Tecnoglass (TGLS) Competitors

Tecnoglass pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. AAON pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Tecnoglass pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AAON pays out 20.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tecnoglass has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and AAON has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Tecnoglass is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

37.3% of Tecnoglass shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.8% of AAON shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tecnoglass shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.1% of AAON shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tecnoglass has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AAON's net margin of 8.24%. Tecnoglass' return on equity of 17.84% beat AAON's return on equity.

Tecnoglass currently has a consensus target price of $63.33, suggesting a potential upside of 56.87%. AAON has a consensus target price of $126.67, suggesting a potential upside of 66.25%. Given AAON's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe AAON is more favorable than Tecnoglass.

Tecnoglass has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AAON has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Tecnoglass has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AAON. Tecnoglass is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AAON, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, AAON had 7 more articles in the media than Tecnoglass. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for AAON and 0 mentions for Tecnoglass. AAON's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Tecnoglass' score of 0.00 indicating that AAON is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

CSW Industrials pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Tecnoglass pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. CSW Industrials pays out 16.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tecnoglass pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CSW Industrials has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Tecnoglass has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Tecnoglass has a net margin of 12.35% compared to CSW Industrials' net margin of 10.34%. Tecnoglass' return on equity of 17.84% beat CSW Industrials' return on equity.

Tecnoglass has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CSW Industrials. Tecnoglass is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CSW Industrials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CSW Industrials has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tecnoglass has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

CSW Industrials currently has a consensus target price of $347.57, indicating a potential upside of 7.44%. Tecnoglass has a consensus target price of $63.33, indicating a potential upside of 56.87%. Given Tecnoglass' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tecnoglass is more favorable than CSW Industrials.

82.8% of CSW Industrials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.3% of Tecnoglass shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of CSW Industrials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tecnoglass shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CSW Industrials had 9 more articles in the media than Tecnoglass. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for CSW Industrials and 0 mentions for Tecnoglass. CSW Industrials' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Tecnoglass' score of 0.00 indicating that CSW Industrials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Tecnoglass has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 11 more articles in the media than Tecnoglass. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 0 mentions for Tecnoglass. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Tecnoglass' score of 0.00 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

37.3% of Tecnoglass shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tecnoglass shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tecnoglass has a net margin of 12.35% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat Tecnoglass' return on equity.

Tecnoglass pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Tecnoglass pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tecnoglass has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Tecnoglass presently has a consensus price target of $63.33, indicating a potential upside of 56.87%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $55.71, indicating a potential upside of 21.81%. Given Tecnoglass' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Tecnoglass is more favorable than Fortune Brands Innovations.

Fortune Brands Innovations has higher revenue and earnings than Tecnoglass. Tecnoglass is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tecnoglass has a net margin of 12.35% compared to UFP Industries' net margin of 3.99%. Tecnoglass' return on equity of 17.84% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Tecnoglass has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UFP Industries has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, UFP Industries had 20 more articles in the media than Tecnoglass. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for UFP Industries and 0 mentions for Tecnoglass. UFP Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Tecnoglass' score of 0.00 indicating that UFP Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

UFP Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Tecnoglass. Tecnoglass is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UFP Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

37.3% of Tecnoglass shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of UFP Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tecnoglass shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tecnoglass presently has a consensus price target of $63.33, indicating a potential upside of 56.87%. UFP Industries has a consensus price target of $104.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.77%. Given Tecnoglass' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Tecnoglass is more favorable than UFP Industries.

Tecnoglass pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Tecnoglass pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UFP Industries pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tecnoglass has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and UFP Industries has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. UFP Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.