Free Trial

Headwater Exploration (HWX) Competitors

Headwater Exploration logo
C$13.30 +0.35 (+2.70%)
As of 05/15/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

HWX vs. SCR, MEG, PSK, CPG, and ATH

Should you buy Headwater Exploration stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Headwater Exploration with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Headwater Exploration include Strathcona Resources (SCR), MEG Energy (MEG), PrairieSky Royalty (PSK), Crescent Point Energy (CPG), and Athabasca Oil (ATH). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to Strathcona Resources?

Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) and Strathcona Resources (TSE:SCR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Headwater Exploration has a net margin of 24.12% compared to Strathcona Resources' net margin of 20.18%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 18.54% beat Strathcona Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Headwater Exploration24.12% 18.54% 17.83%
Strathcona Resources 20.18%13.89%6.81%

Headwater Exploration presently has a consensus target price of C$11.68, suggesting a potential downside of 12.19%. Strathcona Resources has a consensus target price of C$39.14, suggesting a potential downside of 19.28%. Given Headwater Exploration's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Headwater Exploration is more favorable than Strathcona Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Strathcona Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.494355, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strathcona Resources has a beta of 2.614012, suggesting that its share price is 161% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Headwater Exploration had 4 more articles in the media than Strathcona Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Headwater Exploration and 1 mentions for Strathcona Resources. Headwater Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Strathcona Resources' score of 0.03 indicating that Headwater Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Headwater Exploration
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Strathcona Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

43.4% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Strathcona Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 91.3% of Strathcona Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Strathcona Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. Strathcona Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headwater Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Headwater ExplorationC$624.85M5.06C$184.15MC$0.5822.93
Strathcona ResourcesC$4.14B2.51C$370.36MC$3.4713.97

Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Strathcona Resources pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Headwater Exploration pays out 75.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Strathcona Resources pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Headwater Exploration beats Strathcona Resources on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to MEG Energy?

MEG Energy (TSE:MEG) and Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

MEG Energy has a beta of 0.446509, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.494355, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Headwater Exploration has a net margin of 24.12% compared to MEG Energy's net margin of 12.56%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 18.54% beat MEG Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MEG Energy12.56% 11.73% 8.96%
Headwater Exploration 24.12%18.54%17.83%

MEG Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$28.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.36%. Headwater Exploration has a consensus target price of C$11.68, indicating a potential downside of 12.19%. Given MEG Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe MEG Energy is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MEG Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Headwater Exploration had 4 more articles in the media than MEG Energy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Headwater Exploration and 1 mentions for MEG Energy. MEG Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Headwater Exploration's score of 0.46 indicating that MEG Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MEG Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Headwater Exploration
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

MEG Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. MEG Energy pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Headwater Exploration pays out 75.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

MEG Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. MEG Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headwater Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MEG EnergyC$4.63B1.70C$487.47MC$2.1114.64
Headwater ExplorationC$624.85M5.06C$184.15MC$0.5822.93

46.2% of MEG Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.4% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of MEG Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Headwater Exploration beats MEG Energy on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

PrairieSky Royalty (TSE:PSK) and Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

PrairieSky Royalty has a beta of 0.568175, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.494355, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

PrairieSky Royalty has a net margin of 42.81% compared to Headwater Exploration's net margin of 24.12%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 18.54% beat PrairieSky Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PrairieSky Royalty42.81% 7.89% 5.99%
Headwater Exploration 24.12%18.54%17.83%

PrairieSky Royalty currently has a consensus target price of C$32.25, indicating a potential downside of 7.51%. Headwater Exploration has a consensus target price of C$11.68, indicating a potential downside of 12.19%. Given PrairieSky Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PrairieSky Royalty is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Headwater Exploration had 4 more articles in the media than PrairieSky Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Headwater Exploration and 1 mentions for PrairieSky Royalty. Headwater Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat PrairieSky Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Headwater Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Headwater Exploration
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

PrairieSky Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. PrairieSky Royalty pays out 121.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headwater Exploration pays out 75.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headwater Exploration is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

PrairieSky Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Headwater Exploration. Headwater Exploration is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PrairieSky Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PrairieSky RoyaltyC$483.90M16.75C$214.83MC$0.8640.55
Headwater ExplorationC$624.85M5.06C$184.15MC$0.5822.93

71.1% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.4% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

PrairieSky Royalty beats Headwater Exploration on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Crescent Point Energy (TSE:CPG) and Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.84, indicating that its stock price is 184% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.494355, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

47.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.4% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.46 per share. Headwater Exploration pays an annual dividend of C$0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Crescent Point Energy pays out 93.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headwater Exploration pays out 75.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headwater Exploration is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Headwater Exploration has a net margin of 24.12% compared to Crescent Point Energy's net margin of -1.65%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 18.54% beat Crescent Point Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crescent Point Energy-1.65% 3.31% 2.86%
Headwater Exploration 24.12%18.54%17.83%

In the previous week, Headwater Exploration had 5 more articles in the media than Crescent Point Energy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Headwater Exploration and 0 mentions for Crescent Point Energy. Headwater Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Crescent Point Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Headwater Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crescent Point Energy Neutral
Headwater Exploration Neutral

Headwater Exploration has a consensus target price of C$11.68, indicating a potential downside of 12.19%. Given Crescent Point Energy's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Headwater Exploration.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crescent Point Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Crescent Point Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headwater Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Point EnergyC$3.51B0.00C$215.70MC$0.49N/A
Headwater ExplorationC$624.85M5.06C$184.15MC$0.5822.93

Summary

Headwater Exploration beats Crescent Point Energy on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headwater Exploration compare to Athabasca Oil?

Athabasca Oil (TSE:ATH) and Headwater Exploration (TSE:HWX) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Athabasca Oil has a beta of 0.123957, indicating that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Headwater Exploration has a beta of 0.494355, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Headwater Exploration has a net margin of 24.12% compared to Athabasca Oil's net margin of 16.25%. Headwater Exploration's return on equity of 18.54% beat Athabasca Oil's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Athabasca Oil16.25% 12.23% 9.71%
Headwater Exploration 24.12%18.54%17.83%

In the previous week, Headwater Exploration had 2 more articles in the media than Athabasca Oil. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Headwater Exploration and 3 mentions for Athabasca Oil. Athabasca Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Headwater Exploration's score of 0.46 indicating that Athabasca Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Athabasca Oil
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Headwater Exploration
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

38.0% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.4% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Headwater Exploration shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Headwater Exploration. Headwater Exploration is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Athabasca Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Athabasca OilC$1.39B4.32C$221.88MC$0.4527.58
Headwater ExplorationC$624.85M5.06C$184.15MC$0.5822.93

Athabasca Oil currently has a consensus target price of C$10.38, indicating a potential downside of 16.40%. Headwater Exploration has a consensus target price of C$11.68, indicating a potential downside of 12.19%. Given Headwater Exploration's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Headwater Exploration is more favorable than Athabasca Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Athabasca Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Headwater Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Headwater Exploration beats Athabasca Oil on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Headwater Exploration News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HWX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HWX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HWX vs. The Competition

MetricHeadwater ExplorationOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$3.08BC$2.14BC$10.58BC$11.87B
Dividend Yield3.71%7.59%10.19%6.23%
P/E Ratio22.9334.2721.4637.15
Price / Sales5.063,569.251,007.1211.47
Price / Cash8.0685.5438.0682.42
Price / Book4.173.564.394.42
Net IncomeC$184.15MC$82.07MC$4.24BC$299.62M
7 Day Performance6.06%2.16%2.27%-0.79%
1 Month Performance9.92%5.41%4.39%0.21%
1 Year Performance111.78%62.98%54.43%55.40%

Headwater Exploration Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HWX
Headwater Exploration
2.5963 of 5 stars
C$13.30
+2.7%
C$11.68
-12.2%
+113.5%C$3.08BC$624.85M22.9335
SCR
Strathcona Resources
1.737 of 5 stars
C$43.61
-5.1%
C$39.14
-10.2%
+56.8%C$9.34BC$4.19B10.26193
MEG
MEG Energy
3.2556 of 5 stars
C$30.89
+0.7%
C$28.00
-9.4%
+45.0%C$7.86BC$4.63B14.64449
PSK
PrairieSky Royalty
1.1168 of 5 stars
C$33.34
-3.3%
C$32.25
-3.3%
+47.8%C$7.75BC$483.90M38.7765
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$7.24BC$3.51B23.92777

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:HWX) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners