PLDT (PHI) Competitors

PLDT has a net margin of 13.78% compared to SK Telecom's net margin of 2.28%. PLDT's return on equity of 27.78% beat SK Telecom's return on equity.

SK Telecom has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PLDT has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

2.3% of PLDT shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of SK Telecom shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of PLDT shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PLDT has higher revenue and earnings than SK Telecom. PLDT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SK Telecom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, SK Telecom had 5 more articles in the media than PLDT. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for SK Telecom and 1 mentions for PLDT. SK Telecom's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat PLDT's score of 0.30 indicating that SK Telecom is being referred to more favorably in the media.

SK Telecom pays an annual dividend of $0.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. PLDT pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. SK Telecom pays out 77.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PLDT pays out 45.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PLDT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Millicom International Cellular has a net margin of 22.62% compared to PLDT's net margin of 13.78%. PLDT's return on equity of 27.78% beat Millicom International Cellular's return on equity.

Millicom International Cellular has a consensus price target of $65.64, suggesting a potential downside of 21.66%. Given Millicom International Cellular's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Millicom International Cellular is more favorable than PLDT.

2.3% of PLDT shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of PLDT shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Millicom International Cellular shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PLDT pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Millicom International Cellular pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. PLDT pays out 45.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Millicom International Cellular pays out 38.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

PLDT has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Millicom International Cellular has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Millicom International Cellular has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PLDT. PLDT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Millicom International Cellular, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Millicom International Cellular had 3 more articles in the media than PLDT. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Millicom International Cellular and 1 mentions for PLDT. Millicom International Cellular's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat PLDT's score of 0.30 indicating that Millicom International Cellular is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a net margin of 33.44% compared to PLDT's net margin of 13.78%. PLDT's return on equity of 27.78% beat Tencent Music Entertainment Group's return on equity.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group presently has a consensus price target of $22.03, suggesting a potential upside of 140.53%. Given Tencent Music Entertainment Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Tencent Music Entertainment Group is more favorable than PLDT.

24.3% of Tencent Music Entertainment Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.3% of PLDT shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of PLDT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. PLDT pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Tencent Music Entertainment Group pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PLDT pays out 45.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PLDT has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PLDT. PLDT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tencent Music Entertainment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Tencent Music Entertainment Group had 4 more articles in the media than PLDT. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Tencent Music Entertainment Group and 1 mentions for PLDT. Tencent Music Entertainment Group's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat PLDT's score of 0.30 indicating that Tencent Music Entertainment Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

2.3% of PLDT shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of PLDT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TIM has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PLDT has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, TIM and TIM both had 1 articles in the media. TIM's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat PLDT's score of 0.30 indicating that TIM is being referred to more favorably in the media.

TIM pays an annual dividend of $1.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. PLDT pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. TIM pays out 68.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PLDT pays out 45.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PLDT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

TIM has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PLDT. PLDT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TIM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

TIM has a net margin of 16.28% compared to PLDT's net margin of 13.78%. PLDT's return on equity of 27.78% beat TIM's return on equity.

TIM currently has a consensus price target of $26.40, suggesting a potential downside of 2.61%. Given TIM's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TIM is more favorable than PLDT.