Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CLS or PNG?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Kraken Robotics. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica C$15.59B 3.43 C$269.99M C$8.25 51.34 Kraken Robotics C$107.79M 16.64 C$10.63M N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to CLS or PNG?

In the previous week, Celestica had 6 more articles in the media than Kraken Robotics. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Celestica and 1 mentions for Kraken Robotics. Kraken Robotics' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Celestica's score of 0.70 indicating that Kraken Robotics is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Celestica 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kraken Robotics 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CLS or BLN?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Blackline Safety. Blackline Safety is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica C$15.59B 3.43 C$269.99M C$8.25 51.34 Blackline Safety C$160.00M 4.95 -C$13.93M -C$0.11 N/A

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CLS or FTG?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Firan Technology Group. Firan Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Celestica C$15.59B 3.43 C$269.99M C$8.25 51.34 Firan Technology Group C$199.43M 2.54 C$10.76M C$0.59 34.05

Do analysts prefer PHO or CLS?

Celestica has a consensus price target of C$388.33, indicating a potential downside of 8.32%. Given Photon Control's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Photon Control is more favorable than Celestica. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Photon Control 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Celestica 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 6 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.75

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PHO or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Photon Control. Photon Control is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Photon Control C$65.31M 0.00 C$10.40M C$0.10 N/A Celestica C$15.59B 3.43 C$269.99M C$8.25 51.34

Which has higher earnings & valuation, QTRH or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Quarterhill. Quarterhill is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterhill C$159.33M 2.09 -C$22.26M -C$0.43 N/A Celestica C$15.59B 3.43 C$269.99M C$8.25 51.34

Is QTRH or CLS more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Quarterhill's net margin of -31.81%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.28% beat Quarterhill's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Quarterhill -31.81% -56.86% -2.24% Celestica 7.15% 50.28% 5.50%

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

C$423.57 +16.21 (+3.98%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

CLS vs. PNG, BLN, FTG, PHO, and QTRH

Should you buy Celestica stock or one of its competitors? Celestica's main competitors and comparable companies include Kraken Robotics (PNG), Blackline Safety (BLN), Firan Technology Group (FTG), Photon Control (PHO), and Quarterhill (QTRH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment, instruments & components" industry.

How does Celestica compare to Kraken Robotics?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Kraken Robotics (CVE:PNG) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Celestica had 6 more articles in the media than Kraken Robotics. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Celestica and 1 mentions for Kraken Robotics. Kraken Robotics' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Celestica's score of 0.70 indicating that Kraken Robotics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kraken Robotics	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Celestica has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Kraken Robotics' net margin of -0.63%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.28% beat Kraken Robotics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.15%	50.28%	5.50%
Kraken Robotics	-0.63%	-0.33%	10.68%

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Kraken Robotics.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	C$15.59B	3.43	C$269.99M	C$8.25	51.34
Kraken Robotics	C$107.79M	16.64	C$10.63M	N/A	N/A

Celestica has a beta of 1.531281, indicating that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kraken Robotics has a beta of 0.911401, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Celestica currently has a consensus target price of C$388.33, suggesting a potential downside of 8.32%. Kraken Robotics has a consensus target price of C$9.35, suggesting a potential upside of 60.10%. Given Kraken Robotics' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kraken Robotics is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	6 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.75
Kraken Robotics	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

46.9% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of Kraken Robotics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Kraken Robotics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Celestica beats Kraken Robotics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Blackline Safety?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Blackline Safety (TSE:BLN) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Celestica had 7 more articles in the media than Blackline Safety. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Blackline Safety. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Blackline Safety's score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	Positive
Blackline Safety	Neutral

46.9% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.5% of Blackline Safety shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.1% of Blackline Safety shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica presently has a consensus price target of C$388.33, suggesting a potential downside of 8.32%. Blackline Safety has a consensus price target of C$9.27, suggesting a potential upside of 2.45%. Given Blackline Safety's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blackline Safety is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	6 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.75
Blackline Safety	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Blackline Safety. Blackline Safety is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	C$15.59B	3.43	C$269.99M	C$8.25	51.34
Blackline Safety	C$160.00M	4.95	-C$13.93M	-C$0.11	N/A

Celestica has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Blackline Safety's net margin of -6.11%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.28% beat Blackline Safety's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.15%	50.28%	5.50%
Blackline Safety	-6.11%	-13.09%	-8.43%

Celestica has a beta of 1.531281, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackline Safety has a beta of 0.947202, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celestica beats Blackline Safety on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Firan Technology Group?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Firan Technology Group (TSE:FTG) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

46.9% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.8% of Firan Technology Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 32.6% of Firan Technology Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Celestica had 7 more articles in the media than Firan Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Firan Technology Group. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Firan Technology Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Celestica	Positive
Firan Technology Group	Neutral

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Firan Technology Group. Firan Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Celestica	C$15.59B	3.43	C$269.99M	C$8.25	51.34
Firan Technology Group	C$199.43M	2.54	C$10.76M	C$0.59	34.05

Celestica currently has a consensus target price of C$388.33, suggesting a potential downside of 8.32%. Firan Technology Group has a consensus target price of C$30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.33%. Given Firan Technology Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Firan Technology Group is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	6 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.75
Firan Technology Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Celestica has a beta of 1.531281, suggesting that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Firan Technology Group has a beta of 2.148464, suggesting that its share price is 115% more volatile than the broader market.

Firan Technology Group has a net margin of 7.46% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.15%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.28% beat Firan Technology Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Celestica	7.15%	50.28%	5.50%
Firan Technology Group	7.46%	15.33%	7.10%

Summary

Celestica beats Firan Technology Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Photon Control?

Photon Control (TSE:PHO) and Celestica (TSE:CLS) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Celestica has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Photon Control's net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.28% beat Photon Control's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Photon Control	N/A	N/A	N/A
Celestica	7.15%	50.28%	5.50%

Celestica has a consensus price target of C$388.33, indicating a potential downside of 8.32%. Given Photon Control's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Photon Control is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Photon Control	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	6 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.75

In the previous week, Celestica had 7 more articles in the media than Photon Control. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Photon Control. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Photon Control's score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Photon Control	Neutral
Celestica	Positive

46.9% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Photon Control. Photon Control is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Photon Control	C$65.31M	0.00	C$10.40M	C$0.10	N/A
Celestica	C$15.59B	3.43	C$269.99M	C$8.25	51.34

Summary

Celestica beats Photon Control on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Quarterhill?

Quarterhill (TSE:QTRH) and Celestica (TSE:CLS) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Quarterhill. Quarterhill is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quarterhill	C$159.33M	2.09	-C$22.26M	-C$0.43	N/A
Celestica	C$15.59B	3.43	C$269.99M	C$8.25	51.34

Celestica has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Quarterhill's net margin of -31.81%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.28% beat Quarterhill's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quarterhill	-31.81%	-56.86%	-2.24%
Celestica	7.15%	50.28%	5.50%

6.3% of Quarterhill shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.9% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Quarterhill shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Quarterhill has a beta of 0.087901, suggesting that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 1.531281, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

Quarterhill presently has a consensus target price of C$5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 81.82%. Celestica has a consensus target price of C$388.33, suggesting a potential downside of 8.32%. Given Quarterhill's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Quarterhill is more favorable than Celestica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quarterhill	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	6 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.75

In the previous week, Celestica had 7 more articles in the media than Quarterhill. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Quarterhill. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Quarterhill's score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Quarterhill	Neutral
Celestica	Positive

Summary

Celestica beats Quarterhill on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Celestica	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry	Technology Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$53.42B	C$8.68B	C$28.98B	C$12.63B
Dividend Yield	0.76%	2.27%	2.74%	6.22%
P/E Ratio	51.34	29.51	72.07	39.08
Price / Sales	3.43	44.94	590.24	10.49
Price / Cash	5.22	32.34	49.03	82.29
Price / Book	19.68	4.94	7.86	4.84
Net Income	C$269.99M	C$201.66M	C$676.63M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-1.95%	-1.35%	0.35%	1.82%
1 Month Performance	-1.51%	2.36%	4.40%	5.59%
1 Year Performance	58.47%	821.89%	188.64%	35.31%

Celestica Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLS Celestica	2.1052 of 5 stars	C$423.57 +4.0%	C$388.33 -8.3%	+55.8%	C$53.42B	C$15.59B	51.34	23,900	Analyst Upgrade Gap Up
PNG Kraken Robotics	2.7422 of 5 stars	C$6.09 -2.6%	C$9.35 +53.5%	+66.2%	C$1.92B	C$107.79M	744.00	262
BLN Blackline Safety	N/A	C$9.05 flat	C$9.27 +2.4%	+31.2%	C$791.31M	C$160.00M	N/A	496
FTG Firan Technology Group	N/A	C$25.60 +6.3%	C$30.00 +17.2%	+61.9%	C$644.43M	C$199.43M	43.39	450
PHO Photon Control	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$378.34M	C$65.31M	36.36	142

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CLS) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

CLS vs. PNG, BLN, FTG, PHO, and QTRH

How does Celestica compare to Kraken Robotics?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Blackline Safety?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Firan Technology Group?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Photon Control?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Quarterhill?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLS vs. The Competition

Celestica Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

CLS vs. PNG, BLN, FTG, PHO, and QTRH

How does Celestica compare to Kraken Robotics?

Does the media refer more to CLS or PNG?

Is CLS or PNG more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CLS or PNG?

Which has more volatility & risk, CLS or PNG?

Do analysts rate CLS or PNG?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CLS or PNG?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Blackline Safety?

Does the media favor CLS or BLN?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CLS or BLN?

Do analysts prefer CLS or BLN?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CLS or BLN?

Is CLS or BLN more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, CLS or BLN?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Firan Technology Group?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CLS or FTG?

Does the media refer more to CLS or FTG?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CLS or FTG?

Do analysts prefer CLS or FTG?

Which has more risk and volatility, CLS or FTG?

Is CLS or FTG more profitable?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Photon Control?

Is PHO or CLS more profitable?

Do analysts prefer PHO or CLS?

Does the media prefer PHO or CLS?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PHO or CLS?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PHO or CLS?

Summary

How does Celestica compare to Quarterhill?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, QTRH or CLS?

Is QTRH or CLS more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of QTRH or CLS?

Which has more volatility & risk, QTRH or CLS?

Do analysts recommend QTRH or CLS?

Does the media prefer QTRH or CLS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CLS vs. The Competition

Celestica Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools