Canfor Competitors

Teck Resources (TSE:TECK.B) and Canfor (TSE:CFP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Teck Resources and Canfor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Teck Resources and Canfor's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Canfor has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Teck Resources. Teck Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canfor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Teck Resources and Canfor, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Teck Resources currently has a consensus price target of C$30.11, suggesting a potential downside of 1.57%. Canfor has a consensus price target of C$40.67, suggesting a potential upside of 18.11%. Given Canfor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Canfor is more favorable than Teck Resources.

Summary

Canfor beats Teck Resources on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Canfor (TSE:CFP) and Kirkland Lake Gold (TSE:KL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Canfor and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Canfor and Kirkland Lake Gold's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Canfor has higher revenue and earnings than Kirkland Lake Gold. Canfor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kirkland Lake Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Canfor and Kirkland Lake Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.

Canfor presently has a consensus target price of C$40.67, suggesting a potential upside of 18.11%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus target price of C$68.18, suggesting a potential upside of 37.63%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Canfor.

Summary

Canfor beats Kirkland Lake Gold on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Canfor (TSE:CFP) and Augusta Gold (TSE:G) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Canfor and Augusta Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.

Canfor presently has a consensus target price of C$40.67, suggesting a potential upside of 18.11%.

Profitability

This table compares Canfor and Augusta Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Canfor and Augusta Gold's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Canfor has higher revenue and earnings than Augusta Gold. Augusta Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canfor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Canfor beats Augusta Gold on 6 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (TSE:K) and Canfor (TSE:CFP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Kinross Gold and Canfor, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus target price of C$14.57, suggesting a potential upside of 55.84%. Canfor has a consensus target price of C$40.67, suggesting a potential upside of 18.11%. Given Kinross Gold's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Canfor.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Canfor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Kinross Gold and Canfor's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Kinross Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Canfor. Canfor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinross Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Canfor on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ivanhoe Mines (TSE:IVN) and Canfor (TSE:CFP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ivanhoe Mines and Canfor's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Canfor has higher revenue and earnings than Ivanhoe Mines. Ivanhoe Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canfor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Ivanhoe Mines and Canfor, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Ivanhoe Mines currently has a consensus target price of C$8.96, suggesting a potential downside of 3.79%. Canfor has a consensus target price of C$40.67, suggesting a potential upside of 18.11%. Given Canfor's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Canfor is more favorable than Ivanhoe Mines.

Profitability

This table compares Ivanhoe Mines and Canfor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Canfor beats Ivanhoe Mines on 7 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Canfor (TSE:CFP) and Lundin Mining (TSE:LUN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Canfor and Lundin Mining's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Canfor has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Mining. Canfor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Canfor and Lundin Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Canfor currently has a consensus price target of C$40.67, suggesting a potential upside of 18.11%. Lundin Mining has a consensus price target of C$15.50, suggesting a potential upside of 4.29%. Given Canfor's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Canfor is more favorable than Lundin Mining.

Profitability

This table compares Canfor and Lundin Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Canfor beats Lundin Mining on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.