Do analysts prefer GSBD or RFI?

Goldman Sachs BDC presently has a consensus price target of $8.75, suggesting a potential downside of 3.37%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Goldman Sachs BDC 3 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.86 Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, GSBD or RFI?

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Goldman Sachs BDC $365.57M 2.79 $119.27M $0.52 17.41 Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to GSBD or RFI?

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC and Goldman Sachs BDC both had 3 articles in the media. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's score of 0.39 indicating that Goldman Sachs BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Goldman Sachs BDC 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer RFI or OCSL?

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $11.83, indicating a potential downside of 0.56%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Oaktree Specialty Lending 0 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has higher earnings & valuation, RFI or OCSL?

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Oaktree Specialty Lending $316.80M 3.31 $33.92M $0.48 24.79

Does the media favor RFI or OCSL?

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund both had 3 articles in the media. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.06 indicating that Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Oaktree Specialty Lending 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FSCO or RFI?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FS Credit Opportunities $137.77M 7.58 N/A N/A N/A Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is FSCO or RFI more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FS Credit Opportunities N/A N/A N/A Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer ASA or RFI?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ASA Gold and Precious Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, ASA or RFI?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ASA Gold and Precious Metals N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is ASA or RFI more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ASA Gold and Precious Metals N/A N/A N/A Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund N/A N/A N/A

Which has higher earnings & valuation, RFI or TYG?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tortoise Energy Infrastructure N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is RFI or TYG more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund N/A N/A N/A Tortoise Energy Infrastructure N/A N/A N/A

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) Competitors

$10.46 +0.01 (+0.10%)

Closing price 10/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$10.48 +0.01 (+0.14%)

As of 10/2/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

RFI vs. GSBD, OCSL, FSCO, ASA, and TYG

Should you buy Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund stock or one of its competitors? Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL), FS Credit Opportunities (FSCO), ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (NYSE:RFI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC and Goldman Sachs BDC both had 3 articles in the media. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's score of 0.39 indicating that Goldman Sachs BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Goldman Sachs BDC presently has a consensus price target of $8.75, suggesting a potential downside of 3.37%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.86
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC	17.19%	11.04%	4.62%
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.1%. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC	$365.57M	2.79	$119.27M	$0.52	17.41
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (NYSE:RFI) and Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Oaktree Specialty Lending	$316.80M	3.31	$33.92M	$0.48	24.79

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund both had 3 articles in the media. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.06 indicating that Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Oaktree Specialty Lending	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 14.45% compared to Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 9.70% beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A
Oaktree Specialty Lending	14.45%	9.70%	4.64%

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $11.83, indicating a potential downside of 0.56%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Oaktree Specialty Lending	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Oaktree Specialty Lending beats Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

FS Credit Opportunities (NYSE:FSCO) and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (NYSE:RFI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund had 3 more articles in the media than FS Credit Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund and 0 mentions for FS Credit Opportunities. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat FS Credit Opportunities' score of 0.00 indicating that Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FS Credit Opportunities	Neutral
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	Neutral

FS Credit Opportunities has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

36.4% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FS Credit Opportunities	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FS Credit Opportunities	$137.77M	7.58	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

FS Credit Opportunities pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%.

Summary

FS Credit Opportunities beats Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (NYSE:RFI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund had 1 more articles in the media than ASA Gold and Precious Metals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund and 2 mentions for ASA Gold and Precious Metals. ASA Gold and Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's score of 0.39 indicating that ASA Gold and Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ASA Gold and Precious Metals and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (NYSE:RFI) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

20.4% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.7%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	N/A	N/A	N/A

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund and 2 mentions for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund's score of 0.39 indicating that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure beats Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

RFI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$280M	$5.16B	$13.12B	$22.78B
Dividend Yield	6.86%	7.57%	6.04%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	N/A	29.45	24.42	27.75
Price / Sales	N/A	1,200.87	500.08	21.39
Price / Cash	N/A	47.67	45.51	38.23
Price / Book	N/A	3.48	2.70	4.64
Net Income	N/A	$416.56M	$1.32B	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	-1.23%	-0.74%	-1.04%	-1.06%
1 Month Performance	-7.27%	-2.71%	-3.20%	-5.60%
1 Year Performance	-13.56%	9.00%	10.47%	5.09%

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
RFI Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	N/A	$10.46 +0.1%	N/A	-13.6%	$280M	N/A	N/A	N/A	News Coverage
GSBD Goldman Sachs BDC	2.0683 of 5 stars	$9.49 +0.3%	$8.75 -7.7%	-9.9%	$1.06B	$71.05M	18.24	8	News Coverage Analyst Upgrade
OCSL Oaktree Specialty Lending	1.427 of 5 stars	$12.10 +0.8%	$11.83 -2.2%	-8.0%	$1.06B	$53.53M	25.21	N/A
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities	N/A	$5.17 +2.5%	N/A	-25.9%	$1.04B	$137.77M	N/A	N/A
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals	2.4748 of 5 stars	$55.74 +2.1%	N/A	+24.2%	$1.03B	N/A	N/A	1,100	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:RFI) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) Competitors

RFI vs. GSBD, OCSL, FSCO, ASA, and TYG

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Summary

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Summary

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

Summary

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

Summary

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RFI vs. The Competition

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) Competitors

RFI vs. GSBD, OCSL, FSCO, ASA, and TYG

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Which has more risk & volatility, GSBD or RFI?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GSBD or RFI?

Does the media refer more to GSBD or RFI?

Do analysts prefer GSBD or RFI?

Is GSBD or RFI more profitable?

Is GSBD or RFI a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings & valuation, GSBD or RFI?

Summary

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Which has more volatility and risk, RFI or OCSL?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in RFI or OCSL?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, RFI or OCSL?

Does the media favor RFI or OCSL?

Is RFI or OCSL a better dividend stock?

Is RFI or OCSL more profitable?

Do analysts prefer RFI or OCSL?

Summary

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

Does the media favor FSCO or RFI?

Which has more risk and volatility, FSCO or RFI?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FSCO or RFI?

Is FSCO or RFI more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FSCO or RFI?

Is FSCO or RFI a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

Which has better valuation & earnings, ASA or RFI?

Do analysts prefer ASA or RFI?

Is ASA or RFI a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer ASA or RFI?

Which has more volatility and risk, ASA or RFI?

Is ASA or RFI more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ASA or RFI?

Summary

How does Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of RFI or TYG?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, RFI or TYG?

Is RFI or TYG a better dividend stock?

Is RFI or TYG more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, RFI or TYG?

Does the media refer more to RFI or TYG?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RFI vs. The Competition

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools