Orvana Minerals (ORV) Competitors

C$2.25 +0.20 (+9.76%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

ORV vs. ODV, TMQ, FVL, NSR, and VGZ

Should you buy Orvana Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Orvana Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Orvana Minerals include Osisko Development (ODV), Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Freegold Ventures (FVL), Nomad Royalty (NSR), and Vista Gold (VGZ). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) and Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Orvana Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Osisko Development. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Orvana Minerals	C$136.89M	2.25	-C$3.58M	-C$0.01	N/A
Osisko Development	C$37.69M	31.13	-C$332.96M	-C$0.49	N/A

Osisko Development has a consensus price target of C$9.00, indicating a potential upside of 133.77%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than Orvana Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Orvana Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Osisko Development	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.853441, indicating that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Osisko Development has a beta of 2.255934, indicating that its share price is 126% more volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.2% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 4 more articles in the media than Orvana Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Osisko Development and 1 mentions for Orvana Minerals. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Orvana Minerals' score of 0.67 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Orvana Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Osisko Development	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Orvana Minerals has a net margin of -1.58% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -189.60%. Orvana Minerals' return on equity of -4.33% beat Osisko Development's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Orvana Minerals	-1.58%	-4.33%	2.20%
Osisko Development	-189.60%	-10.60%	-16.19%

Summary

Osisko Development beats Orvana Minerals on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Trilogy Metals?

Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Orvana Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Orvana Minerals and 0 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Orvana Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Orvana Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Orvana Minerals	Positive
Trilogy Metals	Neutral

Trilogy Metals has a consensus price target of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.07%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Orvana Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Orvana Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.853441, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -1.58%. Orvana Minerals' return on equity of -4.33% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Orvana Minerals	-1.58%	-4.33%	2.20%
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-36.21%	-2.82%

Orvana Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Orvana Minerals	C$136.89M	2.25	-C$3.58M	-C$0.01	N/A
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.28	N/A

Summary

Orvana Minerals and Trilogy Metals tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Freegold Ventures?

Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) and Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and media sentiment.

Freegold Ventures has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Orvana Minerals. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freegold Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Orvana Minerals	C$136.89M	2.25	-C$3.58M	-C$0.01	N/A
Freegold Ventures	N/A	N/A	-C$809.92K	-C$0.01	N/A

0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of Freegold Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Freegold Ventures has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -1.58%. Orvana Minerals' return on equity of -4.33% beat Freegold Ventures' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Orvana Minerals	-1.58%	-4.33%	2.20%
Freegold Ventures	N/A	-5.11%	-0.68%

Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.853441, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.376159, meaning that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Orvana Minerals and Orvana Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. Orvana Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Freegold Ventures' score of 0.00 indicating that Orvana Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Orvana Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Freegold Ventures	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Orvana Minerals and Freegold Ventures tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Nomad Royalty?

Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) and Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Nomad Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Orvana Minerals. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Royalty	C$31.28M	0.00	C$614.70K	C$0.01	N/A
Orvana Minerals	C$136.89M	2.25	-C$3.58M	-C$0.01	N/A

Nomad Royalty has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -1.58%. Nomad Royalty's return on equity of 0.00% beat Orvana Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nomad Royalty	N/A	N/A	N/A
Orvana Minerals	-1.58%	-4.33%	2.20%

0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Orvana Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Nomad Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Orvana Minerals and 0 mentions for Nomad Royalty. Orvana Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Nomad Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Orvana Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Nomad Royalty	Neutral
Orvana Minerals	Positive

Summary

Orvana Minerals beats Nomad Royalty on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Vista Gold?

Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) and Vista Gold (TSE:VGZ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Vista Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Orvana Minerals. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vista Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Orvana Minerals	C$136.89M	2.25	-C$3.58M	-C$0.01	N/A
Vista Gold	N/A	N/A	C$7.97M	-C$0.06	N/A

In the previous week, Orvana Minerals and Orvana Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. Vista Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Orvana Minerals' score of 0.67 indicating that Vista Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Orvana Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Vista Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.5% of Vista Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Vista Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Vista Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -1.58%. Orvana Minerals' return on equity of -4.33% beat Vista Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Orvana Minerals	-1.58%	-4.33%	2.20%
Vista Gold	N/A	-32.73%	-28.08%

Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.853441, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vista Gold has a beta of 3.500555, meaning that its share price is 250% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Vista Gold beats Orvana Minerals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Orvana Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ORV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ORV vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Orvana Minerals	Other Precious Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$307.40M	C$680.43M	C$4.80B	C$12.16B
Dividend Yield	0.31%	6.05%	5.01%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	-225.00	13.50	22.49	37.64
Price / Sales	2.25	3,819.82	6,750.54	11.68
Price / Cash	4.43	13.04	27.21	82.29
Price / Book	5.44	14.16	6.73	4.50
Net Income	-C$3.58M	-C$4.87M	C$157.11M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-4.66%	-2.07%	-0.51%	1.38%
1 Month Performance	25.70%	0.43%	-0.41%	1.46%
1 Year Performance	301.79%	100.57%	74.77%	55.45%

Orvana Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ORV Orvana Minerals	N/A	C$2.25 +9.8%	N/A	+266.1%	C$307.40M	C$136.89M	N/A	710	Gap Up
ODV Osisko Development	1.1012 of 5 stars	C$4.22 -7.7%	C$9.00 +113.3%	+44.2%	C$1.29B	C$37.69M	N/A	310	Positive News Gap Down
TMQ Trilogy Metals	1.8243 of 5 stars	C$5.69 -6.9%	C$7.00 +23.0%	+228.7%	C$981.79M	N/A	N/A	5	Gap Down
FVL Freegold Ventures	N/A	C$1.09 -6.8%	N/A	+5.9%	C$629.70M	N/A	N/A	3	Gap Up
NSR Nomad Royalty	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$594.42M	C$31.28M	967.00	6

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:ORV) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Orvana Minerals (ORV) Competitors

ORV vs. ODV, TMQ, FVL, NSR, and VGZ

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Summary

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Trilogy Metals?

Summary

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Freegold Ventures?

Summary

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Nomad Royalty?

Summary

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Vista Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ORV vs. The Competition

Orvana Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Orvana Minerals (ORV) Competitors

ORV vs. ODV, TMQ, FVL, NSR, and VGZ

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Osisko Development?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ORV or ODV?

Do analysts rate ORV or ODV?

Which has more risk and volatility, ORV or ODV?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ORV or ODV?

Does the media refer more to ORV or ODV?

Is ORV or ODV more profitable?

Summary

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Trilogy Metals?

Does the media favor ORV or TMQ?

Do analysts recommend ORV or TMQ?

Which has more volatility & risk, ORV or TMQ?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ORV or TMQ?

Is ORV or TMQ more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ORV or TMQ?

Summary

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Freegold Ventures?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, ORV or FVL?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ORV or FVL?

Is ORV or FVL more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, ORV or FVL?

Does the media prefer ORV or FVL?

Summary

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Nomad Royalty?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, NSR or ORV?

Is NSR or ORV more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in NSR or ORV?

Does the media prefer NSR or ORV?

Summary

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Vista Gold?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ORV or VGZ?

Does the media prefer ORV or VGZ?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of ORV or VGZ?

Is ORV or VGZ more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, ORV or VGZ?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ORV vs. The Competition

Orvana Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools