Veralto (VLTO) Competitors

91.3% of Veralto shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Keysight Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Veralto shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Keysight Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Veralto has a net margin of 17.33% compared to Keysight Technologies' net margin of 16.84%. Veralto's return on equity of 34.63% beat Keysight Technologies' return on equity.

Veralto presently has a consensus target price of $105.88, suggesting a potential upside of 18.73%. Keysight Technologies has a consensus target price of $314.33, suggesting a potential downside of 12.07%. Given Veralto's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Veralto is more favorable than Keysight Technologies.

Veralto has higher revenue and earnings than Keysight Technologies. Veralto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keysight Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Veralto has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Keysight Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Veralto. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Keysight Technologies and 19 mentions for Veralto. Keysight Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Veralto's score of 0.59 indicating that Keysight Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

91.3% of Veralto shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Fortive shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Veralto shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Fortive shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Veralto has a net margin of 17.33% compared to Fortive's net margin of 12.84%. Veralto's return on equity of 34.63% beat Fortive's return on equity.

Veralto presently has a consensus target price of $105.88, suggesting a potential upside of 18.73%. Fortive has a consensus target price of $60.92, suggesting a potential upside of 0.94%. Given Veralto's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Veralto is more favorable than Fortive.

Veralto has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortive has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Veralto pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Fortive pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Veralto pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortive pays out 14.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Veralto has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Fortive has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Veralto is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Fortive had 5 more articles in the media than Veralto. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Fortive and 19 mentions for Veralto. Fortive's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Veralto's score of 0.59 indicating that Fortive is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Veralto has higher revenue and earnings than Fortive. Veralto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nova has a net margin of 29.44% compared to Veralto's net margin of 17.33%. Veralto's return on equity of 34.63% beat Nova's return on equity.

Veralto presently has a consensus target price of $105.88, indicating a potential upside of 18.73%. Nova has a consensus target price of $442.25, indicating a potential downside of 11.90%. Given Veralto's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Veralto is more favorable than Nova.

Veralto has higher revenue and earnings than Nova. Veralto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nova, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Veralto had 11 more articles in the media than Nova. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Veralto and 8 mentions for Nova. Nova's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Veralto's score of 0.59 indicating that Nova is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

91.3% of Veralto shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Nova shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Veralto shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Nova shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Veralto has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nova has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Veralto has a net margin of 17.33% compared to Revvity's net margin of 8.26%. Veralto's return on equity of 34.63% beat Revvity's return on equity.

Revvity currently has a consensus target price of $106.82, suggesting a potential upside of 6.38%. Veralto has a consensus target price of $105.88, suggesting a potential upside of 18.73%. Given Veralto's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Veralto is more favorable than Revvity.

In the previous week, Revvity had 13 more articles in the media than Veralto. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Revvity and 19 mentions for Veralto. Veralto's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Revvity's score of 0.42 indicating that Veralto is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Veralto has higher revenue and earnings than Revvity. Veralto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Revvity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Revvity has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Veralto has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Revvity pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Veralto pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Revvity pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Veralto pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Veralto has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Veralto is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

86.7% of Revvity shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.3% of Veralto shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Revvity shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Veralto shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.