Go Pro

Century Global Commodities (CNT) Competitors

Century Global Commodities logo
C$0.04 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:08 PM Eastern

CNT vs. FAF, RLV, GCL, FOOD, and KO

Should you buy Century Global Commodities stock or one of its competitors? Century Global Commodities's main competitors and comparable companies include Fire & Flower (FAF), Relevium Technologies (RLV), Colabor Group (GCL), Goodfood Market (FOOD), and Kiaro (KO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "consumer staples distribution & retail" industry.

How does Century Global Commodities compare to Fire & Flower?

Century Global Commodities (TSE:CNT) and Fire & Flower (TSE:FAF) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Century Global Commodities had 2 more articles in the media than Fire & Flower. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Century Global Commodities and 0 mentions for Fire & Flower. Century Global Commodities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fire & Flower'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Century Global Commodities Neutral
Fire & Flower Neutral

Century Global Commodities has a net margin of -4.68% compared to Fire & Flower's net margin of -57.36%. Century Global Commodities' return on equity of -3.82% beat Fire & Flower's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Century Global Commodities-4.68% -3.82% -5.22%
Fire & Flower -57.36%-69.55%-11.37%

Century Global Commodities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fire & Flower. Century Global Commodities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fire & Flower, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Century Global CommoditiesC$13.79M0.34-C$1.39M-C$0.01N/A
Fire & FlowerC$170.21M0.00-C$97.63M-C$2.07N/A

0.8% of Century Global Commodities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fire & Flower shares are held by institutional investors. 69.4% of Century Global Commodities shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.8% of Fire & Flower shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Century Global Commodities has a beta of -0.704924, indicating that its share price is 170% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fire & Flower has a beta of 2.86, indicating that its share price is 186% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Century Global Commodities beats Fire & Flower on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Century Global Commodities compare to Relevium Technologies?

Century Global Commodities (TSE:CNT) and Relevium Technologies (CVE:RLV) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and earnings.

Century Global Commodities has a net margin of -4.68% compared to Relevium Technologies' net margin of -18.50%. Relevium Technologies' return on equity of 0.00% beat Century Global Commodities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Century Global Commodities-4.68% -3.82% -5.22%
Relevium Technologies -18.50%N/A 4.20%

0.8% of Century Global Commodities shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.4% of Century Global Commodities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Relevium Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Century Global Commodities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Relevium Technologies. Century Global Commodities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Relevium Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Century Global CommoditiesC$13.79M0.34-C$1.39M-C$0.01N/A
Relevium TechnologiesC$14.25M0.46-C$2.64M-C$0.04N/A

In the previous week, Century Global Commodities had 2 more articles in the media than Relevium Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Century Global Commodities and 0 mentions for Relevium Technologies. Century Global Commodities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Relevium Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Century Global Commodities Neutral
Relevium Technologies Neutral

Century Global Commodities has a beta of -0.704924, suggesting that its share price is 170% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Relevium Technologies has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Century Global Commodities and Relevium Technologies tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Century Global Commodities compare to Colabor Group?

Colabor Group (TSE:GCL) and Century Global Commodities (TSE:CNT) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

Colabor Group has higher revenue and earnings than Century Global Commodities. Century Global Commodities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colabor Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Colabor GroupC$716.24M0.01C$863.59K-C$0.78N/A
Century Global CommoditiesC$13.79M0.34-C$1.39M-C$0.01N/A

Colabor Group has a beta of -0.532683, meaning that its share price is 153% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Century Global Commodities has a beta of -0.704924, meaning that its share price is 170% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Century Global Commodities had 2 more articles in the media than Colabor Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Century Global Commodities and 0 mentions for Colabor Group. Colabor Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Century Global Commodities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Colabor Group Neutral
Century Global Commodities Neutral

Colabor Group presently has a consensus price target of C$0.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1,150.00%. Given Colabor Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Colabor Group is more favorable than Century Global Commodities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Colabor Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Century Global Commodities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Century Global Commodities has a net margin of -4.68% compared to Colabor Group's net margin of -15.71%. Century Global Commodities' return on equity of -3.82% beat Colabor Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Colabor Group-15.71% -101.53% 3.28%
Century Global Commodities -4.68%-3.82%-5.22%

0.4% of Colabor Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Century Global Commodities shares are held by institutional investors. 25.0% of Colabor Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 69.4% of Century Global Commodities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Colabor Group beats Century Global Commodities on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Century Global Commodities compare to Goodfood Market?

Century Global Commodities (TSE:CNT) and Goodfood Market (TSE:FOOD) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Century Global Commodities has a beta of -0.704924, indicating that its share price is 170% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goodfood Market has a beta of 1.952789, indicating that its share price is 95% more volatile than the broader market.

Century Global Commodities has a net margin of -4.68% compared to Goodfood Market's net margin of -13.96%. Goodfood Market's return on equity of 41.50% beat Century Global Commodities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Century Global Commodities-4.68% -3.82% -5.22%
Goodfood Market -13.96%41.50%1.61%

Century Global Commodities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Goodfood Market. Century Global Commodities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goodfood Market, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Century Global CommoditiesC$13.79M0.34-C$1.39M-C$0.01N/A
Goodfood MarketC$96.55M0.03-C$3.10M-C$0.14N/A

0.8% of Century Global Commodities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goodfood Market shares are held by institutional investors. 69.4% of Century Global Commodities shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Goodfood Market shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Goodfood Market has a consensus target price of C$0.05, indicating a potential upside of 66.67%. Given Goodfood Market's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Goodfood Market is more favorable than Century Global Commodities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Century Global Commodities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Goodfood Market
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Century Global Commodities had 2 more articles in the media than Goodfood Market. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Century Global Commodities and 0 mentions for Goodfood Market. Century Global Commodities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Goodfood Market'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Century Global Commodities Neutral
Goodfood Market Neutral

Summary

Century Global Commodities and Goodfood Market tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Century Global Commodities compare to Kiaro?

Century Global Commodities (TSE:CNT) and Kiaro (CVE:KO) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Century Global Commodities has a beta of -0.704924, indicating that its share price is 170% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kiaro has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

0.8% of Century Global Commodities shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.4% of Century Global Commodities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.3% of Kiaro shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Century Global Commodities has a net margin of -4.68% compared to Kiaro's net margin of -47.74%. Century Global Commodities' return on equity of -3.82% beat Kiaro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Century Global Commodities-4.68% -3.82% -5.22%
Kiaro -47.74%-269.62%-21.46%

Century Global Commodities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kiaro. Century Global Commodities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kiaro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Century Global CommoditiesC$13.79M0.34-C$1.39M-C$0.01N/A
KiaroC$33.22M0.01-C$16.49M-C$0.64N/A

In the previous week, Century Global Commodities had 2 more articles in the media than Kiaro. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Century Global Commodities and 0 mentions for Kiaro. Century Global Commodities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kiaro'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Century Global Commodities Neutral
Kiaro Neutral

Summary

Century Global Commodities beats Kiaro on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Century Global Commodities News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CNT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

CNT vs. The Competition

MetricCentury Global CommoditiesConsumer Staples Distribution & Retail IndustryConsumer Staples SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$4.73MC$27.95BC$16.14BC$12.54B
Dividend Yield9.55%3.51%3.21%6.20%
P/E Ratio-4.0016.2013.3130.69
Price / Sales0.348.52261,614.679.75
Price / Cash1.0742.9157.5982.29
Price / Book0.274.085.084.64
Net Income-C$1.39MC$883.81MC$831.83MC$299.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.85%0.56%0.94%
1 Month PerformanceN/A0.93%1.46%3.90%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-5.13%13.53%36.05%

Century Global Commodities Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CNT
Century Global Commodities
N/AC$0.04
flat
N/AN/AC$4.73MC$13.79MN/A26
FAF
Fire & Flower
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$13.09MC$170.21MN/A21,200
RLV
Relevium Technologies
N/AC$0.02
flat
N/A+0.0%C$6.59MC$14.25MN/AN/A
GCL
Colabor Group
2.6702 of 5 stars
C$0.04
flat
C$0.50
+1,150.0%
N/AC$4.08MC$716.24MN/A729
FOOD
Goodfood Market
1.023 of 5 stars
C$0.03
flat
C$0.05
+66.7%
N/AC$2.99MC$96.55MN/A780

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CNT) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners