Ryder System (R) Competitors

Ryder System currently has a consensus target price of $296.67, suggesting a potential upside of 11.44%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus target price of $180.52, suggesting a potential upside of 44.04%. Given C.H. Robinson Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more favorable than Ryder System.

In the previous week, Ryder System had 3 more articles in the media than C.H. Robinson Worldwide. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Ryder System and 15 mentions for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Ryder System's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's score of 0.69 indicating that Ryder System is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $4.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $2.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Ryder System pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 46.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ryder System has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years and C.H. Robinson Worldwide has raised its dividend for 27 consecutive years. C.H. Robinson Worldwide is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

87.5% of Ryder System shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Ryder System shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of C.H. Robinson Worldwide shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ryder System has a net margin of 3.98% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 3.67%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 42.49% beat Ryder System's return on equity.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than Ryder System. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 20.08% compared to Ryder System's net margin of 3.98%. Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 25.92% beat Ryder System's return on equity.

77.8% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of Ryder System shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of Old Dominion Freight Line shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Ryder System shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Old Dominion Freight Line currently has a consensus target price of $217.22, indicating a potential upside of 31.71%. Ryder System has a consensus target price of $296.67, indicating a potential upside of 11.44%. Given Old Dominion Freight Line's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Old Dominion Freight Line is more favorable than Ryder System.

In the previous week, Ryder System had 6 more articles in the media than Old Dominion Freight Line. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Ryder System and 12 mentions for Old Dominion Freight Line. Ryder System's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Old Dominion Freight Line's score of 0.60 indicating that Ryder System is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Old Dominion Freight Line has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ryder System. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Dominion Freight Line, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Old Dominion Freight Line pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $4.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ryder System pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Dominion Freight Line has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Ryder System has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Ryder System is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ryder System has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $4.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. GATX pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Ryder System pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GATX pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ryder System has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years and GATX has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Ryder System is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GATX has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

87.5% of Ryder System shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.1% of GATX shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Ryder System shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of GATX shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

GATX has a net margin of 17.69% compared to Ryder System's net margin of 3.98%. Ryder System's return on equity of 19.14% beat GATX's return on equity.

Ryder System has higher revenue and earnings than GATX. GATX is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ryder System, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ryder System presently has a consensus price target of $296.67, suggesting a potential upside of 11.44%. GATX has a consensus price target of $219.33, suggesting a potential upside of 20.03%. Given GATX's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GATX is more favorable than Ryder System.

In the previous week, Ryder System had 5 more articles in the media than GATX. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Ryder System and 13 mentions for GATX. Ryder System's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat GATX's score of 0.74 indicating that Ryder System is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ryder System has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Knight-Swift Transportation's net margin of 1.92%. Ryder System's return on equity of 19.14% beat Knight-Swift Transportation's return on equity.

Ryder System has higher revenue and earnings than Knight-Swift Transportation. Ryder System is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Knight-Swift Transportation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Knight-Swift Transportation has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Ryder System pays an annual dividend of $4.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Knight-Swift Transportation pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Ryder System pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Knight-Swift Transportation pays out 86.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ryder System has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years and Knight-Swift Transportation has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Ryder System is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Knight-Swift Transportation had 5 more articles in the media than Ryder System. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Knight-Swift Transportation and 18 mentions for Ryder System. Knight-Swift Transportation's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Ryder System's score of 0.77 indicating that Knight-Swift Transportation is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ryder System currently has a consensus target price of $296.67, suggesting a potential upside of 11.44%. Knight-Swift Transportation has a consensus target price of $83.22, suggesting a potential upside of 42.55%. Given Knight-Swift Transportation's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Knight-Swift Transportation is more favorable than Ryder System.

87.5% of Ryder System shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Knight-Swift Transportation shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Ryder System shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Knight-Swift Transportation shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.