Go Pro

Algoma Steel Group (ASTL) Competitors

Algoma Steel Group logo
C$5.51 +0.15 (+2.80%)
As of 07/3/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

ASTL vs. TXR, SIM, CMC, TG, and AA

Should you buy Algoma Steel Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Algoma Steel Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Algoma Steel Group include TerraX Minerals (TXR), Siyata Mobile (SIM), Cielo Waste Solutions (CMC), Trifecta Gold (TG), and Alba Minerals (AA). These companies are all part of the "steel works" industry.

How does Algoma Steel Group compare to TerraX Minerals?

TerraX Minerals (CVE:TXR) and Algoma Steel Group (TSE:ASTL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Algoma Steel Group has a consensus price target of C$8.17, suggesting a potential upside of 48.22%. Given Algoma Steel Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Algoma Steel Group is more favorable than TerraX Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TerraX Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Algoma Steel Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

TerraX Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Algoma Steel Group's net margin of -47.22%. TerraX Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Algoma Steel Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TerraX MineralsN/A N/A N/A
Algoma Steel Group -47.22%-125.08%-0.63%

TerraX Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Algoma Steel Group. TerraX Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Algoma Steel Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TerraX MineralsN/AN/AN/A-C$0.01N/A
Algoma Steel GroupC$1.87B0.31-C$150.59M-C$10.29N/A

In the previous week, Algoma Steel Group had 1 more articles in the media than TerraX Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Algoma Steel Group and 0 mentions for TerraX Minerals. TerraX Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Algoma Steel Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TerraX Minerals Neutral
Algoma Steel Group Neutral

18.2% of Algoma Steel Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.6% of Algoma Steel Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Algoma Steel Group beats TerraX Minerals on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Algoma Steel Group compare to Siyata Mobile?

Siyata Mobile (CVE:SIM) and Algoma Steel Group (TSE:ASTL) are both small-cap steel works companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Algoma Steel Group has a net margin of -47.22% compared to Siyata Mobile's net margin of -255.03%. Algoma Steel Group's return on equity of -125.08% beat Siyata Mobile's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Siyata Mobile-255.03% -154.13% -49.24%
Algoma Steel Group -47.22%-125.08%-0.63%

5.3% of Siyata Mobile shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.2% of Algoma Steel Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Siyata Mobile shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of Algoma Steel Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Siyata Mobile has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Algoma Steel Group has a beta of 1.623325, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

Siyata Mobile has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Algoma Steel Group. Siyata Mobile is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Algoma Steel Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Siyata MobileC$7.45M2.71-C$19M-C$4.96N/A
Algoma Steel GroupC$1.87B0.31-C$150.59M-C$10.29N/A

In the previous week, Algoma Steel Group had 1 more articles in the media than Siyata Mobile. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Algoma Steel Group and 0 mentions for Siyata Mobile. Siyata Mobile's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Algoma Steel Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Siyata Mobile Neutral
Algoma Steel Group Neutral

Algoma Steel Group has a consensus price target of C$8.17, indicating a potential upside of 48.22%. Given Algoma Steel Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Algoma Steel Group is more favorable than Siyata Mobile.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Siyata Mobile
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Algoma Steel Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Algoma Steel Group beats Siyata Mobile on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Algoma Steel Group compare to Cielo Waste Solutions?

Cielo Waste Solutions (CVE:CMC) and Algoma Steel Group (TSE:ASTL) are both small-cap steel works companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Cielo Waste Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Algoma Steel Group. Cielo Waste Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Algoma Steel Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cielo Waste SolutionsN/AN/A-C$20.16M-C$0.03N/A
Algoma Steel GroupC$1.87B0.31-C$150.59M-C$10.29N/A

Cielo Waste Solutions has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Algoma Steel Group's net margin of -47.22%. Cielo Waste Solutions' return on equity of 123.35% beat Algoma Steel Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cielo Waste SolutionsN/A 123.35% -12.70%
Algoma Steel Group -47.22%-125.08%-0.63%

Cielo Waste Solutions has a beta of -1.034337, indicating that its share price is 203% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Algoma Steel Group has a beta of 1.623325, indicating that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Cielo Waste Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.2% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.7% of Cielo Waste Solutions shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Algoma Steel Group had 1 more articles in the media than Cielo Waste Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Algoma Steel Group and 0 mentions for Cielo Waste Solutions. Cielo Waste Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Algoma Steel Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cielo Waste Solutions Neutral
Algoma Steel Group Neutral

Algoma Steel Group has a consensus target price of C$8.17, suggesting a potential upside of 48.22%. Given Algoma Steel Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Algoma Steel Group is more favorable than Cielo Waste Solutions.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cielo Waste Solutions
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Algoma Steel Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Algoma Steel Group beats Cielo Waste Solutions on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Algoma Steel Group compare to Trifecta Gold?

Algoma Steel Group (TSE:ASTL) and Trifecta Gold (CVE:TG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Algoma Steel Group and Algoma Steel Group both had 1 articles in the media. Algoma Steel Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trifecta Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Algoma Steel Group Neutral
Trifecta Gold Neutral

Trifecta Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Algoma Steel Group's net margin of -47.22%. Trifecta Gold's return on equity of -7.83% beat Algoma Steel Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Algoma Steel Group-47.22% -125.08% -0.63%
Trifecta Gold N/A -7.83%-3.64%

Algoma Steel Group presently has a consensus price target of C$8.17, suggesting a potential upside of 48.22%. Given Algoma Steel Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Algoma Steel Group is more favorable than Trifecta Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Algoma Steel Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Trifecta Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

18.2% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Trifecta Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 7.6% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Trifecta Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Trifecta Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Algoma Steel Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Algoma Steel GroupC$1.87B0.31-C$150.59M-C$10.29N/A
Trifecta GoldN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Algoma Steel Group has a beta of 1.623325, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifecta Gold has a beta of 0.616993, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Algoma Steel Group beats Trifecta Gold on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Algoma Steel Group compare to Alba Minerals?

Algoma Steel Group (TSE:ASTL) and Alba Minerals (CVE:AA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Alba Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Algoma Steel Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Algoma Steel GroupC$1.87B0.31-C$150.59M-C$10.29N/A
Alba MineralsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

18.2% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by institutional investors. 7.6% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Algoma Steel Group had 1 more articles in the media than Alba Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Algoma Steel Group and 0 mentions for Alba Minerals. Algoma Steel Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alba Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Algoma Steel Group Neutral
Alba Minerals Neutral

Alba Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Algoma Steel Group's net margin of -47.22%. Alba Minerals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Algoma Steel Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Algoma Steel Group-47.22% -125.08% -0.63%
Alba Minerals N/A N/A N/A

Algoma Steel Group currently has a consensus target price of C$8.17, suggesting a potential upside of 48.22%. Given Algoma Steel Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Algoma Steel Group is more favorable than Alba Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Algoma Steel Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Alba Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Algoma Steel Group beats Alba Minerals on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Algoma Steel Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ASTL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ASTL vs. The Competition

MetricAlgoma Steel GroupSteel IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$580.69MC$1.01BC$4.68BC$13.07B
Dividend Yield2.43%9.14%5.02%6.18%
P/E Ratio-0.543.9821.4736.51
Price / Sales0.3110.706,341.2010.34
Price / Cash1.8716.2626.8182.29
Price / Book1.220.888.784.52
Net Income-C$150.59MC$197.22MC$157.26MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-7.24%7.31%1.40%1.85%
1 Month Performance-20.61%4.58%-1.84%1.71%
1 Year Performance-41.82%10.17%46.42%36.40%

Algoma Steel Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ASTL
Algoma Steel Group
1.3795 of 5 stars
C$5.51
+2.8%
C$8.17
+48.2%
-41.8%C$580.69MC$1.87BN/A2,730
TXR
TerraX Minerals
N/AC$0.28
+16.7%
N/A+0.0%C$44.97MN/AN/A20,100
SIM
Siyata Mobile
N/AC$6.50
-3.7%
N/A+0.0%C$20.22MC$7.45MN/A5,310
CMC
Cielo Waste Solutions
N/AC$0.07
-7.1%
N/A+25.0%C$12.49MN/AN/A12,500
TG
Trifecta Gold
N/AC$0.21
+7.9%
N/A-39.1%C$9.78MN/AN/A2,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:ASTL) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners