Free Trial

Orvana Minerals (ORV) Competitors

Orvana Minerals logo
C$2.10 -0.10 (-4.55%)
As of 10/13/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

ORV vs. KRR, MKO, LGD, NFG, and FF

Should you buy Orvana Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Orvana Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Karora Resources (KRR), Mako Mining (MKO), Liberty Gold (LGD), New Found Gold (NFG), and First Mining Gold (FF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Karora Resources?

Karora Resources (TSE:KRR) and Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Orvana Minerals has a net margin of 11.78% compared to Karora Resources' net margin of 2.14%. Orvana Minerals' return on equity of 33.47% beat Karora Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Karora Resources2.14% 2.49% 4.22%
Orvana Minerals 11.78%33.47%2.20%

Karora Resources has a beta of 2.06, suggesting that its share price is 106% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.564899, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

39.5% of Karora Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Karora Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Karora Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Orvana Minerals. Karora Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orvana Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Karora ResourcesC$416.32M0.00C$8.92MC$0.05N/A
Orvana MineralsC$155.59M1.84-C$3.58MC$0.1415.00

In the previous week, Karora Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Orvana Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Karora Resources Neutral
Orvana Minerals Neutral

Summary

Karora Resources beats Orvana Minerals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Mako Mining?

Mako Mining (CVE:MKO) and Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

2.1% of Mako Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mako Mining has a beta of 2.008552, suggesting that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.564899, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Mako Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Orvana Minerals. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mako Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mako MiningC$209.16M5.40C$20.15MC$0.5921.85
Orvana MineralsC$155.59M1.84-C$3.58MC$0.1415.00

In the previous week, Mako Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Orvana Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mako Mining and 0 mentions for Orvana Minerals. Mako Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Orvana Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Mako Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mako Mining Positive
Orvana Minerals Neutral

Mako Mining has a net margin of 25.06% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of 11.78%. Mako Mining's return on equity of 33.99% beat Orvana Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mako Mining25.06% 33.99% N/A
Orvana Minerals 11.78%33.47%2.20%

Mako Mining currently has a consensus target price of C$20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 55.16%. Given Mako Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Mako Mining is more favorable than Orvana Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mako Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Orvana Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Mako Mining beats Orvana Minerals on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Liberty Gold?

Liberty Gold (TSE:LGD) and Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Liberty Gold had 1 more articles in the media than Orvana Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Liberty Gold and 0 mentions for Orvana Minerals. Liberty Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Orvana Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Liberty Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Liberty Gold Positive
Orvana Minerals Neutral

39.7% of Liberty Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Liberty Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Orvana Minerals has a net margin of 11.78% compared to Liberty Gold's net margin of 0.00%. Liberty Gold's return on equity of 37.94% beat Orvana Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Liberty GoldN/A 37.94% -26.12%
Orvana Minerals 11.78%33.47%2.20%

Liberty Gold has a beta of 3.7518, indicating that its share price is 275% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.564899, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Liberty Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$4.30, suggesting a potential upside of 128.72%. Given Liberty Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Liberty Gold is more favorable than Orvana Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Liberty Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Orvana Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Orvana Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Liberty Gold. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liberty GoldN/AN/A-C$13.66MC$0.0294.00
Orvana MineralsC$155.59M1.84-C$3.58MC$0.1415.00

Summary

Liberty Gold beats Orvana Minerals on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to New Found Gold?

Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) and New Found Gold (CVE:NFG) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Orvana Minerals has a net margin of 11.78% compared to New Found Gold's net margin of -185.44%. Orvana Minerals' return on equity of 33.47% beat New Found Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Orvana Minerals11.78% 33.47% 2.20%
New Found Gold -185.44%-16.25%-65.86%

Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.564899, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Found Gold has a beta of 2.340633, suggesting that its share price is 134% more volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of New Found Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 44.1% of New Found Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Orvana Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled New Found Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Orvana Minerals Neutral
New Found Gold Neutral

Orvana Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than New Found Gold. New Found Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orvana Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Orvana MineralsC$155.59M1.84-C$3.58MC$0.1415.00
New Found GoldC$31.42M34.38-C$58.98M-C$0.22N/A

Summary

Orvana Minerals beats New Found Gold on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to First Mining Gold?

First Mining Gold (TSE:FF) and Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

First Mining Gold has a beta of 1.016432, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.564899, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

First Mining Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$1.23, suggesting a potential upside of 81.37%. Given First Mining Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe First Mining Gold is more favorable than Orvana Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Mining Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Orvana Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, First Mining Gold had 3 more articles in the media than Orvana Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for First Mining Gold and 0 mentions for Orvana Minerals. First Mining Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Orvana Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that First Mining Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
First Mining Gold Positive
Orvana Minerals Neutral

Orvana Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than First Mining Gold. First Mining Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orvana Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Mining GoldN/AN/A-C$46.59M-C$0.06N/A
Orvana MineralsC$155.59M1.84-C$3.58MC$0.1415.00

12.8% of First Mining Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of First Mining Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Orvana Minerals has a net margin of 11.78% compared to First Mining Gold's net margin of 0.00%. Orvana Minerals' return on equity of 33.47% beat First Mining Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Mining GoldN/A -32.30% -5.67%
Orvana Minerals 11.78%33.47%2.20%

Summary

Orvana Minerals beats First Mining Gold on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Orvana Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ORV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ORV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ORV vs. The Competition

MetricOrvana MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$286.91MC$3.79BC$4.73BC$12.72B
Dividend Yield0.31%5.25%4.78%6.34%
P/E Ratio15.0022.1721.9638.35
Price / Sales1.8427,297.6316,257.478.68
Price / Cash4.4327.0424.9082.29
Price / Book3.8211.709.724.44
Net Income-C$3.58MC$127.33MC$159.31MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.41%-0.98%-0.88%0.69%
1 Month Performance-14.98%77.45%56.68%-1.38%
1 Year Performance51.08%12.31%11.46%15.18%

Orvana Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ORV
Orvana Minerals
N/AC$2.10
-4.5%
N/A+66.7%C$286.91MC$155.59M15.00710
KRR
Karora Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$1.20BC$416.32M134.00210
MKO
Mako Mining
2.3606 of 5 stars
C$13.38
+3.6%
C$20.00
+49.5%
+58.2%C$1.13BC$209.16M22.6814,600
LGD
Liberty Gold
2.5334 of 5 stars
C$2.04
+1.0%
C$4.30
+110.8%
+172.5%C$1.12BN/A102.0018
NFG
New Found Gold
N/AC$2.81
flat
N/A-18.3%C$1.08BC$31.42MN/A2,130

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:ORV) was last updated on 10/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners