Free Trial
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free PFLT Stock Alerts

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) Competitors

$6.68 +0.01 (+0.07%)
Closing price 10/9/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.72 +0.04 (+0.52%)
As of 10/9/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

PFLT vs. ARCC, CSWC, MFIC, NMFC, and OCSL

Should you buy PennantPark Floating Rate Capital stock or one of its competitors? PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's main competitors and comparable companies include Ares Capital (ARCC), Capital Southwest (CSWC), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), and Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Ares Capital?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus target price of $9.60, suggesting a potential upside of 43.61%. Ares Capital has a consensus target price of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 10.99%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 3 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Ares Capital and 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.33 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ares Capital
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 30.91% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 18.53%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital18.53% 10.24% 3.88%
Ares Capital 30.91%9.80%4.50%

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.54$66.36M$0.5113.11
Ares Capital$3.05B4.37$1.30B$1.3513.75

Summary

Ares Capital beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Capital Southwest?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) and Capital Southwest (NASDAQ:CSWC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Capital Southwest has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Capital Southwest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.54$66.36M$0.5113.11
Capital Southwest$232.10M6.46$113M$1.8113.01

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Southwest. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 5 mentions for Capital Southwest. Capital Southwest's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.33 indicating that Capital Southwest is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Capital Southwest
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus target price of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 43.61%. Capital Southwest has a consensus target price of $24.10, indicating a potential upside of 2.38%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Capital Southwest.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Capital Southwest
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 46.68% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 18.53%. Capital Southwest's return on equity of 13.88% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital18.53% 10.24% 3.88%
Capital Southwest 46.68%13.88%6.45%

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.4% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest pays out 128.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

Capital Southwest beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment-$11.90M-58.65$63.17M-$0.36N/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.54$66.36M$0.5113.11

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 2 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 4 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of -0.56 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

MidCap Financial Investment presently has a consensus target price of $10.71, suggesting a potential upside of 26.43%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.60, suggesting a potential upside of 43.61%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.6%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment-9.85% 11.17% 4.41%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53%10.24%3.88%

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats MidCap Financial Investment on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to New Mountain Finance?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.9%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. New Mountain Finance pays out -212.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$327.08M1.94$16.49M-$0.47N/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.54$66.36M$0.5113.11

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 10.94% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance-16.78% 10.94% 4.58%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53%10.24%3.88%

New Mountain Finance presently has a consensus price target of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 22.59%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 43.61%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than New Mountain Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
New Mountain Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 1 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 5 mentions for New Mountain Finance. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat New Mountain Finance's score of -0.35 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats New Mountain Finance on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Oaktree Specialty Lending presently has a consensus target price of $11.83, suggesting a potential upside of 2.01%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.60, suggesting a potential upside of 43.61%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oaktree Specialty Lending
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 14.45%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oaktree Specialty Lending14.45% 9.70% 4.64%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53%10.24%3.88%

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Specialty Lending$316.80M3.23$33.92M$0.4824.17
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.54$66.36M$0.5113.11

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 3 more articles in the media than Oaktree Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 3 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.33 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Oaktree Specialty Lending
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Oaktree Specialty Lending on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PennantPark Floating Rate Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PFLT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFLT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PFLT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPennantPark Floating Rate CapitalCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$662.78M$5.13B$13.07B$22.94B
Dividend Yield14.37%7.62%6.08%3.72%
P/E Ratio13.1130.0724.7428.60
Price / Sales2.541,132.39476.4814.92
Price / Cash4.9447.5845.1337.72
Price / Book0.623.482.714.72
Net Income$66.36M$415.02M$1.32B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.19%-0.32%-0.51%0.35%
1 Month Performance-5.51%-1.60%-2.39%-2.94%
1 Year Performance-21.81%9.28%10.29%9.25%

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
4.4147 of 5 stars		$6.69
+0.1%		$9.60
+43.6%		-22.6%$662.78M$261.43M13.11658
ARCC
Ares Capital
3.5419 of 5 stars		$18.86
-1.6%		$20.60
+9.2%		-2.8%$13.54B$3.05B13.974,250
CSWC
Capital Southwest
3.367 of 5 stars		$23.52
+0.9%		$23.60
+0.3%		+18.2%$1.50B$232.10M12.9936
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
3.0621 of 5 stars		$8.62
-1.4%		$11.11
+28.9%		-26.7%$710.06M$320.88MN/AN/A
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
1.8437 of 5 stars		$6.94
-1.3%		$8.25
+18.9%		-25.2%$655.50M$327.08MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PFLT) was last updated on 10/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The only 5 stocks that matter
SpaceX's IPO reportedly minted 4,400 new millionaires, and OpenAI is said to be eyeing a 1 trillion dollar IPO...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
A simple options setup that cuts through the noise
Ian Cooper says most options traders overcomplicate the process, juggling countless indicators, strategies, an...
TradeWins | Sponsoredtc pixel
This free guide explains options the way they should be taught
Most options educators jump straight into Greeks, spreads, and implied volatility - losing beginners before th...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
New Chip takes minutes, not days
George Gilder believes today's AI data centers could become tomorrow's typewriters - replaced by a single wafe...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump goes "all-in" on Grand Canyon energy breakthrough
A drilling crew near the Grand Canyon uncovered a clean energy well producing nearly eight times the output of...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
A major gold reset could be closer than people think
For 50 years, Washington has held 8,133 tonnes of gold on its books at a fraction of today's market price. One...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel