Go Pro

Headwater Exploration (HWX) Competitors

Headwater Exploration logo
C$14.67 +0.82 (+5.92%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

HWX vs. SCR, PSK, MEG, CPG, and TVE

Should you buy Headwater Exploration stock or one of its competitors? Headwater Exploration's main competitors and comparable companies include Strathcona Resources (SCR), PrairieSky Royalty (PSK), MEG Energy (MEG), Crescent Point Energy (CPG), and Tamarack Valley Energy (TVE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to Strathcona Resources?

Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) and Strathcona Resources (TSE:SCR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Strathcona Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. Strathcona Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headwater Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Headwater ExplorationC$717.83M4.86C$184.15MC$0.7818.81
Strathcona ResourcesC$4.72B2.09C$370.36MC$3.9411.66

Headwater Exploration currently has a consensus target price of C$12.36, indicating a potential downside of 15.77%. Strathcona Resources has a consensus target price of C$43.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.38%. Given Strathcona Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Strathcona Resources is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Strathcona Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

48.8% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Strathcona Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 91.3% of Strathcona Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Headwater Exploration has a net margin of 27.85% compared to Strathcona Resources' net margin of 19.41%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 24.24% beat Strathcona Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Headwater Exploration27.85% 24.24% 17.83%
Strathcona Resources 19.41%17.02%6.81%

Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Strathcona Resources pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Headwater Exploration pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Strathcona Resources pays out 30.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Headwater Exploration had 1 more articles in the media than Strathcona Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Headwater Exploration and 2 mentions for Strathcona Resources. Headwater Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Strathcona Resources' score of 0.51 indicating that Headwater Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Headwater Exploration
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Strathcona Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.552095, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strathcona Resources has a beta of 2.614012, meaning that its stock price is 161% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Strathcona Resources beats Headwater Exploration on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

PrairieSky Royalty (TSE:PSK) and Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

PrairieSky Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. PrairieSky Royalty pays out 101.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headwater Exploration pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Headwater Exploration is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

76.2% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.8% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PrairieSky Royalty has a net margin of 44.86% compared to Headwater Exploration's net margin of 27.85%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 24.24% beat PrairieSky Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PrairieSky Royalty44.86% 9.48% 5.99%
Headwater Exploration 27.85%24.24%17.83%

PrairieSky Royalty has a beta of 0.730224, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.552095, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Headwater Exploration had 1 more articles in the media than PrairieSky Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Headwater Exploration and 2 mentions for PrairieSky Royalty. Headwater Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat PrairieSky Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Headwater Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Headwater Exploration
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PrairieSky Royalty currently has a consensus price target of C$34.42, indicating a potential downside of 7.21%. Headwater Exploration has a consensus price target of C$12.36, indicating a potential downside of 15.77%. Given PrairieSky Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe PrairieSky Royalty is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

PrairieSky Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Headwater Exploration. Headwater Exploration is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PrairieSky Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PrairieSky RoyaltyC$538.30M16.02C$214.83MC$1.0435.66
Headwater ExplorationC$717.83M4.86C$184.15MC$0.7818.81

Summary

PrairieSky Royalty beats Headwater Exploration on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to MEG Energy?

MEG Energy (TSE:MEG) and Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

46.2% of MEG Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.8% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of MEG Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MEG Energy has a beta of 0.446509, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.552095, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

MEG Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$28.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.36%. Headwater Exploration has a consensus target price of C$12.36, indicating a potential downside of 15.77%. Given MEG Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe MEG Energy is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MEG Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Headwater Exploration had 3 more articles in the media than MEG Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Headwater Exploration and 0 mentions for MEG Energy. Headwater Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat MEG Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Headwater Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MEG Energy Neutral
Headwater Exploration Positive

Headwater Exploration has a net margin of 27.85% compared to MEG Energy's net margin of 13.76%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 24.24% beat MEG Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MEG Energy13.76% 9.39% 8.96%
Headwater Exploration 27.85%24.24%17.83%

MEG Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. MEG Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headwater Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MEG EnergyC$4.63B1.70C$487.47MC$2.1114.64
Headwater ExplorationC$717.83M4.86C$184.15MC$0.7818.81

MEG Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. MEG Energy pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Headwater Exploration pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Headwater Exploration beats MEG Energy on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) and Crescent Point Energy (TSE:CPG) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and media sentiment.

Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.46 per share. Headwater Exploration pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Point Energy pays out 93.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headwater Exploration is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Crescent Point Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headwater Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Headwater ExplorationC$717.83M4.86C$184.15MC$0.7818.81
Crescent Point EnergyC$3.51B0.00C$215.70MC$0.49N/A

Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.552095, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.84, meaning that its stock price is 184% more volatile than the broader market.

48.8% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Headwater Exploration presently has a consensus price target of C$12.36, suggesting a potential downside of 15.77%. Given Crescent Point Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Crescent Point Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Headwater Exploration had 3 more articles in the media than Crescent Point Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Headwater Exploration and 0 mentions for Crescent Point Energy. Headwater Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Crescent Point Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Headwater Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Headwater Exploration Positive
Crescent Point Energy Neutral

Headwater Exploration has a net margin of 27.85% compared to Crescent Point Energy's net margin of -1.65%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 24.24% beat Crescent Point Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Headwater Exploration27.85% 24.24% 17.83%
Crescent Point Energy -1.65%3.31%2.86%

Summary

Headwater Exploration beats Crescent Point Energy on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Tamarack Valley Energy (TSE:TVE) and Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Tamarack Valley Energy had 10 more articles in the media than Headwater Exploration. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Tamarack Valley Energy and 3 mentions for Headwater Exploration. Tamarack Valley Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Headwater Exploration's score of 0.86 indicating that Tamarack Valley Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tamarack Valley Energy
3 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Headwater Exploration
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Headwater Exploration has a net margin of 27.85% compared to Tamarack Valley Energy's net margin of 1.50%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 24.24% beat Tamarack Valley Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tamarack Valley Energy1.50% 1.34% 6.55%
Headwater Exploration 27.85%24.24%17.83%

Tamarack Valley Energy has a beta of 0.262524, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.552095, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Tamarack Valley Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. Headwater Exploration is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tamarack Valley Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tamarack Valley EnergyC$1.85B3.67C$208.06MC$0.07203.86
Headwater ExplorationC$717.83M4.86C$184.15MC$0.7818.81

35.0% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.8% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tamarack Valley Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Tamarack Valley Energy pays out 225.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headwater Exploration pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Headwater Exploration is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Tamarack Valley Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$13.93, indicating a potential downside of 2.37%. Headwater Exploration has a consensus target price of C$12.36, indicating a potential downside of 15.77%. Given Tamarack Valley Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Tamarack Valley Energy is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tamarack Valley Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Headwater Exploration beats Tamarack Valley Energy on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Headwater Exploration News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HWX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HWX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HWX vs. The Competition

MetricHeadwater ExplorationOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$3.49BC$11.77BC$10.26BC$12.55B
Dividend Yield3.55%10.10%10.57%6.28%
P/E Ratio18.8118.7721.8738.93
Price / Sales4.86573.97468.959.17
Price / Cash8.0639.8436.1882.29
Price / Book4.284.574.134.58
Net IncomeC$184.15MC$5.28BC$4.34BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance4.56%0.62%0.27%-1.82%
1 Month Performance10.38%5.24%3.71%-2.26%
1 Year Performance103.47%39.14%39.53%21.79%

Headwater Exploration Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HWX
Headwater Exploration
2.3274 of 5 stars
C$14.67
+5.9%
C$12.36
-15.8%
+91.6%C$3.49BC$717.83M18.8135
SCR
Strathcona Resources
1.7359 of 5 stars
C$43.61
-1.2%
C$43.00
-1.4%
+18.9%C$9.34BC$4.72B11.07193
PSK
PrairieSky Royalty
1.6223 of 5 stars
C$36.72
-1.2%
C$34.42
-6.3%
+46.4%C$8.54BC$538.30M35.3165
MEG
MEG Energy
0.9302 of 5 stars
C$30.89
+0.7%
C$28.00
-9.4%
+7.4%C$7.86BC$4.63B14.64449
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$7.24BC$3.51B23.92777

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:HWX) was last updated on 9/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners