Celestica (CLS) Competitors

Celestica logo
C$478.58 -33.64 (-6.57%)
As of 04:18 PM Eastern

CLS vs. NA, MX, MAXR, MSI, and MNW

Should you buy Celestica stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Celestica with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Celestica include National Bank of Canada (NA), Methanex (MX), Maxar Technologies (MAXR), Morneau Shepell (MSI), and Mitel Networks (MNW). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Celestica compare to National Bank of Canada?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and National Bank of Canada (TSE:NA) are both large-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Celestica and Celestica both had 1 articles in the media. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled National Bank of Canada'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celestica
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
National Bank of Canada
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

National Bank of Canada has a net margin of 16.87% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.95%. Celestica's return on equity of 47.41% beat National Bank of Canada's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica6.95% 47.41% 5.50%
National Bank of Canada 16.87%13.77%0.83%

Celestica has a beta of 1.614906, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, National Bank of Canada has a beta of 1.400077, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of C$367.50, suggesting a potential downside of 23.21%. National Bank of Canada has a consensus price target of C$199.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.15%. Given National Bank of Canada's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe National Bank of Canada is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.83
National Bank of Canada
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.27

45.6% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.3% of National Bank of Canada shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of National Bank of Canada shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

National Bank of Canada has higher revenue and earnings than Celestica. National Bank of Canada is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$13.79B3.99C$269.99MC$8.2558.01
National Bank of CanadaC$14.92B5.73C$4.38BC$11.3019.65

Summary

Celestica beats National Bank of Canada on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Methanex?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Methanex (TSE:MX) are both electronic equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Celestica presently has a consensus price target of C$367.50, indicating a potential downside of 23.21%. Methanex has a consensus price target of C$60.00, indicating a potential downside of 11.88%. Given Methanex's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Methanex is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.83
Methanex
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Celestica has a beta of 1.614906, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Methanex has a beta of 0.555104, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Celestica had 1 more articles in the media than Methanex. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Methanex. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Methanex'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celestica Neutral
Methanex Neutral

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Methanex. Methanex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$13.79B3.99C$269.99MC$8.2558.01
MethanexC$3.67B1.44C$107.23M-C$0.73N/A

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Methanex's net margin of -1.26%. Celestica's return on equity of 47.41% beat Methanex's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica6.95% 47.41% 5.50%
Methanex -1.26%-1.84%1.99%

45.6% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.9% of Methanex shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Methanex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Celestica beats Methanex on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Maxar Technologies?

Maxar Technologies (TSE:MAXR) and Celestica (TSE:CLS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

77.3% of Maxar Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.6% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Maxar Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Maxar Technologies has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 1.614906, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has a consensus price target of C$367.50, indicating a potential downside of 23.21%. Given Maxar Technologies' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Maxar Technologies is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Maxar Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.83

In the previous week, Celestica had 1 more articles in the media than Maxar Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Maxar Technologies. Maxar Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Celestica'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Maxar Technologies Neutral
Celestica Neutral

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Maxar Technologies. Maxar Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maxar TechnologiesC$1.60B0.00-C$150M-C$2.75N/A
CelesticaC$13.79B3.99C$269.99MC$8.2558.01

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Maxar Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 47.41% beat Maxar Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Maxar TechnologiesN/A -10.52% 0.64%
Celestica 6.95%47.41%5.50%

Summary

Celestica beats Maxar Technologies on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Morneau Shepell?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Morneau Shepell (TSE:MSI) are both electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, Celestica had 1 more articles in the media than Morneau Shepell. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Morneau Shepell. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Morneau Shepell'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celestica Neutral
Morneau Shepell Neutral

45.6% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Morneau Shepell's net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 47.41% beat Morneau Shepell's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica6.95% 47.41% 5.50%
Morneau Shepell N/A N/A N/A

Celestica presently has a consensus target price of C$367.50, suggesting a potential downside of 23.21%. Given Morneau Shepell's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Morneau Shepell is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.83
Morneau Shepell
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Morneau Shepell. Morneau Shepell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$13.79B3.99C$269.99MC$8.2558.01
Morneau ShepellC$993.25M0.00C$26.55MC$0.39N/A

Summary

Celestica beats Morneau Shepell on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Mitel Networks?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Mitel Networks (TSE:MNW) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Celestica had 1 more articles in the media than Mitel Networks. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Mitel Networks. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mitel Networks'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celestica Neutral
Mitel Networks Neutral

Celestica presently has a consensus target price of C$367.50, suggesting a potential downside of 23.21%. Given Mitel Networks' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mitel Networks is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.83
Mitel Networks
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Mitel Networks. Mitel Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$13.79B3.99C$269.99MC$8.2558.01
Mitel NetworksC$1.30B0.00-C$14.15M-C$0.12N/A

45.6% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Mitel Networks' net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 47.41% beat Mitel Networks' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica6.95% 47.41% 5.50%
Mitel Networks N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Celestica beats Mitel Networks on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLS vs. The Competition

MetricCelesticaElectronic Components IndustryComputer SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$55.02BC$3.81BC$37.47BC$12.19B
Dividend Yield0.76%2.75%3.30%6.19%
P/E Ratio58.0111.3579.7035.86
Price / Sales3.9998.21611.8710.01
Price / Cash5.2250.3746.3382.29
Price / Book26.214.829.554.43
Net IncomeC$269.99MC$40.73MC$1.07BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-8.91%-2.57%-1.06%-1.13%
1 Month Performance-6.65%9.57%0.02%-2.31%
1 Year Performance133.51%91.17%154.16%37.10%

Celestica Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLS
Celestica
1.6079 of 5 stars
C$478.58
-6.6%
C$367.50
-23.2%
+150.5%C$55.02BC$13.79B58.0123,900
NA
National Bank of Canada
1.4021 of 5 stars
C$223.10
+0.6%
C$199.50
-10.6%
+62.7%C$85.93BC$14.92B19.7428,730
MX
Methanex
1.2951 of 5 stars
C$74.70
-1.2%
C$60.00
-19.7%
+48.7%C$5.78BC$3.67BN/A900
MAXR
Maxar Technologies
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.35BC$1.60BN/A4,600
MSI
Morneau Shepell
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$2.22BC$993.25M83.5520,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CLS) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners