Go Pro

Interfor (IFP) Competitors

Interfor logo
C$14.12 +0.88 (+6.65%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

IFP vs. CFP, PL, ADN, WEF, and GDL

Should you buy Interfor stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Interfor with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Interfor include Canfor (CFP), Pinnacle Renewable Energy (PL), Acadian Timber (ADN), Western Forest Products (WEF), and Goodfellow (GDL).

How does Interfor compare to Canfor?

Canfor (TSE:CFP) and Interfor (TSE:IFP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Interfor has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Canfor. Canfor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interfor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CanforC$5.43B0.34-C$734.03M-C$5.58N/A
InterforC$2.71B0.34-C$426.19M-C$6.54N/A

Canfor presently has a consensus target price of C$17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.80%. Interfor has a consensus target price of C$13.17, suggesting a potential downside of 6.75%. Given Canfor's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Canfor is more favorable than Interfor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Canfor
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Interfor
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Canfor had 6 more articles in the media than Interfor. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Canfor and 2 mentions for Interfor. Canfor's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Interfor's score of 0.37 indicating that Canfor is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Canfor
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Interfor
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Canfor has a beta of 1.412006, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interfor has a beta of 1.628663, meaning that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Canfor has a net margin of -12.04% compared to Interfor's net margin of -13.73%. Canfor's return on equity of -25.37% beat Interfor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Canfor-12.04% -25.37% -5.36%
Interfor -13.73%-28.72%-4.54%

15.5% of Canfor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.2% of Interfor shares are held by institutional investors. 53.9% of Canfor shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Interfor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Canfor beats Interfor on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interfor compare to Pinnacle Renewable Energy?

Pinnacle Renewable Energy (TSE:PL) and Interfor (TSE:IFP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Pinnacle Renewable Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Interfor. Interfor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinnacle Renewable Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pinnacle Renewable EnergyC$490.50M0.00-C$5.04M-C$0.15N/A
InterforC$2.71B0.34-C$426.19M-C$6.54N/A

In the previous week, Interfor had 2 more articles in the media than Pinnacle Renewable Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Interfor and 0 mentions for Pinnacle Renewable Energy. Interfor's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Pinnacle Renewable Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Interfor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pinnacle Renewable Energy Neutral
Interfor Neutral

44.2% of Interfor shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Interfor shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pinnacle Renewable Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Interfor's net margin of -13.73%. Pinnacle Renewable Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Interfor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pinnacle Renewable EnergyN/A N/A N/A
Interfor -13.73%-28.72%-4.54%

Interfor has a consensus target price of C$13.17, suggesting a potential downside of 6.75%. Given Pinnacle Renewable Energy's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Pinnacle Renewable Energy is more favorable than Interfor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pinnacle Renewable Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Interfor
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Interfor beats Pinnacle Renewable Energy on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interfor compare to Acadian Timber?

Acadian Timber (TSE:ADN) and Interfor (TSE:IFP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Acadian Timber currently has a consensus price target of C$18.25, indicating a potential upside of 3.11%. Interfor has a consensus price target of C$13.17, indicating a potential downside of 6.75%. Given Acadian Timber's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Acadian Timber is more favorable than Interfor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acadian Timber
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Interfor
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Acadian Timber has a beta of 0.361999, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interfor has a beta of 1.628663, indicating that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Acadian Timber has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Interfor. Interfor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadian Timber, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acadian TimberC$85.53M3.82C$28.05MC$2.686.60
InterforC$2.71B0.34-C$426.19M-C$6.54N/A

Acadian Timber has a net margin of 57.04% compared to Interfor's net margin of -13.73%. Acadian Timber's return on equity of 13.97% beat Interfor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acadian Timber57.04% 13.97% 2.84%
Interfor -13.73%-28.72%-4.54%

In the previous week, Acadian Timber and Acadian Timber both had 2 articles in the media. Acadian Timber's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Interfor's score of 0.37 indicating that Acadian Timber is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Acadian Timber
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Interfor
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

7.1% of Acadian Timber shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.2% of Interfor shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.4% of Acadian Timber shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Interfor shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Acadian Timber beats Interfor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interfor compare to Western Forest Products?

Western Forest Products (TSE:WEF) and Interfor (TSE:IFP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

Western Forest Products has a net margin of -12.23% compared to Interfor's net margin of -13.73%. Western Forest Products' return on equity of -22.88% beat Interfor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Western Forest Products-12.23% -22.88% -4.24%
Interfor -13.73%-28.72%-4.54%

Western Forest Products has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Interfor. Interfor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Western Forest Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Western Forest ProductsC$925.50M0.22-C$43.70M-C$10.72N/A
InterforC$2.71B0.34-C$426.19M-C$6.54N/A

Western Forest Products has a beta of 0.225929, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interfor has a beta of 1.628663, meaning that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

14.4% of Western Forest Products shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.2% of Interfor shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Western Forest Products shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Interfor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Interfor had 1 more articles in the media than Western Forest Products. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Interfor and 1 mentions for Western Forest Products. Interfor's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Western Forest Products' score of 0.29 indicating that Interfor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Western Forest Products
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Interfor
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Western Forest Products currently has a consensus price target of C$17.40, indicating a potential downside of 9.19%. Interfor has a consensus price target of C$13.17, indicating a potential downside of 6.75%. Given Interfor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Interfor is more favorable than Western Forest Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Western Forest Products
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Interfor
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Interfor beats Western Forest Products on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Interfor compare to Goodfellow?

Goodfellow (TSE:GDL) and Interfor (TSE:IFP) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Interfor has a consensus target price of C$13.17, suggesting a potential downside of 6.75%. Given Interfor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Interfor is more favorable than Goodfellow.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goodfellow
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Interfor
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Goodfellow has a beta of 0.309825, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interfor has a beta of 1.628663, meaning that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Interfor had 1 more articles in the media than Goodfellow. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Interfor and 1 mentions for Goodfellow. Interfor's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Goodfellow's score of 0.00 indicating that Interfor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Goodfellow
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Interfor
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

12.0% of Goodfellow shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.2% of Interfor shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.1% of Goodfellow shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Interfor shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Goodfellow has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Interfor's net margin of -13.73%. Goodfellow's return on equity of 2.85% beat Interfor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goodfellow1.11% 2.85% 4.55%
Interfor -13.73%-28.72%-4.54%

Goodfellow has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Interfor. Interfor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goodfellow, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoodfellowC$530.28M0.18C$12.99MC$0.7016.07
InterforC$2.71B0.34-C$426.19M-C$6.54N/A

Summary

Interfor beats Goodfellow on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Interfor News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IFP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IFP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IFP vs. The Competition

MetricInterforPaper & Forest Products IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$928.63MC$3.76BC$4.89BC$12.56B
Dividend Yield12.47%10.27%4.73%6.21%
P/E Ratio-2.1612.8421.1534.65
Price / Sales0.346.615,304.439.85
Price / Cash8.5237.9926.8382.29
Price / Book0.761.928.754.57
Net Income-C$426.19MC$163.64MC$154.73MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance14.70%4.07%7.34%3.87%
1 Month Performance11.71%7.78%4.99%2.85%
1 Year Performance15.17%-1.64%44.05%35.83%

Interfor Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IFP
Interfor
1.2588 of 5 stars
C$14.12
+6.6%
C$13.17
-6.8%
+6.5%C$928.63MC$2.71BN/A5,390
CFP
Canfor
1.5042 of 5 stars
C$13.96
flat
C$16.60
+18.9%
+17.7%C$1.64BC$5.28BN/A7,580
PL
Pinnacle Renewable Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$376.63MC$490.50MN/A800
ADN
Acadian Timber
1.8713 of 5 stars
C$17.98
flat
C$18.25
+1.5%
-3.0%C$331.84MC$85.53M6.71200
WEF
Western Forest Products
1.428 of 5 stars
C$17.80
flat
C$17.40
-2.2%
+39.6%C$187.93MC$925.50MN/A2,051

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:IFP) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners