Go Pro

Orvana Minerals (ORV) Competitors

Orvana Minerals logo
C$1.90 -0.03 (-1.55%)
As of 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

ORV vs. TMQ, NSR, FVL, AU, and VGZ

Should you buy Orvana Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Orvana Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Orvana Minerals include Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Nomad Royalty (NSR), Freegold Ventures (FVL), Aurion Resources (AU), and Vista Gold (VGZ). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Trilogy Metals?

Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Orvana Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Orvana MineralsC$136.89M1.90-C$3.58M-C$0.01N/A
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.30N/A

In the previous week, Orvana Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trilogy Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Orvana Minerals Neutral
Trilogy Metals Neutral

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -1.58%. Orvana Minerals' return on equity of -4.33% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Orvana Minerals-1.58% -4.33% 2.20%
Trilogy Metals N/A -40.69%-2.82%

0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.5% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 63.17%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Orvana Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Orvana Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.720073, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.502576, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats Orvana Minerals on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Nomad Royalty?

Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) and Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Orvana Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nomad Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Orvana Minerals Neutral
Nomad Royalty Neutral

Nomad Royalty has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -1.58%. Nomad Royalty's return on equity of 0.00% beat Orvana Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Orvana Minerals-1.58% -4.33% 2.20%
Nomad Royalty N/A N/A N/A

Nomad Royalty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Orvana Minerals. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Orvana MineralsC$136.89M1.90-C$3.58M-C$0.01N/A
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A

0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nomad Royalty beats Orvana Minerals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Freegold Ventures?

Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) and Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Freegold Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Orvana Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Freegold Ventures Neutral
Orvana Minerals Neutral

Freegold Ventures has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Orvana Minerals. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freegold Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A
Orvana MineralsC$136.89M1.90-C$3.58M-C$0.01N/A

Freegold Ventures has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -1.58%. Orvana Minerals' return on equity of -4.33% beat Freegold Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freegold VenturesN/A -5.11% -0.68%
Orvana Minerals -1.58%-4.33%2.20%

Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.979954, suggesting that its stock price is 198% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.720073, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

8.0% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Freegold Ventures beats Orvana Minerals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Aurion Resources?

Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) and Aurion Resources (CVE:AU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.720073, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurion Resources has a beta of 0.755643, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Orvana Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aurion Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Orvana Minerals Neutral
Aurion Resources Neutral

Aurion Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Orvana Minerals. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aurion Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Orvana MineralsC$136.89M1.90-C$3.58M-C$0.01N/A
Aurion ResourcesN/AN/A-C$2.59M-C$0.06N/A

Aurion Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -1.58%. Orvana Minerals' return on equity of -4.33% beat Aurion Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Orvana Minerals-1.58% -4.33% 2.20%
Aurion Resources N/A -15.29%-3.68%

0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Aurion Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.3% of Aurion Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Orvana Minerals and Aurion Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Vista Gold?

Vista Gold (TSE:VGZ) and Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Vista Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -1.58%. Orvana Minerals' return on equity of -4.33% beat Vista Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vista GoldN/A -32.73% -28.08%
Orvana Minerals -1.58%-4.33%2.20%

Vista Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Orvana Minerals. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vista Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vista GoldN/AN/AC$7.97M-C$0.06N/A
Orvana MineralsC$136.89M1.90-C$3.58M-C$0.01N/A

Vista Gold has a beta of 3.856357, suggesting that its stock price is 286% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.720073, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Vista Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Orvana Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vista Gold Neutral
Orvana Minerals Neutral

14.9% of Vista Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Vista Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Vista Gold and Orvana Minerals tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Orvana Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ORV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ORV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ORV vs. The Competition

MetricOrvana MineralsOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$263.68MC$579.79MC$4.56BC$12.48B
Dividend Yield0.31%6.10%5.02%6.19%
P/E Ratio-190.0012.4420.9536.95
Price / Sales1.903,595.105,752.369.44
Price / Cash4.4313.0426.3382.29
Price / Book4.5956.148.574.39
Net Income-C$3.58M-C$4.87MC$157.08MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance7.34%3.60%1.24%0.61%
1 Month Performance31.94%1.30%-1.23%1.06%
1 Year Performance239.29%43.65%35.93%30.89%

Orvana Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ORV
Orvana Minerals
N/AC$1.90
-1.6%
N/A+251.9%C$263.68MC$136.89MN/A710
TMQ
Trilogy Metals
1.7222 of 5 stars
C$4.16
flat
C$7.00
+68.3%
+63.7%C$718.62MN/AN/A5
NSR
Nomad Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$594.42MC$31.28M967.006
FVL
Freegold Ventures
N/AC$0.92
+2.2%
N/A-37.5%C$531.49MN/AN/A3
AU
Aurion Resources
N/AC$2.60
flat
N/A+205.3%C$437.85MN/AN/A20,730

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:ORV) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners