CLS vs. MAXR, MSI, MNW, MX, CTS, ICG, PL, VLN, VCM, and ESP
Should you be buying Celestica stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Celestica include Maxar Technologies (MAXR), Morneau Shepell (MSI), Mitel Networks (MNW), Methanex (MX), Converge Technology Solutions (CTS), Integra Gold (ICG), Pinnacle Renewable Energy (PL), Velan (VLN), Vecima Networks (VCM), and Brompton Energy Split (ESP). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.
Celestica vs.
Maxar Technologies (TSE:MAXR) and Celestica (TSE:CLS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their community ranking, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.
77.3% of Maxar Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Maxar Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Celestica has a consensus price target of C$110.50, indicating a potential downside of 6.06%. Given Maxar Technologies' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Maxar Technologies is more favorable than Celestica.
In the previous week, Celestica had 16 more articles in the media than Maxar Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Maxar Technologies. Maxar Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Celestica's score of -0.39 indicating that Maxar Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Celestica has a net margin of 4.08% compared to Maxar Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 21.24% beat Maxar Technologies' return on equity.
Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Maxar Technologies. Maxar Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Maxar Technologies received 49 more outperform votes than Celestica when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 71.12% of users gave Maxar Technologies an outperform vote while only 56.07% of users gave Celestica an outperform vote.
Maxar Technologies has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.23, indicating that its share price is 123% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Celestica beats Maxar Technologies on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Celestica Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (TSE:CLS) was last updated on 5/1/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff