NYSE:SHW

The Sherwin-Williams Stock Competitors

$298.36
-1.05 (-0.35 %)
(As of 09/16/2021 03:04 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$296.33
$299.16
50-Day Range
$273.09
$308.70
52-Week Range
$218.06
$310.43
Volume25,524 shs
Average Volume1.26 million shs
Market Capitalization$78.56 billion
P/E Ratio37.44
Dividend Yield0.74%
Beta1.08

The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) Vs. ECL, IFF, ALB, CE, RPM, and ASH

Should you be buying The Sherwin-Williams stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of The Sherwin-Williams include Ecolab (ECL), International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF), Albemarle (ALB), Celanese (CE), RPM International (RPM), and Ashland Global (ASH). These companies are all part of the "specialty chemicals" industry.

Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) and The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ecolab and The Sherwin-Williams' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ecolab$11.79 billion5.43$-1,205,100,000.00$4.0255.66
The Sherwin-Williams$18.36 billion4.28$2.03 billion$8.1936.43

The Sherwin-Williams has higher revenue and earnings than Ecolab. The Sherwin-Williams is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ecolab, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Ecolab and The Sherwin-Williams, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ecolab05802.62
The Sherwin-Williams041402.78

Ecolab currently has a consensus target price of $233.8889, indicating a potential upside of 4.52%. The Sherwin-Williams has a consensus target price of $336.3889, indicating a potential upside of 12.77%. Given The Sherwin-Williams' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Sherwin-Williams is more favorable than Ecolab.

Dividends

Ecolab pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. The Sherwin-Williams pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Ecolab pays out 47.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Sherwin-Williams pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ecolab has increased its dividend for 36 consecutive years and The Sherwin-Williams has increased its dividend for 42 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

72.3% of Ecolab shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.9% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Ecolab shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Ecolab and The Sherwin-Williams' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ecolab8.66%20.14%6.98%
The Sherwin-Williams11.05%72.71%12.16%

Volatility & Risk

Ecolab has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, The Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Sherwin-Williams beats Ecolab on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

International Flavors & Fragrances (NYSE:IFF) and The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

International Flavors & Fragrances pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. The Sherwin-Williams pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 54.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Sherwin-Williams pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Sherwin-Williams has increased its dividend for 42 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares International Flavors & Fragrances and The Sherwin-Williams' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Flavors & Fragrances$5.08 billion7.02$363.23 million$5.7025.16
The Sherwin-Williams$18.36 billion4.28$2.03 billion$8.1936.43

The Sherwin-Williams has higher revenue and earnings than International Flavors & Fragrances. International Flavors & Fragrances is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Sherwin-Williams, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for International Flavors & Fragrances and The Sherwin-Williams, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
International Flavors & Fragrances02902.82
The Sherwin-Williams041402.78

International Flavors & Fragrances currently has a consensus price target of $152.5110, indicating a potential upside of 6.33%. The Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $336.3889, indicating a potential upside of 12.77%. Given The Sherwin-Williams' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The Sherwin-Williams is more favorable than International Flavors & Fragrances.

Profitability

This table compares International Flavors & Fragrances and The Sherwin-Williams' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
International Flavors & Fragrances1.71%7.32%3.78%
The Sherwin-Williams11.05%72.71%12.16%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.9% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.9% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Sherwin-Williams beats International Flavors & Fragrances on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) and Albemarle (NYSE:ALB) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and Albemarle's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Sherwin-Williams11.05%72.71%12.16%
Albemarle21.78%8.92%4.50%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for The Sherwin-Williams and Albemarle, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Sherwin-Williams041402.78
Albemarle351102.42

The Sherwin-Williams currently has a consensus target price of $336.3889, indicating a potential upside of 12.77%. Albemarle has a consensus target price of $200.55, indicating a potential downside of 13.31%. Given The Sherwin-Williams' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Sherwin-Williams is more favorable than Albemarle.

Volatility and Risk

The Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Albemarle has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.9% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.1% of Albemarle shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Albemarle shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

The Sherwin-Williams pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Albemarle pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. The Sherwin-Williams pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albemarle pays out 37.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Sherwin-Williams has increased its dividend for 42 consecutive years. The Sherwin-Williams is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and Albemarle's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Sherwin-Williams$18.36 billion4.28$2.03 billion$8.1936.43
Albemarle$3.13 billion8.66$375.76 million$4.1256.21

The Sherwin-Williams has higher revenue and earnings than Albemarle. The Sherwin-Williams is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albemarle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

The Sherwin-Williams beats Albemarle on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) and Celanese (NYSE:CE) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.9% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Celanese shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Celanese shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

The Sherwin-Williams pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Celanese pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. The Sherwin-Williams pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Celanese pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Sherwin-Williams has increased its dividend for 42 consecutive years and Celanese has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and Celanese's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Sherwin-Williams$18.36 billion4.28$2.03 billion$8.1936.43
Celanese$5.66 billion3.03$1.99 billion$7.6420.17

The Sherwin-Williams has higher revenue and earnings than Celanese. Celanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Sherwin-Williams, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

The Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celanese has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and Celanese's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Sherwin-Williams11.05%72.71%12.16%
Celanese36.01%38.64%13.45%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for The Sherwin-Williams and Celanese, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Sherwin-Williams041402.78
Celanese141402.68

The Sherwin-Williams presently has a consensus target price of $336.3889, indicating a potential upside of 12.77%. Celanese has a consensus target price of $166.0625, indicating a potential upside of 7.85%. Given The Sherwin-Williams' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe The Sherwin-Williams is more favorable than Celanese.

Summary

The Sherwin-Williams beats Celanese on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) and RPM International (NYSE:RPM) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and RPM International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Sherwin-Williams11.05%72.71%12.16%
RPM International8.23%34.41%9.20%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and RPM International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Sherwin-Williams$18.36 billion4.28$2.03 billion$8.1936.43
RPM International$6.11 billion1.70$502.64 million$4.1619.18

The Sherwin-Williams has higher revenue and earnings than RPM International. RPM International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Sherwin-Williams, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

The Sherwin-Williams pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. RPM International pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. The Sherwin-Williams pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RPM International pays out 36.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Sherwin-Williams has increased its dividend for 42 consecutive years.

Risk and Volatility

The Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPM International has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for The Sherwin-Williams and RPM International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Sherwin-Williams041402.78
RPM International14302.25

The Sherwin-Williams presently has a consensus target price of $336.3889, indicating a potential upside of 12.77%. RPM International has a consensus target price of $95.6250, indicating a potential upside of 19.76%. Given RPM International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe RPM International is more favorable than The Sherwin-Williams.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.9% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of RPM International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of RPM International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The Sherwin-Williams beats RPM International on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) and Ashland Global (NYSE:ASH) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for The Sherwin-Williams and Ashland Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Sherwin-Williams041402.78
Ashland Global01502.83

The Sherwin-Williams presently has a consensus price target of $336.3889, indicating a potential upside of 12.77%. Ashland Global has a consensus price target of $102.7143, indicating a potential upside of 9.85%. Given The Sherwin-Williams' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Sherwin-Williams is more favorable than Ashland Global.

Profitability

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and Ashland Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Sherwin-Williams11.05%72.71%12.16%
Ashland Global7.60%7.72%3.56%

Dividends

The Sherwin-Williams pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Ashland Global pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. The Sherwin-Williams pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ashland Global pays out 42.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Sherwin-Williams has increased its dividend for 42 consecutive years.

Risk & Volatility

The Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ashland Global has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and Ashland Global's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Sherwin-Williams$18.36 billion4.28$2.03 billion$8.1936.43
Ashland Global$2.33 billion2.44$-508,000,000.00$2.8033.42

The Sherwin-Williams has higher revenue and earnings than Ashland Global. Ashland Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Sherwin-Williams, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.9% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.6% of Ashland Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Ashland Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

The Sherwin-Williams beats Ashland Global on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


The Sherwin-Williams Competitors List

Competitor NameBTM RankShare PriceAnalysts' Price TargetMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
Ecolab logo
ECL
Ecolab
2.7$223.75
-0.0%
$233.89
-4.5%
$64.01 billion$11.79 billion61.4744,000Ex-Dividend
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
International Flavors & Fragrances logo
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances
2.3$143.39
-0.6%
$152.51
-6.4%
$35.71 billion$5.08 billion117.532,600
Albemarle logo
ALB
Albemarle
2.6$231.60
-1.0%
$200.55
-13.4%
$27.09 billion$3.13 billion37.545,900Analyst Report
Short Interest ↓
Analyst Revision
Celanese logo
CE
Celanese
2.7$154.12
-1.9%
$166.06
-7.7%
$17.13 billion$5.66 billion7.067,658
RPM International logo
RPM
RPM International
2.5$79.79
-0.8%
$95.63
-19.8%
$10.35 billion$6.11 billion20.6715,490Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Ashland Global logo
ASH
Ashland Global
2.8$93.58
-0.9%
$102.71
-9.8%
$5.68 billion$2.33 billion31.944,500Insider Selling
W. R. Grace & Co. logo
GRA
W. R. Grace & Co.
2.2$69.95
-0.0%
$68.17
-2.5%
$4.64 billion$1.73 billion60.304,000News Coverage
Balchem logo
BCPC
Balchem
2.2$139.19
-0.1%
$152.50
-9.6%
$4.51 billion$703.64 million50.431,342Analyst Upgrade
Short Interest ↑
Quaker Chemical logo
KWR
Quaker Chemical
2.1$250.08
-0.5%
$300.00
-20.0%
$4.47 billion$1.42 billion30.204,200
Sensient Technologies logo
SXT
Sensient Technologies
2.5$93.11
-0.2%
$90.00
-3.3%
$3.93 billion$1.33 billion34.113,948Insider Buying
Positive News
NewMarket logo
NEU
NewMarket
1.7$328.40
-0.4%
N/A$3.59 billion$2.01 billion12.622,105
H.B. Fuller logo
FUL
H.B. Fuller
2.6$62.81
-1.4%
$69.50
-10.7%
$3.30 billion$2.79 billion20.806,428Upcoming Earnings
Stepan logo
SCL
Stepan
2.3$115.18
-0.5%
$130.00
-12.9%
$2.59 billion$1.87 billion18.222,293
Minerals Technologies logo
MTX
Minerals Technologies
1.9$72.71
-1.2%
$67.67
-6.9%
$2.44 billion$1.59 billion17.563,566Analyst Downgrade
Innospec logo
IOSP
Innospec
2.8$87.32
-0.6%
$110.00
-26.0%
$2.15 billion$1.19 billion26.791,900
Ferro logo
FOE
Ferro
1.5$20.72
-0.2%
$22.00
-6.2%
$1.71 billion$958.95 million11.085,615
Kraton logo
KRA
Kraton
1.9$41.96
-0.3%
$41.50
-1.1%
$1.35 billion$1.56 billion-3.741,808
FutureFuel logo
FF
FutureFuel
2.3$7.57
-0.9%
$1.30
-82.8%
$331.29 million$204.51 million32.91474News Coverage
Landec logo
LNDC
Landec
2.2$10.28
-1.0%
$13.33
-29.7%
$302.87 million$544.16 million-9.18796News Coverage
Advanced Emissions Solutions logo
ADES
Advanced Emissions Solutions
1.6$6.42
-0.0%
N/A$121.04 million$61.58 million3.31136Short Interest ↓
Positive News
Flotek Industries logo
FTK
Flotek Industries
2.2$1.30
-4.6%
$2.50
-92.3%
$96.33 million$53.14 million-1.11147
This page was last updated on 9/16/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research.