Go Pro

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) Competitors

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund logo
$11.00 +0.05 (+0.41%)
Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$11.00 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 09/11/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

RFI vs. ASA, PSEC, OCSL, GSBD, and TYG

Should you buy Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund stock or one of its competitors? Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), Prospect Capital (PSEC), Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL), Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (NYSE:RFI) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, ASA Gold and Precious Metals had 3 more articles in the media than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for ASA Gold and Precious Metals and 2 mentions for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. ASA Gold and Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's score of 0.93 indicating that ASA Gold and Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty FundN/A N/A N/A
ASA Gold and Precious Metals N/A N/A N/A

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ASA Gold and Precious MetalsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

ASA Gold and Precious Metals beats Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Prospect Capital?

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (NYSE:RFI) and Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Prospect Capital has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.91%. Given Prospect Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Prospect Capital is more favorable than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Prospect Capital
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Prospect Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Prospect Capital$639.45M1.82$153.66M$0.0544.40

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Prospect Capital has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Prospect Capital had 7 more articles in the media than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Prospect Capital and 2 mentions for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. Prospect Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's score of 0.93 indicating that Prospect Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Prospect Capital
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.1% of Prospect Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Prospect Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Prospect Capital has a net margin of 19.33% compared to Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Prospect Capital's return on equity of 12.15% beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty FundN/A N/A N/A
Prospect Capital 19.33%12.15%5.54%

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Prospect Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.9%. Prospect Capital pays out 840.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Prospect Capital beats Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (NYSE:RFI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 3 more articles in the media than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 2 mentions for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's score of 0.93 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Oaktree Specialty Lending
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Specialty Lending$316.80M3.52$33.92M$0.4826.40
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Oaktree Specialty Lending currently has a consensus price target of $11.83, indicating a potential downside of 6.60%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oaktree Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 14.45% compared to Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 9.70% beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oaktree Specialty Lending14.45% 9.70% 4.64%
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund N/A N/A N/A

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Oaktree Specialty Lending beats Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (NYSE:RFI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and earnings.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC17.19% 11.04% 4.62%
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund N/A N/A N/A

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.3%. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Goldman Sachs BDC presently has a consensus target price of $8.75, indicating a potential downside of 9.19%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.57
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund had 2 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund and 0 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.00 indicating that Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC Neutral
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund Positive

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.97$119.27M$0.5218.53
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (NYSE:RFI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure both had 2 articles in the media. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's score of 0.41 indicating that Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tortoise Energy InfrastructureN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.4%. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tortoise Energy InfrastructureN/A N/A N/A
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure beats Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RFI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RFI vs. The Competition

MetricCohen & Steers Total Return Realty FundCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$293.88M$5.52B$13.80B$23.40B
Dividend Yield6.54%7.50%5.95%3.57%
P/E RatioN/A30.5725.6828.71
Price / SalesN/A1,237.19510.2121.23
Price / CashN/A47.9230.3019.47
Price / BookN/A3.532.744.75
Net IncomeN/A$417.39M$1.32B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.44%-1.39%-1.17%-2.00%
1 Month Performance-4.22%-1.78%-0.23%-3.20%
1 Year Performance-8.44%2.79%8.39%10.51%

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RFI
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
N/A$11.01
+0.4%
N/A-8.4%$293.88MN/AN/AN/A
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
1.8967 of 5 stars
$62.37
-1.1%
N/A+48.7%$1.19BN/AN/A1,100
PSEC
Prospect Capital
2.1824 of 5 stars
$2.19
-1.8%
$2.00
-8.7%
-20.4%$1.17B$639.45M43.802,019
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
1.905 of 5 stars
$12.77
-2.2%
$11.83
-7.3%
-8.1%$1.15B$53.53M26.60N/A
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
1.2776 of 5 stars
$9.68
-3.0%
$8.75
-9.6%
-15.3%$1.12B$71.05M18.61N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:RFI) was last updated on 9/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners