Go Pro

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) Competitors

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund logo
$4.90 -0.13 (-2.58%)
Closing price 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$4.91 +0.01 (+0.20%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

RCS vs. TIGR, LCLN, BBDC, RPC, and MYN

Should you buy PIMCO Strategic Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include UP Fintech (TIGR), Lincoln International (LCLN), Barings Bdc (BBDC), Ridgepost Capital (RPC), and BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to UP Fintech?

UP Fintech (NASDAQ:TIGR) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, UP Fintech had 4 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for UP Fintech and 0 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. UP Fintech's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that UP Fintech is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
UP Fintech Neutral
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Neutral

UP Fintech presently has a consensus target price of $8.16, suggesting a potential upside of 68.20%. Given UP Fintech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe UP Fintech is more favorable than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UP Fintech
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

UP Fintech has a net margin of 16.22% compared to PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. UP Fintech's return on equity of 13.11% beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UP Fintech16.22% 13.11% 1.23%
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

UP Fintech has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

UP Fintech has higher revenue and earnings than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UP Fintech$612.07M1.50$170.90M$0.598.22
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund$24.62M9.40N/AN/AN/A

9.0% of UP Fintech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

UP Fintech beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to Lincoln International?

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) and Lincoln International (NYSE:LCLN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Lincoln International N/A N/A N/A

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund$24.62M9.40N/AN/AN/A
Lincoln InternationalN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Lincoln International's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Lincoln International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Neutral
Lincoln International Very Positive

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Lincoln International pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%.

Lincoln International has a consensus price target of $27.36, suggesting a potential upside of 1.90%. Given Lincoln International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lincoln International is more favorable than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Lincoln International
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Summary

Lincoln International beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to Barings Bdc?

Barings Bdc (NYSE:BBDC) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Barings Bdc has a net margin of 32.73% compared to PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Barings Bdc's return on equity of 10.07% beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Barings Bdc32.73% 10.07% 4.38%
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.9%. PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Barings Bdc pays out 125.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Barings Bdc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Barings Bdc presently has a consensus price target of $9.75, suggesting a potential upside of 11.11%. Given Barings Bdc's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Barings Bdc
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Barings Bdc$279.21M3.29$101.92M$0.8310.57
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund$24.62M9.40N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Barings Bdc had 1 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Barings Bdc and 0 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. Barings Bdc's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Barings Bdc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Barings Bdc Positive
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Neutral

Summary

Barings Bdc beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to Ridgepost Capital?

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) and Ridgepost Capital (NYSE:RPC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

Ridgepost Capital has a net margin of 9.03% compared to PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Ridgepost Capital's return on equity of 21.02% beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Ridgepost Capital 9.03%21.02%9.21%

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Ridgepost Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Ridgepost Capital pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Ridgepost Capital has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 61.59%. Given Ridgepost Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ridgepost Capital is more favorable than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ridgepost Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Ridgepost Capital had 2 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ridgepost Capital and 0 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. Ridgepost Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Ridgepost Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Neutral
Ridgepost Capital Positive

Ridgepost Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund$24.62M9.40N/AN/AN/A
Ridgepost Capital$297.35M2.98$19.50M$0.2532.18

13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.1% of Ridgepost Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.8% of Ridgepost Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ridgepost Capital has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ridgepost Capital beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PIMCO Strategic Income Fund compare to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund?

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:RCS) and BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (NYSE:MYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PIMCO Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund N/A N/A N/A

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

13.5% of PIMCO Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund$24.62M9.40N/AN/AN/A
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund$6.89M125.83N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund had 6 more articles in the media than PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund and 0 mentions for PIMCO Strategic Income Fund. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat PIMCO Strategic Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Summary

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund beats PIMCO Strategic Income Fund on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PIMCO Strategic Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RCS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RCS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RCS vs. The Competition

MetricPIMCO Strategic Income FundCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$231.39M$5.44B$13.99B$23.21B
Dividend Yield10.34%7.49%5.95%3.57%
P/E RatioN/A30.2925.5528.60
Price / Sales9.401,158.23499.7321.03
Price / CashN/A47.9230.3019.47
Price / BookN/A3.532.754.75
Net IncomeN/A$417.39M$1.32B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-5.41%-1.56%-1.21%-2.38%
1 Month Performance-7.27%-2.02%-0.30%-3.62%
1 Year Performance-33.01%2.17%8.20%9.75%

PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RCS
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
N/A$4.90
-2.6%
N/A-31.4%$231.39M$24.62MN/AN/A
TIGR
UP Fintech
2.8315 of 5 stars
$5.00
-1.6%
$8.16
+63.2%
-57.1%$963.67M$612.07M8.611,346
LCLN
Lincoln International
3.9252 of 5 stars
$26.89
-1.1%
$27.36
+1.7%
N/A$947.49MN/AN/A1,453
BBDC
Barings Bdc
3.48 of 5 stars
$8.87
-1.7%
$9.75
+10.0%
-5.7%$944.46M$279.21M10.6826
RPC
Ridgepost Capital
4.563 of 5 stars
$8.26
-2.8%
$13.00
+57.3%
N/A$937.03M$297.35M11.04180

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:RCS) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners