Go Pro

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) Competitors

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund logo
$5.26 +0.01 (+0.10%)
As of 03:42 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

RCS vs. BBDC, RPC, MYN, NXP, and LCLN

Should you buy PIMCO Strategic Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include Barings Bdc (BBDC), Ridgepost Capital (RPC), BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN), Nuveen Sl Tfip (NXP), and Lincoln International (LCLN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to Barings Bdc?

Barings Bdc (NYSE:BBDC) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Barings Bdc pays out 125.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Barings Bdc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Barings Bdc has a net margin of 32.73% compared to PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Barings Bdc's return on equity of 10.07% beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Barings Bdc32.73% 10.07% 4.38%
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Barings Bdc$279.21M3.53$101.92M$0.8311.33
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Barings Bdc presently has a consensus price target of $9.75, suggesting a potential upside of 3.67%. Given Barings Bdc's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Barings Bdc
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Barings Bdc's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PIMCO Strategic Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Barings Bdc Neutral
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Neutral

Summary

Barings Bdc beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to Ridgepost Capital?

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) and Ridgepost Capital (NYSE:RPC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ridgepost Capital has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ridgepost Capital had 1 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ridgepost Capital and 0 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ridgepost Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Neutral
Ridgepost Capital Neutral

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Ridgepost Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Ridgepost Capital pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Ridgepost Capital has a consensus price target of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.42%. Given Ridgepost Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ridgepost Capital is more favorable than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ridgepost Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Ridgepost Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Ridgepost Capital$297.35M3.28$19.50M$0.2535.36

Ridgepost Capital has a net margin of 9.03% compared to PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Ridgepost Capital's return on equity of 21.02% beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Ridgepost Capital 9.03%21.02%9.21%

13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.1% of Ridgepost Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 11.8% of Ridgepost Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ridgepost Capital beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund?

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (NYSE:MYN) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund had 1 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund and 0 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund Very Positive
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Neutral

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

29.3% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality FundN/A N/A N/A
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%.

Summary

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to Nuveen Sl Tfip?

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) and Nuveen Sl Tfip (NYSE:NXP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.2% of Nuveen Sl Tfip shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Nuveen Sl Tfip shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nuveen Sl Tfip has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Nuveen Sl Tfip N/A N/A N/A

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Nuveen Sl Tfip pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Nuveen Sl TfipN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Nuveen Sl Tfip had 1 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Nuveen Sl Tfip and 0 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. Nuveen Sl Tfip's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Nuveen Sl Tfip is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Neutral
Nuveen Sl Tfip Very Positive

Summary

Nuveen Sl Tfip beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to Lincoln International?

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) and Lincoln International (NYSE:LCLN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Lincoln InternationalN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Lincoln International N/A N/A N/A

13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lincoln International had 1 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Lincoln International and 0 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. Lincoln International's average media sentiment score of 1.92 beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Lincoln International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Neutral
Lincoln International Very Positive

Lincoln International has a consensus target price of $27.36, suggesting a potential upside of 15.24%. Given Lincoln International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lincoln International is more favorable than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Lincoln International
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Summary

Lincoln International beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PIMCO Strategic Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RCS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RCS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RCS vs. The Competition

MetricPIMCO Strategic Income FundCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$248.61M$5.74B$14.04B$24.24B
Dividend Yield9.11%7.39%5.89%3.70%
P/E RatioN/A39.0729.6630.24
Price / SalesN/A1,215.63513.9917.46
Price / CashN/A48.3130.7119.80
Price / BookN/A3.772.884.90
Net IncomeN/A$417.46M$1.31B$1.07B
7 Day Performance0.10%0.75%1.33%0.59%
1 Month Performance2.02%2.29%2.92%2.94%
1 Year Performance-26.26%7.68%11.60%15.04%

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RCS
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
N/A$5.27
+0.1%
N/A-26.3%$248.61MN/AN/AN/A
BBDC
Barings Bdc
2.3494 of 5 stars
$9.41
+0.2%
$9.75
+3.7%
-2.7%$974.82M$279.21M8.3126
RPC
Ridgepost Capital
4.0166 of 5 stars
$8.51
-0.3%
$11.00
+29.3%
N/A$955.77M$297.35M11.26180
MYN
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund
N/A$9.78
+0.2%
N/A+4.6%$926.18MN/AN/AN/A
NXP
Nuveen Sl Tfip
N/A$14.20
-0.4%
N/A+1.8%$901.76MN/AN/A40,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:RCS) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners