest
4 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Capital Southwest pays out 128.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 154.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Southwest has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Southwest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Southwest$232.10M6.90$113M$1.8113.89
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.81$66.36M$0.6211.94

23.4% of Capital Southwest shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Capital Southwest shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Capital Southwest beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 23.08% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital23.08% 9.95% 3.87%
MidCap Financial Investment -9.85%11.17%4.41%

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 8 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 9 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of -0.01 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
MidCap Financial Investment
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.81$66.36M$0.6211.94
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.48$63.17M-$0.36N/A

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus price target of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 32.43%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.25, indicating a potential upside of 16.22%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.8%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 154.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats MidCap Financial Investment on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to New Mountain Finance?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

New Mountain Finance presently has a consensus target price of $8.60, suggesting a potential upside of 11.83%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 32.43%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than New Mountain Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
New Mountain Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 23.08% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 10.94% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance-16.78% 10.94% 4.58%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 23.08%9.95%3.87%

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 2 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 7 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of -0.01 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$327.08M2.22$16.49M-$0.47N/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.81$66.36M$0.6211.94

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. New Mountain Finance pays out -212.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 154.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats New Mountain Finance on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) and Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oaktree Specialty Lending. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.81$66.36M$0.6211.94
Oaktree Specialty Lending$316.80M3.54$33.92M$0.4826.52

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 154.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 23.08% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 14.45%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 9.95% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital23.08% 9.95% 3.87%
Oaktree Specialty Lending 14.45%9.70%4.64%

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 4 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 9 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of -0.01 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Oaktree Specialty Lending
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus target price of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 32.43%. Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus target price of $11.83, suggesting a potential downside of 7.04%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Oaktree Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Oaktree Specialty Lending on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PennantPark Floating Rate Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PFLT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFLT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PFLT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPennantPark Floating Rate CapitalCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$746.12M$5.58B$14.07B$24.19B
Dividend Yield12.77%7.40%5.89%3.69%
P/E Ratio11.9438.2929.1929.02
Price / Sales2.811,262.06515.2320.30
Price / Cash5.5748.3030.2219.37
Price / Book0.683.733.714.91
Net Income$66.36M$417.15M$1.31B$1.06B
7 Day Performance3.44%0.79%0.29%1.30%
1 Month Performance3.28%0.23%0.75%2.29%
1 Year PerformanceN/A6.44%12.56%19.89%

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
4.452 of 5 stars		$7.40
-1.6%		$9.80
+32.4%		N/A$746.12M$261.43M11.94658
ARCC
Ares Capital
2.6231 of 5 stars		$18.76
-0.4%		$20.40
+8.7%		-11.3%$13.47B$3.05B13.902,550
CSWC
Capital Southwest
2.5975 of 5 stars		$23.59
flat		$23.20
-1.7%		+9.7%$1.47B$232.10M12.4220
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
3.2693 of 5 stars		$9.56
-1.0%		$11.46
+19.9%		-22.5%$787.49M$320.88M239.06N/A
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
1.9143 of 5 stars		$6.89
-0.3%		$9.08
+31.8%		-24.4%$650.77M$327.08MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PFLT) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Barricks gold output fell from 2 million ounces to 719000
Barrick's gold production has plunged from 2 million ounces to just 719,000, leaving the world's second-larges...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
$8B is moving in... are you?
Venture capital investment in US crypto companies hit $7.9 billion last year, up 44 percent from the year befo...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
A $5 stock inside Kennedy Space Center?
A small publicly traded company operates a specialized launch vehicle fleet inside the secure perimeter of Ken...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
Eric Fry’s super simple investing mantra
Former Wall Street money manager Eric Fry used a simple four-word mantra to win a major financial competition,...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
I found Rolls-Royce below $2. Now THIS.
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla flagged Rolls-Royce when shares traded below $2 - they later climbed above $10. N...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel