Free Trial
→ Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE (From Base Camp Trading) (Ad)tc pixel Free AMC Stock Alerts

Arizona Metals (AMC) Competitors

C$0.17 -0.01 (-5.56%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern
Compare

AMC vs. LTH, HAN, FT, RCK, and CRE

Should you buy Arizona Metals stock or one of its competitors? Arizona Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include Lithium Ionic (LTH), Hannan Metals (HAN), Fortune Minerals (FT), Rock Tech Lithium (RCK), and Critical Elements Lithium (CRE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified metals & mining" industry.

How does Arizona Metals compare to Lithium Ionic?

Lithium Ionic (CVE:LTH) and Arizona Metals (TSE:AMC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Lithium Ionic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Arizona Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Ionic Neutral
Arizona Metals Neutral

Lithium Ionic has a beta of 1.870419, meaning that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arizona Metals has a beta of 1.317294, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Lithium Ionic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arizona Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium IonicN/AN/A-C$39.09M-C$0.05N/A
Arizona MetalsN/AN/A-C$32.39M-C$0.11N/A

Arizona Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Lithium Ionic's net margin of -4,007,353,700.00%. Lithium Ionic's return on equity of -77.95% beat Arizona Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Ionic-4,007,353,700.00% -77.95% N/A
Arizona Metals N/A -93.19%N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Ionic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Arizona Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

5.9% of Lithium Ionic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Arizona Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lithium Ionic and Arizona Metals tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Arizona Metals compare to Hannan Metals?

Hannan Metals (CVE:HAN) and Arizona Metals (TSE:AMC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Hannan Metals has a beta of 0.654098, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arizona Metals has a beta of 1.317294, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hannan Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Arizona Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hannan Metals and 0 mentions for Arizona Metals. Hannan Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Arizona Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hannan Metals Neutral
Arizona Metals Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hannan Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Arizona Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

2.4% of Hannan Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Arizona Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of Hannan Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hannan Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arizona Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hannan MetalsN/AN/A-C$5.56M-C$0.01N/A
Arizona MetalsN/AN/A-C$32.39M-C$0.11N/A

Hannan Metals' return on equity of -8.29% beat Arizona Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hannan MetalsN/A -8.29% -39.01%
Arizona Metals N/A -93.19%N/A

Summary

Hannan Metals and Arizona Metals tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Arizona Metals compare to Fortune Minerals?

Fortune Minerals (TSE:FT) and Arizona Metals (TSE:AMC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Fortune Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Arizona Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fortune Minerals Neutral
Arizona Metals Neutral

Fortune Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arizona Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.22M-C$0.01N/A
Arizona MetalsN/AN/A-C$32.39M-C$0.11N/A

0.3% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Arizona Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Fortune Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$0.63, suggesting a potential upside of 425.00%. Given Fortune Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Fortune Minerals is more favorable than Arizona Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Arizona Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Arizona Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fortune Minerals' net margin of -13,690.93%. Fortune Minerals' return on equity of 80.32% beat Arizona Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Minerals-13,690.93% 80.32% -5.38%
Arizona Metals N/A -93.19%N/A

Fortune Minerals has a beta of -0.922969, meaning that its share price is 192% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arizona Metals has a beta of 1.317294, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fortune Minerals beats Arizona Metals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Arizona Metals compare to Rock Tech Lithium?

Rock Tech Lithium (CVE:RCK) and Arizona Metals (TSE:AMC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, Rock Tech Lithium had 3 more articles in the media than Arizona Metals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Rock Tech Lithium and 0 mentions for Arizona Metals. Rock Tech Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Arizona Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Rock Tech Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rock Tech Lithium Neutral
Arizona Metals Neutral

Rock Tech Lithium has a beta of -0.10218, meaning that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arizona Metals has a beta of 1.317294, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Rock Tech Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Arizona Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of Rock Tech Lithium shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Rock Tech Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arizona Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rock Tech LithiumN/AN/A-C$17.97M-C$0.10N/A
Arizona MetalsN/AN/A-C$32.39M-C$0.11N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rock Tech Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Arizona Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Rock Tech Lithium's return on equity of -35.01% beat Arizona Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rock Tech LithiumN/A -35.01% -28.63%
Arizona Metals N/A -93.19%N/A

Summary

Rock Tech Lithium beats Arizona Metals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Arizona Metals compare to Critical Elements Lithium?

Critical Elements Lithium (CVE:CRE) and Arizona Metals (TSE:AMC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Critical Elements Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Arizona Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Elements Lithium Neutral
Arizona Metals Neutral

Critical Elements Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arizona Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical Elements LithiumN/AN/AC$1.53M-C$0.01N/A
Arizona MetalsN/AN/A-C$32.39M-C$0.11N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Critical Elements Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Arizona Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Critical Elements Lithium has a beta of -0.707948, indicating that its stock price is 171% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arizona Metals has a beta of 1.317294, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

2.6% of Critical Elements Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Arizona Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Critical Elements Lithium shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Critical Elements Lithium's return on equity of -2.90% beat Arizona Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Elements LithiumN/A -2.90% -3.67%
Arizona Metals N/A -93.19%N/A

Summary

Critical Elements Lithium beats Arizona Metals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Arizona Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AMC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AMC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AMC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricArizona MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$23.42MC$3.79BC$4.73BC$12.72B
Dividend YieldN/A5.25%4.78%6.34%
P/E Ratio-1.5522.2021.8038.35
Price / SalesN/A25,971.3015,468.388.68
Price / CashN/A27.0424.9082.29
Price / Book1.9711.709.734.44
Net Income-C$32.39MC$127.33MC$159.31MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-2.86%-2.40%-2.06%-0.45%
1 Month Performance-5.56%76.10%55.61%-1.68%
1 Year Performance-77.92%14.26%13.09%17.31%

Arizona Metals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AMC
Arizona Metals
0.0382 of 5 stars		C$0.17
-5.6%		N/A-76.6%C$23.42MN/AN/AN/A
LTH
Lithium Ionic
N/AC$0.50
flat		N/A-38.3%C$98.65MN/AN/AN/A
HAN
Hannan Metals
N/AC$0.64
-3.0%		N/A-13.3%C$93.12MN/AN/AN/A
FT
Fortune Minerals
N/AC$0.12
-2.0%		C$0.63
+414.3%		+50.0%C$82.09MN/AN/A4
RCK
Rock Tech Lithium
N/AC$0.64
+1.6%		N/A-25.9%C$78.65MN/AN/A2,820

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:AMC) was last updated on 10/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
100% overnight gains?
Rumors are circulating that Elon Musk is preparing to acquire three publicly traded companies. Dr. Mark Sko...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Musk’s Hushed FCC Filing. Dec 8th.
Elon Musk quietly filed a document with the federal government tied to artificial intelligence, one of the lar...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Earth's biggest energy source: near Grand Canyon
The largest energy source on Earth contains 50,000 times every oil and gas reserve on the planet combined - an...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel