Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) Competitors

Prospect Capital has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Prospect Capital had 24 more articles in the media than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Prospect Capital and 0 mentions for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. Prospect Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Prospect Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Prospect Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.0%. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Prospect Capital pays out -113.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Prospect Capital presently has a consensus price target of $2.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.16%. Given Prospect Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Prospect Capital is more favorable than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

9.1% of Prospect Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Prospect Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Prospect Capital has a net margin of 19.33% compared to Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Prospect Capital's return on equity of 12.15% beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's return on equity.

Prospect Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 14.45% compared to Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 9.70% beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's return on equity.

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 4 more articles in the media than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 0 mentions for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $11.83, indicating a potential downside of 8.90%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure had 7 more articles in the media than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%.

20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Virtus Investment Partners currently has a consensus price target of $145.50, suggesting a potential downside of 12.92%. Given Virtus Investment Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Virtus Investment Partners is more favorable than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Virtus Investment Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Virtus Investment Partners has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity of 21.56% beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's return on equity.

80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Virtus Investment Partners had 7 more articles in the media than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Virtus Investment Partners and 0 mentions for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. Virtus Investment Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Virtus Investment Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Virtus Investment Partners pays an annual dividend of $9.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Virtus Investment Partners pays out 55.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.