Sono-Tek Competitors

Sono-Tek (OTCMKTS:SOTK) and Byrna Technologies (OTCMKTS:BYRN) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Sono-Tek and Byrna Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

2.1% of Byrna Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 16.0% of Sono-Tek shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Byrna Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Sono-Tek and Byrna Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Risk and Volatility

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.12, indicating that its stock price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Byrna Technologies has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Sono-Tek and Byrna Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sono-Tek has higher revenue and earnings than Byrna Technologies.

Summary

Sono-Tek beats Byrna Technologies on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sono-Tek (OTCMKTS:SOTK) and Flux Power (NASDAQ:FLUX) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Sono-Tek and Flux Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.12, indicating that its stock price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flux Power has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

3.4% of Flux Power shares are held by institutional investors. 16.0% of Sono-Tek shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 71.2% of Flux Power shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sono-Tek and Flux Power's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sono-Tek has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Flux Power. Flux Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sono-Tek, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Sono-Tek and Flux Power, as provided by MarketBeat.

Flux Power has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.88%. Given Flux Power's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Flux Power is more favorable than Sono-Tek.

Summary

Flux Power beats Sono-Tek on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sono-Tek (OTCMKTS:SOTK) and Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Sono-Tek and Polar Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.12, indicating that its stock price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Polar Power has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.0% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. 16.0% of Sono-Tek shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 49.9% of Polar Power shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sono-Tek and Polar Power's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sono-Tek has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Polar Power.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Sono-Tek and Polar Power, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

Polar Power beats Sono-Tek on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sono-Tek (OTCMKTS:SOTK) and Security Devices International (OTCMKTS:SDEV) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Sono-Tek and Security Devices International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.12, indicating that its stock price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Security Devices International has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

2.0% of Security Devices International shares are held by institutional investors. 16.0% of Sono-Tek shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of Security Devices International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sono-Tek and Security Devices International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sono-Tek has higher revenue and earnings than Security Devices International.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Sono-Tek and Security Devices International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

Sono-Tek beats Security Devices International on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sono-Tek (OTCMKTS:SOTK) and Ultralife (NASDAQ:ULBI) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Sono-Tek and Ultralife's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.12, indicating that its stock price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ultralife has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

35.0% of Ultralife shares are held by institutional investors. 16.0% of Sono-Tek shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 38.4% of Ultralife shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sono-Tek and Ultralife's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ultralife has higher revenue and earnings than Sono-Tek.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Sono-Tek and Ultralife, as provided by MarketBeat.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.53%. Given Ultralife's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ultralife is more favorable than Sono-Tek.

Summary

Ultralife beats Sono-Tek on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sono-Tek (OTCMKTS:SOTK) and Evercel (OTCMKTS:EVRC) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Sono-Tek and Evercel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.12, indicating that its stock price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Evercel has a beta of 0.24, indicating that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sono-Tek and Evercel's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sono-Tek has higher revenue and earnings than Evercel.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Sono-Tek and Evercel, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

Sono-Tek beats Evercel on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.