Free Trial
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free RCS Stock Alerts

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) Competitors

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund logo
$5.02 -0.03 (-0.67%)
Closing price 10/2/2026 03:57 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.02 +0.00 (+0.08%)
As of 10/2/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

RCS vs. BBDC, OXLC, TIGR, VRTS, and KBDC

Should you buy PIMCO Strategic Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include Barings Bdc (BBDC), Oxford Lane Capital (OXLC), UP Fintech (TIGR), Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS), and Kayne Anderson BDC (KBDC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to Barings Bdc?

Barings Bdc (NYSE:BBDC) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and media sentiment.

Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Barings Bdc has a net margin of 32.73% compared to PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Barings Bdc's return on equity of 10.07% beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Barings Bdc32.73% 10.07% 4.38%
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Barings Bdc$279.21M3.24$101.92M$0.8310.40
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Barings Bdc had 2 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Barings Bdc and 1 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. Barings Bdc's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's score of 1.00 indicating that Barings Bdc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Barings Bdc Positive
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Positive

Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.1%. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Barings Bdc pays out 125.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Barings Bdc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Barings Bdc presently has a consensus target price of $9.75, indicating a potential upside of 12.98%. Given Barings Bdc's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Barings Bdc
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Barings Bdc beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) and Oxford Lane Capital (NASDAQ:OXLC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Oxford Lane Capital N/A N/A N/A

13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Oxford Lane Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Oxford Lane Capital-$580.18M-1.51$680.33M$6.941.28

In the previous week, PIMCO Strategic Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Oxford Lane Capital. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund and 0 mentions for Oxford Lane Capital. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Oxford Lane Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that PIMCO Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Positive
Oxford Lane Capital Neutral

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Lane Capital has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Oxford Lane Capital pays an annual dividend of $3.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 42.6%. Oxford Lane Capital pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund beats Oxford Lane Capital on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to UP Fintech?

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) and UP Fintech (NASDAQ:TIGR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.0% of UP Fintech shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.9% of UP Fintech shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

UP Fintech has a net margin of 16.22% compared to PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. UP Fintech's return on equity of 13.11% beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
UP Fintech 16.22%13.11%1.23%

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UP Fintech has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, UP Fintech had 1 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for UP Fintech and 1 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat UP Fintech's score of 0.43 indicating that PIMCO Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Positive
UP Fintech Neutral

UP Fintech has a consensus price target of $8.16, indicating a potential upside of 96.09%. Given UP Fintech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe UP Fintech is more favorable than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
UP Fintech
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

UP Fintech has higher revenue and earnings than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
UP Fintech$612.07M1.29$170.90M$0.597.05

Summary

UP Fintech beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to Virtus Investment Partners?

Virtus Investment Partners (NASDAQ:VRTS) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Virtus Investment Partners has a net margin of 13.42% compared to PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity of 21.56% beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Virtus Investment Partners13.42% 21.56% 5.27%
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Virtus Investment Partners had 2 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Virtus Investment Partners and 1 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Virtus Investment Partners' score of 0.60 indicating that PIMCO Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Virtus Investment Partners Positive
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Positive

Virtus Investment Partners pays an annual dividend of $9.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Virtus Investment Partners pays out 55.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Virtus Investment Partners presently has a consensus target price of $143.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.93%. Given Virtus Investment Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Virtus Investment Partners is more favorable than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Virtus Investment Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Virtus Investment Partners has higher revenue and earnings than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Virtus Investment Partners$819.58M1.08$121.75M$17.557.62
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Virtus Investment Partners beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to Kayne Anderson BDC?

Kayne Anderson BDC (NYSE:KBDC) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Kayne Anderson BDC presently has a consensus target price of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.32%. Given Kayne Anderson BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kayne Anderson BDC is more favorable than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kayne Anderson BDC
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Kayne Anderson BDC has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Kayne Anderson BDC has a net margin of 31.54% compared to PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Kayne Anderson BDC's return on equity of 10.63% beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kayne Anderson BDC31.54% 10.63% 5.06%
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

Kayne Anderson BDC has higher revenue and earnings than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kayne Anderson BDC$235.82M3.55$93.71M$1.0911.64
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Kayne Anderson BDC had 7 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Kayne Anderson BDC and 1 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Kayne Anderson BDC's score of 0.57 indicating that PIMCO Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kayne Anderson BDC Positive
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Positive

Kayne Anderson BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Kayne Anderson BDC pays out 146.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Kayne Anderson BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Kayne Anderson BDC beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PIMCO Strategic Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RCS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RCS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RCS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPIMCO Strategic Income FundCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$236.59M$5.16B$13.12B$22.78B
Dividend Yield9.58%7.57%6.04%3.73%
P/E RatioN/A29.4524.4227.75
Price / SalesN/A1,198.95499.7821.40
Price / CashN/A47.6745.5138.23
Price / BookN/A3.482.704.64
Net IncomeN/A$416.56M$1.32B$1.08B
7 Day Performance1.64%-0.74%-1.04%-1.06%
1 Month Performance-3.17%-2.71%-3.20%-5.60%
1 Year Performance-35.24%9.00%10.47%5.09%

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RCS
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
N/A$5.02
-0.7%		N/A-35.2%$236.59MN/AN/AN/A
BBDC
Barings Bdc
3.5212 of 5 stars		$8.71
+0.8%		$9.75
+12.0%		+0.1%$904.67M$279.21M10.492
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital
0.7304 of 5 stars		$9.01
+1.1%		N/A-47.7%$883.25M-$580.18M1.30601
TIGR
UP Fintech
4.4867 of 5 stars		$4.55
-2.2%		$8.16
+79.3%		-59.2%$882.10M$612.07M7.711,346
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
3.5382 of 5 stars		$131.20
+1.3%		$143.00
+9.0%		-30.2%$868.95M$819.58M7.76801

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:RCS) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Warns "America Will Go Bankrupt". Trump's Plan Inside.
National debt just crossed 40 trillion dollars, and Elon Musk says America is 1,000% going to go bankrupt with...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
How Elon’s Empire Ends (and how to profit)
Marc Chaikin, the 60 year Wall Street veteran whose Chaikin Money Flow indicator sits on every Bloomberg termi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s issues shocking Executive Order on U.S. Dollar
Three days into his second term, President Trump signed Executive Order 14178 a move the press barely covered....
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
I'm giving you a space stock today. Free.
On December 8th, $600 billion in frozen SpaceX stock comes loose. Dylan Jovine says one simple purchase in any...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
WATCH THIS BEFORE DECEMBER 8th!!
James Altucher says a quiet government filing could reveal Elon Musk's biggest move yet, and almost nobody has...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel