Free Trial
Your Rate Never Goes Up! Save $100 a Year on MarketBeat All Access
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Celestica (CLS) Competitors

Celestica logo
C$364.40 -12.29 (-3.26%)
As of 10/23/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

CLS vs. PNG, FTG, BLN, QTRH, and PHO

Should you buy Celestica stock or one of its competitors? Celestica's main competitors and comparable companies include Kraken Robotics (PNG), Firan Technology Group (FTG), Blackline Safety (BLN), Quarterhill (QTRH), and Photon Control (PHO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment, instruments & components" industry.

How does Celestica compare to Kraken Robotics?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Kraken Robotics (CVE:PNG) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

43.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Kraken Robotics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Kraken Robotics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Kraken Robotics. Kraken Robotics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$15.59B2.95C$269.99MC$9.6337.84
Kraken RoboticsC$108.72M13.90C$10.63M-C$0.02N/A

Celestica presently has a consensus target price of C$388.33, suggesting a potential upside of 6.57%. Kraken Robotics has a consensus target price of C$8.67, suggesting a potential upside of 112.94%. Given Kraken Robotics' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kraken Robotics is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
7 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.78
Kraken Robotics
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Celestica and Celestica both had 4 articles in the media. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Kraken Robotics' score of 0.03 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celestica
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Kraken Robotics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Kraken Robotics' net margin of -6.90%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.64% beat Kraken Robotics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica7.16% 50.64% 5.50%
Kraken Robotics -6.90%-3.17%10.68%

Celestica has a beta of 1.359556, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kraken Robotics has a beta of 1.026757, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celestica beats Kraken Robotics on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Firan Technology Group?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Firan Technology Group (TSE:FTG) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Firan Technology Group. Celestica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Firan Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$15.59B2.95C$269.99MC$9.6337.84
Firan Technology GroupC$215.79M3.96C$10.76MC$0.8838.56

In the previous week, Celestica had 1 more articles in the media than Firan Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Celestica and 3 mentions for Firan Technology Group. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Firan Technology Group's score of -0.07 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celestica
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Firan Technology Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Firan Technology Group has a net margin of 10.22% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.64% beat Firan Technology Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica7.16% 50.64% 5.50%
Firan Technology Group 10.22%21.62%7.10%

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of C$388.33, suggesting a potential upside of 6.57%. Firan Technology Group has a consensus price target of C$35.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.15%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Firan Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
7 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.78
Firan Technology Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

43.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of Firan Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.6% of Firan Technology Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celestica has a beta of 1.359556, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Firan Technology Group has a beta of 1.661819, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celestica beats Firan Technology Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Blackline Safety?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Blackline Safety (TSE:BLN) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Celestica has a beta of 1.359556, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackline Safety has a beta of 0.947202, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

43.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.5% of Blackline Safety shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 30.1% of Blackline Safety shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Blackline Safety. Blackline Safety is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$15.59B2.95C$269.99MC$9.6337.84
Blackline SafetyC$160.00M4.95-C$13.93M-C$0.11N/A

In the previous week, Celestica had 4 more articles in the media than Blackline Safety. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Blackline Safety. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Blackline Safety's score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celestica Neutral
Blackline Safety Neutral

Celestica presently has a consensus price target of C$388.33, indicating a potential upside of 6.57%. Blackline Safety has a consensus price target of C$9.16, indicating a potential upside of 1.19%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than Blackline Safety.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
7 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.78
Blackline Safety
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Blackline Safety's net margin of -6.11%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.64% beat Blackline Safety's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica7.16% 50.64% 5.50%
Blackline Safety -6.11%-13.09%-8.43%

Summary

Celestica beats Blackline Safety on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Quarterhill?

Celestica (TSE:CLS) and Quarterhill (TSE:QTRH) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Celestica has a beta of 1.359556, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quarterhill has a beta of -0.234451, suggesting that its stock price is 123% less volatile than the broader market.

43.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.9% of Quarterhill shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Quarterhill shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica currently has a consensus price target of C$388.33, suggesting a potential upside of 6.57%. Quarterhill has a consensus price target of C$4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 66.05%. Given Quarterhill's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quarterhill is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
7 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.78
Quarterhill
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

In the previous week, Celestica had 3 more articles in the media than Quarterhill. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Celestica and 1 mentions for Quarterhill. Quarterhill's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Celestica's score of 0.17 indicating that Quarterhill is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celestica
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quarterhill
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Quarterhill. Quarterhill is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CelesticaC$15.59B2.95C$269.99MC$9.6337.84
QuarterhillC$159.33M2.42-C$22.26M-C$0.43N/A

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Quarterhill's net margin of -31.81%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.64% beat Quarterhill's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celestica7.16% 50.64% 5.50%
Quarterhill -31.81%-56.86%-2.24%

Summary

Celestica beats Quarterhill on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celestica compare to Photon Control?

Photon Control (TSE:PHO) and Celestica (TSE:CLS) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Celestica had 4 more articles in the media than Photon Control. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Celestica and 0 mentions for Photon Control. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Photon Control's score of 0.00 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Photon Control Neutral
Celestica Neutral

43.4% of Celestica shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Celestica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Photon Control's net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 50.64% beat Photon Control's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Photon ControlN/A N/A N/A
Celestica 7.16%50.64%5.50%

Celestica has a consensus target price of C$388.33, indicating a potential upside of 6.57%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Celestica is more favorable than Photon Control.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Photon Control
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
7 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.78

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Photon Control. Photon Control is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Photon ControlC$65.31M0.00C$10.40MC$0.10N/A
CelesticaC$15.59B2.95C$269.99MC$9.6337.84

Summary

Celestica beats Photon Control on 15 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celestica News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLS vs. The Competition

MetricCelesticaElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components IndustryTechnology SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$45.95BC$7.98BC$29.07BC$12.85B
Dividend Yield0.76%2.33%2.86%6.35%
P/E Ratio37.8426.7878.6936.62
Price / Sales2.9535.41575.848.21
Price / Cash5.2234.2945.5782.29
Price / Book16.904.057.714.24
Net IncomeC$269.99MC$177.57MC$766.52MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-15.11%-1.18%-0.05%-1.51%
1 Month Performance-30.98%-7.55%-5.66%-2.81%
1 Year Performance-12.30%754.64%158.25%13.87%

Celestica Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLS
Celestica
3.1292 of 5 stars
C$364.40
-3.3%
C$388.33
+6.6%
-7.9%C$45.95BC$15.59B37.8423,803
PNG
Kraken Robotics
2.3351 of 5 stars
C$4.00
-1.2%
C$9.00
+125.0%
-41.1%C$1.49BC$108.72MN/A433
FTG
Firan Technology Group
2.3374 of 5 stars
C$34.46
+0.3%
C$35.00
+1.6%
+204.3%C$867.46MC$215.79M39.16737
BLN
Blackline Safety
1.0655 of 5 stars
C$9.05
flat
C$9.16
+1.2%
+28.4%C$791.31MC$160.00MN/A496
QTRH
Quarterhill
2.531 of 5 stars
C$2.82
+0.4%
C$4.50
+59.6%
+153.3%C$401.00MC$159.33MN/A417

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CLS) was last updated on 10/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners