Free Trial

Orvana Minerals (ORV) Competitors

Orvana Minerals logo
C$1.61 -0.04 (-2.42%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

ORV vs. TMQ, FVL, NSR, VGZ, and AU

Should you be buying Orvana Minerals stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Orvana Minerals include Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Freegold Ventures (FVL), Nomad Royalty (NSR), Vista Gold (VGZ), and Aurion Resources (AU). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Trilogy Metals?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -19.14%. Trilogy Metals' return on equity of -36.21% beat Orvana Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trilogy MetalsN/A -36.21% -2.82%
Orvana Minerals -19.14%-42.64%2.20%

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Orvana Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals Neutral
Orvana Minerals Neutral

Orvana Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orvana Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.28N/A
Orvana MineralsC$109.22M2.01-C$3.58M-C$0.15N/A

10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Trilogy Metals currently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.95%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Orvana Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Orvana Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.665853, meaning that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.9284, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats Orvana Minerals on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Freegold Ventures?

Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) and Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Freegold Ventures has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -19.14%. Freegold Ventures' return on equity of -5.80% beat Orvana Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freegold VenturesN/A -5.80% -0.68%
Orvana Minerals -19.14%-42.64%2.20%

In the previous week, Freegold Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Orvana Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Freegold Ventures Neutral
Orvana Minerals Neutral

Freegold Ventures has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Orvana Minerals. Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orvana Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A
Orvana MineralsC$109.22M2.01-C$3.58M-C$0.15N/A

8.1% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.419281, meaning that its share price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.9284, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Freegold Ventures beats Orvana Minerals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Nomad Royalty?

Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) and Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Orvana Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nomad Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Orvana Minerals Neutral
Nomad Royalty Neutral

Nomad Royalty has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -19.14%. Nomad Royalty's return on equity of 0.00% beat Orvana Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Orvana Minerals-19.14% -42.64% 2.20%
Nomad Royalty N/A N/A N/A

Nomad Royalty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Orvana Minerals. Orvana Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Orvana MineralsC$109.22M2.01-C$3.58M-C$0.15N/A
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A

Summary

Nomad Royalty beats Orvana Minerals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Vista Gold?

Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) and Vista Gold (TSE:VGZ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.6% of Vista Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Vista Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Vista Gold had 2 more articles in the media than Orvana Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Vista Gold and 0 mentions for Orvana Minerals. Vista Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Orvana Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Vista Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Orvana Minerals Neutral
Vista Gold Positive

Vista Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -19.14%. Vista Gold's return on equity of -32.73% beat Orvana Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Orvana Minerals-19.14% -42.64% 2.20%
Vista Gold N/A -32.73%-28.08%

Vista Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Orvana Minerals. Vista Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orvana Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Orvana MineralsC$109.22M2.01-C$3.58M-C$0.15N/A
Vista GoldN/AN/AC$7.97M-C$0.06N/A

Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.9284, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vista Gold has a beta of 3.410001, suggesting that its share price is 241% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Vista Gold beats Orvana Minerals on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Orvana Minerals compare to Aurion Resources?

Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) and Aurion Resources (CVE:AU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

0.1% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.5% of Aurion Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.3% of Aurion Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Orvana Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aurion Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Orvana Minerals Neutral
Aurion Resources Neutral

Aurion Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -19.14%. Aurion Resources' return on equity of -11.69% beat Orvana Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Orvana Minerals-19.14% -42.64% 2.20%
Aurion Resources N/A -11.69%-3.68%

Aurion Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Orvana Minerals. Aurion Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orvana Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Orvana MineralsC$109.22M2.01-C$3.58M-C$0.15N/A
Aurion ResourcesN/AN/A-C$2.59M-C$0.05N/A

Orvana Minerals has a beta of 0.9284, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Aurion Resources has a beta of 0.727246, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Orvana Minerals and Aurion Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Orvana Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ORV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ORV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ORV vs. The Competition

MetricOrvana MineralsOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$219.96MC$653.35MC$4.72BC$11.72B
Dividend Yield0.31%6.03%4.98%6.22%
P/E Ratio-10.7312.3420.9723.83
Price / Sales2.013,619.857,339.1413.46
Price / Cash4.4313.0424.3582.69
Price / Book5.6313.617.704.48
Net Income-C$3.58M-C$4.87MC$159.29MC$300.68M
7 Day Performance-6.94%-2.16%0.00%0.12%
1 Month Performance-3.01%-0.18%2.58%2.88%
1 Year Performance192.73%102.49%76.07%57.78%

Orvana Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ORV
Orvana Minerals
N/AC$1.61
-2.4%
N/AN/AC$219.96MC$109.22MN/A710
TMQ
Trilogy Metals
1.9433 of 5 stars
C$5.62
-1.9%
C$7.00
+24.6%
N/AC$969.71MN/AN/A5
FVL
Freegold Ventures
N/AC$1.20
flat
N/AN/AC$693.24MN/AN/A3
NSR
Nomad Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$594.42MC$31.28M967.006
VGZ
Vista Gold
N/AC$3.05
+2.3%
N/AN/AC$442.09MN/AN/A10

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:ORV) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners