Question 1

Do analysts recommend ARCC or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

Ares Capital currently has a consensus target price of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 6.19%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 39.64%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Ares Capital. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ares Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.73 PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Question 2

Is ARCC or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.7%. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Question 3

Which has better valuation & earnings, ARCC or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ares Capital $3.05B 4.56 $1.30B $1.35 14.37 PennantPark Floating Rate Capital $261.43M 2.66 $66.36M $0.51 13.76

Question 4

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ARCC or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 5

Is ARCC or PFLT more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Ares Capital has a net margin of 30.91% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 18.53%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Ares Capital's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ares Capital 30.91% 9.80% 4.50% PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53% 10.24% 3.88%

Question 6

Which has more risk & volatility, ARCC or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 7

Does the media prefer ARCC or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 19 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Ares Capital and 2 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Ares Capital's score of 0.41 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ares Capital 5 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 8

Do analysts recommend PFLT or CSWC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus target price of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 39.64%. Capital Southwest has a consensus target price of $23.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.77%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Capital Southwest. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Capital Southwest 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 6 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Question 9

Is PFLT or CSWC a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.7%. Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest pays out 128.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Question 10

Which has better earnings and valuation, PFLT or CSWC?

Accepted Answer

Capital Southwest has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Capital Southwest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PennantPark Floating Rate Capital $261.43M 2.66 $66.36M $0.51 13.76 Capital Southwest $232.10M 6.43 $113M $1.81 12.94

Question 11

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PFLT or CSWC?

Accepted Answer

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.4% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 12

Is PFLT or CSWC more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 46.68% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 18.53%. Capital Southwest's return on equity of 13.88% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53% 10.24% 3.88% Capital Southwest 46.68% 13.88% 6.45%

Question 13

Which has more volatility & risk, PFLT or CSWC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 14

Does the media favor PFLT or CSWC?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Capital Southwest had 3 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Capital Southwest and 2 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Capital Southwest's score of 0.35 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Capital Southwest 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Question 15

Do analysts prefer PFLT or MFIC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus price target of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 39.64%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.11, indicating a potential upside of 23.14%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 MidCap Financial Investment 1 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.11

Question 16

Is PFLT or MFIC a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.7%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.7%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Question 17

Which has better earnings and valuation, PFLT or MFIC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PennantPark Floating Rate Capital $261.43M 2.66 $66.36M $0.51 13.76 MidCap Financial Investment $320.88M 2.32 $63.17M -$0.36 N/A

Question 18

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PFLT or MFIC?

Accepted Answer

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 19

Is PFLT or MFIC more profitable?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53% 10.24% 3.88% MidCap Financial Investment -9.85% 11.17% 4.41%

Question 20

Which has more volatility & risk, PFLT or MFIC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 21

Does the media favor PFLT or MFIC?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 1 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 2 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of -0.24 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MidCap Financial Investment 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Question 22

Do analysts recommend PFLT or NMFC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus price target of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 39.64%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.03%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than New Mountain Finance. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 New Mountain Finance 1 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.80

Question 23

Is PFLT or NMFC a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.7%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out -212.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Question 24

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PFLT or NMFC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PennantPark Floating Rate Capital $261.43M 2.66 $66.36M $0.51 13.76 New Mountain Finance $327.08M 2.02 $16.49M -$0.47 N/A

Question 25

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PFLT or NMFC?

Accepted Answer

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 26

Is PFLT or NMFC more profitable?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 10.94% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53% 10.24% 3.88% New Mountain Finance -16.78% 10.94% 4.58%

Question 27

Which has more risk & volatility, PFLT or NMFC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 28

Does the media prefer PFLT or NMFC?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 2 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 2 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.74 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive New Mountain Finance 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 29

Do analysts rate OCSL or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

Oaktree Specialty Lending presently has a consensus price target of $11.83, indicating a potential downside of 4.65%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 39.64%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Oaktree Specialty Lending 0 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Question 30

Is OCSL or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.7%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Question 31

Which has higher valuation & earnings, OCSL or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Oaktree Specialty Lending $316.80M 3.45 $33.92M $0.48 25.85 PennantPark Floating Rate Capital $261.43M 2.66 $66.36M $0.51 13.76

Question 32

Do institutionals and insiders believe in OCSL or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 33

Is OCSL or PFLT more profitable?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 14.45%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Oaktree Specialty Lending 14.45% 9.70% 4.64% PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53% 10.24% 3.88%

Question 34

Which has more risk and volatility, OCSL or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 35

Does the media prefer OCSL or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending and Oaktree Specialty Lending both had 2 articles in the media. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.74 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Oaktree Specialty Lending 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Metric	PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$695.52M	$5.35B	$13.82B	$23.10B
Dividend Yield	13.69%	7.51%	5.95%	3.62%
P/E Ratio	13.76	29.96	25.31	28.21
Price / Sales	2.66	1,246.53	511.07	20.34
Price / Cash	5.19	47.85	43.42	36.36
Price / Book	0.65	3.52	2.73	4.67
Net Income	$66.36M	$417.39M	$1.31B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-1.50%	-0.57%	-0.59%	-1.64%
1 Month Performance	-5.03%	-1.45%	0.16%	-3.60%
1 Year Performance	-28.24%	1.36%	7.82%	8.41%

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	4.0296 of 5 stars	$7.02 -2.8%	$9.80 +39.6%	N/A	$695.52M	$261.43M	13.76	658	Ex-Dividend
ARCC Ares Capital	2.8462 of 5 stars	$19.74 +0.3%	$20.60 +4.4%	-10.0%	$14.17B	$3.05B	14.62	4,250	Ex-Dividend Analyst Upgrade
CSWC Capital Southwest	2.8319 of 5 stars	$24.19 +0.4%	$23.60 -2.4%	+1.3%	$1.54B	$232.10M	13.36	36	Ex-Dividend
MFIC MidCap Financial Investment	2.6072 of 5 stars	$9.04 -0.1%	$11.11 +22.9%	-27.1%	$744.65M	$320.88M	N/A	N/A
NMFC New Mountain Finance	2.6896 of 5 stars	$7.24 +0.1%	$8.60 +18.8%	-29.5%	$683.83M	$327.08M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) Competitors

PFLT vs. ARCC, CSWC, MFIC, NMFC, and OCSL

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Ares Capital?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Capital Southwest?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to New Mountain Finance?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFLT vs. The Competition

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) Competitors

PFLT vs. ARCC, CSWC, MFIC, NMFC, and OCSL

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Ares Capital?

Is ARCC or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer ARCC or PFLT?

Which has more risk & volatility, ARCC or PFLT?

Which has better valuation & earnings, ARCC or PFLT?

Is ARCC or PFLT more profitable?

Do analysts recommend ARCC or PFLT?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ARCC or PFLT?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Capital Southwest?

Does the media favor PFLT or CSWC?

Is PFLT or CSWC a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, PFLT or CSWC?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PFLT or CSWC?

Is PFLT or CSWC more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PFLT or CSWC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PFLT or CSWC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Is PFLT or MFIC more profitable?

Is PFLT or MFIC a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor PFLT or MFIC?

Which has more volatility & risk, PFLT or MFIC?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PFLT or MFIC?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PFLT or MFIC?

Do analysts prefer PFLT or MFIC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to New Mountain Finance?

Is PFLT or NMFC more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PFLT or NMFC?

Do analysts recommend PFLT or NMFC?

Is PFLT or NMFC a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer PFLT or NMFC?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PFLT or NMFC?

Which has more risk & volatility, PFLT or NMFC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Does the media prefer OCSL or PFLT?

Which has more risk and volatility, OCSL or PFLT?

Do analysts rate OCSL or PFLT?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, OCSL or PFLT?

Is OCSL or PFLT more profitable?

Is OCSL or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in OCSL or PFLT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFLT vs. The Competition

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools