Headwater Exploration (HWX) Competitors

Headwater Exploration logo
C$12.04 -0.05 (-0.41%)
As of 06/25/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

HWX vs. SCR, MEG, PSK, CPG, and ERF

Should you buy Headwater Exploration stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Headwater Exploration with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Headwater Exploration include Strathcona Resources (SCR), MEG Energy (MEG), PrairieSky Royalty (PSK), Crescent Point Energy (CPG), and Enerplus (ERF). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to Strathcona Resources?

Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) and Strathcona Resources (TSE:SCR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Strathcona Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. Strathcona Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headwater Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Headwater ExplorationC$624.85M4.58C$184.15MC$0.5820.76
Strathcona ResourcesC$4.14B2.00C$370.36MC$3.4711.16

Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Strathcona Resources pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Headwater Exploration pays out 75.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Strathcona Resources pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Headwater Exploration has a net margin of 24.12% compared to Strathcona Resources' net margin of 20.18%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 18.54% beat Strathcona Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Headwater Exploration24.12% 18.54% 17.83%
Strathcona Resources 20.18%13.89%6.81%

Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.584521, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strathcona Resources has a beta of 2.614012, indicating that its share price is 161% more volatile than the broader market.

51.3% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Strathcona Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 91.3% of Strathcona Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Headwater Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Strathcona Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Headwater Exploration Neutral
Strathcona Resources Neutral

Headwater Exploration currently has a consensus target price of C$11.68, indicating a potential downside of 3.00%. Strathcona Resources has a consensus target price of C$43.43, indicating a potential upside of 12.19%. Given Strathcona Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Strathcona Resources is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Strathcona Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Summary

Strathcona Resources beats Headwater Exploration on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to MEG Energy?

Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) and MEG Energy (TSE:MEG) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Headwater Exploration has a net margin of 24.12% compared to MEG Energy's net margin of 12.56%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 18.54% beat MEG Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Headwater Exploration24.12% 18.54% 17.83%
MEG Energy 12.56%11.73%8.96%

In the previous week, MEG Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Headwater Exploration. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for MEG Energy and 0 mentions for Headwater Exploration. MEG Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Headwater Exploration's score of 0.00 indicating that MEG Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Headwater Exploration Neutral
MEG Energy Positive

Headwater Exploration currently has a consensus target price of C$11.68, suggesting a potential downside of 3.00%. MEG Energy has a consensus target price of C$28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. Given Headwater Exploration's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Headwater Exploration is more favorable than MEG Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
MEG Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. MEG Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Headwater Exploration pays out 75.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MEG Energy pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

51.3% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.2% of MEG Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of MEG Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MEG Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. MEG Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headwater Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Headwater ExplorationC$624.85M4.58C$184.15MC$0.5820.76
MEG EnergyC$4.63B1.70C$487.47MC$2.1114.64

Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.584521, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MEG Energy has a beta of 0.446509, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Headwater Exploration beats MEG Energy on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

PrairieSky Royalty (TSE:PSK) and Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

PrairieSky Royalty currently has a consensus price target of C$32.25, suggesting a potential upside of 0.12%. Headwater Exploration has a consensus price target of C$11.68, suggesting a potential downside of 3.00%. Given PrairieSky Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe PrairieSky Royalty is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

70.9% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.3% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PrairieSky Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Headwater Exploration. Headwater Exploration is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PrairieSky Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PrairieSky RoyaltyC$483.90M15.47C$214.83MC$0.8637.45
Headwater ExplorationC$624.85M4.58C$184.15MC$0.5820.76

PrairieSky Royalty has a net margin of 42.81% compared to Headwater Exploration's net margin of 24.12%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 18.54% beat PrairieSky Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PrairieSky Royalty42.81% 7.89% 5.99%
Headwater Exploration 24.12%18.54%17.83%

PrairieSky Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. PrairieSky Royalty pays out 121.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headwater Exploration pays out 75.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headwater Exploration is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, PrairieSky Royalty had 4 more articles in the media than Headwater Exploration. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for PrairieSky Royalty and 0 mentions for Headwater Exploration. PrairieSky Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Headwater Exploration's score of 0.00 indicating that PrairieSky Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PrairieSky Royalty Positive
Headwater Exploration Neutral

PrairieSky Royalty has a beta of 0.754992, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.584521, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PrairieSky Royalty beats Headwater Exploration on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Crescent Point Energy (TSE:CPG) and Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.46 per share. Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Crescent Point Energy pays out 93.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headwater Exploration pays out 75.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headwater Exploration is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Crescent Point Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headwater Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Point EnergyC$3.51B0.00C$215.70MC$0.49N/A
Headwater ExplorationC$624.85M4.58C$184.15MC$0.5820.76

Headwater Exploration has a consensus target price of C$11.68, indicating a potential downside of 3.00%. Given Crescent Point Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crescent Point Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Headwater Exploration has a net margin of 24.12% compared to Crescent Point Energy's net margin of -1.65%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 18.54% beat Crescent Point Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crescent Point Energy-1.65% 3.31% 2.86%
Headwater Exploration 24.12%18.54%17.83%

In the previous week, Crescent Point Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Headwater Exploration'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crescent Point Energy Neutral
Headwater Exploration Neutral

47.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.3% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.84, suggesting that its share price is 184% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.584521, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Headwater Exploration beats Crescent Point Energy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to Enerplus?

Enerplus (TSE:ERF) and Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Headwater Exploration has a consensus target price of C$11.68, indicating a potential downside of 3.00%. Given Enerplus' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Enerplus is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enerplus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Enerplus' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Headwater Exploration'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Enerplus Neutral
Headwater Exploration Neutral

Enerplus has a net margin of 26.04% compared to Headwater Exploration's net margin of 24.12%. Enerplus' return on equity of 32.27% beat Headwater Exploration's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enerplus26.04% 32.27% 15.25%
Headwater Exploration 24.12%18.54%17.83%

Enerplus has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its share price is 164% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.584521, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Enerplus has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headwater Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EnerplusC$1.48B0.00C$384.73MC$2.44N/A
Headwater ExplorationC$624.85M4.58C$184.15MC$0.5820.76

Enerplus pays an annual dividend of C$0.36 per share. Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Enerplus pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Headwater Exploration pays out 75.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

67.9% of Enerplus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.3% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Enerplus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Enerplus beats Headwater Exploration on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Headwater Exploration News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HWX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HWX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HWX vs. The Competition

MetricHeadwater ExplorationOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.86BC$1.79BC$9.79BC$12.14B
Dividend Yield3.84%7.67%10.56%6.19%
P/E Ratio20.7626.7818.6835.39
Price / Sales4.582,495.44748.179.95
Price / Cash8.0685.5337.7582.29
Price / Book3.782.294.084.40
Net IncomeC$184.15MC$82.07MC$4.24BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.79%-2.64%-2.34%-1.79%
1 Month Performance-3.45%-8.82%-8.16%-2.95%
1 Year Performance75.00%31.16%30.03%36.15%

Headwater Exploration Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HWX
Headwater Exploration
N/AC$12.04
-0.4%
C$11.68
-3.0%
+76.3%C$2.86BC$624.85M20.7635
SCR
Strathcona Resources
2.3458 of 5 stars
C$41.42
-1.5%
C$43.43
+4.8%
+27.4%C$8.87BC$4.14B11.94193
MEG
MEG Energy
1.6331 of 5 stars
C$30.89
+0.7%
C$28.00
-9.4%
+20.5%C$7.86BC$4.63B14.64449
PSK
PrairieSky Royalty
2.7334 of 5 stars
C$32.50
-0.5%
C$32.25
-0.8%
+36.9%C$7.55BC$483.90M37.7965
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$7.24BC$3.51B23.92777

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:HWX) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners