Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) Competitors

Avery Dennison presently has a consensus price target of $201.33, suggesting a potential upside of 27.39%. Packaging Corporation of America has a consensus price target of $241.83, suggesting a potential upside of 3.84%. Given Avery Dennison's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Avery Dennison is more favorable than Packaging Corporation of America.

Packaging Corporation of America has higher revenue and earnings than Avery Dennison. Avery Dennison is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Packaging Corporation of America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Avery Dennison has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Packaging Corporation of America has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Packaging Corporation of America had 4 more articles in the media than Avery Dennison. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Packaging Corporation of America and 5 mentions for Avery Dennison. Avery Dennison's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Packaging Corporation of America's score of 1.25 indicating that Avery Dennison is being referred to more favorably in the media.

94.2% of Avery Dennison shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Packaging Corporation of America shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Avery Dennison shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Packaging Corporation of America shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Packaging Corporation of America has a net margin of 8.04% compared to Avery Dennison's net margin of 7.66%. Avery Dennison's return on equity of 33.69% beat Packaging Corporation of America's return on equity.

Avery Dennison pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Packaging Corporation of America pays an annual dividend of $6.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Avery Dennison pays out 45.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Packaging Corporation of America pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avery Dennison has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years.

Packaging Corporation of America has higher revenue and earnings than Eastman Chemical. Eastman Chemical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Packaging Corporation of America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Eastman Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Packaging Corporation of America pays an annual dividend of $6.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Eastman Chemical pays out 97.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Packaging Corporation of America pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eastman Chemical has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Eastman Chemical is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Packaging Corporation of America has a net margin of 8.04% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 4.62%. Packaging Corporation of America's return on equity of 19.27% beat Eastman Chemical's return on equity.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Packaging Corporation of America has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

Eastman Chemical currently has a consensus target price of $80.25, indicating a potential upside of 15.58%. Packaging Corporation of America has a consensus target price of $241.83, indicating a potential upside of 3.84%. Given Eastman Chemical's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Eastman Chemical is more favorable than Packaging Corporation of America.

In the previous week, Packaging Corporation of America had 9 more articles in the media than Eastman Chemical. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Packaging Corporation of America and 0 mentions for Eastman Chemical. Packaging Corporation of America's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Eastman Chemical's score of 0.50 indicating that Packaging Corporation of America is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

83.7% of Eastman Chemical shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Packaging Corporation of America shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Eastman Chemical shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Packaging Corporation of America shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Packaging Corporation of America had 1 more articles in the media than H. B. Fuller. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Packaging Corporation of America and 8 mentions for H. B. Fuller. Packaging Corporation of America's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat H. B. Fuller's score of 0.53 indicating that Packaging Corporation of America is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

H. B. Fuller has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Packaging Corporation of America has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

Packaging Corporation of America has higher revenue and earnings than H. B. Fuller. H. B. Fuller is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Packaging Corporation of America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

95.9% of H. B. Fuller shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Packaging Corporation of America shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of H. B. Fuller shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Packaging Corporation of America shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

H. B. Fuller pays an annual dividend of $0.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Packaging Corporation of America pays an annual dividend of $6.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. H. B. Fuller pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Packaging Corporation of America pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. H. B. Fuller has increased its dividend for 57 consecutive years.

H. B. Fuller presently has a consensus target price of $66.40, suggesting a potential upside of 5.01%. Packaging Corporation of America has a consensus target price of $241.83, suggesting a potential upside of 3.84%. Given H. B. Fuller's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe H. B. Fuller is more favorable than Packaging Corporation of America.

Packaging Corporation of America has a net margin of 8.04% compared to H. B. Fuller's net margin of 4.62%. Packaging Corporation of America's return on equity of 19.27% beat H. B. Fuller's return on equity.

89.8% of Packaging Corporation of America shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.7% of Greif shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Packaging Corporation of America shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Greif shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Packaging Corporation of America had 5 more articles in the media than Greif. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Packaging Corporation of America and 4 mentions for Greif. Packaging Corporation of America's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Greif's score of 1.24 indicating that Packaging Corporation of America is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Packaging Corporation of America has higher revenue and earnings than Greif. Greif is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Packaging Corporation of America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Packaging Corporation of America presently has a consensus price target of $241.83, indicating a potential upside of 3.84%. Greif has a consensus price target of $73.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.72%. Given Greif's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greif is more favorable than Packaging Corporation of America.

Packaging Corporation of America pays an annual dividend of $6.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Greif pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Packaging Corporation of America pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Greif pays out 95.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Greif has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Greif is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Packaging Corporation of America has a net margin of 8.04% compared to Greif's net margin of 7.27%. Packaging Corporation of America's return on equity of 19.27% beat Greif's return on equity.

Packaging Corporation of America has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greif has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.