Century Global Commodities (CNT) Competitors

0.8% of Century Global Commodities shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.4% of Century Global Commodities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Relevium Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Century Global Commodities has a beta of -0.612615, indicating that its stock price is 161% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Relevium Technologies has a beta of 1.88, indicating that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

Century Global Commodities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Relevium Technologies. Century Global Commodities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Relevium Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Century Global Commodities has a net margin of -4.68% compared to Relevium Technologies' net margin of -18.50%. Relevium Technologies' return on equity of 0.00% beat Century Global Commodities' return on equity.

In the previous week, Century Global Commodities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Relevium Technologies'average media sentiment score.

0.8% of Century Global Commodities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Colabor Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.4% of Century Global Commodities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.0% of Colabor Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Century Global Commodities has a beta of -0.612615, indicating that its share price is 161% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Colabor Group has a beta of -0.532683, indicating that its share price is 153% less volatile than the broader market.

Colabor Group has a consensus target price of C$0.50, indicating a potential upside of 1,150.00%. Given Colabor Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Colabor Group is more favorable than Century Global Commodities.

Century Global Commodities has a net margin of -4.68% compared to Colabor Group's net margin of -20.08%. Century Global Commodities' return on equity of -3.82% beat Colabor Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, Century Global Commodities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Colabor Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Colabor Group has higher revenue and earnings than Century Global Commodities. Century Global Commodities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colabor Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Century Global Commodities has a net margin of -4.68% compared to Goodfood Market's net margin of -13.96%. Goodfood Market's return on equity of 41.50% beat Century Global Commodities' return on equity.

In the previous week, Century Global Commodities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Goodfood Market'saverage media sentiment score.

Century Global Commodities has a beta of -0.612615, suggesting that its share price is 161% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goodfood Market has a beta of 2.003403, suggesting that its share price is 100% more volatile than the broader market.

Goodfood Market has a consensus target price of C$0.05, indicating a potential upside of 66.67%. Given Goodfood Market's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Goodfood Market is more favorable than Century Global Commodities.

Century Global Commodities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Goodfood Market. Century Global Commodities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goodfood Market, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

0.8% of Century Global Commodities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goodfood Market shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.4% of Century Global Commodities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Goodfood Market shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

0.8% of Century Global Commodities shares are held by institutional investors. 27.3% of Kiaro shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 69.4% of Century Global Commodities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Kiaro's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Century Global Commodities'average media sentiment score.

Century Global Commodities has a net margin of -4.68% compared to Kiaro's net margin of -47.74%. Century Global Commodities' return on equity of -3.82% beat Kiaro's return on equity.

Century Global Commodities has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kiaro. Century Global Commodities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kiaro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kiaro has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Century Global Commodities has a beta of -0.612615, indicating that its share price is 161% less volatile than the broader market.